ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Malcolm X Academy · San Francisco

Malcolm X Academy: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Malcolm X Academy posts low test scores — and the same students gain more here than at most schools between grade 3 and grade 5. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

350 Harbor Road, 94124 (opens in new tab)·San Francisco Unified·San Francisco·Grades TK-5·97 students·81% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(415) 695-5950
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2845
% Exceeded1%21%
% Met+15%43%
Growth+9.4-2.9
Absence49.2%17.9%
Suspension0.5%1.6%
Scope Score
28
📈 On the Rise · Needs Support
ranked #5,015 statewide · #58 of 74 in San Francisco Unified

Malcolm X Academy scores 28 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 13th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “15% proficient” and call it done. Malcolm X Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Francisco, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 40th to the 13th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 15% meet the standard today, versus 32% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 30%5%10%12%
Grade 433%0%13%7%36%
Grade 527%22%14%18%13%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 357%0%10%12%0%
Grade 439%0%6%0%21%
Grade 536%11%7%12%6%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
1.4%
State 21.3%
19.9pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+9.4pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
15.2%
State 42.7%
27.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
49.2%
State 17.9%
31.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.5%
State 1.6%
1.1pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Malcolm X Academy in San Francisco, 28.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Malcolm X Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 10.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (16.0% Math proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 25 students tested.

All students at this school: 15% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 15%, district —, state 43%15%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 22%, district 36%, state 32%22% · +7 vs school
MaleMale: this school 36%, district 49%, state 42%36% · +21 vs school

7 of 10 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 49.2%, district 27.1%, state 17.9%49.2% · +31.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.5%, district —, state 1.6%0.5% · −1.1pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–658.8%
TK/K64.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 19:1, district 22:119:1
Teaching staff6 teachers
Avg. experience3.0 years
Fully credentialed62%
First-year teachers33%
Intern / emergency permit38.5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$69,525 – $131,654
Principal salary$150,963 – $163,648
Superintendent salary$328,879

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $36,536, CA average $14,815$36,536 · spent at this school
Federal share$433 per student

$433 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,762 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support12%
Student services15%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance7%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$17,416 per pupil
2019$17,139 per pupil
2018$17,228 per pupil
2017$13,640 per pupil
2016$11,532 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Black61.9%
District 7.3% · CA 4.8%
Other27.8%
District 15.1% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic10.3%
District 36.7% · CA 56.1%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 81.4% (18pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$81K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.03M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+26% · CA 35%
ZIP population34,475
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 97 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 6% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Malcolm X Academy a good elementary school?

Malcolm X Academy has a Scope Score of 28 out of 100, placing it in the 13th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,015 statewide. 1.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 19.9 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Malcolm X Academy's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 15.2% of students at Malcolm X Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 1.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 13.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 1.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 71 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Malcolm X Academy rank in California?

Malcolm X Academy ranks #5,015 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 13th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Malcolm X Academy getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Malcolm X Academy increases by 9.4 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Malcolm X Academy?

49.2% of students at Malcolm X Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.5%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Malcolm X Academy compare to other schools in San Francisco?

Malcolm X Academy scores 28/100 (13th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 97 students. Use the schools in San Francisco page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Malcolm X Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Malcolm X Academy in San Francisco, 28.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Malcolm X Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 10.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (16.0% Math proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 25 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
1.4%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 31th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+9.4pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 57th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
15.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 29th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
49.2%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 0th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.5%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 59th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39
Grade 4147%29%29%36%36%−9
Grade 5160%13%13%75%13%−35
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3110%0%18%82%0%−46
Grade 4140%21%29%50%21%−20
Grade 5160%6%19%75%6%−29
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11166%0%44%50%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged2528.0%−11−10
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Malcolm X Academy ←281.4%15.2%+9.40.5%
King (Thomas Starr) Elementary1.7 mi6441.7%62.8%−1.71.7%
Mission Preparatory2.1 mi4925.7%49.2%−12.23.4%
Webster (Daniel) Elementary2 mi4833.2%54.4%−0.50.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193840#33076.2%32.2%39.6%0.1%+3.2pp
20223033#38392.8%6.3%83.6%0.1%+13.8pp
2023217#53361.2%10.0%70.9%0.2%+0.7pp
20243325#42872.9%10.0%54.6%0.4%+2.9pp
20252813#50151.4%15.2%49.2%0.5%+9.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 10 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female44.1%62.7%+18.6pp
Male40.0%62.1%+22.1pp
Black/African American47.6%52.2%+4.6pp
Filipino30.8%
Hispanic/Latino27.3%75.0%+47.7pp
Pacific Islander44.4%81.8%+37.4pp
Two or More Races46.7%71.4%+24.7pp
Students with Disabilities27.8%65.4%+37.6pp
English Learners28.6%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged45.0%62.8%+17.8pp
All Students42.3%62.4%+20.1pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction