ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Ponderosa Elementary · South San Francisco

Ponderosa Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Ponderosa posts 53% meeting the standard, and 20.6% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4745
% Exceeded21%21%
% Met+53%43%
Growth+1.9-2.9
Absence12.2%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
47
🤝 Culture First · Developing
ranked #2,260 statewide · #5 of 9 in South San Francisco Unified

Ponderosa Elementary scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 61st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “53% proficient” and call it done. Ponderosa deserves a closer read. The school sits in South San Francisco, where one in three students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 50th to the 61st percentile since 2019 — past roughly 500 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 53% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 353%56%55%49%49%
Grade 456%59%54%48%60%
Grade 549%55%50%54%56%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 370%49%60%59%47%
Grade 456%43%40%46%59%
Grade 536%44%46%45%44%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

25%
24%
51%
Grade 3 · 49% proficient
28%
33%
39%
Grade 4 · 61% proficient
13%
43%
44%
Grade 5 · 56% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 12.3pp across grades; the floor rises 6.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
20.6%
State 21.3%
0.7pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+1.9pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
52.5%
State 42.7%
9.9pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
12.2%
State 17.9%
5.7pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
20.6%
State 18.0%
2.6pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Ponderosa Elementary in South San Francisco, 37.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 32.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ponderosa Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.0 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 62 students tested.

All students at this school: 52% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 52%, district —, state 43%52%
MaleMale: this school 51%, district 43%, state 42%51% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 54%, district 47%, state 44%54% · +1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 39%, district 26%, state 32%39% · −13 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 34%, district 28%, state 32%34% · −18 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 63%, district 50%, state 56%63% · +11 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 12%, state 15%5% · −48 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 28%, district 8%, state 11%28% · −25 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 77%, district 62%, state 65%77% · +24 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 50%, district 75%, state 72%50% · −2 vs school

6 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 4.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +2.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 12.2%, district 16.9%, state 17.9%12.2% · −5.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–610.1%
TK/K13.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 20:122:1
Teaching staff20 teachers
Avg. experience14.9 years
Fully credentialed87%
First-year teachers5%
Intern / emergency permit4.7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$67,889 – $125,220
Principal salary$164,251 – $224,372
Superintendent salary$323,369

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $22,207, CA average $14,815$22,207 · spent at this school
Federal share$2,257 per student

$2,257 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,037 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support11%
Student services13%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance12%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,807 per pupil
2019$13,331 per pupil
2018$13,184 per pupil
2017$12,036 per pupil
2016$11,397 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic46.5%
District 48.6% · CA 56.1%
Other23.7%
District 28.9% · CA 9.0%
Asian15.6%
District 15.3% · CA 10.2%
White13.9%
District 6.3% · CA 19.9%
Black0.3%
District 1.0% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 35.4% (28pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$137K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.19M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+41% · CA 35%
ZIP population64,761
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 39% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Ponderosa Elementary a good elementary school?

Ponderosa Elementary has a Scope Score of 47 out of 100, placing it in the 61st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,260 statewide. 20.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Ponderosa Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 52.5% of students at Ponderosa Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 20.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 31.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 20.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 365 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Ponderosa Elementary rank in California?

Ponderosa Elementary ranks #2,260 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 61st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Ponderosa Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Ponderosa Elementary increases by 1.9 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Ponderosa Elementary?

12.2% of students at Ponderosa Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Ponderosa Elementary compare to other schools in South San Francisco?

Ponderosa Elementary scores 47/100 (61st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 359 students. Use the schools in South San Francisco page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Ponderosa Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Ponderosa Elementary in South San Francisco, 37.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 32.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ponderosa Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.0 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 62 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
20.6%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 49th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+1.9pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 45th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
52.5%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 58th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
12.2%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 59th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
20.6%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 54th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36325%24%24%27%49%+6
Grade 45828%33%10%29%60%+16
Grade 56113%43%16%28%56%+8
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36414%33%28%25%47%+1
Grade 45821%38%26%16%59%+17
Grade 56123%21%25%31%44%+9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/116110%30%51%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6237.1%+4−1
Hispanic/Latino7941.8%+10+3
White2466.7%+10+5
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Ponderosa Elementary ←4720.6%52.5%+1.90.1%
Monte Verde Elementary1.3 mi7251.3%78.5%−8.80.1%
Brisbane Elementary3 mi6339.3%67.0%+0.00.2%
Skyline Elementary1.9 mi6033.1%57.5%+7.41.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194250#273622.2%53.6%9.4%0.2%-19.0pp
20224670#170324.6%51.1%27.6%0.0%-3.2pp
20235276#138526.2%50.8%20.9%0.0%-9.3pp
20244763#213221.7%50.0%17.8%0.4%-4.9pp
20254761#226020.6%52.5%12.2%0.1%+1.9pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female5.6%14.8%+9.2pp
Male12.7%8.9%-3.8pp
Asian2.0%5.1%+3.1pp
White4.1%6.5%+2.4pp
Hispanic/Latino12.5%15.4%+2.9pp
Two or More Races15.8%11.4%-4.4pp
Students with Disabilities11.1%9.0%-2.1pp
English Learners9.3%10.3%+1.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.6%18.7%+3.1pp
All Students9.4%11.7%+2.3pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction