ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Buckeye School of the Arts · Redding

Buckeye School of the Arts: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Buckeye School of the Arts posts 32% meeting the standard and 9.6% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

3407 Hiatt Drive, 96003 (opens in new tab)·Gateway Unified·Redding·Grades TK-8·482 students·89% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(530) 225-0420·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3645
% Exceeded10%21%
% Met+32%43%
Growth-6.5-2.9
Absence32.2%17.9%
Suspension13.5%1.6%
Scope Score
36
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,953 statewide · #4 of 4 in Gateway Unified

Buckeye School of the Arts scores 36 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 31st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Buckeye School of the Arts deserves a closer read. The school sits in Redding, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 29.2% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 31st percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 32% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 318%18%19%26%35%
Grade 438%28%29%21%41%
Grade 539%36%43%40%43%
Grade 634%23%27%33%33%
Grade 718%33%22%25%45%
Grade 834%26%26%18%37%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 327%26%26%29%31%
Grade 443%17%20%19%29%
Grade 537%16%15%25%11%
Grade 625%19%16%12%15%
Grade 723%30%9%20%17%
Grade 827%29%9%11%15%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

17%
19%
64%
Grade 3 · 36% proficient
16%
25%
59%
Grade 4 · 41% proficient
36%
57%
Grade 5 · 43% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 9.8pp across grades; the floor rises 7.7pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
9.6%
State 21.3%
11.8pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-6.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
31.8%
State 42.7%
10.8pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
32.2%
State 17.9%
14.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
13.5%
State 1.6%
11.8pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
29.2%
State 18.0%
11.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Buckeye School of the Arts in Redding, 37.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 36.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Buckeye School of the Arts outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.9% Math proficient); White students (42.3% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 297 students tested.

All students at this school: 29% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 29%, district —, state 43%29%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 28%, district 31%, state 32%28% · −1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 31%, district 34%, state 56%31% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 30%, district 32%, state 42%30% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 28%, district 34%, state 44%28% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 28%, district 31%, state 32%28% · −1 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 4%, district 9%, state 15%4% · −26 vs school

8 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 5.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 32.2%, district 31.9%, state 17.9%32.2% · +14.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 13.5%, district —, state 1.6%13.5% · +11.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–630.4%
Grades 7–833.3%
TK/K37.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Buckeye School of the Arts
36/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 20:120:1
Teaching staff28 teachers
Avg. experience11.1 years
Fully credentialed91%
First-year teachers18%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$53,647 – $111,715
Principal salary$130,891 – $145,533
Superintendent salary$188,490

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,698, CA average $14,815$20,698 · spent at this school
Federal share$857 per student

$857 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,062 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support9%
Student services9%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$16,199 per pupil
2019$14,254 per pupil
2018$15,276 per pupil
2017$14,200 per pupil
2016$14,141 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White56.6%
District 63.8% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic22.6%
District 16.9% · CA 56.1%
Other12.9%
District 14.8% · CA 9.0%
Asian5.8%
District 3.3% · CA 10.2%
Black2.1%
District 1.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 89.4% (26pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$72K · CA $85K
Median home value$403K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+29% · CA 35%
ZIP population44,923
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 25% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Buckeye School of the Arts a good elementary school?

Buckeye School of the Arts has a Scope Score of 36 out of 100, placing it in the 31st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,953 statewide. 9.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 11.8 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Buckeye School of the Arts's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 31.8% of students at Buckeye School of the Arts met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 9.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 22.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 9.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 313 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Buckeye School of the Arts rank in California?

Buckeye School of the Arts ranks #3,953 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 31st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Buckeye School of the Arts getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Buckeye School of the Arts decreases by 6.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Buckeye School of the Arts?

32.2% of students at Buckeye School of the Arts are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 13.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Buckeye School of the Arts compare to other schools in Redding?

Buckeye School of the Arts scores 36/100 (31st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 482 students. Use the schools in Redding page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Buckeye School of the Arts serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Buckeye School of the Arts in Redding, 37.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 36.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Buckeye School of the Arts outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.9% Math proficient); White students (42.3% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 297 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
9.6%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 39th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-6.5pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 58th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
31.8%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 42th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
32.2%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 27th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
13.5%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 0th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
29.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 66th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34817%19%27%38%35%−8
Grade 45116%25%18%41%41%−4
Grade 5587%36%17%40%43%−5
Grade 6585%28%24%43%33%−14
Grade 76012%33%17%38%45%−3
Grade 8659%28%22%42%37%−9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34810%21%25%44%31%−14
Grade 4516%24%24%47%29%−12
Grade 5572%9%25%65%11%−25
Grade 6595%10%20%64%15%−20
Grade 7607%10%32%52%17%−17
Grade 8653%12%22%63%15%−17
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111223%22%47%28%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged29737.0%+0−1
White19642.3%+3−19
Hispanic/Latino6035.0%−3−4
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Buckeye School of the Arts ←369.6%31.8%−6.513.5%
Rocky Point Charter0.9 mi5923.7%54.9%−15.91.2%
Turtle Bay2.5 mi4923.5%48.5%−12.53.0%
Redding STEM Academy0.3 mi4314.9%40.6%+15.84.7%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193737#348413.3%33.5%16.9%8.7%+15.8pp
20222519#46727.0%23.6%65.3%12.4%+4.2pp
20233436#36527.3%25.5%37.5%9.7%+6.7pp
20243943#32708.3%26.6%33.7%7.0%+4.9pp
20253631#39539.6%31.8%32.2%13.5%-6.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female15.5%33.7%+18.2pp
Male18.4%33.6%+15.2pp
Asian11.1%17.2%+6.1pp
Black/African American9.5%41.2%+31.7pp
Hispanic/Latino14.1%32.3%+18.2pp
American Indian/Alaska Native23.1%28.6%+5.5pp
Two or More Races30.8%31.8%+1.0pp
Students with Disabilities19.1%45.6%+26.5pp
English Learners11.5%12.5%+1.0pp
Foster Youth20.0%
Homeless24.3%54.5%+30.2pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17.2%35.1%+17.9pp
All Students17.0%33.6%+16.6pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction