ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Bell Mountain Middle · Menifee

Bell Mountain Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Bell Mountain posts 38% meeting the standard and 12.3% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

28525 La Piedra Drive, 92584 (opens in new tab)·Menifee Union·Menifee·Grades 6-8·1,066 students·62% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 301-8496·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3443
% Exceeded12%17%
% Met+38%39%
Growth-11.0+1.5
Absence18.0%18.5%
Suspension4.8%3.7%
Scope Score
34
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,515 statewide · #6 of 7 in Menifee Union

Bell Mountain Middle scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 32nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “38% proficient” and call it done. Bell Mountain deserves a closer read. The school sits in Menifee, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 72nd to the 32nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Maintained)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 38% meet the standard today, versus 55% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 660%43%41%45%51%
Grade 764%51%41%41%38%
Grade 862%56%45%43%42%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 642%31%39%28%40%
Grade 752%35%35%33%29%
Grade 848%32%23%29%27%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

18%
33%
49%
Grade 6 · 51% proficient
9%
29%
62%
Grade 7 · 38% proficient
10%
32%
58%
Grade 8 · 42% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 8.1pp across grades; the floor slips 9.0pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
12.3%
State 16.8%
4.6pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-11.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
37.6%
State 39.3%
1.7pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.0%
State 18.5%
0.5pp below state avg
Suspension rate
4.8%
State 3.7%
1.1pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
21.8%
State 18.0%
3.8pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Bell Mountain Middle in Menifee, 39.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Bell Mountain Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 3.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 624 students tested.

All students at this school: 38% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 38%, district —, state 39%38%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 33%, district 39%, state 32%33% · −4 vs school
MaleMale: this school 36%, district 42%, state 42%36% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 39%, district 44%, state 44%39% · +1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 31%, district 38%, state 32%31% · −7 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 43%, district 49%, state 56%43% · +5 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 42%, district 49%, state 56%42% · +5 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 14%, state 15%8% · −29 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 37%, district 47%, state 46%37% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 10%, district 12%, state 11%10% · −27 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 17%, district 30%, state 26%17% · −20 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 72%, district 67%, state 65%72% · +35 vs school

5 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 13.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +0.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.0%, district 11.9%, state 18.5%18.0% · −0.5pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.8%, district —, state 3.7%4.8% · +1.1pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.0%
Grades 7–818.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 24:125:1
Teaching staff43 teachers
Avg. experience15.5 years
Fully credentialed82%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$56,891 – $135,681
Principal salary$178,747 – $0
Superintendent salary$331,219

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,404, CA average $14,491$17,404 · spent at this school
Federal share$21 per student

$21 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,556 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction65%
Instruction support12%
Student services9%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,823 per pupil
2019$10,905 per pupil
2018$10,434 per pupil
2017$10,282 per pupil
2016$9,729 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic46.6%
District 51.5% · CA 56.1%
Other26.4%
District 17.0% · CA 9.0%
White19.5%
District 23.5% · CA 19.9%
Black4.9%
District 5.7% · CA 4.8%
Asian2.5%
District 2.3% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 61.6% (2pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$114K · CA $85K
Median home value$599K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+28% · CA 35%
ZIP population61,366
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 32% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Bell Mountain Middle a good middle school?

Bell Mountain Middle has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100, placing it in the 32nd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,515 statewide. 12.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.6 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Bell Mountain Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 37.6% of students at Bell Mountain Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 12.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 12.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,009 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Bell Mountain Middle rank in California?

Bell Mountain Middle ranks #1,515 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 32nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Bell Mountain Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Bell Mountain Middle decreases by 11.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Bell Mountain Middle?

18.0% of students at Bell Mountain Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 4.8%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Bell Mountain Middle compare to other schools in Menifee?

Bell Mountain Middle scores 34/100 (32nd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,066 students. Use the schools in Menifee page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Bell Mountain Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Bell Mountain Middle in Menifee, 39.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Bell Mountain Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 3.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 624 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
12.3%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 45th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-11.0pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 34th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
37.6%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 49th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.0%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.8%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 45th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
21.8%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 51th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 633818%33%26%23%51%+4
Grade 73439%29%31%31%38%−10
Grade 832210%32%29%29%42%−4
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 634216%23%30%30%40%+5
Grade 734211%18%30%42%29%−5
Grade 832210%17%26%48%27%−6
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/113219%23%54%14%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged62439.9%−3+2
Hispanic/Latino46936.2%−7−3
Two or More Races23047.8%−6−14
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Bell Mountain Middle ←3412.3%37.6%−11.04.8%
Menifee Valley Middle2.6 mi4816.9%43.4%+3.95.0%
Ethan A Chase Middle2.9 mi317.7%27.0%−2.55.6%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194972#56420.9%54.8%10.1%3.1%+3.7pp
20224058#90813.8%41.6%27.1%7.3%+6.4pp
20233639#132911.6%37.3%21.8%8.2%-6.2pp
20243645#121212.5%36.4%17.7%5.7%-0.5pp
20253432#151512.3%37.6%18.0%4.8%-11.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.1%17.8%+7.7pp
Male10.0%18.2%+8.2pp
Asian5.6%0.0%-5.6pp
Black/African American9.7%15.1%+5.4pp
White2.6%2.6%+0.0pp
Hispanic/Latino9.7%19.2%+9.5pp
Pacific Islander27.3%
Two or More Races11.8%25.8%+14.0pp
Students with Disabilities18.0%24.9%+6.9pp
English Learners18.0%20.3%+2.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.4%20.8%+6.4pp
All Students10.1%18.0%+7.9pp
Filipino16.0%
Foster Youth27.3%
Homeless21.1%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction