Duff Language Magnet Academy: The score is strong. The trajectory is stronger.
Duff Language Magnet Academy pairs 71% proficiency with gains that hold up when the same students are tracked two years apart — the rare school that posts both.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 67 | 45% | 71% | +10.2 | 3.2% | 0.2% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Duff Language Magnet Academy scores 67 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 89th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “71% proficient” and call it done. Duff Language Magnet Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Rosemead, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Duff Language Magnet Academy's low-income kids hit 63.6% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 89th-percentile line every tested year since 2024.
| Grade | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 56% | 63% | 78% | 51% |
| Grade 4 | — | 65% | 61% | 59% |
| Grade 5 | — | — | 76% | 79% |
| Grade | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 81% | 76% | 85% | 84% |
| Grade 4 | — | 81% | 82% | 73% |
| Grade 5 | — | — | 61% | 76% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 8.6pp across grades; the floor rises 28.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Duff Language Magnet Academy's most underrated number
63.6% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Duff Language Magnet Academy in Rosemead, 63.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 52.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Duff Language Magnet Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 10.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (74.4% Math proficient); Asian students (65.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 49.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 129 students tested.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 35.2pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.4pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$262 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 74% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Duff Language Magnet Academy a good elementary school?
What are Duff Language Magnet Academy's CAASPP test scores?
How does Duff Language Magnet Academy rank in California?
Is Duff Language Magnet Academy getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Duff Language Magnet Academy?
How does Duff Language Magnet Academy compare to other schools in Rosemead?
How does Duff Language Magnet Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 69
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 52
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 64
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 45 | 36% | 16% | 24% | 24% | 51% | +8 |
| Grade 4 | 41 | 27% | 32% | 17% | 24% | 59% | +14 |
| Grade 5 | 34 | 44% | 35% | 6% | 15% | 79% | +32 |
| Grade 6 | 30 | 37% | 40% | 10% | 13% | 77% | +30 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 45 | 64% | 20% | 13% | 2% | 84% | +39 |
| Grade 4 | 41 | 46% | 27% | 15% | 12% | 73% | +32 |
| Grade 5 | 34 | 50% | 26% | 15% | 9% | 76% | +41 |
| Grade 6 | 30 | 40% | 20% | 30% | 10% | 60% | +25 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 34 | 32% | 41% | 18% | 9% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 129 | 63.6% | +11 | +25 |
| Asian | 140 | 65.0% | −3 | −9 |
| English Learners | 40 | 17.5% | −1 | +7 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duff Language Magnet Academy ← | — | 67 | 44.5% | 70.5% | +10.2 | 0.2% |
| Potrero Heights Elementary | 1.6 mi | 77 | 44.9% | 69.4% | +11.7 | 0.3% |
| Ramona Elementary | 1.8 mi | 67 | 34.9% | 57.7% | −13.4 | 1.8% |
| Mildred B. Janson Elementary | 1.1 mi | 64 | 39.5% | 62.7% | +9.2 | 0.4% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 74 | 95 | #314 | 48.4% | 73.6% | 4.1% | 0.2% | -12.7pp |
| 2025 | 67 | 89 | #613 | 44.5% | 70.5% | 3.2% | 0.2% | +10.2pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 0.0% | 0.6% | +0.6pp |
| Male | 0.0% | 2.2% | +2.2pp |
| Asian | 0.0% | 1.1% | +1.1pp |
| English Learners | 0.0% | 0.6% | +0.6pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 0.0% | 1.2% | +1.2pp |
| All Students | 0.0% | 1.4% | +1.4pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | — | 7.7% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction