ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Pine Hollow Middle · Concord

Pine Hollow Middle: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Pine Hollow posts 40% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

5522 Pine Hollow Road, 94521 (opens in new tab)·Mt. Diablo Unified·Concord·Grades 6-8·538 students·57% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(925) 672-5444·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4343
% Exceeded17%17%
% Met+40%39%
Growth+3.3+1.5
Absence18.4%18.5%
Suspension5.8%3.7%
Scope Score
43
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #1,010 statewide · #8 of 11 in Mt. Diablo Unified

Pine Hollow Middle scores 43 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 55th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “40% proficient” and call it done. Pine Hollow deserves a closer read. The school sits in Concord, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 55th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 40% meet the standard today, versus 44% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 649%45%42%49%43%
Grade 754%44%42%50%48%
Grade 847%37%42%42%51%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 636%27%30%36%37%
Grade 737%33%16%39%28%
Grade 844%29%30%12%35%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

19%
23%
58%
Grade 6 · 42% proficient
12%
36%
52%
Grade 7 · 48% proficient
16%
34%
50%
Grade 8 · 50% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 2.8pp across grades; the floor rises 7.8pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
16.6%
State 16.8%
0.2pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+3.3pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
40.2%
State 39.3%
0.9pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.4%
State 18.5%
0.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
5.8%
State 3.7%
2.2pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
13.2%
State 18.0%
4.8pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Pine Hollow Middle in Concord, 41.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Pine Hollow Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 282 students tested.

All students at this school: 40% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 40%, district —, state 39%40%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 34%, district 27%, state 32%34% · −6 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 42%, district 44%, state 44%42% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 39%, district 43%, state 42%39% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 30%, district 26%, state 32%30% · −11 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 43%, district 60%, state 56%43% · +2 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 46%, district 54%, state 56%46% · +6 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 55%, district 59%, state 72%55% · +15 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 18%, district 17%, state 15%18% · −22 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 7%, district 5%, state 11%7% · −33 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 52%, district 60%, state 65%52% · +12 vs school

5 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 15.0pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.4%, district 22.3%, state 18.5%18.4% · −0.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 5.8%, district —, state 3.7%5.8% · +2.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–620.9%
Grades 7–817.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 24:122:1
Teaching staff27 teachers
Avg. experience12.3 years
Fully credentialed78%
First-year teachers4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,422 – $120,624
Principal salary$151,493 – $174,392
Superintendent salary$305,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $273, CA average $14,815$273 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$249 per student

$249 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,016 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support11%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,965 per pupil
2019$12,119 per pupil
2018$13,284 per pupil
2017$12,803 per pupil
2016$12,073 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic37.9%
District 42.5% · CA 56.1%
White28.3%
District 27.3% · CA 19.9%
Other19.7%
District 17.3% · CA 9.0%
Asian11.0%
District 9.6% · CA 10.2%
Black3.2%
District 3.3% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 57.1% (7pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$126K · CA $85K
Median home value$853K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+45% · CA 35%
ZIP population41,909
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 40% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Pine Hollow Middle a good middle school?

Pine Hollow Middle has a Scope Score of 43 out of 100, placing it in the 55th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,010 statewide. 16.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Pine Hollow Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 40.2% of students at Pine Hollow Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 16.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.6% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 16.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 994 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Pine Hollow Middle rank in California?

Pine Hollow Middle ranks #1,010 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 55th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Pine Hollow Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Pine Hollow Middle increases by 3.3 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Pine Hollow Middle?

18.4% of students at Pine Hollow Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 5.8%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Pine Hollow Middle compare to other schools in Concord?

Pine Hollow Middle scores 43/100 (55th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 538 students. Use the schools in Concord page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Pine Hollow Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Pine Hollow Middle in Concord, 41.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Pine Hollow Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 282 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
16.6%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 50th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+3.3pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 54th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
40.2%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 51th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.4%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 50th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
5.8%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 41th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
13.2%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 39th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 616619%23%31%27%43%−4
Grade 714712%36%22%29%48%+1
Grade 818216%34%25%25%51%+4
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 616720%17%31%32%37%+2
Grade 714813%15%34%39%28%−6
Grade 818419%16%28%37%35%+3
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1118315%25%51%9%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged28241.1%+9+3
Hispanic/Latino18236.8%+5−2
White14648.6%−15−13
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Pine Hollow Middle ←4316.6%40.2%+3.35.8%
Diablo View Middle1.8 mi6836.5%67.1%+5.32.6%
El Dorado Middle3.2 mi306.2%21.4%−4.36.9%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194053#93615.3%44.4%9.1%6.8%+2.9pp
20223236#138410.8%35.8%28.1%8.4%-3.0pp
20233740#130110.7%33.7%23.2%12.6%-0.2pp
20242723#170012.7%37.9%17.1%19.2%-15.4pp
20254355#101016.6%40.2%18.4%5.8%+3.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.4%19.1%+9.7pp
Male8.8%17.8%+9.0pp
Asian6.4%23.0%+16.6pp
Black/African American25.0%23.5%-1.5pp
White0.0%5.6%+5.6pp
Hispanic/Latino11.5%19.3%+7.8pp
Two or More Races2.0%7.0%+5.0pp
Students with Disabilities22.4%25.3%+2.9pp
English Learners11.3%17.6%+6.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.1%19.7%+8.6pp
All Students9.1%18.4%+9.3pp
Filipino12.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction