English
−2
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Average, the third of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Independent charter school · Shasta County Office of Education
3711 Oasis Road, Redding · 253 students · Grades TK–8
Choose up to four elementary schools.
Type at least two characters to search.
Redding STEM Academy’s 2025–26 test results, released October 15, 2026, are on this page.
Shared campus · © OpenStreetMap
Redding STEM Academy, Shasta County Independent Study and Shasta County Special Education share this address in the state’s school directory. OpenStreetMap maps the grounds as one campus. Which buildings each school uses here isn’t mapped.
Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.
A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.
Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.
Scope Score 69
75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built
Well below California in English (reading and writing) and math, grades 3–5, spring 2026: 32% and 22% scored Proficient or Advanced, against 46% and 42%.
For grades 6–8, the standing among California middle schools is in Tests ↓
Overview
Needs Support. Redding STEM Academy is higher than most California elementary schools on attendance. Redding STEM Academy is lower than most on test results and progress in both subjects.
Test results, spring 2026
Progress in a year, 2025
Showing up, 2025–26
8.0% of students (19 of 238) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school.
Each bar is Redding STEM Academy’s place among 5,726 California public elementary schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.
A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 3–5. Progress is the state’s measure of how the same students’ scores changed against the score it expected, 2025. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.
In its own words
We haven’t read Redding STEM Academy’s website yet. Until we do, the school’s own site is the best place to hear it in its own words.
Progress
In English, about the same. In math, lower. In 2025, students here in grades 4–8 scored 2 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Average. In math, they scored 6 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.
English
−2
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Average, the third of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Math
−6
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Grades 4–8, 2025, 105 students with scores in both years. Faded rows have fewer than 40 students. It describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education, growth model.
The state calls this comparison an expected score. It sets one for each student from that student’s own score the year before.
California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 2 points below that expected score, and in math 6 points below it.
The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.
Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.
Nearby
5 of the 7 elementary schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Redding STEM Academy. Each school is compared with every California elementary school.
Scope Score
8 elementary schools within 3.9 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.
A neighborhood school in another district takes students who live in its area. Ask that district about a transfer. A charter school takes applications from any family and holds a lottery when it has more applicants than seats.
Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 3–5. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map
Scores and family income
Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students scored Proficient or Advanced in English.
5 of 8 schools are named on the chart. Point at a dot or tap it to read any school.
English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 3–5. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.
Schools like it
Redding STEM Academy’s Scope Score is 69. 637 California elementary schools, counting Redding STEM Academy, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 75. Redding STEM Academy’s result is higher than 45 of them.
The five schools with the highest results of the 637
Students from low-income families: 64%
Los Angeles
Scope Score 96Strong · 99th percentile
Students from low-income families: 62%
San Diego
Scope Score 93Strong · 97th percentile
Students from low-income families: 63%
San Clemente
Scope Score 92Strong · 97th percentile
Students from low-income families: 55%
Buena Park
Scope Score 91Strong · 95th percentile
Students from low-income families: 56%
Chino Hills
Scope Score 91Strong · 95th percentile
637 California public elementary schools where 53% to 65% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.
The group is every California public elementary school we score where 53% to 65% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Redding STEM Academy’s share. The count includes Redding STEM Academy. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.
Over time
Results in both subjects were lower than in 2025. English went from 52% to 32% and math from 30% to 22%.
Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026
Grades 3–5. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.
English
Math
The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Shasta County Office of Education’s line combines its 2 elementary schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other school. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Shasta County Office of Education’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.
| Spring | Redding STEM Academy | Shasta County Office of Education | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 49% | 54% | 45% | 71 |
| 2018 | 51% | 52% | 49% | 68 |
| 2019 | 50% | 56% | 50% | 72 |
| 2022 | 59% | 58% | 45% | 75 |
| 2023 | 52% | 53% | 44% | 73 |
| 2024 | 46% | 50% | 45% | 69 |
| 2025 | 52% | 49% | 46% | 69 |
| 2026 | 32% | 40% | 46% | 78 |
| Spring | Redding STEM Academy | Shasta County Office of Education | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 36% | 42% | 40% | 70 |
| 2018 | 47% | 46% | 42% | 68 |
| 2019 | 49% | 46% | 44% | 72 |
| 2022 | 36% | 40% | 38% | 75 |
| 2023 | 36% | 42% | 40% | 73 |
| 2024 | 29% | 35% | 41% | 69 |
| 2025 | 30% | 36% | 41% | 69 |
| 2026 | 22% | 34% | 42% | 77 |
Tests
Well below California in both subjects.
English
32%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
3830239Math
22%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
384019In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 32% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 22% in math, against 46% and 42% across California.
The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 3–5 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
In grades 3–5, spring 2026, math trails English by 10 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 4 points across California. The grades 3–5 cards above give each subject’s share.
Near California in English; above it in math. In grades 6–8, spring 2026, 50% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 42% in math, against 49% and 37% across California. The middle grades are placed separately: 63rd percentile (Solid) among California’s middle schools.
English
50%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
23273218Math
42%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
30282220What each level means: California's level descriptions.
English
| Measure | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 28% | 21% | 44% |
| Advanced | 6% | 5% | 15% |
| Proficient | 22% | 16% | 29% |
| Developing level | 34% | 21% | 30% |
| Minimal | 38% | 58% | 26% |
| Tested | 32 | 19 | 27 |
| California | 44% | 46% | 49% |
| Difference | −16 | −25 | −5 |
| Measure | Grade 6 | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 47% | 45% | 58% |
| Advanced | 16% | 9% | 32% |
| Proficient | 31% | 36% | 26% |
| Developing level | 32% | 23% | 26% |
| Minimal | 21% | 32% | 16% |
| Tested | 19 | 22 | 19 |
| California | 48% | 51% | 49% |
| Difference | −1 | −6 | +9 |
California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Math
| Measure | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 25% | 11% | 26% |
| Advanced | 0% | 0% | 7% |
| Proficient | 25% | 11% | 19% |
| Developing level | 47% | 50% | 26% |
| Minimal | 28% | 39% | 48% |
| Tested | 32 | 18 | 27 |
| California | 47% | 42% | 37% |
| Difference | −22 | −31 | −11 |
| Measure | Grade 6 | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 37% | 36% | 53% |
| Advanced | 26% | 9% | 26% |
| Proficient | 11% | 27% | 27% |
| Developing level | 26% | 41% | 15% |
| Minimal | 37% | 23% | 32% |
| Tested | 19 | 22 | 19 |
| California | 37% | 38% | 36% |
| Difference | 0 | −2 | +17 |
California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.
| Students | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English, grades 3–5 · This school | 9% | 23% | 30% | 38% | 78 |
| English, grades 3–5 · California | 24% | 22% | 21% | 33% | 1,208,894 |
| English, grades 3–5 · Shasta County Office of Education | 18% | 22% | 30% | 30% | 150 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · This school | 3% | 19% | 40% | 38% | 77 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · California | 21% | 21% | 25% | 33% | 1,211,701 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · Shasta County Office of Education | 15% | 19% | 31% | 35% | 149 |
| English, grades 6–8 · This school | 18% | 32% | 27% | 23% | 60 |
| English, grades 6–8 · California | 19% | 30% | 23% | 28% | 1,254,039 |
| English, grades 6–8 · Shasta County Office of Education | 13% | 29% | 23% | 35% | 197 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · This school | 20% | 22% | 28% | 30% | 60 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · California | 21% | 16% | 23% | 40% | 1,254,800 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · Shasta County Office of Education | 12% | 17% | 22% | 49% | 197 |
Spring 2026, grades 3–5 combined: 78 tested in English, 77 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Who goes here
White students are the largest group here, at 63% of students. 25 of 236 students missed 10% or more of school days.
Missing school, 2025–26
11in 100
students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (25 of 236 students).
At the average Shasta County Office of Education elementary school: 10 in 100. At the average California elementary school: 17 in 100.
Students, 2024–25
253
students in grades TK–8.
Family income
59%
of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 150 of 253. California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
13
teachers, with 9 years of experience on average.
8% were in their first year.
76% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.
Suspensions, 2025–26
8.0%
of students were suspended at least once (19 of 238). Average California elementary school 1.6%.
Sources: California Department of Education. Each tile names its year.
Our records hold no figure for Grades TK–3.
| Students | Here |
|---|---|
| White | 63% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 18% |
| Two or more races | 11% |
| Asian | — |
| Black or African American | — |
| Filipino | — |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | — |
| Pacific Islander | — |
| Not reported | — |
Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.
Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 9.4 of 12.3 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.
Student groups
White students scored well below the same group across California.
33% of White students scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 34% in math (grades 3–8, spring 2026), against 61% and 53% for the same group across California.
Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grades 3–8, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.
| Group and subject | Here | vs Shasta County Office of Education | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income · 68 tested in English, 67 in math · grades 3–5, 7 and 8 only | |||
| English | 34% | — | −337% |
| Math | 27% | — | −229% |
| White · 88 tested in English, 87 in math | |||
| English | 33% | — | −2861% |
| Math | 34% | — | −1953% |
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Shasta County Office of Education, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.
No published rate here for Hispanic or Latino, Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Family and staff answers
Families can answer a short set of questions about Redding STEM Academy. These are not star ratings or reviews.
Families
0 of 20 needed before answers show
Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work
The school day
Redding STEM Academy has transitional kindergarten (TK). Our records do not hold school hours or before- and after-school care yet. Ask the office.
Transitional kindergarten (TK), 2025–26
17
TK students in 2025–26.
TK is California’s free public program for four-year-olds.
TK count: California Department of Education, Census Day enrollment, 2025–26. Find TK schools near you
The neighborhood
These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 96003. They are not figures for the families at Redding STEM Academy.
Typical household income in a year
$72,445
Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 96003.
What you can do
Redding STEM Academy’s own board decides its plan.
Where is its yearly plan?
Shasta County Office of Education authorized this charter; its current term ends June 30, 2031.
Authorizer from the California Department of Education’s charter term file; term from its Charter School Database, checked October 22, 2026. Source
State support
The state hasn’t placed Redding STEM Academy in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source
California law requires schools to screen kindergartners through second graders for reading difficulties every year, with some exceptions. You get notice at least 15 days before, results within 45 days, and can opt out in writing.
Kindergartners can’t be screened before the 91st school day; transitional kindergarten isn’t covered.
If screening shows your child may be at risk for reading difficulties, the school must provide supports. That result isn’t a diagnosis, and screening can’t be used to delay a special-education evaluation.
Ask how many K–2 students screening found at risk last year, and how many got extra reading help.
California Education Code § 53008. Source
Questions to ask
Bring these 6 questions to Redding STEM Academy. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.
Getting in
Ask Redding STEM Academy how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.
Where it is
A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map
Ask Redding STEM Academy how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. See the details ↓
Redding STEM Academy has a Scope Score of 69. It scored higher than 14 in 100 of California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools (Needs Support, 14th percentile, spring 2026).
In 2025–26, 11 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 10 in 100 at the average Shasta County Office of Education elementary school. 8.0% of students (19 of 238) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school. See the details ↓
In English, about the same. In math, lower. In 2025, students here in grades 4–8 scored 2 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Average. In math, they scored 6 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.
In spring 2026, 34% of low-income students in grades 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 at Redding STEM Academy scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 37% for the same group across California. See the details ↓
In its 2026–27 plan, $480,274 is planned for 25 funded actions in 3 goals. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.
The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓
Its own plan
$480,274 is planned for 25 funded actions in 3 goals. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.
$480,274
planned in the school’s own plan for 2026–27The three largest actions in the plan
Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 90 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.
Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 90 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
The money is spread out. No action gets more than 15%, and the three largest, A.60 FTE Intervention Teacher will be available to coordinate before school intervention, to provide Tier 2 pull out intervention, and to provide social / emotional learning support for students who need it; Social-emotional Support Person to do whole class and small group instruction for social/emotional learning; and Teachers will be available before school to provide Tier 2 intervention to students for 40 minutes per day four days a week via the Academy Program, take 38% between them. The plan itself puts 70% of it toward staff.
8 of the plan’s 25 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.
Largest of these
It plans $348,307 in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $406,178 and estimates it spent $304,075, $102,103 (25%) less than planned (our arithmetic).
Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $102,103 under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?
Read these state results for this school as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.
The test rows are schoolwide results for every grade the school tests; the source doesn’t list which grades. The headline at the top of this page covers grades 3–5 only: 32% in English and 22% in math, spring 2026.
| Measure | 2024–25 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 2 and 3 | 31% | 31% | no change |
| Chronically absentGoal 1 | 8 in 100 | 11 in 100 | 3 more in 100 |
| Suspended at least onceGoal 1 | 5.4% | 8.0% | up 2.6 pts |
Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the school tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.
We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($480,274).
51% to Goal 2. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars. Tap a box to open its goal.
“RSTEM will maintain a safe, positive, and productive learning environment where students are meaningfully engaged in academics as well as a wide variety of co-curricular activities. Through positive interventions and supports (PBIS), students will learn to be good citizens who choose to stay engaged in the learning process and come to school daily. Attendance rates will improve, chronic absenteeism will decrease, and the suspension rates will decrease” p. 15 ↗
14 funded actions
Largest funded actions
9 more funded actions in this goal
How the plan measures it · 12 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 15 ↗.
“Based on I-Ready Diagnostics in Math and LA, Smarter Balanced Assessments, the percentage of students meeting proficiency or making significant progress toward proficiency in Language Arts, Math, and Science will improve yearly. Math will be a special focus area where students will make more progress than in previous years compared to Language Arts. All R-STEM students will utilize Chromebooks to access individualized instructional software appropriate to their grade level. Students will utilize learning software to improve learning outcomes” p. 24 ↗
8 funded actions
Largest funded actions
3 more funded actions in this goal
How the plan measures it · 9 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 24 ↗.
“All RSTEM students will have access to a broad course of study emphasizing California State Standards and will be taught by highly qualified staff. All curriculum will be aligned to California Standards. All facilities will be maintained to a high standard” p. 32 ↗
3 funded actions
Largest funded actions
How the plan measures it · 3 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 32 ↗.
All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.
The full record
This page is built from 12 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.
Data updated
October 15, 2026
Results
Students
Money and staff
Place, downloads and method
| Factor | School | Index | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advancedaverage of English and math | 6% | 35 | 42% |
| Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math | 26% | 37 | 23% |
| Chronically absent | 11 in 100 | 59 | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 8.0% (19 of 238) | 6 | 5% |
| Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) | +8.6pp | — | not scored |
Index is where the school's value sits among the California elementary schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. The weights above add to 75%: the remaining 25%, for measures with no value here, is shared out among the measures above.
| School year | Scope Score | Percentile | Rank | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 69 | 14 | #4921 | California elementary schools · 5,726 schools · current formula |
2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.
| School year | Chronic absence | Suspension | Grade gap (points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018–19 | not on file | not on file | −11 |
| 2021–22 | not on file | not on file | +9 |
| 2022–23 | not on file | not on file | −4 |
| 2023–24 | 12 in 100 | 3.2% (8 of 247) | −7 |
| 2024–25 | 8 in 100 | 5.4% (14 of 261) | +16 |
| 2025–26 | 11 in 100 | 8.0% (19 of 238) | +9 |
Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.
English and math by test year · all tested grades
| Year · subject | Students with scores | Top level | Top two levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · English | 138 | 13% | 40% |
| 2026 · Math | 137 | 10% | 31% |
| 2025 · English | 133 | 16% | 52% |
| 2025 · Math | 133 | 12% | 31% |
| 2024 · English | 133 | 16% | 53% |
| 2024 · Math | 133 | 15% | 36% |
| 2023 · English | 142 | 18% | 54% |
| 2023 · Math | 143 | 20% | 44% |
| 2022 · English | 145 | 22% | 54% |
| 2022 · Math | 145 | 14% | 39% |
| 2019 · English | 139 | 20% | 47% |
| 2019 · Math | 139 | 21% | 42% |
| 2018 · English | 134 | 17% | 50% |
| 2018 · Math | 134 | 22% | 45% |
| 2017 · English | 134 | 17% | 46% |
| 2017 · Math | 133 | 17% | 35% |
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
| Year · grade · subject | Students with scores | Met or exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 · Grade 3 · English | 20 | 40% |
| 2025 · Grade 4 · English | 25 | 52% |
| 2025 · Grade 5 · English | 24 | 62% |
| 2025 · Grade 6 · English | 22 | 32% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · English | 20 | 55% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · English | 22 | 68% |
| 2025 · Grade 3 · Math | 20 | 20% |
| 2025 · Grade 4 · Math | 25 | 40% |
| 2025 · Grade 5 · Math | 24 | 29% |
| 2025 · Grade 6 · Math | 22 | 14% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · Math | 20 | 45% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · Math | 22 | 36% |
| 2024 · Grade 3 · English | 26 | 35% |
| 2024 · Grade 4 · English | 21 | 67% |
| 2024 · Grade 5 · English | 22 | 41% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · English | 21 | 57% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · English | 23 | 39% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · English | 20 | 90% |
| 2024 · Grade 3 · Math | 26 | 35% |
| 2024 · Grade 4 · Math | 21 | 38% |
| 2024 · Grade 5 · Math | 22 | 14% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · Math | 21 | 29% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · Math | 23 | 39% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · Math | 20 | 65% |
| 2023 · Grade 3 · English | 26 | 50% |
| 2023 · Grade 4 · English | 23 | 52% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · English | 24 | 54% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · English | 26 | 50% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · English | 24 | 67% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · English | 19 | 53% |
| 2023 · Grade 3 · Math | 26 | 42% |
| 2023 · Grade 4 · Math | 23 | 35% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · Math | 24 | 29% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · Math | 26 | 46% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · Math | 24 | 71% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · Math | 20 | 40% |
| 2022 · Grade 3 · English | 24 | 46% |
| 2022 · Grade 4 · English | 25 | 72% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · English | 26 | 58% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · English | 26 | 62% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · English | 24 | 46% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · English | 20 | 40% |
| 2022 · Grade 3 · Math | 24 | 25% |
| 2022 · Grade 4 · Math | 25 | 52% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · Math | 26 | 31% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · Math | 26 | 50% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · Math | 24 | 50% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · Math | 20 | 20% |
| 2019 · Grade 3 · English | 29 | 52% |
| 2019 · Grade 4 · English | 17 | 41% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · English | 26 | 54% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · English | 27 | 33% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · English | 19 | 53% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · English | 21 | 52% |
| 2019 · Grade 3 · Math | 29 | 62% |
| 2019 · Grade 4 · Math | 17 | 41% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · Math | 26 | 38% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · Math | 27 | 33% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · Math | 19 | 42% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · Math | 21 | 33% |
| 2018 · Grade 3 · English | 19 | 68% |
| 2018 · Grade 4 · English | 23 | 57% |
| 2018 · Grade 5 · English | 26 | 35% |
| 2018 · Grade 6 · English | 24 | 50% |
| 2018 · Grade 7 · English | 20 | 60% |
| 2018 · Grade 8 · English | 22 | 36% |
| 2018 · Grade 3 · Math | 19 | 68% |
| 2018 · Grade 4 · Math | 23 | 52% |
| 2018 · Grade 5 · Math | 26 | 27% |
| 2018 · Grade 6 · Math | 24 | 38% |
| 2018 · Grade 7 · Math | 20 | 45% |
| 2018 · Grade 8 · Math | 22 | 45% |
| 2017 · Grade 3 · English | 22 | 59% |
| 2017 · Grade 4 · English | 22 | 45% |
| 2017 · Grade 5 · English | 27 | 44% |
| 2017 · Grade 6 · English | 23 | 30% |
| 2017 · Grade 7 · English | 22 | 64% |
| 2017 · Grade 8 · English | 18 | 28% |
| 2017 · Grade 3 · Math | 22 | 55% |
| 2017 · Grade 4 · Math | 21 | 29% |
| 2017 · Grade 5 · Math | 27 | 26% |
| 2017 · Grade 6 · Math | 23 | 26% |
| 2017 · Grade 7 · Math | 22 | 50% |
| 2017 · Grade 8 · Math | 18 | 22% |
Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 46 | 13% | 30% | 46% | 11% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Group · English | Tested | Proficient or Advanced | vs district | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income (grades 3–5, 7 and 8 only) | 68 | 34% | — | −3 |
| White | 88 | 33% | — | −28 |
| Group | English | n | CDE category | Math | n | CDE category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All students | −2 | 105 | Average | −6 | 105 | Moderate |
| English-only students | −1 | 103 | not categorized | −7 | 103 | not categorized |
| White | −2 | 66 | Average | −1 | 66 | Average |
| Low-income | −4 | 60 | Average | −10 | 60 | Moderate |
| Students with disabilities | −5 | 23 | Average | −3 | 23 | Average |
| Two or more races | −3 | 18 | Average | −5 | 18 | Average |
| Hispanic or Latino | +3 | 16 | Average | −21 | 16 | Minimal |
CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
State model · English−2 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 4–8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 4–8
105 students
CDE growth category: Average
State model · math−6 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 4–8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 4–8
105 students
CDE growth category: Moderate
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median English estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.
CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.
| Year-over-year school rates |
|---|
| Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 8 in 100 → 2025–26 · 11 in 100 · +3 in 100 |
| Suspension rate2024–25 · 5.4% (14 of 261) → 2025–26 · 8.0% (19 of 238) · +2.6 percentage points |
| Group | 2018–19 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | — | 9 of 89 | — |
| Male | — | 11 in 100 | — |
| Hispanic or Latino | — | 6 of 43 | — |
| Two or more races | — | 2 of 26 | — |
| White | — | 9 in 100 | — |
| Students with disabilities | — | 2 of 46 | — |
| Low-income | — | 14 in 100 | — |
| All students | — | 11 in 100 | — |
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
NCES F-33 · FY 2017–18 (2018) · fall district membership: 604 pupils
| Group | Dollars | Share, to two decimals | Printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $4,685,413 | 9.81% | 10% |
| Instruction support | $12,616,378 | 26.40% | 26% |
| Student services | $11,748,960 | 24.59% | 25% |
| Administration | $11,262,960 | 23.57% | 23% |
| Buildings & maintenance | $2,758,679 | 5.77% | 6% |
| Other | $4,709,981 | 9.86% | 10% |
| Total | $47,782,371 | 100.00% | 100% |
These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $47,782,371 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
| Measure | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $72,445 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+) | 29% |
| ZIP-area population | 44,923 |
| Median age | 39.6 years |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 96003 →
Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 5,726 elementary schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026
Optional and anonymous. Up to 280 characters.
What brought you here? Optional
Thanks — that helps.