Public school · Bakersfield City

Sequoia Jr. High — Rating & test scores

900 Belle Terrace, Bakersfield · 746 students · Grades 7–8

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four middle schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

Scope Score 70

Needs SupportScope Score · 18th percentile. Higher than 18 in 100 of the 2,529 California public middle schools we score.

75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built

Well below California in English and math: 28% and 13% scored Proficient or Advanced in grades 7 and 8, spring 2026, against 50% and 37%.

Source for this line
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 7 and 8: 747 in English, 744 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s grade 7 and 8 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 838,600 in English and 838,896 in math tested).

Overview

Is Sequoia Jr. a good middle school?

Needs Support. Sequoia Jr. is lower than most California middle schools on test results, progress in both subjects and attendance.

Test results, spring 2026

English, Proficient or Advanced1528%
Math, Proficient or Advanced1113%
English, Advanced135%
Math, Advanced114%

Progress in a year, 2025

English3−22 pts
Math7−20 pts

Showing up, 2025–26

Attendance2324 in 100
Sequoia Jr.’s place among California middle schools, out of 100Bakersfield City’s other middle schoolsBar colour, from the lowest quarter of schools to the highest

One more thing to know

40% of the 158 English learners tested here reached the top level of the state’s English test in 2025–26, against 22% at the average California middle school.

Each bar is Sequoia Jr.’s place among 2,529 California public middle schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.

How to read these bars, and their sources

A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 6–8. Progress is the state’s measure of how the same students’ scores changed against the score it expected, 2025. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.

Source for the sentence
CDE ELPAC Summative, Overall Performance Level 4, 2025–26. English learners who took the summative ELPAC: 158. The California figure is an average of school rates (2,171 scored California middle schools), our calculation.

In its own words

What does Sequoia Jr. say about itself?

We haven’t read Sequoia Jr.’s website yet. Until we do, the school’s own site is the best place to hear it in its own words.

Open bcsd.com (opens in a new tab)

Progress

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 7 and 8 scored 22 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Minimal. In math, they scored 20 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.

English

−22

points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Minimal, the lowest of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Low-income658−23 points
Hispanic or Latino593−21 points
English learners282−21 points
Long-term English learners177−23 points
Students with disabilities90−23 points

Math

−20

points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Low-income659−21 points
Hispanic or Latino595−19 points
English learners282−12 points
Long-term English learners177−13 points
Students with disabilities90−17 points

Grades 7 and 8, 2025, 672 students in English, 674 in math with scores in both years. It describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education, growth model.

How the state’s growth measure works

The state calls this comparison an expected score. It sets one for each student from that student’s own score the year before.

California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 22 points below that expected score, and in math 20 points below it.

The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.

Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.

Nearby

How does it compare with schools nearby?

1 of the 7 middle schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Sequoia Jr.. Each school is compared with every California middle school.

Scope Score

8 middle schools within 3.9 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.

  1. O. J. ActisPanama-Buena Vista Union · by addressScope Score 7125th
  2. Sequoia Jr.Scope Score 7018th
  3. GreenfieldGreenfield Union · by addressScope Score 6916th
  4. Fred L. ThompsonPanama-Buena Vista Union · by addressScope Score 6912th
  5. EmersonNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 675th
  6. SierraNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 675th
  7. Abraham Lincoln Jr.Neighborhood school · by addressScope Score 674th
  8. CurranNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 662nd
Bakersfield CityA neighborhood school in another district

A neighborhood school in another district takes students who live in its area. Ask that district about a transfer.

Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map

Scores and family income

Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students scored Proficient or Advanced in English.

25%50%0%25%50%75%100%

4 of 8 schools are named on the chart. Point at a dot or tap it to read any school.

English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.

Schools like it

How does Sequoia Jr. compare with schools like it?

Sequoia Jr.’s Scope Score is 70. 405 California middle schools, counting Sequoia Jr., have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 71. Sequoia Jr.’s result is higher than 154 of them.

The five schools with the highest results of the 405

  1. Students from low-income families: 92%

    Scope Score 89Strong · 93rd percentile

  2. Students from low-income families: 93%

    Scope Score 88Strong · 92nd percentile

  3. Students from low-income families: 96%

    Scope Score 87Strong · 91st percentile

  4. Students from low-income families: 91%

    Scope Score 87Strong · 90th percentile

  5. Students from low-income families: 91%

    Scope Score 86Strong · 89th percentile

405 California public middle schools where 91% to 100% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.

How the group is chosen

The group is every California public middle school we score where 91% to 100% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Sequoia Jr.’s share. The count includes Sequoia Jr.. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.

Over time

Have results changed?

Results in both subjects were higher than in 2025. English went from 20% to 28% and math from 8% to 13%.

Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026

Grades 7 and 8. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.

English

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017201820192022202320242025202633%37%50%CaliforniaCalifornia33%Bakersfield CityDistrict28%Sequoia Jr.Sequoia Jr.

Math

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017201820192022202320242025202620%18%37%CaliforniaCalifornia13%Bakersfield CityDistrict13%Sequoia Jr.Sequoia Jr.

The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Bakersfield City’s line combines its 11 middle schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other schools. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Each year’s results

The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Bakersfield City’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.

English, grades 7 and 8: share at the top two levels
SpringSequoia Jr.Bakersfield CityCaliforniaTested here
201737%33%49%691
201832%34%50%715
201937%35%50%707
202223%29%48%713
202321%28%47%774
202423%29%47%753
202520%28%49%746
202628%33%50%747
Math, grades 7 and 8: share at the top two levels
SpringSequoia Jr.Bakersfield CityCaliforniaTested here
201718%20%37%703
201820%19%37%714
201922%18%37%706
20228%10%31%714
20238%12%32%773
20247%11%33%750
20258%11%35%749
202613%13%37%744

Tests

How did students here do on state tests?

Well below California in both subjects.

English

28%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

462623
Bakersfield City33%California50%

Math

13%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

68199
Bakersfield City13%California37%
MinimalDeveloping levelProficientAdvanced

In grades 7 and 8, spring 2026, 28% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 13% in math, against 50% and 37% across California.

The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 7 and 8 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

How does math compare with English?

In grades 7 and 8, spring 2026, math trails English by 15 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 13 points across California. The grades 7 and 8 cards above give each subject’s share.

Results for each grade, spring 2026

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English

English, grades 7 and 8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced30%26%
Advanced6%5%
Proficient24%21%
Developing level26%26%
Minimal44%48%
Tested362385
California51%49%
Difference−21−23

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math

Math, grades 7 and 8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced14%11%
Advanced5%3%
Proficient9%8%
Developing level23%17%
Minimal63%72%
Tested361383
California38%36%
Difference−24−25

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

All four test levels, with the number of students tested
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026. The state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal.
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grades 7 and 8 · This school5%23%26%46%747
English, grades 7 and 8 · California19%31%23%27%838,600
English, grades 7 and 8 · Bakersfield City8%25%25%42%5,954
Math, grades 7 and 8 · This school4%9%19%68%744
Math, grades 7 and 8 · California21%16%23%40%838,896
Math, grades 7 and 8 · Bakersfield City5%8%21%66%5,946

Spring 2026, grades 7 and 8 combined: 747 tested in English, 744 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Who goes here

Who goes here?

Hispanic or Latino students are the largest group here, at 86% of students. 193 of 795 students missed 10% or more of school days.

Missing school, 2025–26

24in 100

students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (193 of 795 students).

At the average Bakersfield City middle school: 20 in 100. At the average California middle school: 18 in 100.

Suspensions: 2.7% of students were suspended at least once (22 of 813). Average California middle school 3.7%.

Students, 2024–25

746

students in grades 7–8.

Hispanic or Latino 86%Black or African American 8%White 4%

Family income

97%

of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 725 of 746. California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

36

teachers, with 9 years of experience on average.

19% were in their first year.

68% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.

English learners

58%

of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026 (88 of 151 students).

Bakersfield City: 51%. California: 47%.

It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Sources: California Department of Education and the California School Dashboard. Each tile names its year.

Full student mix, 2025–26
StudentsHere
Hispanic or Latino86%
Black or African American8%
White4%
Asian—
Filipino—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Where these figures come from

Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. English learner progress: California School Dashboard, 2026 . Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.

Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 22.1 of 32.5 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.

Student groups

How do kids like mine do here?

Four student groups scored below the same groups across California in English.

This schoolThe same group, California
  • Hispanic or Latino646 tested29%California 40%
  • Low-income730 tested28%California 39%
  • Black or African American58 tested19%California 34%
  • Students with disabilities83 tested10%California 14%
  • English learners110 tested1%California 7%

28% of low-income students scored Proficient or Advanced in English (grades 7 and 8, spring 2026), against 39% for the same group across California. Hispanic or Latino and Black or African American students and English learners also scored below the same groups across California; the chart gives their figures. Every group’s math results are in the table below.

Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grades 7 and 8 English, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Every group’s results, with the district

Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.

Proficient or Advancedgrades 7 and 8 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Bakersfield Cityvs California
Low-income · 730 tested in English, 727 in math
English28%−230%−1139%
Math12%+111%−1426%
Hispanic or Latino · 646 tested in English, 645 in math
English29%−332%−1140%
Math13%+112%−1225%
Black or African American · 58 tested in English, 57 in math
English19%+118%−1534%
Math7%+16%−1320%
English learners · 110 tested
English1%01%−67%
Math2%+11%−57%
Students with disabilities · 83 tested in English, 81 in math
English10%+19%−414%
Math6%+24%−39%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Bakersfield City, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.

White students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Family and staff answers

What would families and staff tell you?

Families can answer a short set of questions about Sequoia Jr.. These are not star ratings or reviews.

  1. Family answers show once 20 families have answered.Until then this page shows how many have answered.
  2. The questions are about the school, never a person.No question asks about a named teacher or staff member.
  3. Answers are never part of the Scope Score.They sit beside the state’s records and do not change a school’s score.

Families

No family answers yet

0 of 20 needed before answers show

  • Does the school tell you how your child is doing, in a way you understand, before report cards arrive?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
  • When you contact the school with a question, do you hear back within two school days?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely · Haven’t contacted them
  • Can you get school information in the language you read best?Yes · Mostly · No
  • And 4 more questions.

Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work

Staff

Staff can’t answer for this school yet

We don’t check staff emails for Bakersfield City yet. Tell us your district’s email domain and we’ll work on adding it.

Ask us to add your district

Money

Where does the money go?

$20,596 for each student in 2024–25. California’s middle schools spent $19,269 for each student. Bakersfield City’s plan for 2026–27 covers $213 million.

$20,596

for each student at this school, 2024–25
Spent at the school
$12,348
The school’s share of district office costs
$8,248
Of the total, from federal funds
$4,913
  • Sequoia Jr.$20,596
  • Bakersfield City middle schools$20,202
  • California middle schools$19,269

The district and California figures combine their middle schools, weighted by enrollment (our calculation, 1,241 California schools). Spending does not show how well money is used. Source: California Department of Education, per-school spending report, 2024–25. Funding records ↓

Bakersfield City’s yearly plan

$213million

in the district’s plan for 2026–27

$130million

planned for services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth

This is the district’s plan. It is not this school’s own budget. The plan has 8 goals. The district’s page lists each one. The plan covers $213 million of $710 million in total budgeted spending. Source: Bakersfield City Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), 2026–27. Read the district’s plan →

The neighborhood

What is the area around Sequoia Jr. like?

These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 93304. They are not figures for the families at Sequoia Jr..

Typical household income in a year

$50,790

Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 93304.

Typical home value
$240,900
People who live in this ZIP code
51,037
Typical age
29.9 years
Adults 25 and older with a four-year college degree
11%

What you can do

Who can act on Sequoia Jr.’s results?

Bakersfield City’s board decides Sequoia Jr.’s plan.

How to take part

  1. Watch the board’s agenda: the hearing is posted at least 72 hours ahead.
  2. Send written comments on the actions and spending the plan proposes.
  3. Raise questions through the district’s parent advisory committee; the superintendent must answer its comments in writing.
  4. Read the midyear report, due by February 28.

State support

The state hasn’t placed Sequoia Jr. in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source 

Extra state help for the district

The state is giving Bakersfield City extra help in 2026. It qualified on the 2025 California School Dashboard. The county office must help the district for at least three years, including a review of its yearly plan.

Extra help for Bakersfield City: CDE’s assistance status file for the 2025 California School Dashboard. Source 

Questions to ask

What should I ask, and when?

Bring these 7 questions to Sequoia Jr.. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.

On a tour

  1. When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?24 in 100 chronically absent, 2025–26 (193 of 795 students); average Bakersfield City middle school: 20 in 100
  2. What changes for a student who falls behind in English?22 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before, grades 7 and 8, 2025 (672 students)
  3. What extra help do English learners get, and how do you know it’s working?1% of English learners scored Proficient or Advanced in English, grades 7 and 8, spring 2026 (110 students tested); the same group across California: 7%
  4. Which math courses can students take, and how are placements decided?
  5. Which electives and high-school transition supports are available?

At the office

  1. What time does the day start and end, and is any day shorter?
  2. Is there care before or after school, and what does it cost?

Getting in

What comes after Sequoia Jr., and how do I get in?

Ask Bakersfield City which school serves your address. Next comes Del Oro High.

  1. Elementary
    Casa Loma Elementary
    Scope Score 69Needs Support · 12th percentile · 2026Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
  2. Middle · this school
    Sequoia Jr. High
    Grades 7–8Scope Score 70Needs Support · 18th percentile
  3. High · part of the zone
    Del Oro High
    Scope Score 67Needs Support · 11th percentile · 202552% of the zone’s children

    Or South High for another 33%. Scope Score 70 · Developing · 25th percentile · 2025.

    Or West High for another 13%. Scope Score 66 · Needs Support · 10th percentile · 2025.

The district splits Sequoia Jr.’s attendance zone. 52% of its children are assigned to Del Oro High, 33% to South High and 13% to West High. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level.

From Kern High’s 2026 attendance boundaries, plus nearby estimates. Shares are our estimate of where the zone’s children live. We use 2020 Census child counts, or land area where few children were counted. A share counts children living in the zone, not a school’s enrolled students. A boundary doesn’t guarantee a place. Transfers, permits, magnets and other programs can change the path. Check your child’s address and current assignment with Kern High, the separate district that runs the high schools. Explore schools on the map

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Elementary links

  • Casa Loma Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 69 · Needs Support · 12th percentile · elementary · 2026

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Leo G. Pauly Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 71 · Needs Support · 22nd percentile · elementary · 2026

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Wayside Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 68 · Needs Support · 8th percentile · elementary · 2026

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    Scope Score 66 · Needs Support · 3rd percentile · elementary · 2026

High-school links

  • Del Oro High

    Assigned for part of the zone

    Scope Score 67 · Needs Support · 11th percentile · high · 2025

    52% of the zone’s children

  • South High

    Assigned for part of the zone

    Scope Score 70 · Developing · 25th percentile · high · 2025

    33% of the zone’s children

  • West High

    Assigned for part of the zone

    Scope Score 66 · Needs Support · 10th percentile · high · 2025

    13% of the zone’s children

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking. Older zone links come from the federal School Attendance Boundary Survey (NCES SABS).

Where the path ends: Del Oro High
Del Oro HighScope Score 67 · Needs Support · 11th percentile · 2025district-published assignment for part of the zone

The road from this school ends at Del Oro High. UC records 9 enrollees from Del Oro High for fall 2025. The AP Course Audit lists 5 AP courses its teachers are authorized to teach in 2025–26. Those figures come from dated records. A child starting here today would reach Del Oro High around 2028, and a school can change a lot in 2 years.

9 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 5 authorized AP courses (AP Course Audit 2025–26) → full record on Del Oro High's page
Source: UC & College Board AP Course Ledger

Where it is

Where is Sequoia Jr.?

Address
900 Belle Terrace, Bakersfield 93304Get directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
Administrator
Sara WilliamsAs the state’s school directory lists it, last updated February 9, 2023.

A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map

Short answers to 6 common questions

How do I get in?

Ask Bakersfield City which school serves your address. See the details ↓

Is Sequoia Jr. a good middle school?

Sequoia Jr. High has a Scope Score of 70. It scored higher than 18 in 100 of California’s 2,529 scored public middle schools (Needs Support, 18th percentile, spring 2026). See the details ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 24 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 20 in 100 at the average Bakersfield City middle school. 2.7% of students (22 of 813) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school. See the details ↓

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 7 and 8 scored 22 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Minimal. In math, they scored 20 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.

  • Included in this measure: 672 students in English, 674 in math

See the details ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 28% of low-income students in grades 7 and 8 at Sequoia Jr. High in Bakersfield scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 39% for the same group across California. See the details ↓

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓

The full record

Source records

This page is built from 12 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.

Data updated

October 15, 2026

Record sets on this page
12
Sources
California Department of EducationU.S. Census Bureau
State test years
2017–2026

Results

Students

Money and staff

Place, downloads and method

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2025–26 · ranked #2,052 of 2,529 California middle schools we score · #4 of 11 in Bakersfield City
Score factors, 2025–26
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Advancedaverage of English and math5%3642%
Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math20%3423%
Chronically absent24 in 100425%
Suspension rate2.7% (22 of 813)545%
English learners: top level40%745%

Index is where the school's value sits among the California middle schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. The weights above add to 80%: the remaining 20%, for measures with no value here, is shared out among the measures above.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2025–26 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2025–267018#2052California middle schools · 2,529 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspensionGrade gap (points)
2018–199 in 1001.8% (21 of 1,139)+6
2021–22not on filenot on file—
2022–23not on filenot on file—
2023–2426 in 1004.1% (34 of 830)—
2024–2523 in 1003.3% (28 of 853)—
2025–2624 in 1002.7% (22 of 813)—

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

Grade gap: the same year’s grade 6 and grade 8 results, side by side. They are different children, so the gap describes one year, not any child’s progress. The Scope Score’s growth measure is a different comparison, shown in Score factors above (how it’s built).
No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English7475%28%
2026 · Math7444%13%
2025 · English7463%20%
2025 · Math7492%8%
2024 · English7554%23%
2024 · Math7522%7%
2023 · English7755%21%
2023 · Math7743%8%
2022 · English7142%23%
2022 · Math7152%8%
2019 · English9496%35%
2019 · Math9477%21%
2018 · English1,0896%29%
2018 · Math1,0886%19%
2017 · English1,0556%33%
2017 · Math1,0667%20%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 7 · English38422%
2025 · Grade 8 · English36218%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math38610%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math3637%
2024 · Grade 6 · English——
2024 · Grade 7 · English36121%
2024 · Grade 8 · English39225%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math——
2024 · Grade 7 · Math3599%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math3915%
2023 · Grade 6 · English——
2023 · Grade 7 · English38625%
2023 · Grade 8 · English38818%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math——
2023 · Grade 7 · Math38513%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math3883%
2022 · Grade 6 · English——
2022 · Grade 7 · English35026%
2022 · Grade 8 · English36320%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math——
2022 · Grade 7 · Math35111%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math3634%
2019 · Grade 6 · English24227%
2019 · Grade 7 · English36639%
2019 · Grade 8 · English34135%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math24119%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math36424%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math34221%
2018 · Grade 6 · English37423%
2018 · Grade 7 · English35728%
2018 · Grade 8 · English35837%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math37416%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math36015%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math35426%
2017 · Grade 6 · English36426%
2017 · Grade 7 · English33433%
2017 · Grade 8 · English35741%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math36323%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math34721%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math35616%

Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide3863%17%59%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California
Group · EnglishTestedProficient or Advancedvs districtvs California
Low-income73028%−2−11
Hispanic or Latino64629%−3−11
English learners1101%0−6
Student groups: the state’s growth measureCalifornia School Dashboard 2025 · points above or below what the state expected · shown, not part of the score
GroupEnglishnCDE categoryMathnCDE category
All students−22672Minimal−20674Moderate
Low-income−23658Minimal−21659Minimal
Hispanic or Latino−21593Minimal−19595Moderate
English-only students−23308not categorized−25310not categorized
English learners−21282Minimal−12282Moderate
Long-term English learners (grades 6–8 only)−23177Minimal−13177Moderate
Recently reclassified as fluent in English−13151not categorized−13151not categorized
English learners only−27131not categorized−13131not categorized
Students with disabilities−2390Minimal−1790Moderate
Black or African American−1751Moderate−2351Minimal
Homeless−1524Moderate−1524Moderate
White−2219Minimal−2919Minimal

CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-term English learner counts cover grades 6–8 only (CDE’s rule), so that row is not comparable to the All students row. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 7 and 8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth recordsthe state’s student-by-student measure
California growth model · points vs expected

State model · English−22 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 7 and 8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 7 and 8

672 students

CDE growth category: Minimal

California growth model, English: −22 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Minimal, against SchoolScope's −2-point median for California middle school records.

State model · math−20 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 7 and 8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 7 and 8

674 students

CDE growth category: Moderate

California growth model, math: −20 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Moderate, against SchoolScope's −3-point median for California middle school records.

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median English estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 7 and 8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 23 in 100 → 2025–26 · 24 in 100 · +1 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 3.3% (28 of 853) → 2025–26 · 2.7% (22 of 813) · −0.6 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female10 in 10026 in 100+16 in 100
Male8 in 10023 in 100+15 in 100
Black or African American12 of 9718 of 66—
Hispanic or Latino9 in 10024 in 100+15 in 100
White3 of 308 of 31—
Students with disabilities11 in 10035 of 97—
English learners7 in 10022 in 100+15 in 100
Foster youth1 of 133 of 12—
Homeless11 of 398 of 20—
Military families2 of 419 of 29—
Low-income9 in 10025 in 100+16 in 100
All students9 in 10024 in 100+15 in 100

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$15,168 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 29,307 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$2,759 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 746

Central federal expenditures attributed here$2,154 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 746

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,638 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 65%Instruction support 11%Student services 10%Administration 5%Buildings & maintenance 9%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$389,369,28364.64%65%
Instruction support$68,787,26911.42%11%
Student services$59,533,9589.88%10%
Administration$28,067,5064.66%5%
Buildings & maintenance$55,801,3349.26%9%
Total$602,358,796100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $602,358,796 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$15,168 per pupil
2020$13,998 per pupil
2019$14,646 per pupil
2018$13,609 per pupil
2017$12,715 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders18.4%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 93304 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 93304 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$50,790
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)11%
ZIP-area population51,037
Median age29.9 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 93304 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/sequoia-jr-high-8957"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Sequoia Jr. High — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 2,529 middle schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026

How we analyzeRequest a correction