ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
John Sutter Middle · Fowler

John Sutter Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

John Sutter posts 35% meeting the standard and 12.3% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

701 East Walter, 93625 (opens in new tab)·Fowler Unified·Fowler·Grades 6-8·579 students·82% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(559) 834-6180·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3643
% Exceeded12%17%
% Met+35%39%
Growth-2.4+1.5
Absence12.4%18.5%
Suspension3.2%3.7%
Scope Score
36
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,415 statewide

John Sutter Middle scores 36 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 37th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “35% proficient” and call it done. John Sutter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fowler, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 57th to the 37th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELARed(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 35% meet the standard today, versus 43% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 654%37%38%38%35%
Grade 745%46%54%45%45%
Grade 846%44%40%55%38%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 639%32%29%29%33%
Grade 728%31%34%30%35%
Grade 845%39%31%40%25%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

10%
25%
65%
Grade 6 · 35% proficient
13%
32%
55%
Grade 7 · 45% proficient
8%
30%
62%
Grade 8 · 38% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 1.8pp across grades; the floor rises 3.2pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
12.3%
State 16.8%
4.5pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-2.4pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
35.3%
State 39.3%
4.0pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
12.4%
State 18.5%
6.2pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.2%
State 3.7%
0.4pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
19.5%
State 18.0%
1.5pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At John Sutter Middle in Fowler, 35.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. John Sutter Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 5.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 470 students tested.

All students at this school: 35% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 35%, district —, state 39%35%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 31%, district 35%, state 32%31% · −4 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 32%, district 35%, state 32%32% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 31%, district 36%, state 42%31% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 39%, district 40%, state 44%39% · +4 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 7%, state 11%3% · −32 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 9%, state 15%5% · −30 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 76%, district 66%, state 72%76% · +41 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 45%, district 49%, state 56%45% · +10 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 33%, district 34%, state 46%33% · −2 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 4.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 12.4%, district 17.1%, state 18.5%12.4% · −6.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.2%, district —, state 3.7%3.2% · −0.4pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–611.8%
Grades 7–812.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 21:121:1
Teaching staff30 teachers
Avg. experience11.1 years
Fully credentialed67%
First-year teachers13%
Intern / emergency permit3.6%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,106 – $118,391
Principal salary$130,559 – $143,328
Superintendent salary$234,598

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,028, CA average $14,815$20,028 · spent at this school
Federal share$939 per student

$939 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,260 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support8%
Student services12%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,285 per pupil
2019$12,181 per pupil
2018$13,169 per pupil
2017$12,174 per pupil
2016$11,624 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic83.1%
District 83.5% · CA 56.1%
Asian7.3%
District 8.2% · CA 10.2%
White6.7%
District 6.6% · CA 19.9%
Other2.1%
District 1.1% · CA 9.0%
Black0.9%
District 0.5% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 82.0% (18pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$73K · CA $85K
Median home value$393K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+27% · CA 35%
ZIP population8,778
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 20% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is John Sutter Middle a good middle school?

John Sutter Middle has a Scope Score of 36 out of 100, placing it in the 37th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,415 statewide. 12.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.5 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are John Sutter Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 35.3% of students at John Sutter Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 12.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 12.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,147 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does John Sutter Middle rank in California?

John Sutter Middle ranks #1,415 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 37th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is John Sutter Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at John Sutter Middle decreases by 2.4 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at John Sutter Middle?

12.4% of students at John Sutter Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.2%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does John Sutter Middle compare to other schools in Fowler?

John Sutter Middle scores 36/100 (37th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 579 students. Use the schools in Fowler page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does John Sutter Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At John Sutter Middle in Fowler, 35.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. John Sutter Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 5.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 470 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Nearby Elementary Schools

1 within ~3 mi · avg 42

See more on map →

Nearby High Schools

1 within ~3 mi · avg 53

See more on map →

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
12.3%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 45th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-2.4pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 39th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
35.3%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 47th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
12.4%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 59th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.2%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 52th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
19.5%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 48th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 618210%25%35%30%35%−11
Grade 718013%32%21%34%45%−3
Grade 82118%30%28%33%38%−8
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 618213%20%36%31%33%−2
Grade 718019%16%24%41%35%+1
Grade 821210%15%33%42%25%−7
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112143%16%61%19%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged47035.7%−6−2
Hispanic/Latino47735.6%−6−3
English Learners712.8%−5−8
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
John Sutter Middle ←3612.3%35.3%−2.43.2%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194157#87116.6%42.9%7.4%3.0%-0.8pp
20224159#88813.2%38.0%27.5%3.7%+6.6pp
20234151#106413.0%37.6%25.7%6.8%+2.3pp
20244769#68213.2%39.6%13.4%6.5%+13.4pp
20253637#141512.3%35.3%12.4%3.2%-2.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.1%11.3%+3.2pp
Male6.7%13.0%+6.3pp
Asian6.6%0.0%-6.6pp
Hispanic/Latino7.9%12.4%+4.5pp
Students with Disabilities16.7%27.8%+11.1pp
English Learners4.5%14.0%+9.5pp
Military-Connected0.0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.0%13.7%+5.7pp
All Students7.4%12.2%+4.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction