ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Jaime Escalante Elementary · Cudahy

Jaime Escalante Elementary: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Jaime Escalante posts 45% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

4443 Live Oak Street, 90201 (opens in new tab)·Los Angeles Unified·Cudahy·Grades TK-6·453 students·95% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(323) 890-2340·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5345
% Exceeded20%21%
% Met+45%43%
Growth+9.3-2.9
Absence8.7%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
53
🚀 Growth Engine · Solid
ranked #1,564 statewide · #160 of 580 in Los Angeles Unified

Jaime Escalante Elementary scores 53 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 73rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “45% proficient” and call it done. Jaime Escalante deserves a closer read. The school sits in Cudahy, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 8.7% chronic absenteeism — versus 17.9% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 34th to the 73rd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 2100 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 45% of students meet the standard today, above the 32% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 327%35%46%40%38%
Grade 455%42%33%46%40%
Grade 526%48%51%46%54%
Grade 664%45%53%73%52%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 329%40%41%51%45%
Grade 439%33%38%51%46%
Grade 515%33%37%42%47%
Grade 644%29%31%52%42%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

16%
21%
63%
Grade 3 · 37% proficient
16%
24%
60%
Grade 4 · 40% proficient
21%
34%
45%
Grade 5 · 55% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 4.2pp across grades; the floor rises 16.7pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
20.1%
State 21.3%
1.3pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+9.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
45.1%
State 42.7%
2.5pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
8.7%
State 17.9%
9.3pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
19.3%
State 18.0%
1.4pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Jaime Escalante Elementary in Cudahy, 45.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Jaime Escalante Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (46.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 216 students tested.

All students at this school: 46% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 46%, district —, state 43%46%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 46%, district 36%, state 32%46% · +0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 45%, district 36%, state 32%45% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 52%, district 42%, state 44%52% · +6 vs school
MaleMale: this school 39%, district 41%, state 42%39% · −7 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 15%, district 9%, state 11%15% · −31 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: too few students to report‹11
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 14.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 8.7%, district 24.5%, state 17.9%8.7% · −9.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (10.1% vs 6.2%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–66.2%
TK/K10.1%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 20:121:1
Teaching staff22 teachers
Avg. experience21.1 years
Fully credentialed92%
Intern / emergency permit6.9%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $33,364, CA average $14,815$33,364 · spent at this school
Federal share$3,382 per student

$3,382 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic99.3%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
Other0.4%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
White0.2%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 95.1% (31pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$61K · CA $85K
Median home value$569K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+8% · CA 35%
ZIP population92,763
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 32% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Jaime Escalante Elementary a good elementary school?

Jaime Escalante Elementary has a Scope Score of 53 out of 100, placing it in the 73rd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,564 statewide. 20.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Jaime Escalante Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 45.1% of students at Jaime Escalante Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 20.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 20.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 370 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Jaime Escalante Elementary rank in California?

Jaime Escalante Elementary ranks #1,564 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 73rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Jaime Escalante Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Jaime Escalante Elementary increases by 9.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Jaime Escalante Elementary?

8.7% of students at Jaime Escalante Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Jaime Escalante Elementary compare to other schools in Cudahy?

Jaime Escalante Elementary scores 53/100 (73rd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 453 students. Use the schools in Cudahy page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Jaime Escalante Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Jaime Escalante Elementary in Cudahy, 45.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Jaime Escalante Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (46.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 216 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
20.1%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 49th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+9.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 67th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
45.1%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 52th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
8.7%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 65th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
19.3%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 52th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36116%21%25%38%38%−6
Grade 45516%24%22%38%40%−5
Grade 56821%34%16%29%54%+7
Grade 64831%21%27%21%52%+6
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36216%29%27%27%45%−1
Grade 45621%25%29%25%46%+5
Grade 56829%18%24%29%47%+12
Grade 64821%21%23%35%42%+7
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/116810%22%53%15%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21645.4%+4+7
Hispanic/Latino23246.1%+5+7
English Learners397.7%+1−3
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Jaime Escalante Elementary ←5320.1%45.1%+9.30.1%
Aspire Firestone Academy Charter1.1 mi6115.2%41.5%+9.20.1%
Maywood Elementary1.8 mi5927.2%54.3%−4.70.1%
Heliotrope Avenue Elementary1.4 mi5619.3%47.4%+12.70.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193634#36289.1%31.9%9.3%0.0%-7.5pp
20224366#192515.3%38.6%37.0%0.0%+2.4pp
20234461#222518.3%41.0%20.5%0.0%-0.0pp
20245069#177419.4%46.0%15.7%0.1%-1.5pp
20255373#156420.1%45.1%8.7%0.1%+9.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female7.6%7.7%+0.1pp
Male10.7%8.0%-2.7pp
Hispanic/Latino9.5%7.7%-1.8pp
Students with Disabilities27.0%21.2%-5.8pp
English Learners12.3%7.3%-5.0pp
Foster Youth6.3%
Homeless44.4%12.5%-31.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.1%7.8%-1.3pp
All Students9.3%7.9%-1.4pp
Military-Connected7.7%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction