South Tahoe Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
South Tahoe posts 36% meeting the standard and 14.7% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 34 | 15% | 36% | -7.8 | 35.7% | 12.2% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
South Tahoe Middle scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 33rd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “36% proficient” and call it done. South Tahoe deserves a closer read. The school sits in South Lake Tahoe, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 33rd percentile since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 36% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 47% | 37% | 36% | 44% | 44% |
| Grade 7 | 39% | 41% | 42% | 40% | 44% |
| Grade 8 | 39% | 36% | 41% | 35% | 30% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 36% | 29% | 28% | 40% | 32% |
| Grade 7 | 28% | 21% | 22% | 25% | 36% |
| Grade 8 | 28% | 24% | 26% | 33% | 30% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 12.7pp across grades; the floor slips 14.0pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
How every group of students does here
At South Tahoe Middle in South Lake Tahoe, 25.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. South Tahoe Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 8.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (24.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 333 students tested.
8 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 16.6pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -16.7pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (40.6% vs 26.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$622 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 29% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is South Tahoe Middle a good middle school?
What are South Tahoe Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does South Tahoe Middle rank in California?
Is South Tahoe Middle getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at South Tahoe Middle?
How does South Tahoe Middle compare to other schools in South Lake Tahoe?
How does South Tahoe Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 42
Nearby High Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 28
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 223 | 20% | 25% | 26% | 29% | 44% | −2 |
| Grade 7 | 212 | 11% | 33% | 26% | 30% | 44% | −4 |
| Grade 8 | 240 | 7% | 23% | 30% | 40% | 30% | −16 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 224 | 16% | 16% | 31% | 37% | 32% | −3 |
| Grade 7 | 213 | 16% | 20% | 29% | 35% | 36% | +2 |
| Grade 8 | 239 | 18% | 12% | 27% | 43% | 30% | −2 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 240 | 9% | 20% | 59% | 12% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 333 | 25.8% | −8 | −12 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 329 | 24.3% | −6 | −15 |
| White | 292 | 54.8% | −5 | −7 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Tahoe Middle ← | — | 34 | 14.7% | 36.1% | −7.8 | 12.2% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 30 | 25 | #1497 | 11.8% | 36.2% | 14.9% | 5.5% | -8.3pp |
| 2022 | 24 | 16 | #1810 | 9.3% | 31.3% | 48.1% | 9.4% | -3.6pp |
| 2023 | 38 | 45 | #1190 | 10.6% | 32.6% | 37.9% | 9.2% | +1.8pp |
| 2024 | 34 | 42 | #1290 | 13.3% | 36.0% | 37.8% | 10.2% | -8.0pp |
| 2025 | 34 | 33 | #1502 | 14.7% | 36.1% | 35.7% | 12.2% | -7.8pp |
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 12 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 13.9% | 36.7% | +22.8pp |
| Male | 15.7% | 35.5% | +19.8pp |
| Asian | 9.1% | — | — |
| White | 6.1% | 26.3% | +20.2pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 14.2% | 41.6% | +27.4pp |
| Two or More Races | 17.9% | 26.1% | +8.2pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 27.7% | 40.4% | +12.7pp |
| English Learners | 14.0% | 40.7% | +26.7pp |
| Homeless | 30.4% | 66.7% | +36.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 17.2% | 43.5% | +26.3pp |
| All Students | 14.9% | 36.1% | +21.2pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction