Morrill Middle: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Morrill posts 54% meeting the standard, and 29.8% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 54 | 30% | 54% | -3.7 | 14.2% | 2.0% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Morrill Middle scores 54 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 78th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “54% proficient” and call it done. Morrill deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Jose, where one in three students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 78th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 54% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 60% | 61% | 59% | 63% | 61% |
| Grade 7 | 62% | 68% | 62% | 59% | 65% |
| Grade 8 | 59% | 61% | 71% | 64% | 60% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 50% | 45% | 39% | 48% | 46% |
| Grade 7 | 55% | 50% | 46% | 45% | 51% |
| Grade 8 | 51% | 37% | 44% | 46% | 39% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 7.3pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Morrill Middle in San Jose, 46.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 45.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Morrill Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.3% Math proficient); Asian students (81.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 52.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 230 students tested.
6 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 4.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +5.6pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (16.2% vs 10.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$161 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 39% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Morrill Middle a good middle school?
What are Morrill Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does Morrill Middle rank in California?
Is Morrill Middle getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Morrill Middle?
How does Morrill Middle compare to other schools in San Jose?
How does Morrill Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 66
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 73
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 202 | 32% | 29% | 16% | 23% | 61% | +14 |
| Grade 7 | 194 | 32% | 32% | 17% | 18% | 65% | +17 |
| Grade 8 | 221 | 24% | 35% | 14% | 26% | 60% | +14 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 202 | 26% | 19% | 24% | 30% | 46% | +11 |
| Grade 7 | 192 | 33% | 18% | 20% | 29% | 51% | +17 |
| Grade 8 | 219 | 31% | 8% | 21% | 40% | 39% | +7 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 221 | 16% | 23% | 46% | 14% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 230 | 46.5% | +1 | +8 |
| Asian | 279 | 81.7% | +3 | +7 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 189 | 31.2% | −5 | −8 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrill Middle ← | — | 54 | 29.8% | 53.6% | −3.7 | 2.0% |
| Rancho Milpitas Middle | 1 mi | 74 | 42.9% | 66.4% | — | 3.3% |
| Sierramont Middle | 1 mi | 68 | 39.6% | 67.0% | +2.0 | 1.0% |
| Piedmont Middle | 2.1 mi | 56 | 27.1% | 51.8% | −1.0 | 2.9% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 51 | 75 | #503 | 26.3% | 56.0% | 5.5% | 3.0% | +0.1pp |
| 2022 | 53 | 81 | #405 | 29.9% | 53.7% | 21.1% | 3.9% | -4.2pp |
| 2023 | 66 | 91 | #204 | 29.9% | 53.4% | 17.3% | 2.7% | +8.7pp |
| 2024 | 60 | 86 | #300 | 30.1% | 54.1% | 12.6% | 2.1% | +0.1pp |
| 2025 | 54 | 78 | #496 | 29.8% | 53.6% | 14.2% | 2.0% | -3.7pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 6.3% | 11.6% | +5.3pp |
| Male | 4.5% | 16.1% | +11.6pp |
| Asian | 1.1% | 4.0% | +2.9pp |
| Black/African American | 18.8% | — | — |
| White | 5.2% | 2.9% | -2.3pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 11.5% | 30.9% | +19.4pp |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 10.0% | +10.0pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 11.1% | 24.8% | +13.7pp |
| English Learners | 5.0% | 21.3% | +16.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 10.3% | 22.9% | +12.6pp |
| All Students | 5.4% | 14.1% | +8.7pp |
| Homeless | — | 22.5% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction