ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Innovation Middle · San Diego

Innovation Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Innovation posts 37% meeting the standard and 14.4% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

5095 Arvinels Avenue, 92117 (opens in new tab)·San Diego Unified·San Diego·Grades 6-8·350 students·80% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(858) 278-5948·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4043
% Exceeded14%17%
% Met+37%39%
Growth+12.3+1.5
Absence25.9%18.5%
Suspension5.9%3.7%
Scope Score
40
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #1,169 statewide · #33 of 58 in San Diego Unified

Innovation Middle scores 40 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 48th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “37% proficient” and call it done. Innovation deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Diego, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 14th to the 48th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 500 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 37% of students meet the standard today, above the 32% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 639%49%43%22%43%
Grade 739%51%53%63%39%
Grade 833%47%43%54%60%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 633%20%27%13%29%
Grade 728%15%29%44%15%
Grade 818%20%16%33%37%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

19%
24%
57%
Grade 6 · 43% proficient
9%
30%
61%
Grade 7 · 39% proficient
19%
41%
40%
Grade 8 · 60% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 17.3pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
14.4%
State 16.8%
2.4pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+12.3pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
37.1%
State 39.3%
2.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
25.9%
State 18.5%
7.4pp above state avg
Suspension rate
5.9%
State 3.7%
2.2pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
26.5%
State 18.0%
8.6pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Innovation Middle in San Diego, 44.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Innovation Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 279 students tested.

All students at this school: 39% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 39%, district —, state 39%39%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 33%, district 36%, state 32%33% · −5 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 30%, district 35%, state 32%30% · −9 vs school
MaleMale: this school 36%, district 50%, state 42%36% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 42%, district 51%, state 44%42% · +3 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 15%, district 21%, state 15%15% · −24 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 51%, district 71%, state 56%51% · +12 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 10%, district 10%, state 11%10% · −28 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 35%, district 23%, state 22%35% · −3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 82%, district 72%, state 72%82% · +43 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 45%, district 63%, state 56%45% · +7 vs school

5 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 18.9pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +0.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 25.9%, district 20.8%, state 18.5%25.9% · +7.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 5.9%, district —, state 3.7%5.9% · +2.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–625.5%
Grades 7–826.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 17:1, district 23:117:1
Teaching staff23 teachers
Avg. experience17.7 years
Fully credentialed87%
First-year teachers4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$55,375 – $124,275
Principal salary$0 – $187,294
Superintendent salary$300,404

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $22,468, CA average $14,815$22,468 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,281 per student

$1,281 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,967 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support12%
Student services12%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance7%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,976 per pupil
2019$14,540 per pupil
2018$14,457 per pupil
2017$11,416 per pupil
2016$11,708 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic58.3%
District 47.0% · CA 56.1%
White16.0%
District 22.9% · CA 19.9%
Other12.6%
District 13.8% · CA 9.0%
Asian8.9%
District 8.7% · CA 10.2%
Black4.3%
District 7.5% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 80.0% (16pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$104K · CA $85K
Median home value$981K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+52% · CA 35%
ZIP population52,275
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 350 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 47% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Innovation Middle a good middle school?

Innovation Middle has a Scope Score of 40 out of 100, placing it in the 48th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,169 statewide. 14.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 2.4 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Innovation Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 37.1% of students at Innovation Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 14.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 22.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 14.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 692 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Innovation Middle rank in California?

Innovation Middle ranks #1,169 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 48th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Innovation Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Innovation Middle increases by 12.3 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Innovation Middle?

25.9% of students at Innovation Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 5.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Innovation Middle compare to other schools in San Diego?

Innovation Middle scores 40/100 (48th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 350 students. Use the schools in San Diego page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Innovation Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Innovation Middle in San Diego, 44.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Innovation Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 279 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
14.4%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 47th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+12.3pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 50th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
37.1%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 48th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
25.9%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 40th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
5.9%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 41th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
26.5%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 57th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 69619%24%31%26%43%−4
Grade 7989%30%26%36%39%−9
Grade 815019%41%19%21%60%+14
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 69918%11%21%49%29%−6
Grade 7995%10%32%53%15%−19
Grade 815017%20%21%42%37%+4
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1115023%23%39%15%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged27944.8%+2+7
Hispanic/Latino20139.8%−1+1
Students with Disabilities7520.0%−3+3
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Innovation Middle ←4014.4%37.1%+12.35.9%
Standley Middle2 mi6140.6%66.5%−8.12.0%
Marston Middle2.6 mi5327.5%54.7%−1.05.0%
High Tech Middle Mesa1.6 mi4017.0%46.4%−7.70.7%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192514#171712.8%31.8%13.3%10.9%-10.7pp
20223338#13328.6%33.6%28.5%1.7%-0.6pp
20233226#160410.9%35.1%23.7%2.7%-6.0pp
20244363#81913.7%38.0%26.4%6.7%+26.0pp
20254048#116914.4%37.1%25.9%5.9%+12.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female14.8%26.1%+11.3pp
Male12.5%26.3%+13.8pp
Asian0.0%14.3%+14.3pp
Black/African American16.0%31.3%+15.3pp
Hispanic/Latino16.9%27.2%+10.3pp
Two or More Races11.1%26.5%+15.4pp
Students with Disabilities23.1%33.3%+10.2pp
English Learners15.4%29.8%+14.4pp
Homeless22.0%37.5%+15.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16.4%27.0%+10.6pp
All Students13.3%26.2%+12.9pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction