ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Starr King K-8 · Carmichael

Starr King K-8: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Starr King K-8 posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

4848 Cottage Way, 95608 (opens in new tab)·San Juan Unified·Carmichael·Grades TK-8·885 students·86% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(916) 971-7320·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2145
% Exceeded3%21%
% Met+10%43%
Growth-7.6-2.9
Absence28.2%17.9%
Suspension3.3%1.6%
Scope Score
21
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #5,539 statewide · #41 of 47 in San Juan Unified

Starr King K-8 scores 21 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 4th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “10% proficient” and call it done. Starr King K-8 deserves a closer read. The school sits in Carmichael, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 4th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 10% meet the standard today, versus 21% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 331%12%14%7%15%
Grade 420%8%10%10%5%
Grade 521%14%13%11%10%
Grade 622%15%31%18%22%
Grade 731%14%5%17%18%
Grade 819%11%17%18%10%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 320%14%15%9%16%
Grade 418%4%6%12%9%
Grade 515%0%1%3%6%
Grade 616%8%12%6%3%
Grade 718%8%4%5%5%
Grade 83%6%14%3%5%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

12%
84%
Grade 3 · 16% proficient
95%
Grade 4 · 5% proficient
90%
Grade 5 · 10% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
2.5%
State 21.3%
18.8pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-7.6pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
10.3%
State 42.7%
32.4pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
28.2%
State 17.9%
10.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.3%
State 1.6%
1.7pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
6.8%
State 18.0%
11.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Starr King K-8 in Carmichael, 10.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Starr King K-8 trails its district average for low-income students by 18.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (6.4% Math proficient); English Learner students (5.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 7.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 454 students tested.

All students at this school: 10% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 10%, district —, state 43%10%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 8%, district 24%, state 32%8% · −2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 6%, state 11%5% · −5 vs school
MaleMale: this school 11%, district 33%, state 42%11% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 9%, district 35%, state 44%9% · −1 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 7%, district 25%, state 72%7% · −3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 12%, district 41%, state 56%12% · +2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 15%, district 28%, state 32%15% · +5 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 13%, state 15%8% · −2 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 0%, district 15%, state 26%0% · −10 vs school

5 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 2.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 28.2%, district 23.7%, state 17.9%28.2% · +10.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.3%, district —, state 1.6%3.3% · +1.7pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (47.7% vs 26.7%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–626.7%
Grades 7–830.6%
TK/K47.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 23:122:1
Teaching staff52 teachers
Avg. experience6.8 years
Fully credentialed81%
First-year teachers27%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,000 – $118,000
Principal salary$153,210 – $185,821
Superintendent salary$392,080

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,010, CA average $14,815$20,010 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,236 per student

$1,236 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,542 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support16%
Student services8%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,962 per pupil
2019$12,705 per pupil
2018$13,148 per pupil
2017$11,096 per pupil
2016$10,446 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian46.0%
District 11.7% · CA 10.2%
White26.2%
District 45.5% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic13.1%
District 26.4% · CA 56.1%
Black7.7%
District 5.9% · CA 4.8%
Other7.0%
District 10.5% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 85.8% (22pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$87K · CA $85K
Median home value$599K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+38% · CA 35%
ZIP population61,440
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 885 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 8% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Starr King K-8 a good elementary school?

Starr King K-8 has a Scope Score of 21 out of 100, placing it in the 4th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,539 statewide. 2.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 18.8 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Starr King K-8's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 10.3% of students at Starr King K-8 met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 2.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 7.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 2.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 533 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Starr King K-8 rank in California?

Starr King K-8 ranks #5,539 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 4th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Starr King K-8 getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Starr King K-8 decreases by 7.6 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Starr King K-8?

28.2% of students at Starr King K-8 are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Starr King K-8 compare to other schools in Carmichael?

Starr King K-8 scores 21/100 (4th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 885 students. Use the schools in Carmichael page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Starr King K-8 serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Starr King K-8 in Carmichael, 10.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Starr King K-8 trails its district average for low-income students by 18.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (6.4% Math proficient); English Learner students (5.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 7.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 454 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
2.5%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 32th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-7.6pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 38th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
10.3%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 25th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
28.2%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 33th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.3%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 36th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
6.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 35th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3784%12%22%63%15%−28
Grade 4790%5%23%72%5%−40
Grade 5904%6%17%73%10%−38
Grade 6794%18%33%46%22%−25
Grade 7850%18%21%61%18%−30
Grade 8902%8%26%64%10%−36
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3886%10%22%63%16%−30
Grade 4990%9%23%68%9%−33
Grade 5991%5%11%83%6%−29
Grade 6870%3%20%77%3%−32
Grade 7990%5%18%77%5%−29
Grade 8960%5%9%85%5%−27
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111982%6%47%44%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged45410.8%−18−27
English Learners2915.5%−0−5
Asian2329.1%−20−65
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Starr King K-8 ←212.5%10.3%−7.63.3%
James R. Cowan Fundamental Elementary2 mi5526.2%49.0%+20.74.1%
Mariemont Elementary1.1 mi5433.9%64.5%+1.11.2%
Mary Deterding Elementary2 mi5133.9%60.9%+1.41.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019259#50187.7%20.8%24.1%6.5%-7.7pp
2022111#56722.5%8.7%44.8%8.0%-6.5pp
2023194#55004.4%9.7%40.2%6.7%-7.2pp
2024172#56432.4%8.8%31.2%7.8%-1.1pp
2025214#55392.5%10.3%28.2%3.3%-7.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 27 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female20.5%28.9%+8.4pp
Male27.5%28.7%+1.2pp
Asian12.2%18.0%+5.8pp
Black/African American34.5%48.6%+14.1pp
Hispanic/Latino30.2%45.5%+15.3pp
Two or More Races37.7%51.9%+14.2pp
Students with Disabilities30.1%50.5%+20.4pp
English Learners12.1%20.8%+8.7pp
Homeless50.5%43.6%-6.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged24.4%28.5%+4.1pp
All Students24.2%28.8%+4.6pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction