ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Hughes Middle · Long Beach

Hughes Middle: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Hughes posts 49% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

3846 California Avenue, 90807 (opens in new tab)·Long Beach Unified·Long Beach·Grades 6-8·1,214 students·53% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(562) 595-0831
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4843
% Exceeded25%17%
% Met+49%39%
Growth+0.1+1.5
Absence18.1%18.5%
Suspension9.6%3.7%
Scope Score
48
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #752 statewide · #10 of 23 in Long Beach Unified

Hughes Middle scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 66th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “49% proficient” and call it done. Hughes deserves a closer read. The school sits in Long Beach, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 66th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 49% meet the standard today, versus 58% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 662%52%44%49%55%
Grade 765%50%54%49%60%
Grade 858%50%49%51%51%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 659%41%37%41%36%
Grade 752%40%42%45%51%
Grade 852%34%32%44%40%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

26%
29%
45%
Grade 6 · 55% proficient
28%
32%
40%
Grade 7 · 60% proficient
19%
32%
49%
Grade 8 · 51% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 6.8pp across grades; the floor slips 3.4pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
24.7%
State 16.8%
7.9pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+0.1pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
48.9%
State 39.3%
9.6pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.1%
State 18.5%
0.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
9.6%
State 3.7%
6.0pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
15.8%
State 18.0%
2.1pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Hughes Middle in Long Beach, 46.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hughes Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (32.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (46.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 53.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 638 students tested.

All students at this school: 49% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 49%, district —, state 39%49%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 40%, district 35%, state 32%40% · −9 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 51%, district 46%, state 44%51% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 47%, district 44%, state 42%47% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 40%, district 38%, state 32%40% · −9 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 31%, district 29%, state 26%31% · −18 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 14%, district 19%, state 15%14% · −35 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 70%, district 65%, state 72%70% · +21 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 77%, district 70%, state 56%77% · +28 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 76%, district 70%, state 65%76% · +27 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 63%, district 63%, state 56%63% · +14 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 2%, district 12%, state 11%2% · −47 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 38%, district 25%, state 22%38% · −11 vs school
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 1.0pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +5.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.1%, district 25.9%, state 18.5%18.1% · −0.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 9.6%, district —, state 3.7%9.6% · +6.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–616.7%
Grades 7–818.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 24:124:1
Teaching staff51 teachers
Avg. experience13.5 years
Fully credentialed85%
First-year teachers6%
Intern / emergency permit1.8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,703 – $137,718
Principal salary$163,293 – $190,880
Superintendent salary$421,034

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,204, CA average $14,815$17,204 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$541 per student

$541 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,199 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support13%
Student services11%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,498 per pupil
2019$12,985 per pupil
2018$13,175 per pupil
2017$12,489 per pupil
2016$12,227 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic48.7%
District 59.2% · CA 56.1%
Black17.1%
District 12.0% · CA 4.8%
Other16.1%
District 9.9% · CA 9.0%
Asian10.1%
District 7.0% · CA 10.2%
White8.1%
District 11.8% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 52.9% (11pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$104K · CA $85K
Median home value$885K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+47% · CA 35%
ZIP population33,101
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 35% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hughes Middle a good middle school?

Hughes Middle has a Scope Score of 48 out of 100, placing it in the 66th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #752 statewide. 24.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 7.9 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Hughes Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 48.9% of students at Hughes Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 24.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 24.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,317 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Hughes Middle rank in California?

Hughes Middle ranks #752 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 66th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Hughes Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Hughes Middle increases by 0.1 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Hughes Middle?

18.1% of students at Hughes Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 9.6%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Hughes Middle compare to other schools in Long Beach?

Hughes Middle scores 48/100 (66th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,214 students. Use the schools in Long Beach page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Hughes Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Hughes Middle in Long Beach, 46.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hughes Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (32.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (46.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 53.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 638 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
24.7%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 59th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+0.1pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 51th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
48.9%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 58th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.1%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
9.6%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 26th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
15.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 43th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 639126%29%24%22%55%+8
Grade 738828%32%20%20%60%+12
Grade 838419%32%22%27%51%+5
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 639021%15%26%37%36%+1
Grade 738231%20%21%28%51%+17
Grade 838223%17%23%37%40%+8
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1138910%25%56%9%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged63846.6%+5+8
Hispanic/Latino56346.5%+2+8
Black/African American20238.6%+3+6
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Hughes Middle ←4824.7%48.9%+0.19.6%
Intellectual Virtues Academy of Long Beach0.5 mi5526.9%56.3%+3.42.5%
Stephens Middle2.4 mi4316.9%44.1%+6.811.2%
Hoover Middle2 mi3914.0%35.2%−3.27.9%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194972#55530.3%58.2%7.9%7.1%-5.6pp
20224058#90919.3%44.5%23.4%3.2%-4.4pp
20234663#79818.9%42.9%19.3%11.9%+0.6pp
20244363#82920.2%46.5%16.2%9.1%+2.7pp
20254866#75224.7%48.9%18.1%9.6%+0.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female7.9%18.1%+10.2pp
Male8.0%18.1%+10.1pp
Asian2.2%10.6%+8.4pp
Black/African American6.4%22.4%+16.0pp
Filipino13.7%
White2.3%7.9%+5.6pp
Hispanic/Latino10.0%18.8%+8.8pp
Pacific Islander24.0%36.8%+12.8pp
Two or More Races4.8%20.5%+15.7pp
Students with Disabilities12.2%30.9%+18.7pp
English Learners17.2%29.7%+12.5pp
Foster Youth10.0%33.3%+23.3pp
Homeless9.7%24.7%+15.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.9%23.9%+14.0pp
All Students7.9%18.1%+10.2pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction