ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Hans Christensen Middle · Menifee

Hans Christensen Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Hans Christensen posts 35% meeting the standard and 10.9% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

27625 Sherman Road, 92586 (opens in new tab)·Menifee Union·Menifee·Grades 6-8·369 students·73% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 679-8356·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3343
% Exceeded11%17%
% Met+35%39%
Growth-3.0+1.5
Absence16.8%18.5%
Suspension10.3%3.7%
Scope Score
33
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,571 statewide · #7 of 7 in Menifee Union

Hans Christensen Middle scores 33 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 30th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “35% proficient” and call it done. Hans Christensen deserves a closer read. The school sits in Menifee, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 29.4% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 45th to the 30th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathGreen(Increased)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 35% meet the standard today, versus 42% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 651%41%42%50%51%
Grade 756%31%41%50%39%
Grade 854%38%38%39%48%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 633%21%30%13%26%
Grade 731%25%24%19%22%
Grade 827%16%16%25%23%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

18%
33%
49%
Grade 6 · 51% proficient
10%
29%
61%
Grade 7 · 39% proficient
18%
30%
52%
Grade 8 · 48% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor slips 3.1pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
10.9%
State 16.8%
5.9pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-3.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
34.7%
State 39.3%
4.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.8%
State 18.5%
1.7pp below state avg
Suspension rate
10.3%
State 3.7%
6.7pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
29.4%
State 18.0%
11.4pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Hans Christensen Middle in Menifee, 42.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hans Christensen Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 0.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.0 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 257 students tested.

All students at this school: 35% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 35%, district —, state 39%35%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 31%, district 39%, state 32%31% · −4 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 34%, district 38%, state 32%34% · −0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 29%, district 42%, state 42%29% · −5 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 41%, district 44%, state 44%41% · +6 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 43%, district 49%, state 56%43% · +8 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 40%, district 49%, state 56%40% · +5 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 4%, district 14%, state 15%4% · −31 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 7%, district 30%, state 26%7% · −27 vs school

7 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.1pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +0.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 16.8%, district 11.9%, state 18.5%16.8% · −1.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 10.3%, district —, state 3.7%10.3% · +6.7pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.4%
Grades 7–818.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 24:122:1
Teaching staff17 teachers
Avg. experience15.5 years
Fully credentialed82%
Intern / emergency permit0.2%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$56,891 – $135,681
Principal salary$178,747 – $0
Superintendent salary$331,219

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,939, CA average $14,491$20,939 · spent at this school
Federal share$37 per student

$37 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,556 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction65%
Instruction support12%
Student services9%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,823 per pupil
2019$10,905 per pupil
2018$10,434 per pupil
2017$10,282 per pupil
2016$9,729 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic56.1%
District 51.5% · CA 56.1%
Other18.7%
District 17.0% · CA 9.0%
White15.2%
District 23.5% · CA 19.9%
Black8.4%
District 5.7% · CA 4.8%
Asian1.6%
District 2.3% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 73.4% (10pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$58K · CA $85K
Median home value$382K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+15% · CA 35%
ZIP population20,767
Median age58 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 369 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 31% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hans Christensen Middle a good middle school?

Hans Christensen Middle has a Scope Score of 33 out of 100, placing it in the 30th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,571 statewide. 10.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.9 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Hans Christensen Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 34.7% of students at Hans Christensen Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 681 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Hans Christensen Middle rank in California?

Hans Christensen Middle ranks #1,571 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 30th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Hans Christensen Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Hans Christensen Middle decreases by 3.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Hans Christensen Middle?

16.8% of students at Hans Christensen Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 10.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Hans Christensen Middle compare to other schools in Menifee?

Hans Christensen Middle scores 33/100 (30th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 369 students. Use the schools in Menifee page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Hans Christensen Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Hans Christensen Middle in Menifee, 42.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hans Christensen Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 0.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.0 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 257 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
10.9%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 44th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-3.0pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 37th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
34.7%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 46th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
16.8%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 52th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
10.3%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 23th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
29.4%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 61th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 611818%33%24%25%51%+4
Grade 710910%29%29%31%39%−8
Grade 811318%30%27%26%48%+2
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61179%16%30%44%26%−9
Grade 71104%18%25%53%22%−12
Grade 81147%16%30%47%23%−9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111174%27%56%13%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged25742.4%−1+4
Hispanic/Latino18947.3%+4+8
White5052.0%−0−10
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Hans Christensen Middle ←3310.9%34.7%−3.010.3%
Ethan A Chase Middle2.2 mi317.7%27.0%−2.55.6%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193745#110312.8%41.8%11.2%1.3%-1.6pp
20222518#17667.6%28.6%36.5%2.3%-4.2pp
20233125#16399.0%31.9%29.2%4.5%-8.8pp
20243337#13847.9%32.4%20.6%7.5%+1.0pp
20253330#157110.9%34.7%16.8%10.3%-3.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female11.9%17.4%+5.5pp
Male10.4%16.0%+5.6pp
Asian5.6%
Black/African American12.5%10.8%-1.7pp
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino11.2%15.6%+4.4pp
Pacific Islander0.0%
Two or More Races13.9%27.8%+13.9pp
Students with Disabilities17.9%15.3%-2.6pp
English Learners5.5%20.8%+15.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.5%18.0%+4.5pp
All Students11.2%16.7%+5.5pp
Filipino7.9%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction