California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Hillviewhigher than 11 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Hillviewhigher than 11 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well below California in English and math: 28% and 14% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 876
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).
About 3 in 10 students (272 of 934) missed 10% or more of school days.2025–26
29 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
Ask: When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?
Source
CDE chronic absenteeism file, 2025–26
Students
all students counted for chronic absence (CDE’s eligible enrollment): 934
Comparison
272 of 934. District and California figures are averages of school rates (3 Pittsburg Unified schools; 2,531 scored California middle schools), our calculation.
10.7% of students (101 of 945) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, about three times the rate at the average California middle school.2025–26
10.7%of students were suspended at least once, 2025–26
Ask: When a student is suspended, what happens before and after, and who talks with the family?
Source
CDE suspension file, 2025–26
Students
all students enrolled during the year (CDE’s cumulative enrollment): 945
Comparison
101 of 945. District and California figures are averages of school rates (3 Pittsburg Unified schools; 2,532 scored California middle schools), our calculation.
Academic achievement
Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have been below California in every tested year since 2015.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 6–8
HillviewCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID28%49%
HillviewCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 6–8
HillviewCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID14%37%
HillviewCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 32% in 2017 to 28% in 2026. Math was 14% in both 2017 and 2026. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Hillview
California
2015
35% 838 tested
44% 1,356,180 tested
2016
33% 884 tested
48% 1,366,988 tested
2017
32% 928 tested
48% 1,377,836 tested
2018
31% 915 tested
49% 1,391,379 tested
2019
34% 925 tested
50% 1,390,416 tested
2022
33% 841 tested
47% 1,277,584 tested
2023
27% 885 tested
46% 1,267,562 tested
2024
27% 867 tested
46% 1,269,432 tested
2025
31% 829 tested
49% 1,266,619 tested
2026
28% 876 tested
49% 1,254,039 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Hillview
California
2015
19% 839 tested
33% 1,359,309 tested
2016
19% 884 tested
36% 1,371,026 tested
2017
14% 928 tested
37% 1,383,609 tested
2018
15% 928 tested
37% 1,394,516 tested
2019
14% 938 tested
38% 1,394,239 tested
2022
10% 844 tested
31% 1,279,506 tested
2023
11% 900 tested
32% 1,272,024 tested
2024
11% 892 tested
33% 1,277,570 tested
2025
12% 838 tested
36% 1,272,526 tested
2026
14% 876 tested
37% 1,254,800 tested
The state’s growth measure778 students in English, 781 in math · grades 6–8 · 2025
English0ptsCDE level: Average (3 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math−10ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored right at that prediction, and in math 10 points below it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
Ask: English is lower than in 2015 here (35% to 28%), while across California it went from 44% to 49%. How does the school check what’s working in English?
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
29 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
27in 100 at the average Pittsburg Unified school18in 100 at the average California middle school
272 of 934 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school29 in 100
at the average Pittsburg Unified school27 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
10.7%of students were suspended at least once (101 of 945), 2025–26
7.7%at the average Pittsburg Unified school3.7%at the average California middle school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
23
74 of 316
Grades 7–8
32
198 of 618
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Hillview works for your family.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for Hillview. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 6–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
667 English · 665 math tested
English
26% / 39%
Math
12% / 26%
Hispanic or Latino
535 English · 534 math tested
English
26% / 39%
Math
12% / 25%
Black or African American
139 tested per subject
English
17% / 33%
Math
9% / 20%
Two or more races
59 English · 58 math tested
English
37% / 62%
Math
19% / 50%
Asian
44 tested per subject
English
41% / 75%
Math
25% / 71%
Filipino
40 tested per subject
English
60% / 74%
Math
50% / 60%
White
39 tested per subject
English
26% / 62%
Math
10% / 50%
English learners
151 tested per subject
English
3% / 7%
Math
3% / 7%
Students with disabilities
92 English · 91 math tested
English
4% / 14%
Math
1% / 10%
Homeless
33 tested per subject · grades 6 and 8
English
24% / 27%
Math
3% / 17%
Military families
73 English · 72 math tested
English
22% / 51%
Math
19% / 39%
Low-income, Hispanic or Latino, Black or African American, Asian, White and military-family students, students of two or more races and students with disabilities did worse than the same groups statewide. Homeless students did worse than the same group statewide in math.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Pittsburg Unified
vs California
Low-income · 667 tested in English, 665 in math
English
26%
−127%
−1339%
Math
12%
012%
−1426%
Hispanic or Latino · 535 tested in English, 534 in math
English
26%
−228%
−1339%
Math
12%
012%
−1325%
Black or African American · 139 tested
English
17%
−421%
−1633%
Math
9%
−211%
−1120%
Two or more races · 59 tested in English, 58 in math
English
37%
−138%
−2562%
Math
19%
+316%
−3150%
Asian · 44 tested
English
41%
−344%
−3475%
Math
25%
−934%
−4671%
Filipino · 40 tested
English
60%
+258%
−1474%
Math
50%
+1238%
−1060%
White · 39 tested
English
26%
−329%
−3662%
Math
10%
−515%
−4050%
English learners · 151 tested
English
3%
03%
−47%
Math
3%
+12%
−47%
Students with disabilities · 92 tested in English, 91 in math
English
4%
04%
−1014%
Math
1%
01%
−910%
Homeless · 33 tested · grades 6 and 8 only
English
24%
+321%
−327%
Math
3%
+21%
−1417%
Military families · 73 tested in English, 72 in math
English
22%
−426%
−2951%
Math
19%
+613%
−2039%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Pittsburg Unified, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.
No published rate here for American Indian or Alaska Native and Pacific Islander students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Hispanic or Latino61%
2Black or African American17%
3Two or more races6%
4Asian5%
5White4%
6Filipino4%
7Pacific Islander1%
8American Indian or Alaska Native—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Hispanic or Latino
61%
Black or African American
17%
Two or more races
6%
Asian
5%
White
4%
Filipino
4%
Pacific Islander
1%
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 4 in 5 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (81%, 725 of 893). California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
Teachers45
Average experience14 years
First-year teachers0%
87% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 87.12%: 36.3 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 41.7 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
51%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school51%
Pittsburg Unified46%
California47%
81 of 160 English learners here; 871 of 1,916 in Pittsburg Unified; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
High-school endpoint evidence · Pittsburg Senior High
The road from this school ends at Pittsburg Senior High. UC records 45 enrollees from Pittsburg Senior High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 7 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — a child starting here today would reach Pittsburg Senior High around 2032, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 63% of Pittsburg Senior High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
Hillview Junior High is in the 11th percentile (Needs Support) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 23 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Hillview Junior High was well below California in English and math: 28% and 14% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Hillview Junior High's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 28% of students tested in grades 6–8 met or exceeded the English standard and 14% the math standard; 6% and 5% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 49% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 876 students were tested in English and 876 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Hillview Junior High rank in California?
Hillview Junior High is in the 11th percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Needs Support, 2026). Hillview Junior High ranks #2,234 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
Is Hillview Junior High getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Hillview Junior High's grade 6 results in 2024 with its grade 8 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 40th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Hillview Junior High?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 29.1% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 272 chronically absent of 934 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 10.7%; 101 unduplicated suspended students of 945 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Hillview Junior High compare to other schools in Pittsburg?
Hillview Junior High is in the 11th percentile (Needs Support) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 893 students. Use the schools in Pittsburg page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Hillview Junior High?
At Hillview Junior High in Pittsburg, 26% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 6–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 27% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 1 point below the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 12% in math; Hispanic students, 26% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 667 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What high school does Hillview Junior High feed into?
In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Hillview Junior High's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Pittsburg Senior High. Pittsburg Senior High is in the 13th percentile (Needs Support) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Other options
If this school isn’t the fit
The closest schools at the same level, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.
↓ vs CA 17.7% · index 37 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↓ vs CA 40.6% · index 34 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G6 → 2026 G8)
↓ vs CA average · ≈40th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↓ vs CA 17.8% · index 35 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 1.1pp higher vs 2025
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 3.8% · index 23 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 7.3pp higher vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.5% · index 49 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
298
5%
25%
23%
47%
30%
48%
−18
Grade 7
297
7%
21%
24%
48%
28%
51%
−23
Grade 8
281
6%
19%
33%
42%
25%
49%
−24
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
298
3%
8%
25%
64%
11%
37%
−26
Grade 7
297
6%
9%
21%
64%
15%
38%
−23
Grade 8
281
6%
11%
21%
62%
17%
36%
−19
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
283
25.1%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
277
34.3%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
269
32.7%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
283
10.6%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
283
10.9%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
272
14.0%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
280
26.1%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
284
24.6%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
303
29.4%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
291
11.0%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
291
9.3%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
310
11.3%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
290
19.7%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
313
32.6%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
282
28.0%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
298
10.1%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
317
11.0%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
285
10.5%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
299
34.1%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
270
35.9%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
272
29.8%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
299
14.4%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
272
10.3%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
273
5.1%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
292
37.0%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
343
31.8%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
290
32.4%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
291
17.5%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
352
14.5%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
295
9.8%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
332
33.4%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
274
36.5%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
309
24.9%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
335
16.7%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
277
13.0%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
316
16.1%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
294
33.7%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
321
28.7%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
313
32.9%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
293
11.9%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
321
14.3%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
314
15.3%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
302
25%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
290
33%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
292
41%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
302
14%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
290
20%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
292
23%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
289
34%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
292
33%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
257
37%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
290
17%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
294
15%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
255
25%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
283
6%
13%
62%
19%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
667
26%
−0
−13
Hispanic/Latino
535
26%
−2
−14
English Learners
151
3%
−0
−4
03More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Additional workforce records
Properly assigned intern credential holders2.4%
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
11.6%
24.2%
-6.1pp
2022
—
—
—
38.7%
7.2%
-6.8pp
2023
—
—
—
32.4%
9.7%
+4.4pp
2024
—
—
—
29.9%
7.9%
+1.8pp
2025
—
—
—
27.8%
3.3%
+5.5pp
2026
23
11
#2234
28.9%
10.6%
+0.7pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
— Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here trail the state average for their group by 13 points in ELA in grades 6–8 — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
04Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
11.0%
31.3%
+20.3pp
Male
12.3%
27.1%
+14.8pp
Asian
2.8%
14.9%
+12.1pp
Black/African American
18.1%
37.4%
+19.3pp
Filipino
3.7%
9.8%
+6.1pp
Hispanic/Latino
9.2%
28.9%
+19.7pp
Pacific Islander
29.4%
46.2%
+16.8pp
Two or More Races
18.5%
26.7%
+8.2pp
White
13.8%
36.6%
+22.8pp
Students with Disabilities
17.5%
41.0%
+23.5pp
English Learners
9.9%
31.0%
+21.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
12.2%
31.9%
+19.7pp
All Students
11.6%
29.1%
+17.5pp
Homeless
13.0%
51.2%
+38.2pp
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
05California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
0
778
Average
−10
781
Moderate
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
0
625
Average
−11
628
Moderate
Hispanic or Latino
−2
492
Average
−10
494
Moderate
English Only
−2
429
not categorised
−12
432
not categorised
English Learner
−8
217
Moderate
−12
218
Moderate
English Learners Only
−18
134
not categorised
−11
134
not categorised
Black or African American
−7
121
Moderate
−11
122
Moderate
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)
−9
87
Moderate
0
87
Average
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+7
83
not categorised
−15
84
not categorised
Students with Disabilities
−15
78
Moderate
−2
79
Average
Two or More Races
−4
44
Average
−18
43
Moderate
Filipino
+9
37
Accelerated
−3
38
Average
White
−1
35
Average
−9
35
Moderate
Asian
+14
31
Accelerated
−12
31
Moderate
Homeless Youth
+2
18
Average
+1
18
Average
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
0
13
Average
+7
13
Accelerated
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
06Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 6
6%
exceeded standard · 26% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 280 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 8
6%
exceeded standard · 25% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 281 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 281 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
778 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: 0 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 45th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.45th pctile · 0 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
781 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: −10 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 20th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.20th pctile · −10 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
07Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$13,724 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 11,015 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$361 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 893
Central federal expenditures attributed here$370 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 893
District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,816 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
08ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 94565+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 94565
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$95,556
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
21.30%
ZCTA population
100,488
Median age
35.4 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 94565 →
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.