ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary · Sacramento

Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Hubert H. Bancroft posts 34% meeting the standard and 15.2% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

2929 Belmar Street, 95826 (opens in new tab)·Sacramento City Unified·Sacramento·Grades TK-6·408 students·55% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(916) 395-4595
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3645
% Exceeded15%21%
% Met+34%43%
Growth-7.1-2.9
Absence31.0%17.9%
Suspension3.9%1.6%
Scope Score
36
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,897 statewide · #25 of 58 in Sacramento City Unified

Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary scores 36 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 32nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “34% proficient” and call it done. Hubert H. Bancroft deserves a closer read. The school sits in Sacramento, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 42nd to the 32nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 34% meet the standard today, versus 44% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 355%28%21%24%31%
Grade 443%19%35%25%42%
Grade 541%46%26%47%41%
Grade 649%47%53%44%44%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 349%36%29%30%40%
Grade 443%22%32%30%36%
Grade 531%31%25%29%16%
Grade 641%38%43%34%40%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

19%
12%
69%
Grade 3 · 31% proficient
18%
24%
58%
Grade 4 · 42% proficient
15%
25%
60%
Grade 5 · 40% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 3.9pp across grades; the floor rises 9.8pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
15.2%
State 21.3%
6.2pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-7.1pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
34.2%
State 42.7%
8.4pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
31.0%
State 17.9%
13.1pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.9%
State 1.6%
2.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
10.9%
State 18.0%
7.1pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary in Sacramento, 29.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 0.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.4% Math proficient); White students (54.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.0 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 126 students tested.

All students at this school: 36% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 36%, district —, state 43%36%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 26%, district 25%, state 32%26% · −9 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 37%, district 37%, state 44%37% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 34%, district 35%, state 42%34% · −2 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 53%, district 56%, state 56%53% · +17 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 24%, district 28%, state 32%24% · −12 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 23%, district 16%, state 15%23% · −13 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 18%, district 10%, state 11%18% · −18 vs school

7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +2.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 31.0%, district 25.5%, state 17.9%31.0% · +13.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.9%, district —, state 1.6%3.9% · +2.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–633.7%
TK/K42.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff20 teachers
Avg. experience18.8 years
Fully credentialed81%
First-year teachers5%
Intern / emergency permit5.3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$61,429 – $132,487
Principal salary$161,216 – $185,549
Superintendent salary$325,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $23,867, CA average $14,815$23,867 · spent at this school
Federal share$409 per student

$409 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$24,421 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support13%
Student services12%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,654 per pupil
2019$13,792 per pupil
2018$14,667 per pupil
2017$12,722 per pupil
2016$11,601 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White36.3%
District 17.3% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic34.3%
District 42.2% · CA 56.1%
Other12.8%
District 12.3% · CA 9.0%
Black12.3%
District 12.1% · CA 4.8%
Asian4.4%
District 16.2% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 55.4% (8pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$82K · CA $85K
Median home value$463K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+36% · CA 35%
ZIP population40,165
Median age34 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 24% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary a good elementary school?

Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary has a Scope Score of 36 out of 100, placing it in the 32nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,897 statewide. 15.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.2 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 34.2% of students at Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 15.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 19.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 15.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 362 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary rank in California?

Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary ranks #3,897 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 32nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary decreases by 7.1 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary?

31.0% of students at Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary compare to other schools in Sacramento?

Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary scores 36/100 (32nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 408 students. Use the schools in Sacramento page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary in Sacramento, 29.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 0.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.4% Math proficient); White students (54.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.0 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 126 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
15.2%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 44th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-7.1pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 48th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
34.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 44th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
31.0%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 29th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.9%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 31th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
10.9%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 41th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36819%12%31%38%31%−12
Grade 45518%24%16%42%42%−3
Grade 55915%25%15%44%41%−7
Grade 64524%20%27%29%44%−2
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36813%26%22%38%40%−6
Grade 45516%20%27%36%36%−5
Grade 5579%7%33%51%16%−20
Grade 64527%13%24%36%40%+5
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11598%15%56%20%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12629.4%−0−9
White8854.5%−6−7
Hispanic/Latino7925.3%−7−14
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Hubert H. Bancroft Elementary ←3615.2%34.2%−7.13.9%
Mariemont Elementary2.8 mi5433.9%64.5%+1.11.2%
California Montessori Project - Capitol Campus0.7 mi5027.3%48.4%−6.71.7%
Golden Empire Elementary1.4 mi4918.1%47.1%+6.83.4%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193942#316917.1%43.8%15.1%2.1%-15.6pp
20223548#297610.8%30.3%46.4%2.2%+6.5pp
20233335#370312.0%27.9%31.9%2.6%+0.5pp
20243428#411013.1%30.6%29.9%5.9%+10.9pp
20253632#389715.2%34.2%31.0%3.9%-7.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female19.1%27.4%+8.3pp
Male11.7%36.8%+25.1pp
Asian14.8%31.8%+17.0pp
Black/African American21.6%61.5%+39.9pp
Hispanic/Latino22.8%39.2%+16.4pp
Two or More Races15.7%22.0%+6.3pp
Students with Disabilities15.7%38.9%+23.2pp
English Learners28.6%35.2%+6.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged22.9%42.1%+19.2pp
All Students15.2%32.1%+16.9pp
Homeless82.9%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction