ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Riverside Meadows Intermediate · Plumas Lake

Riverside Meadows Intermediate: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Riverside Meadows Intermediate posts 36% meeting the standard and 11.1% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1751 Cimarron Drive, 95961 (opens in new tab)·Plumas Lake Elementary·Plumas Lake·Grades 6-8·528 students·44% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(530) 743-1271·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3143
% Exceeded11%17%
% Met+36%39%
Growth-4.2+1.5
Absence12.4%18.5%
Suspension4.5%3.7%
Scope Score
31
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,636 statewide

Riverside Meadows Intermediate scores 31 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 27th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “36% proficient” and call it done. Riverside Meadows Intermediate deserves a closer read. The school sits in Plumas Lake, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 41st to the 27th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathRed(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 36% meet the standard today, versus 50% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 655%44%48%41%44%
Grade 764%44%49%51%43%
Grade 849%47%41%34%48%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 652%23%34%30%34%
Grade 745%29%34%33%28%
Grade 836%31%28%36%22%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

15%
29%
56%
Grade 6 · 44% proficient
11%
32%
57%
Grade 7 · 43% proficient
8%
41%
51%
Grade 8 · 49% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 7.5pp across grades; the floor rises 4.5pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
11.1%
State 16.8%
5.7pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-4.2pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
36.5%
State 39.3%
2.8pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
12.4%
State 18.5%
6.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
4.5%
State 3.7%
0.8pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
14.3%
State 18.0%
3.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Riverside Meadows Intermediate in Plumas Lake, 33.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 39.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Riverside Meadows Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 5.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.5% Math proficient); White students (46.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 224 students tested.

All students at this school: 36% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 36%, district —, state 39%36%
MaleMale: this school 34%, district 41%, state 42%34% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 39%, district 43%, state 44%39% · +3 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 26%, district 33%, state 32%26% · −11 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 41%, district 47%, state 56%41% · +5 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 33%, district 37%, state 32%33% · −4 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 31%, district 38%, state 72%31% · −6 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 7%, district 13%, state 15%7% · −30 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 38%, district 43%, state 56%38% · +2 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 45%, district 49%, state 46%45% · +9 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 13%, district 13%, state 26%13% · −23 vs school

5 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 12.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +12.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 12.4%, district 8.9%, state 18.5%12.4% · −6.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.5%, district —, state 3.7%4.5% · +0.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–610.3%
Grades 7–813.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 21:120:1
Teaching staff28 teachers
Avg. experience13.8 years
Fully credentialed81%
Intern / emergency permit4.1%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$61,121 – $118,646
Principal salary$152,573 – $0
Superintendent salary$205,965

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $25,415, CA average $14,815$25,415 · spent at this school
Federal share$328 per student

$328 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,336 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support11%
Student services11%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other4%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,608 per pupil
2019$11,132 per pupil
2018$10,599 per pupil
2017$10,406 per pupil
2016$10,255 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White38.3%
District 35.0% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic33.1%
District 34.7% · CA 56.1%
Other14.0%
District 14.4% · CA 9.0%
Asian9.8%
District 11.2% · CA 10.2%
Black4.7%
District 4.7% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 43.9% (20pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$90K · CA $85K
Median home value$436K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+16% · CA 35%
ZIP population33,999
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 27% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Riverside Meadows Intermediate a good middle school?

Riverside Meadows Intermediate has a Scope Score of 31 out of 100, placing it in the 27th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,636 statewide. 11.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.7 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Riverside Meadows Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 36.5% of students at Riverside Meadows Intermediate met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 11.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 11.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,003 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Riverside Meadows Intermediate rank in California?

Riverside Meadows Intermediate ranks #1,636 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 27th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Riverside Meadows Intermediate getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Riverside Meadows Intermediate decreases by 4.2 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Riverside Meadows Intermediate?

12.4% of students at Riverside Meadows Intermediate are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 4.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Riverside Meadows Intermediate compare to other schools in Plumas Lake?

Riverside Meadows Intermediate scores 31/100 (27th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 528 students. Use the schools in Plumas Lake page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Riverside Meadows Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Riverside Meadows Intermediate in Plumas Lake, 33.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 39.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Riverside Meadows Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 5.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.5% Math proficient); White students (46.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 224 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
11.1%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 44th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-4.2pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 30th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
36.5%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 48th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
12.4%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 59th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.5%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 47th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
14.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 41th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 617515%29%33%23%44%−3
Grade 716011%32%31%27%43%−5
Grade 81658%41%23%28%48%+2
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 617414%20%29%37%34%−1
Grade 71639%19%33%39%28%−6
Grade 816610%12%37%41%22%−11
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111657%20%65%8%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged22433.5%−6−5
White19346.6%−6−15
Hispanic/Latino16543.6%−3+5
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Riverside Meadows Intermediate ←3111.1%36.5%−4.24.5%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193641#117517.1%50.2%8.8%8.5%-11.7pp
20223854#99310.6%36.3%16.9%12.0%+5.6pp
20233638#134511.2%39.0%14.4%10.3%-6.8pp
20243850#110311.6%37.7%14.4%4.8%-0.4pp
20253127#163611.1%36.5%12.4%4.5%-4.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.3%10.7%+0.4pp
Male7.4%13.9%+6.5pp
Asian0.0%3.6%+3.6pp
Black/African American5.9%11.5%+5.6pp
Hispanic/Latino7.3%12.4%+5.1pp
Two or More Races25.0%14.8%-10.2pp
Students with Disabilities20.9%22.0%+1.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.5%17.2%+2.7pp
All Students8.8%12.2%+3.4pp
English Learners3.7%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction