ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy · San Francisco

Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy posts 16% meeting the standard and 6.1% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

50 Pomona Avenue, 94124 (opens in new tab)·San Francisco Unified·San Francisco·Grades TK-5·200 students·74% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(415) 330-1526
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3545
% Exceeded6%21%
% Met+16%43%
Growth-7.0-2.9
Absence40.1%17.9%
Suspension0.3%1.6%
Scope Score
35
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,997 statewide · #49 of 74 in San Francisco Unified

Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy scores 35 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 30th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “16% proficient” and call it done. Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Francisco, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 18th to the 30th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 500 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 16% of students meet the standard today, above the 9% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 35%6%5%22%27%
Grade 47%24%14%8%23%
Grade 527%12%12%25%19%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 30%0%0%9%14%
Grade 40%11%14%0%6%
Grade 516%0%12%0%8%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

9%
18%
73%
Grade 3 · 27% proficient
19%
78%
Grade 4 · 22% proficient
12%
8%
80%
Grade 5 · 20% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 2.4pp across grades; the floor slips 8.0pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
6.1%
State 21.3%
15.2pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-7.0pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
16.1%
State 42.7%
26.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
40.1%
State 17.9%
22.2pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.3%
State 1.6%
1.4pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
0.0%
State 18.0%
18.0pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask how English learners are supported, and what changes for them after they reclassify.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy in San Francisco, 18.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 20.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (5.0% Math proficient); Black students (25.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 5.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 60 students tested.

All students at this school: 16% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 16%, district —, state 43%16%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 12%, district 36%, state 32%12% · −4 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 17%, district 15%, state 26%17% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 14%, district 50%, state 44%14% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 16%, district 49%, state 42%16% · +0 vs school

8 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 19.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 40.1%, district 27.1%, state 17.9%40.1% · +22.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.3%, district —, state 1.6%0.3% · −1.4pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (61.4% vs 36.7%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–636.7%
TK/K61.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 22:125:1
Teaching staff9 teachers
Avg. experience10.4 years
Fully credentialed89%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$69,525 – $131,654
Principal salary$150,963 – $163,648
Superintendent salary$328,879

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $28,835, CA average $14,815$28,835 · spent at this school
Federal share$390 per student

$390 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,762 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support12%
Student services15%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance7%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$17,416 per pupil
2019$17,139 per pupil
2018$17,228 per pupil
2017$13,640 per pupil
2016$11,532 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Black55.0%
District 7.3% · CA 4.8%
Hispanic31.5%
District 36.7% · CA 56.1%
Other13.5%
District 15.1% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 73.5% (10pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$81K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.03M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+26% · CA 35%
ZIP population34,475
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 200 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 12% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy a good elementary school?

Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy has a Scope Score of 35 out of 100, placing it in the 30th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,997 statewide. 6.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 15.2 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 16.1% of students at Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 6.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 10.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 6.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 158 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy rank in California?

Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy ranks #3,997 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 30th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy decreases by 7.0 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy?

40.1% of students at Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy compare to other schools in San Francisco?

Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy scores 35/100 (30th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 200 students. Use the schools in San Francisco page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy in San Francisco, 18.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 20.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (5.0% Math proficient); Black students (25.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 5.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 60 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
6.1%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 35th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-7.0pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 69th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
16.1%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 30th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
40.1%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 14th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.3%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 61th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
0.0%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 28th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3229%18%14%59%27%−16
Grade 4313%19%16%61%23%−22
Grade 52612%8%31%50%19%−29
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3229%5%14%73%14%−32
Grade 4310%6%16%77%6%−35
Grade 5264%4%8%85%8%−28
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11264%8%46%42%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6018.3%−20−20
Black/African American4725.5%+6−7
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy ←356.1%16.1%−7.00.3%
King (Thomas Starr) Elementary1.5 mi6441.7%62.8%−1.71.7%
Monroe Elementary2 mi5024.0%47.8%+9.20.3%
Mission Preparatory1.8 mi4925.7%49.2%−12.23.4%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193018#45042.8%9.2%38.9%0.9%+18.8pp
2022142#56091.2%8.8%66.1%0.1%+2.8pp
20232922#44823.1%9.4%58.3%0.1%+9.5pp
20242610#51511.4%10.6%39.6%0.3%-2.7pp
20253530#39976.1%16.1%40.1%0.3%-7.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 20 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female40.0%45.1%+5.1pp
Male41.8%43.6%+1.8pp
Black/African American44.8%48.7%+3.9pp
Filipino27.3%
Hispanic/Latino39.5%34.8%-4.7pp
Pacific Islander18.2%
Two or More Races50.0%64.7%+14.7pp
Students with Disabilities36.8%41.7%+4.9pp
English Learners43.8%23.2%-20.6pp
Homeless50.0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged44.7%47.0%+2.3pp
All Students40.8%44.3%+3.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction