ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Sanchez (George I.) Elementary · Rosemead

Sanchez (George I.) Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Sanchez (George I.) posts 41% meeting the standard and 20.3% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

8470 East Fern Avenue, 91770 (opens in new tab)·Garvey Elementary·Rosemead·Grades TK-6·293 students·81% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(626) 307-3368
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4545
% Exceeded20%21%
% Met+41%43%
Growth-2.5-2.9
Absence19.0%17.9%
Suspension1.1%1.6%
Scope Score
45
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #2,485 statewide · #6 of 9 in Garvey Elementary

Sanchez (George I.) Elementary scores 45 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 57th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “41% proficient” and call it done. Sanchez (George I.) deserves a closer read. The school sits in Rosemead, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 70th to the 57th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathRed(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 41% meet the standard today, versus 54% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 342%30%33%39%39%
Grade 465%67%40%28%45%
Grade 553%52%63%39%43%
Grade 650%53%60%62%51%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 362%34%47%58%43%
Grade 464%60%43%49%44%
Grade 541%32%55%34%34%
Grade 644%40%52%49%45%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

19%
19%
62%
Grade 3 · 38% proficient
18%
27%
55%
Grade 4 · 45% proficient
18%
25%
57%
Grade 5 · 43% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 4.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
20.3%
State 21.3%
1.0pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-2.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
41.5%
State 42.7%
1.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
19.0%
State 17.9%
1.1pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.1%
State 1.6%
0.6pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
12.5%
State 18.0%
5.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Sanchez (George I.) Elementary in Rosemead, 42.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 52.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Sanchez (George I.) Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 10.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 139 students tested.

All students at this school: 43% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 43%, district —, state 43%43%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 42%, district 51%, state 32%42% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 44%, district 53%, state 42%44% · +1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 29%, district 30%, state 32%29% · −14 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 41%, district 55%, state 44%41% · −2 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 59%, district 68%, state 72%59% · +16 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 17%, district 22%, state 11%17% · −26 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 6.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.4pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 19.0%, district 11.8%, state 17.9%19.0% · +1.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.1%, district —, state 1.6%1.1% · −0.6pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (29.1% vs 15.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–615.3%
TK/K29.1%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Sanchez (George I.) Elementary
45/100
This school
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 23:124:1
Teaching staff21 teachers
Avg. experience15.3 years
Fully credentialed94%
First-year teachers10%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,666 – $124,770
Principal salary$155,143 – $0
Superintendent salary$273,524

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,643, CA average $14,815$20,643 · spent at this school
Federal share$474 per student

$474 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,566 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance10%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$17,935 per pupil
2019$16,304 per pupil
2018$16,755 per pupil
2017$15,576 per pupil
2016$14,368 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic55.0%
District 36.1% · CA 56.1%
Asian42.7%
District 58.6% · CA 10.2%
Other2.0%
District 4.2% · CA 9.0%
Black0.3%
District 0.4% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 80.5% (17pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$75K · CA $85K
Median home value$790K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+22% · CA 35%
ZIP population58,382
Median age45 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 23% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Sanchez (George I.) Elementary a good elementary school?

Sanchez (George I.) Elementary has a Scope Score of 45 out of 100, placing it in the 57th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,485 statewide. 20.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Sanchez (George I.) Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 41.5% of students at Sanchez (George I.) Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 20.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 20.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 231 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Sanchez (George I.) Elementary rank in California?

Sanchez (George I.) Elementary ranks #2,485 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 57th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Sanchez (George I.) Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Sanchez (George I.) Elementary decreases by 2.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Sanchez (George I.) Elementary?

19.0% of students at Sanchez (George I.) Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Sanchez (George I.) Elementary compare to other schools in Rosemead?

Sanchez (George I.) Elementary scores 45/100 (57th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 293 students. Use the schools in Rosemead page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Sanchez (George I.) Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Sanchez (George I.) Elementary in Rosemead, 42.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 52.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Sanchez (George I.) Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 10.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 139 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
20.3%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 49th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-2.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 53th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
41.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 49th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
19.0%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 48th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 55th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
12.5%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 44th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 33619%19%31%31%39%−4
Grade 43318%27%18%36%45%+1
Grade 54418%25%14%43%43%−5
Grade 64524%27%31%18%51%+5
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 33719%24%27%30%43%−2
Grade 43424%21%32%24%44%+3
Grade 54723%11%38%28%34%−1
Grade 64723%21%19%36%45%+10
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/114711%13%55%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13942.8%−10+5
Hispanic/Latino8432.1%−3−7
Asian7259.7%−8−15
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Sanchez (George I.) Elementary ←4520.3%41.5%−2.51.1%
Potrero Heights Elementary1.1 mi7744.9%69.4%+11.70.3%
Duff Language Magnet Academy1 mi6744.5%70.5%+10.20.2%
Mildred B. Janson Elementary1.1 mi6439.5%62.7%+9.20.4%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195270#167927.5%54.3%5.0%0.5%-5.4pp
20225582#103724.9%45.8%30.2%1.1%+10.1pp
20236286#80826.5%47.0%27.5%1.0%+19.1pp
20245373#152423.6%41.1%18.6%0.2%-12.0pp
20254557#248520.3%41.5%19.0%1.1%-2.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female4.7%23.2%+18.5pp
Male5.1%15.7%+10.6pp
Asian2.1%3.8%+1.7pp
Hispanic/Latino8.9%31.7%+22.8pp
Students with Disabilities17.0%17.1%+0.1pp
English Learners3.0%15.9%+12.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged4.9%20.3%+15.4pp
All Students4.9%19.1%+14.2pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction