ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Lena M. Preston Elementary · Rialto

Lena M. Preston Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Lena M. Preston posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

1750 North Willow Avenue, 92376 (opens in new tab)·Rialto Unified·Rialto·Grades TK-5·471 students·89% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(909) 820-7932·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3145
% Exceeded11%21%
% Met+29%43%
Growth-15.8-2.9
Absence22.6%17.9%
Suspension3.8%1.6%
Scope Score
31
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,614 statewide · #19 of 19 in Rialto Unified

Lena M. Preston Elementary scores 31 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 20th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “29% proficient” and call it done. Lena M. Preston deserves a closer read. The school sits in Rialto, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 20th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 29% of students meet the standard today, above the 24% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 331%27%29%25%38%
Grade 427%32%20%32%34%
Grade 533%11%16%21%36%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 324%28%29%30%38%
Grade 413%12%22%21%22%
Grade 518%1%6%8%8%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

20%
18%
62%
Grade 3 · 38% proficient
16%
18%
66%
Grade 4 · 34% proficient
13%
22%
65%
Grade 5 · 35% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
10.8%
State 21.3%
10.5pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-15.8pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
29.2%
State 42.7%
13.4pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
22.6%
State 17.9%
4.7pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.8%
State 1.6%
2.2pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
7.7%
State 18.0%
10.3pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Lena M. Preston Elementary in Rialto, 32.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 39.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lena M. Preston Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 7.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 192 students tested.

All students at this school: 28% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 28%, district —, state 43%28%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 27%, district 30%, state 32%27% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 29%, district 33%, state 32%29% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 26%, district 33%, state 44%26% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 30%, district 33%, state 42%30% · +2 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 9%, state 15%8% · −20 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 10%, state 11%9% · −19 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 20%, district 23%, state 26%20% · −8 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 20%, district 24%, state 22%20% · −8 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 2.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +6.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 22.6%, district 24.3%, state 17.9%22.6% · +4.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.8%, district —, state 1.6%3.8% · +2.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–623.1%
TK/K27.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 24:125:1
Teaching staff30 teachers
Avg. experience15.8 years
Fully credentialed85%
First-year teachers3%
Intern / emergency permit3.6%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$64,211 – $132,726
Principal salary$153,570 – $182,580
Superintendent salary$383,367

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,532, CA average $14,815$16,532 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$1,698 per student

$1,698 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,114 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support13%
Student services13%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,341 per pupil
2019$13,235 per pupil
2018$14,090 per pupil
2017$12,504 per pupil
2016$12,182 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic78.6%
District 87.0% · CA 56.1%
Black15.5%
District 7.6% · CA 4.8%
Other4.5%
District 2.3% · CA 9.0%
White1.3%
District 2.4% · CA 19.9%
Asian0.2%
District 0.7% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 88.5% (25pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$80K · CA $85K
Median home value$463K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+10% · CA 35%
ZIP population84,394
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 18% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Lena M. Preston Elementary a good elementary school?

Lena M. Preston Elementary has a Scope Score of 31 out of 100, placing it in the 20th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,614 statewide. 10.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.5 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Lena M. Preston Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 29.2% of students at Lena M. Preston Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 18.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 435 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Lena M. Preston Elementary rank in California?

Lena M. Preston Elementary ranks #4,614 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 20th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Lena M. Preston Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Lena M. Preston Elementary decreases by 15.8 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Lena M. Preston Elementary?

22.6% of students at Lena M. Preston Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.8%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Lena M. Preston Elementary compare to other schools in Rialto?

Lena M. Preston Elementary scores 31/100 (20th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 471 students. Use the schools in Rialto page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Lena M. Preston Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Lena M. Preston Elementary in Rialto, 32.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 39.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lena M. Preston Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 7.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 192 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
10.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 40th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-15.8pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 42th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
29.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 40th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
22.6%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 42th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.8%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 32th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
7.7%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 37th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36120%18%25%38%38%−6
Grade 46816%18%22%44%34%−11
Grade 58913%22%15%49%36%−12
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36111%26%26%36%38%−8
Grade 4673%19%33%45%22%−19
Grade 5891%7%31%61%8%−27
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11894%13%54%28%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged19232.3%−7−6
Hispanic/Latino16936.7%−6−2
English Learners3212.5%−0+2
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Lena M. Preston Elementary ←3110.8%29.2%−15.83.8%
Locust Elementary2.2 mi4310.8%29.1%+24.90.4%
W.J.C. Trapp Elementary1.4 mi4320.5%53.1%−26.41.4%
Virginia Primrose Elementary2.1 mi4211.0%26.7%+2.10.6%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193018#44917.2%24.3%29.1%4.5%-1.8pp
2022101#56943.8%18.7%44.4%4.2%-21.2pp
2023173#55525.2%20.6%43.1%4.2%-18.2pp
2024236#54036.6%22.6%33.4%2.3%-12.9pp
20253120#461410.8%29.2%22.6%3.8%-15.8pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female26.7%26.3%-0.4pp
Male31.8%19.6%-12.2pp
Black/African American33.3%33.7%+0.4pp
Hispanic/Latino29.3%20.4%-8.9pp
Two or More Races41.7%14.3%-27.4pp
Students with Disabilities26.2%26.8%+0.6pp
English Learners27.1%18.0%-9.1pp
Foster Youth50.0%
Homeless38.9%34.5%-4.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged30.8%24.5%-6.3pp
All Students29.4%22.9%-6.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction