Fowler High: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.
Fowler posts 48% meeting the standard against 36% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 53 | 20% | 48% | 97.4% | 44.7% | 21.4% | 2.3% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
Fowler High scores 53 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 72nd percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “48% proficient” and call it done. Fowler deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fowler, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Fowler's low-income kids hit 67.7% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 63rd to the 72nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 200 high schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 48% of students meet the standard today, above the 37% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 55% | 56% | 62% | 68% | 70% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 20% | 30% | 21% | 26% | 26% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 48 are proficient by 11th grade → 97 graduate → 45 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
Fowler's most underrated number
67.7% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 7 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Fowler High in Fowler, 67.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Fowler High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 26.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (66.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 50.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 158 students tested.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$626 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 27% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Fowler High a good high school?
What are Fowler High's CAASPP test scores?
How does Fowler High rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Fowler High?
How does Fowler High compare to other schools in Fowler?
How does Fowler High serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 201 | 35% | 35% | 19% | 10% | 70% | +23 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 202 | 5% | 20% | 27% | 47% | 26% | +2 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 203 | 4% | 23% | 65% | 8% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 158 | 67.7% | +26 | +29 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 160 | 66.9% | +25 | +28 |
| Students with Disabilities | 25 | 20.0% | +9 | +3 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fowler High ← | — | 53 | 20.4% | 48.0% | — | 2.3% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 52 | 63 | #765 | 13.0% | 37.3% | 10.8% | 1.9% | — |
| 2022 | 51 | 71 | #604 | 18.5% | 43.1% | 27.1% | 5.9% | — |
| 2023 | 51 | 69 | #667 | 18.1% | 41.8% | 23.9% | 6.7% | — |
| 2024 | 53 | 73 | #589 | 19.8% | 46.9% | 23.6% | 4.7% | — |
| 2025 | 53 | 72 | #611 | 20.4% | 48.0% | 21.4% | 2.3% | — |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 10.9% | 22.9% | +12.0pp |
| Male | 7.6% | 18.4% | +10.8pp |
| Asian | 2.5% | 12.2% | +9.7pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 10.0% | 21.6% | +11.6pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 19.7% | 26.2% | +6.5pp |
| English Learners | 4.4% | 19.6% | +15.2pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 9.5% | 23.9% | +14.4pp |
| All Students | 9.3% | 20.6% | +11.3pp |
| Homeless | — | 18.8% | — |
| Military-Connected | — | 37.5% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction