Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet posts 68% meeting the standard, and 38.6% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 65 | 39% | 68% | -1.2 | 10.6% | 0.4% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet scores 65 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 88th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.
Most rating sites would stop at “68% proficient” and call it done. Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet deserves a closer read. It sits at the 88th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 88th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 68% of students meet the standard today, above the 64% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 61% | 55% | 60% | 53% | 69% |
| Grade 4 | 66% | 67% | 55% | 62% | 64% |
| Grade 5 | 78% | 64% | 67% | 61% | 76% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 62% | 60% | 61% | 64% | 70% |
| Grade 4 | 62% | 64% | 53% | 68% | 70% |
| Grade 5 | 57% | 46% | 55% | 53% | 61% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 14.6pp across grades; the floor rises 7.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet in San Jose, 46.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet outperforms its district average for low-income students by 19.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (32.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (58.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 42.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 76 students tested.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 10.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.7pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$456 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 56% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet a good elementary school?
What are Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet's CAASPP test scores?
How does Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet rank in California?
Is Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet?
How does Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet compare to other schools in San Jose?
How does Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 76
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 47
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 105 | 48% | 21% | 14% | 17% | 69% | +25 |
| Grade 4 | 105 | 32% | 31% | 20% | 16% | 64% | +19 |
| Grade 5 | 109 | 33% | 43% | 12% | 12% | 76% | +28 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 105 | 43% | 28% | 15% | 14% | 70% | +25 |
| Grade 4 | 105 | 36% | 33% | 19% | 11% | 70% | +28 |
| Grade 5 | 109 | 39% | 21% | 23% | 17% | 61% | +25 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 110 | 25% | 31% | 41% | 3% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 76 | 46.1% | +20 | +8 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 99 | 58.6% | +28 | +20 |
| White | 96 | 74.0% | +3 | +12 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hacienda Science/Environmental Magnet ← | — | 65 | 38.6% | 68.2% | −1.2 | 0.4% |
| Oster Elementary | 2.2 mi | 80 | 57.9% | 78.3% | +2.1 | 1.2% |
| Bagby Elementary | 2.2 mi | 75 | 49.8% | 73.5% | +11.9 | 0.3% |
| Hammer Montessori at Galarza Elementary | 2.3 mi | 72 | 43.3% | 72.2% | +0.2 | 1.0% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 65 | 86 | #785 | 36.2% | 64.3% | 6.6% | 0.1% | +5.8pp |
| 2022 | 52 | 80 | #1168 | 28.9% | 59.1% | 14.1% | 0.6% | -2.5pp |
| 2023 | 58 | 82 | #1031 | 31.1% | 58.4% | 15.9% | 0.6% | +0.6pp |
| 2024 | 62 | 84 | #898 | 34.2% | 60.2% | 14.2% | 0.6% | -1.8pp |
| 2025 | 65 | 88 | #705 | 38.6% | 68.2% | 10.6% | 0.4% | -1.2pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 5.9% | 8.8% | +2.9pp |
| Male | 7.0% | 11.8% | +4.8pp |
| Asian | 3.9% | 6.8% | +2.9pp |
| Black/African American | 0.0% | 23.8% | +23.8pp |
| White | 0.0% | 18.8% | +18.8pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 9.8% | 15.7% | +5.9pp |
| Two or More Races | 1.4% | 7.1% | +5.7pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 12.1% | 19.3% | +7.2pp |
| English Learners | 9.7% | 16.7% | +7.0pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 11.7% | 20.4% | +8.7pp |
| All Students | 6.5% | 10.3% | +3.8pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction