ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Piedmont Middle · San Jose

Piedmont Middle: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Piedmont posts 52% meeting the standard, and 27.1% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

955 Piedmont Road, 95132 (opens in new tab)·Berryessa Union Elementary·San Jose·Grades 6-8·591 students·34% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 923-1945
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5643
% Exceeded27%17%
% Met+52%39%
Growth-1.0+1.5
Absence13.5%18.5%
Suspension2.9%3.7%
Scope Score
56
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #408 statewide · #2 of 3 in Berryessa Union Elementary

Piedmont Middle scores 56 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 82nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “52% proficient” and call it done. Piedmont deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Jose, where one in three students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Piedmont's low-income kids hit 51.1% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 72nd to the 82nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 100 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 52% of students meet the standard today, above the 48% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 648%58%46%58%62%
Grade 757%62%55%58%65%
Grade 860%66%61%61%62%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 632%38%34%37%40%
Grade 745%40%44%42%45%
Grade 844%43%40%40%38%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

31%
31%
38%
Grade 6 · 62% proficient
27%
38%
35%
Grade 7 · 65% proficient
26%
36%
38%
Grade 8 · 62% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 4.8pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

51.1%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Piedmont's most underrated number

51.1% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Piedmont low-income: 51.1%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
27.1%
State 16.8%
10.3pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-1.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
51.8%
State 39.3%
12.5pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
13.5%
State 18.5%
5.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.9%
State 3.7%
0.7pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
38.3%
State 18.0%
20.3pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Piedmont Middle in San Jose, 51.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 45.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Piedmont Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 6.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.2% Math proficient); Asian students (77.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 219 students tested.

All students at this school: 52% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 52%, district —, state 39%52%
MaleMale: this school 49%, district 59%, state 42%49% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 54%, district 61%, state 44%54% · +3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 69%, district 77%, state 72%69% · +17 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 40%, district 39%, state 32%40% · −12 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 30%, district 29%, state 32%30% · −21 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 12%, district 22%, state 11%12% · −40 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 53%, district 58%, state 65%53% · +1 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 13%, district 19%, state 15%13% · −39 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 72%, district 67%, state 56%72% · +20 vs school
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
WhiteWhite: this school 68%, district 63%, state 56%68% · +16 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 6.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +5.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 13.5%, district 11.9%, state 18.5%13.5% · −5.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.9%, district —, state 3.7%2.9% · −0.7pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–611.9%
Grades 7–814.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff26 teachers
Avg. experience18.3 years
Fully credentialed86%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$71,289 – $136,423
Principal salary$167,531 – $0
Superintendent salary$273,899

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,062, CA average $14,815$18,062 · spent at this school
Federal share$208 per student

$208 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,544 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction67%
Instruction support10%
Student services6%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,230 per pupil
2019$12,291 per pupil
2018$12,462 per pupil
2017$10,961 per pupil
2016$10,515 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian40.1%
District 51.4% · CA 10.2%
Hispanic34.9%
District 26.2% · CA 56.1%
Other20.3%
District 16.7% · CA 9.0%
White3.5%
District 4.3% · CA 19.9%
Black1.2%
District 1.4% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 34.0% (30pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$179K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.35M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+50% · CA 35%
ZIP population40,334
Median age42 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 39% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Piedmont Middle a good middle school?

Piedmont Middle has a Scope Score of 56 out of 100, placing it in the 82nd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #408 statewide. 27.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.3 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Piedmont Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 51.8% of students at Piedmont Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 27.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 27.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,176 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Piedmont Middle rank in California?

Piedmont Middle ranks #408 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 82nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Piedmont Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Piedmont Middle decreases by 1.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Piedmont Middle?

13.5% of students at Piedmont Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 2.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Piedmont Middle compare to other schools in San Jose?

Piedmont Middle scores 56/100 (82nd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 591 students. Use the schools in San Jose page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Piedmont Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Piedmont Middle in San Jose, 51.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 45.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Piedmont Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 6.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.2% Math proficient); Asian students (77.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 219 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
27.1%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 61th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-1.0pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 57th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
51.8%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 60th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
13.5%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 57th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.9%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 53th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
38.3%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 73th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 620631%31%19%19%62%+15
Grade 719227%38%21%14%65%+17
Grade 819026%36%15%24%62%+15
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 620226%13%25%35%40%+5
Grade 719524%21%21%34%45%+11
Grade 819129%9%16%47%38%+5
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1119016%23%45%16%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21951.1%+6+13
Asian23677.5%−1+3
Hispanic/Latino20142.8%+6+4
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Piedmont Middle ←5627.1%51.8%−1.02.9%
Rancho Milpitas Middle2.8 mi7442.9%66.4%3.3%
Sierramont Middle1.1 mi6839.6%67.0%+2.01.0%
Morrill Middle2.1 mi5429.8%53.6%−3.72.0%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194972#55721.9%47.7%9.6%7.1%+11.9pp
20225583#36625.0%51.1%20.5%3.2%+5.9pp
20235984#35624.6%46.9%16.8%5.3%+10.4pp
20245075#55623.3%49.4%14.5%4.7%+3.2pp
20255682#40827.1%51.8%13.5%2.9%-1.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.5%11.9%+2.4pp
Male9.7%14.8%+5.1pp
Asian3.2%4.6%+1.4pp
Black/African American20.8%
White4.2%2.5%-1.7pp
Hispanic/Latino17.6%25.9%+8.3pp
Two or More Races7.3%5.3%-2.0pp
Students with Disabilities21.8%32.3%+10.5pp
English Learners8.3%21.8%+13.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.8%17.8%+2.0pp
All Students9.6%13.4%+3.8pp
Homeless21.2%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction