ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Riverview Middle · Bay Point

Riverview Middle: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Riverview posts low test scores — and grade 8 tests above grade 6 here this year, by 9.0pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

205 Pacifica Avenue, 94565 (opens in new tab)·Mt. Diablo Unified·Bay Point·Grades 6-8·682 students·89% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(925) 458-3216
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2443
% Exceeded4%17%
% Met+15%39%
Growth+9.0+1.5
Absence32.5%18.5%
Suspension14.3%3.7%
Scope Score
24
📈 On the Rise · Needs Support
ranked #2,031 statewide · #10 of 11 in Mt. Diablo Unified

Riverview Middle scores 24 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 9th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “15% proficient” and call it done. Riverview deserves a closer read. The school sits in Bay Point, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 21st to the 9th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 15% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 623%20%20%19%15%
Grade 723%25%19%14%22%
Grade 830%28%19%18%25%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 68%10%10%7%5%
Grade 711%7%11%9%10%
Grade 811%11%8%10%13%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

13%
85%
Grade 6 · 15% proficient
17%
78%
Grade 7 · 22% proficient
21%
75%
Grade 8 · 25% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
3.7%
State 16.8%
13.2pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+9.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
14.9%
State 39.3%
24.3pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
32.5%
State 18.5%
14.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
14.3%
State 3.7%
10.6pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
12.8%
State 18.0%
5.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Riverview Middle in Bay Point, 19.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Riverview Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 12.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (8.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (19.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 606 students tested.

All students at this school: 15% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 15%, district —, state 39%15%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 14%, district 27%, state 32%14% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 14%, district 26%, state 32%14% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 15%, district 43%, state 42%15% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 15%, district 44%, state 44%15% · +0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 5%, state 11%3% · −13 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 2%, district 17%, state 15%2% · −13 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 14%, district 24%, state 26%14% · −1 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 10%, district 54%, state 56%10% · −5 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 33%, district 59%, state 72%33% · +18 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 39%, district 60%, state 65%39% · +24 vs school

5 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 12.0pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 32.5%, district 22.3%, state 18.5%32.5% · +14.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 14.3%, district —, state 3.7%14.3% · +10.6pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–630.9%
Grades 7–833.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 24:121:1
Teaching staff32 teachers
Avg. experience13.6 years
Fully credentialed88%
First-year teachers19%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,422 – $120,624
Principal salary$151,493 – $174,392
Superintendent salary$305,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $873, CA average $14,815$873 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$870 per student

$870 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,016 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support11%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,965 per pupil
2019$12,119 per pupil
2018$13,284 per pupil
2017$12,803 per pupil
2016$12,073 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic71.7%
District 42.5% · CA 56.1%
Black11.1%
District 3.3% · CA 4.8%
Other10.7%
District 17.3% · CA 9.0%
Asian3.7%
District 9.6% · CA 10.2%
White2.8%
District 27.3% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 89.3% (26pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$96K · CA $85K
Median home value$584K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+21% · CA 35%
ZIP population100,488
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 9% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Riverview Middle a good middle school?

Riverview Middle has a Scope Score of 24 out of 100, placing it in the 9th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #2,031 statewide. 3.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 13.2 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Riverview Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 14.9% of students at Riverview Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 3.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 11.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 3.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,346 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Riverview Middle rank in California?

Riverview Middle ranks #2,031 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 9th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Riverview Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Riverview Middle increases by 9.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Riverview Middle?

32.5% of students at Riverview Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 14.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Riverview Middle compare to other schools in Bay Point?

Riverview Middle scores 24/100 (9th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 682 students. Use the schools in Bay Point page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Riverview Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Riverview Middle in Bay Point, 19.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Riverview Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 12.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (8.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (19.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 606 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
3.7%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 35th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+9.0pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 46th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
14.9%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 31th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
32.5%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 30th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
14.3%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 7th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
12.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 38th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62072%13%21%64%15%−32
Grade 72275%17%25%53%22%−26
Grade 82384%21%26%49%25%−21
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62052%3%11%84%5%−30
Grade 72323%7%18%72%10%−24
Grade 82375%7%17%70%13%−20
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112361%8%56%34%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged60619.7%−12−19
Hispanic/Latino48519.2%−12−20
English Learners2723.3%−2−7
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Riverview Middle ←243.7%14.9%+9.014.3%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192821#15773.3%17.6%16.3%17.0%+5.3pp
20222620#17342.8%16.7%32.6%11.1%+4.7pp
20232611#19522.9%14.8%31.0%13.6%-1.7pp
2024198#20282.8%12.8%36.2%16.7%+0.8pp
2025249#20313.7%14.9%32.5%14.3%+9.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 19 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female16.5%31.1%+14.6pp
Male16.1%34.4%+18.3pp
Asian7.4%14.3%+6.9pp
Black/African American32.6%43.9%+11.3pp
Filipino30.8%43.3%+12.5pp
White3.0%17.4%+14.4pp
Hispanic/Latino14.5%31.2%+16.7pp
Two or More Races20.0%35.0%+15.0pp
Students with Disabilities30.1%37.3%+7.2pp
English Learners13.2%33.3%+20.1pp
Homeless42.0%35.3%-6.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16.5%33.3%+16.8pp
All Students16.3%32.8%+16.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction