School district · San Bernardino County

Rialto Unified schools

In Rialto Unified, 3 of 3 public high schools sit at or above the 50th percentile among California high schools we score; 1 of 5 public middle schools does (spring 2026 tests; high schools, spring 2025).

Elementary · 19 schools

from 10th to 87th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Samuel W. Simpson Elementary: 87th percentile, Strong
  • Georgia F. Morris Elementary: 64th percentile, Solid
  • Dr. Ernest Garcia Elementary: 62nd percentile, Solid
  • A. H. Morgan Elementary: 52nd percentile, Solid
  • Nancy R. Kordyak Elementary: 43rd percentile, Developing
  • Elizabeth T. Hughbanks Elementary: 33rd percentile, Developing
  • Lida M. Henry Elementary: 31st percentile, Developing
  • J. Calvin Boyd Elementary: 30th percentile, Developing
  • W.J.C. Trapp Elementary: 30th percentile, Developing
  • J.P. Kelley Elementary: 28th percentile, Developing
  • Helen L. Dollahan Elementary: 27th percentile, Developing
  • Sam V. Curtis Elementary: 26th percentile, Developing
  • Winn A. Myers Elementary: 26th percentile, Developing
  • Merle S. Casey Elementary: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
  • Lena M. Preston Elementary: 21st percentile, Needs Support
  • Dr. Edward Fitzgerald Elementary: 19th percentile, Needs Support
  • Charlotte N. Werner Elementary: 16th percentile, Needs Support
  • Levi Bemis Elementary: 12th percentile, Needs Support
  • George H. Dunn Elementary: 10th percentile, Needs Support
6Needs Support
9Developing
3Solid
1Strong

Middle · 5 schools

from 24th to 61st · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • William G. Jehue Middle: 61st percentile, Solid
  • Ben F. Kolb Middle: 46th percentile, Developing
  • Rialto Middle: 44th percentile, Developing
  • Ethel Kucera Middle: 24th percentile, Needs Support
  • Warren F. Frisbie Middle: 24th percentile, Needs Support
2Needs Support
2Developing
1Solid
0Strong

High · 3 schools

from 50th to 59th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Eisenhower High: 59th percentile, Solid
  • Wilmer Amina Carter High: 56th percentile, Solid
  • Rialto High: 50th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
3Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

  • 2 schools not ranked statewide

Schools around Rialto Unified

29 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Rialto Unified score highest?

Samuel W. Simpson Elementary is highest, at the 87th percentile.

That’s higher than 87 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Rialto Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 16 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Rialto Unified had 19 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Rialto Unified score highest?

William G. Jehue Middle is highest, at the 61st percentile.

That’s higher than 61 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Rialto Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 2 middle schools
Context

The average middle school in Rialto Unified had 23 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Rialto Unified score highest?

Eisenhower High is highest, at the 59th percentile.

That’s higher than 59 in 100 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Rialto Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Context

The average high school in Rialto Unified had 24 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

2 high schools not ranked statewide

Alternative schools and continuation schools enroll students differently from a regular school, so each is compared only with schools of its kind.

The district

Where does Rialto Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Rialto Unified spent $21,114 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 59 cents of every Rialto Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction59%
  • Instruction support13%
  • Student services13%
  • Administration7%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$178.9 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 77 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 32% of its $551.1 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 256 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

The money is spread out. No action gets more than 11%, and the three largest, Home to School Transportation; Student Device Program; and Teacher Support for Learning and Differentiated Instruction, take 28% between them. The plan itself puts 74% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

14 of the plan’s 77 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $10.7 million
  • Math $11.1 million
  • Catch-up help $4.8 million
  • English learners $12.4 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Dual Language Immersion Program Implementation$10.6 million
  • Literacy and Numeracy Support - Elementary Schools$6.5 million
  • Credit Recovery for Secondary Students$2.7 million
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $106.7 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $95.5 million and estimates it spent $95.6 million, within 1% of the plan.

What changed

The total is $22.6 million (14%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Student Device Program, which went from $11.7 million to $18.6 million.

Largest cuts

  • Behavior Support Services−⁠$6.1 million
  • Family and Foster Youth Support Services−⁠$1.1 million
  • Music and Arts During the School Day−⁠$830,905

Largest increases

  • Student Device Program+⁠$6.8 million
  • Home to School Transportation+⁠$5.7 million
  • Family Engagement - District Committees+⁠$4.1 million

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Social Emotional Learning$801,095

Ask: What did Behavior Support Services pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $6.1 million less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 143%44%up 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 124%25%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 123 in 10022 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 13.6%3.2%down 0.4 pts

Goals 4 and 5 track named schools and Goals 2 and 3 track other measures, so they aren’t shown here.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Home to School Transportation · $18,803,415
  • Student Device Program · $18,566,863
  • Teacher Support for Learning and Differentiated Instruction · $12,272,226
The full plan5 goals, 47 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($178.9 million).

Where does the money go?

54% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Every student will succeed at grade level and graduate high school proficient in literacy and numeracy, while…$96.8 million54% of action budgets

“Every student will succeed at grade level and graduate high school proficient in literacy and numeracy, while being future ready for higher education, career, and life” p. 20 ↗

29 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $90.1 million (+⁠$6.7 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Student Device Program$18.6 millionaction 1.21 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $17.0 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Teacher Support for Learning and Differentiated Instruction$12.3 millionaction 1.33 · p. 202 ↗
  3. Dual Language Immersion Program Implementation$10.6 millionaction 1.7 · p. 199 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Music and Arts During the School Day$8.0 millionaction 1.6 · p. 199 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.4 million is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Classroom Support Services$7.4 millionaction 1.25 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

24 more funded actions in this goal

  • Literacy and Numeracy Support - Elementary Schools · action 1.2 · p. 199 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.3 million is state funding counted toward those services$6.5 million
  • College / Career Readiness (CCR) · action 1.14 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.4 million is state funding counted toward those services$5.3 million
  • Behavior Support Services · action 1.26 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$4.0 million
  • Library Media Services · action 1.23 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3.7 million
  • Lower TK-3 Class Size · action 1.29 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3.2 million
  • Credit Recovery for Secondary Students · action 1.16 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.1 million is state funding counted toward those services$2.7 million
  • 9-12 Independent Study · action 1.31 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.6 million is state funding counted toward those services$2.3 million
  • Comprehensive Counseling Program · action 1.24 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2.1 million
  • Multilingual Instructional Support · action 1.11 · p. 200 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.6 million
  • Diversified Curriculum · action 1.30 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $45,040 is state funding counted toward those services$1.4 million
  • Data Analysis Platform · action 1.20 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.2 million is state funding counted toward those services$1.4 million
  • Technology Support Services · action 1.22 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.3 million
  • Literacy and Numeracy - Instructional Support · action 1.1 · p. 199 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $769,800 is state funding counted toward those services$1.1 million
  • Dual Language Immersion - Targeted Instructional Assistance · action 1.8 · p. 200 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.0 million
  • Dual Language Immersion - Supplemental Materials · action 1.9 · p. 200 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $102,396 is state funding counted toward those services$0.7 million
  • Adaptive Diagnostic Testing · action 1.19 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $81,284 is state funding counted toward those services$0.4 million
  • College Entrance and AP Testing · action 1.15 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Math Intervention · action 1.5 · p. 199 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $125,782 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Early College Program · action 1.17 · p. 201 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $151,286 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Milor High Class Size · action 1.32 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Goal Book · action 1.28 · p. 202 ↗$0.1 million
  • Multilingual Classroom Books · action 1.10 · p. 200 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Special Services - Transition Services and Curriculum · action 1.27 · p. 202 ↗$0.1 million
  • Seal of Biliteracy and Golden State Merit · action 1.12 · p. 200 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Student Device Program+⁠$6.8 million$11.7 million → $18.6 million · p. 201 ↗
  2. Behavior Support Services−⁠$6.1 million$10.2 million → $4.0 million · p. 202 ↗
  3. Classroom Support Services+⁠$2.6 million$4.8 million → $7.4 million · p. 201 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Teacher Support for Learning and Differentiated Instruction · $12.4 million → $12.3 million · p. 202 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • Dual Language Immersion Program Implementation · $8.9 million → $10.6 million · p. 199 ↗+⁠$1.7 million
  • Music and Arts During the School Day · $8.8 million → $8.0 million · p. 199 ↗−⁠$0.8 million
  • Literacy and Numeracy Support - Elementary Schools · $5.3 million → $6.5 million · p. 199 ↗+⁠$1.2 million
  • College / Career Readiness (CCR) · $5.0 million → $5.3 million · p. 201 ↗+⁠$0.4 million
  • Library Media Services · $3.7 million → $3.7 million · p. 201 ↗−⁠$35,648
  • Lower TK-3 Class Size · $3.6 million → $3.2 million · p. 202 ↗−⁠$0.3 million
  • Credit Recovery for Secondary Students · $2.7 million → $2.7 million · p. 201 ↗+⁠$537
  • 9-12 Independent Study · $1.9 million → $2.3 million · p. 202 ↗+⁠$0.4 million
  • Comprehensive Counseling Program · $1.4 million → $2.1 million · p. 201 ↗+⁠$0.8 million
  • Multilingual Instructional Support · $1.5 million → $1.6 million · p. 200 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Diversified Curriculum · $0.5 million → $1.4 million · p. 202 ↗+⁠$0.9 million
  • Data Analysis Platform · $1.4 million → $1.4 million · p. 201 ↗+⁠$39,068
  • Technology Support Services · $1.7 million → $1.3 million · p. 201 ↗−⁠$0.4 million
  • Literacy and Numeracy - Instructional Support · $0.8 million → $1.1 million · p. 199 ↗+⁠$0.3 million
  • Dual Language Immersion - Targeted Instructional Assistance · $904,309 → $999,612 · p. 200 ↗+⁠$95,303
  • Dual Language Immersion - Supplemental Materials · $269,999 → $675,506 · p. 200 ↗+⁠$405,507
  • Adaptive Diagnostic Testing · $486,107 → $372,284 · p. 201 ↗−⁠$113,823
  • College Entrance and AP Testing · $319,704 → $312,294 · p. 201 ↗−⁠$7,410
  • Math Intervention · $225,611 → $209,782 · p. 199 ↗−⁠$15,829
  • Early College Program · $324,352 → $187,286 · p. 201 ↗−⁠$137,066
  • Milor High Class Size · $734,360 → $180,374 · p. 202 ↗−⁠$553,986
  • Goal Book · $100,000 → $145,000 · p. 202 ↗+⁠$45,000
  • Multilingual Classroom Books · $56,000 → $63,000 · p. 200 ↗+⁠$7,000
  • Special Services - Transition Services and Curriculum · $65,000 → $55,000 · p. 202 ↗−⁠$10,000
  • Seal of Biliteracy and Golden State Merit · $2,500 → $18,000 · p. 200 ↗+⁠$15,500

How the plan measures it · 32 measures · 1 quoted

  • Middle School Drop Out Rate - District % of MS students who dropped out CALPADS Snapshot Report 1.14, 8.1c p. 30 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23 ALL 0.33% …
    Target for year 3
    ALL 0.27% …

31 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2We will ensure all students are provided with access and opportunities to support learning with highly…$44.6 million25% of action budgets

“We will ensure all students are provided with access and opportunities to support learning with highly qualified teachers and professional learning communities that promote a culture of continuous improvement for student achievement” p. 65 ↗

22 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $35.7 million (+⁠$8.8 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Home to School Transportation$18.8 millionaction 2.22 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.9 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Health Clinic and Services$10.2 millionaction 2.18 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $6.8 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Teacher Induction - Core Services for Induction Teachers$2.9 millionaction 2.1 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.4 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Educational Program Support$2.8 millionaction 2.8 · p. 203 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2.1 million is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Secondary Literacy and Numeracy Support$2.5 millionaction 2.7 · p. 203 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.1 million is state funding counted toward those services

17 more funded actions in this goal

  • Emerging Linguist Support Programs · action 2.10 · p. 203 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.1 million is state funding counted toward those services$1.4 million
  • Numeracy Training · action 2.5 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $253,797 is state funding counted toward those services$0.9 million
  • Culturally Linguistically Responsive Teaching and Learning · action 2.12 · p. 203 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $419,614 is state funding counted toward those services$0.8 million
  • Social Emotional Learning · action 2.23 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $672,102 is state funding counted toward those services$0.8 million
  • Teacher Induction - Professional Development · action 2.2 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $188,857 is state funding counted toward those services$0.8 million
  • Literacy Training · action 2.4 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $230,494 is state funding counted toward those services$0.6 million
  • School Site Strategic Planning and Support · action 2.16 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • Differentiated Instructional Practices · action 2.21 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $211,603 is state funding counted toward those services$0.4 million
  • Multilingual Programs Professional Development · action 2.11 · p. 203 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $64,201 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • STEM Training · action 2.15 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Social Emotional Learning Professional Development · action 2.17 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $100,665 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • AP Teacher Professional Development · action 2.14 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $135,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Bilingual Authorization · action 2.9 · p. 203 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $102,396 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Equity and Implicit Bias Training · action 2.13 · p. 203 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $90,080 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • PAR (Peer Assistance Review Program) for Tenured Teachers · action 2.3 · p. 202 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Special Education (Equity and Inclusion) · action 2.19 · p. 204 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Alternative Curriculum for Alternative Pathways to High School Diploma for Students with Disabilities · action 2.20 · p. 204 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Home to School Transportation+⁠$5.7 million$13.1 million → $18.8 million · p. 204 ↗
  2. Health Clinic and Services+⁠$2.4 million$7.9 million → $10.2 million · p. 204 ↗
  3. Teacher Induction - Core Services for Induction Teachers+⁠$1.0 million$1.9 million → $2.9 million · p. 202 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Educational Program Support · $2.9 million → $2.8 million · p. 203 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • Secondary Literacy and Numeracy Support · $2.9 million → $2.5 million · p. 203 ↗−⁠$0.5 million
  • Emerging Linguist Support Programs · $1.4 million → $1.4 million · p. 203 ↗−⁠$34,719
  • Numeracy Training · $318,739 → $851,658 · p. 202 ↗+⁠$532,919
  • Culturally Linguistically Responsive Teaching and Learning · $592,802 → $817,088 · p. 203 ↗+⁠$224,286
  • Social Emotional Learning · $801,095 · p. 204 ↗new or renamed
  • Teacher Induction - Professional Development · $654,230 → $751,511 · p. 202 ↗+⁠$97,281
  • Literacy Training · $250,000 → $642,649 · p. 202 ↗+⁠$392,649
  • School Site Strategic Planning and Support · $718,664 → $462,043 · p. 204 ↗−⁠$256,621
  • Differentiated Instructional Practices · $414,988 → $423,206 · p. 204 ↗+⁠$8,218
  • Multilingual Programs Professional Development · $355,472 → $266,320 · p. 203 ↗−⁠$89,152
  • STEM Training · $250,812 → $210,221 · p. 204 ↗−⁠$40,591
  • Social Emotional Learning Professional Development · $657,092 → $156,624 · p. 204 ↗−⁠$500,468
  • AP Teacher Professional Development · $210,149 → $153,492 · p. 204 ↗−⁠$56,657
  • Bilingual Authorization · $97,299 → $152,396 · p. 203 ↗+⁠$55,097
  • Equity and Implicit Bias Training · $65,000 → $140,080 · p. 203 ↗+⁠$75,080
  • PAR (Peer Assistance Review Program) for Tenured Teachers · $51,209 → $53,044 · p. 202 ↗+⁠$1,835
  • Special Education (Equity and Inclusion) · $124,908 → $27,120 · p. 204 ↗−⁠$97,788
  • Alternative Curriculum for Alternative Pathways to High School Diploma for Students with Disabilities · $25,000 → $25,000 · p. 204 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 3 measures · 1 quoted

  • State Summative - CAST % of students who scored Met or Exceeded CAASPP Public Dashboard p. 66 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23 ALL 17.75% …
    Target for year 3
    ALL 26.75% …

2 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3We will create a positive, safe, and engaging learning environment that is student and family centered$36.2 million20% of action budgets

18 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $29.7 million (+⁠$6.5 million) · p. 81 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Social Emotional Learning / Educational Related Mental Health Services$11.0 millionaction 3.8 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $7.0 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Engagement of Students in Extracurricular Activities$7.4 millionaction 3.1 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $6.2 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Family Engagement - District Committees$5.0 millionaction 3.5 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $457,373 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Chronic Absenteeism$3.9 millionaction 3.18 · p. 206 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Family and Foster Youth Support Services$1.8 millionaction 3.16 · p. 206 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.5 million is state funding counted toward those services

13 more funded actions in this goal

  • Student Services Support for Students and Families · action 3.17 · p. 206 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.0 million
  • Website and Online Presence · action 3.13 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.0 million
  • Multilingual Interpretation Services · action 3.14 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.9 million
  • Intervention and Support Services · action 3.15 · p. 206 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $500,232 is state funding counted toward those services$0.9 million
  • Family Engagement - Family and Community Engagement Center · action 3.7 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $485,064 is state funding counted toward those services$0.8 million
  • District Registration Center · action 3.10 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.7 million
  • Wellness Centers · action 3.9 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.7 million
  • Equity and Cultural Community Engagement · action 3.4 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Student and Community Engagement · action 3.3 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • College and Career Centers · action 3.6 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Communication with Families and Community · action 3.12 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Engagement of Students during the School Day · action 3.2 · p. 204 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Rialto Equity Council · action 3.11 · p. 205 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Family Engagement - District Committees+⁠$4.1 million$0.8 million → $5.0 million · p. 205 ↗
  2. Engagement of Students in Extracurricular Activities+⁠$1.9 million$5.5 million → $7.4 million · p. 204 ↗
  3. Family and Foster Youth Support Services−⁠$1.1 million$2.9 million → $1.8 million · p. 206 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Social Emotional Learning / Educational Related Mental Health Services · $10.5 million → $11.0 million · p. 205 ↗+⁠$0.6 million
  • Chronic Absenteeism · $3.4 million → $3.9 million · p. 206 ↗+⁠$0.5 million
  • Student Services Support for Students and Families · $0.9 million → $1.0 million · p. 206 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Website and Online Presence · $837,849 → $984,841 · p. 205 ↗+⁠$146,992
  • Multilingual Interpretation Services · $901,884 → $905,740 · p. 205 ↗+⁠$3,856
  • Intervention and Support Services · $571,207 → $886,401 · p. 206 ↗+⁠$315,194
  • Family Engagement - Family and Community Engagement Center · $1.2 million → $0.8 million · p. 205 ↗−⁠$0.4 million
  • District Registration Center · $806,677 → $731,730 · p. 205 ↗−⁠$74,947
  • Wellness Centers · $639,033 → $676,004 · p. 205 ↗+⁠$36,971
  • Equity and Cultural Community Engagement · $100,000 → $434,000 · p. 205 ↗+⁠$334,000
  • Student and Community Engagement · $267,000 → $268,000 · p. 204 ↗+⁠$1,000
  • College and Career Centers · $195,728 → $193,878 · p. 205 ↗−⁠$1,850
  • Communication with Families and Community · $100,000 → $135,000 · p. 205 ↗+⁠$35,000
  • Engagement of Students during the School Day · $16,081 → $16,081 · p. 204 ↗unchanged
  • Rialto Equity Council · $15,000 → $15,000 · p. 205 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 7 measures · 3 quoted

  • School Facilities Total “Good Repair” Facility Deficiencies 2022-2023 Annual Report p. 83 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 68 - Total "Good Repair" Facility Deficiencies
    Target for year 3
    30 - Total "Good Repair" Facility Deficiencies
  • Attendance Rate Average % attendance rate CALPADS Snapshot Reports 14.2 p. 83 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23 ALL 88.7% …
    Target for year 3
    ALL 91.7% …
  • Expulsion Rates % of students who were expelled from school DataQuest p. 84 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23 ALL 0.1% …
    Target for year 3
    ALL 0.08% …

4 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalBy June 30, 2027, Milor High School will increase its College / Career Indicator (CCI) for all students…$673,134under 1% of action budgets

“By June 30, 2027, Milor High School will increase its College / Career Indicator (CCI) for all students including English Learners, Long-Term English Learners, Hispanic students, Homeless students, Low-Income students, and Students with Disabilities” p. 96 ↗

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $519,659 (+⁠$153,475)

Largest funded actions

  1. Targeted Academic Support$394,213action 4.4 · p. 206 ↗
  2. High Quality Professional Development$116,921action 4.3 · p. 206 ↗
  3. Extracurricular Activities Before, During and After the School Day$87,000action 4.2 · p. 206 ↗
  4. Social Emotional Learning Programs$75,000action 4.1 · p. 206 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Targeted Academic Support+⁠$205,730$188,483 → $394,213 · p. 206 ↗
  2. Social Emotional Learning Programs−⁠$75,000$150,000 → $75,000 · p. 206 ↗
  3. Extracurricular Activities Before, During and After the School Day+⁠$27,000$60,000 → $87,000 · p. 206 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • High Quality Professional Development · $121,176 → $116,921 · p. 206 ↗−⁠$4,255

How the plan measures it · 2 measures · 2 quoted

  • College and Career Indicator - School and Student Group % of students Prepared CA School Dashboard p. 97 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 ALL 0% …
    Target for year 3
    ALL 12% …
  • HS Graduation Rate - School and Student Group % of HS students graduating CA School Dashboard p. 97 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23 ALL 80.9% …
    Target for year 3
    ALL 83.9% …
Goal 5 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalBy June 30, 2027, students at Zupanic Virtual Academy will increase the graduation rate by 15% for all…$687,027under 1% of action budgets

“By June 30, 2027, students at Zupanic Virtual Academy will increase the graduation rate by 15% for all students, including Low Income and Hispanic, the College/​Career index by 15% for all students, including English Learners, Low Income, and Hispanic, and decrease the distance from standard in ELA by 20 points for all students, including Low Income and Hispanic, as indicated on the CA School Dashboard” p. 102 ↗

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $270,000 (+⁠$417,027)

Largest funded actions

  1. Targeted Academic Support$552,027action 5.3 · p. 206 ↗
  2. Extracurricular Activities Before and After the School Day$104,000action 5.2 · p. 206 ↗
  3. College and Career Readiness Support$30,000action 5.4 · p. 206 ↗
  4. High Quality Professional Development$1,000action 5.1 · p. 206 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Targeted Academic Support+⁠$522,027$30,000 → $552,027 · p. 206 ↗
  2. College and Career Readiness Support−⁠$120,000$150,000 → $30,000 · p. 206 ↗
  3. Extracurricular Activities Before and After the School Day+⁠$64,000$40,000 → $104,000 · p. 206 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • High Quality Professional Development · $50,000 → $1,000 · p. 206 ↗−⁠$49,000

How the plan measures it · 3 measures · 1 quoted

  • College and Career Indicator % of students Prepared CA Dashboard p. 103 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 ALL 9.6% …
    Target for year 3
    ALL 15.6% …

2 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 23,073 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 87%2. Black or African American: 8%3. White: 2%4. Two or more races: 1%5. Asian: <1%6. Filipino: <1%7. Pacific Islander: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino87%
  2. Black or African American8%
  3. White2%
  4. Two or more races1%
  5. Asian<1%
  6. Filipino<1%
  7. Pacific Islander<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported0%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

84%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 19,316 of 23,067 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Rialto Unified isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 43% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (1,442 of 3,332 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

2 schools getting state support, 2025–26

Elizabeth T. Hughbanks Elementary (Targeted support) · Wilmer Amina Carter High (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (6)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Rialto Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Samuel W. Simpson Elementary, 87th percentile (Strong). Middle: William G. Jehue Middle, 61st percentile (Solid). High: Eisenhower High, 59th percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Rialto Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Rialto Unified good?

Rialto Unified’s 19 public elementary schools run from the 10th to the 87th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong, 3 Solid, 9 Developing and 6 Needs Support. Rialto Unified’s 5 public middle schools run from the 24th to the 61st percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid, 2 Developing and 2 Needs Support. Rialto Unified’s 3 public high schools run from the 50th to the 59th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 3 Solid. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Rialto Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Rialto Unified had 19 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Rialto Unified had 23 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Rialto Unified had 24 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Rialto Unified spend per student?

Rialto Unified spent $21,114 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 59 cents of every Rialto Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Rialto Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $178.9 million into 77 funded actions in 5 goals, 32% of its $551.1 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $96.8 million, 54% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Rialto Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.