ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Sunshine Gardens Elementary · South San Francisco

Sunshine Gardens Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Sunshine Gardens posts 37% meeting the standard and 13.3% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4345
% Exceeded13%21%
% Met+37%43%
Growth+7.5-2.9
Absence17.5%17.9%
Suspension1.0%1.6%
Scope Score
43
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #2,775 statewide · #6 of 9 in South San Francisco Unified

Sunshine Gardens Elementary scores 43 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 52nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “37% proficient” and call it done. Sunshine Gardens deserves a closer read. The school sits in South San Francisco, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 52nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 37% meet the standard today, versus 42% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 339%29%36%36%32%
Grade 447%28%30%33%39%
Grade 555%44%38%40%45%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 337%26%30%25%37%
Grade 444%30%22%42%30%
Grade 530%30%17%26%38%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

14%
18%
68%
Grade 3 · 32% proficient
16%
23%
61%
Grade 4 · 39% proficient
17%
29%
54%
Grade 5 · 46% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.0pp across grades; the floor rises 13.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
13.3%
State 21.3%
8.0pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+7.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
36.7%
State 42.7%
6.0pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.5%
State 17.9%
0.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.0%
State 1.6%
0.7pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
15.5%
State 18.0%
2.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Sunshine Gardens Elementary in South San Francisco, 32.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 32.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Sunshine Gardens Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 85 students tested.

All students at this school: 37% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 37%, district —, state 43%37%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 29%, district 26%, state 32%29% · −8 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 30%, district 28%, state 32%30% · −8 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 40%, district 47%, state 44%40% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 35%, district 43%, state 42%35% · −2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 8%, state 11%9% · −28 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 12%, district 12%, state 15%12% · −26 vs school

9 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +2.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.5%, district 16.9%, state 17.9%17.5% · −0.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.0%, district —, state 1.6%1.0% · −0.7pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (26.1% vs 16.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–616.9%
TK/K26.1%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Parkway Heights Middle, which scores 15 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 19:1, district 20:119:1
Teaching staff20 teachers
Avg. experience11.7 years
Fully credentialed74%
First-year teachers5%
Intern / emergency permit10.5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$67,889 – $125,220
Principal salary$164,251 – $224,372
Superintendent salary$323,369

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $23,085, CA average $14,815$23,085 · spent at this school
Federal share$2,440 per student

$2,440 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,037 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support11%
Student services13%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance12%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,807 per pupil
2019$13,331 per pupil
2018$13,184 per pupil
2017$12,036 per pupil
2016$11,397 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic59.0%
District 48.6% · CA 56.1%
Other29.5%
District 28.9% · CA 9.0%
Asian5.8%
District 15.3% · CA 10.2%
White4.3%
District 6.3% · CA 19.9%
Black1.5%
District 1.0% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 48.3% (15pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$137K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.19M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+41% · CA 35%
ZIP population64,761
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 22% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Sunshine Gardens Elementary a good elementary school?

Sunshine Gardens Elementary has a Scope Score of 43 out of 100, placing it in the 52nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,775 statewide. 13.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 8.0 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Sunshine Gardens Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 36.7% of students at Sunshine Gardens Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 13.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 13.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 308 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Sunshine Gardens Elementary rank in California?

Sunshine Gardens Elementary ranks #2,775 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 52nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Sunshine Gardens Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Sunshine Gardens Elementary increases by 7.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Sunshine Gardens Elementary?

17.5% of students at Sunshine Gardens Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.0%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Sunshine Gardens Elementary compare to other schools in South San Francisco?

Sunshine Gardens Elementary scores 43/100 (52nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 329 students. Use the schools in South San Francisco page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Sunshine Gardens Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Sunshine Gardens Elementary in South San Francisco, 32.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 32.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Sunshine Gardens Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 85 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
13.3%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 42th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+7.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 59th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
36.7%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 45th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.5%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.0%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 55th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
15.5%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 47th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34414%18%25%43%32%−12
Grade 44416%23%27%34%39%−6
Grade 56617%29%27%27%45%−2
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3415%32%29%34%37%−9
Grade 44711%19%43%28%30%−12
Grade 56618%20%30%32%38%+3
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11656%15%52%26%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8532.9%+0−5
Hispanic/Latino9434.0%+3−5
English Learners478.5%+1−2
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Sunshine Gardens Elementary ←4313.3%36.7%+7.51.0%
Monte Verde Elementary2.1 mi7251.3%78.5%−8.80.1%
Brisbane Elementary2.3 mi6339.3%67.0%+0.00.2%
Skyline Elementary1.9 mi6033.1%57.5%+7.41.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194351#271113.9%41.8%12.2%0.8%+4.3pp
20224264#208013.8%31.1%25.1%0.9%+9.9pp
20233334#376510.1%28.9%27.8%0.8%-5.6pp
20244252#277312.5%33.8%21.0%1.4%+3.1pp
20254352#277513.3%36.7%17.5%1.0%+7.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female13.1%19.0%+5.9pp
Male11.4%16.1%+4.7pp
Asian8.8%5.3%-3.5pp
White4.2%14.5%+10.3pp
Hispanic/Latino14.9%16.8%+1.9pp
Two or More Races13.6%25.0%+11.4pp
Students with Disabilities16.0%16.9%+0.9pp
English Learners6.8%11.9%+5.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.0%18.7%+3.7pp
All Students12.2%17.5%+5.3pp
Homeless15.4%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction