California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Crescenthigher than 97 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Crescenthigher than 97 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 78% and 80% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 366
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
58%
Proficient
22%
Below Proficient
20%
80% proficient or advanced · 366 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
58%
21%
28%
Proficient
22%
21%
24%
Developing
12%
25%
24%
Minimal
8%
33%
24%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
English
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
60%
Proficient
27%
Below Proficient
13%
87% proficient or advanced · 145 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
60%
20%
29%
Proficient
27%
28%
34%
Developing
10%
24%
22%
Minimal
3%
28%
15%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
65%
Proficient
18%
Below Proficient
17%
83% proficient or advanced · 145 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
65%
21%
32%
Proficient
18%
16%
18%
Developing
15%
25%
25%
Minimal
2%
38%
25%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
What these tests tell you · what to ask
Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.
Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?
Things worth knowing
Open a finding for the evidence
In 2025, students in grades 4–6 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Accelerated.grades 4–6 · 2025
students with scores in both years in grades 4–6: 389
Comparison
389 students in grades 4–6 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
About 3 in 5 reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2026
59%English · exceeded the standard58%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 366
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Low-income students here (139 tested, grades 3–6, spring 2026) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (36% and 30%).grades 3–6 · spring 2026
68%English · met or exceeded69%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 3–6: 139
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 139 students.
Comparisons & progress
Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.
Same grades, same year
How does this school compare?
English
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school78%
California46%
Tested: 366 here · 1,208,894 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school78%
Orange Unified56%
Tested: 366 here · 4,966 in Orange Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 27 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
59%
24%
32%
Proficient
19%
22%
24%
Developing
14%
21%
21%
Minimal
8%
33%
23%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school80%
California42%
Tested: 366 here · 1,211,701 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school80%
Orange Unified52%
Tested: 366 here · 4,974 in Orange Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 27 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
58%
21%
28%
Proficient
22%
21%
24%
Developing
12%
25%
24%
Minimal
8%
33%
24%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
English
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school87%
California48%
Tested: 145 here · 415,439 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school87%
Orange Unified63%
Tested: 145 here · 1,779 in Orange Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 27 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
60%
20%
29%
Proficient
27%
28%
34%
Developing
10%
24%
22%
Minimal
3%
28%
15%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grade 6Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school83%
California37%
Tested: 145 here · 415,904 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school83%
Orange Unified50%
Tested: 145 here · 1,783 in Orange Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 27 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Orange Unified
Advanced
65%
21%
32%
Proficient
18%
16%
18%
Developing
15%
25%
25%
Minimal
2%
38%
25%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Progress over time
How have test results changed?
English
Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
Grades 3–5 are well above California. Grade 6 are also well above it.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 3–5
CrescentCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID78%46%
CrescentCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5
CrescentCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID80%42%
CrescentCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 79% in 2017 to 78% in 2026. Math went from 77% in 2017 to 80% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Crescent
California
2015
71% 364 tested
41% 1,396,572 tested
2016
75% 371 tested
45% 1,395,534 tested
2017
79% 374 tested
45% 1,384,680 tested
2018
86% 356 tested
49% 1,346,907 tested
2019
81% 354 tested
50% 1,332,547 tested
2022
80% 361 tested
45% 1,260,830 tested
2023
86% 389 tested
44% 1,247,801 tested
2024
80% 389 tested
45% 1,235,509 tested
2025
85% 370 tested
46% 1,232,086 tested
2026
78% 366 tested
46% 1,208,894 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Crescent
California
2015
68% 364 tested
35% 1,401,446 tested
2016
71% 370 tested
39% 1,401,413 tested
2017
77% 374 tested
40% 1,392,040 tested
2018
81% 355 tested
42% 1,352,321 tested
2019
81% 354 tested
44% 1,338,625 tested
2022
79% 361 tested
38% 1,265,943 tested
2023
80% 389 tested
40% 1,256,519 tested
2024
82% 388 tested
41% 1,249,262 tested
2025
81% 370 tested
41% 1,241,652 tested
2026
80% 366 tested
42% 1,211,701 tested
The state’s growth measure389 students · grades 4–6 · 2025
English+16ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+15ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 16 points above that prediction, and in math 15 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
School pattern, spring 2026High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.
School pattern, spring 2026Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.
Life at school
Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
5 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
12in 100 at the average Orange Unified school17in 100 at the average California elementary school
45 of 841 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school5 in 100
at the average Orange Unified school12 in 100
at the average California elementary school17 in 100
0.2%of students were suspended at least once (2 of 844), 2025–26
0.2%at the average Orange Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school
Reviews & community voices
Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace
Parent voices
Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Teacher & staff voices
School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.
Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 3–6 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
139 tested per subject
English
68% / 36%
Math
69% / 30%
Asian
158 tested per subject
English
92% / 71%
Math
95% / 71%
White
157 tested per subject
English
76% / 60%
Math
77% / 54%
Hispanic or Latino
101 tested per subject
English
62% / 37%
Math
57% / 30%
Two or more races
72 tested per subject
English
92% / 60%
Math
89% / 54%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–6 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Orange Unified
vs California
Low-income · 139 tested
English
68%
+2444%
■+3236%
Math
69%
+3435%
■+3930%
Asian · 158 tested
English
92%
+884%
+2171%
Math
95%
+1085%
+2471%
White · 157 tested
English
76%
+571%
+1660%
Math
77%
+1166%
+2354%
Hispanic or Latino · 101 tested
English
62%
+1745%
■+2537%
Math
57%
+2136%
■+2730%
Two or more races · 72 tested
English
92%
+1973%
+3260%
Math
89%
+2168%
+3554%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Orange Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
Students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, English learners and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students here did far better than the same groups statewide.
Read the student-group results as sentences
At Crescent Elementary in Anaheim, 67.6% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5 and 6, compared to 44.4% district-wide for those same grades and 36.0% statewide for those same grades. Crescent Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 23.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (69.1% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (91.8% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 23.5 percentage points: Hispanic students in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 139 ELA grade test records.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Asian30%
2White30%
3Hispanic or Latino22%
4Two or more races10%
5Filipino4%
6Not reported3%
7Black or African American—
8American Indian or Alaska Native—
9Pacific Islander—
–Unallocated share<1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Asian
30%
White
30%
Hispanic or Latino
22%
Two or more races
10%
Filipino
4%
Not reported
3%
Black or African American
—
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 1 in 4 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (26%, 210 of 805). California: 63%.
100% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 100.00%: 25.6 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 25.6 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
Getting in
Ask Orange Unified which school serves your address.
Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.
Similar elementary schools2026 statewide percentile
CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 18.1–34.1% meal eligibility and 403–1,610 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.
Common questions
Is Crescent Elementary a good elementary school?
Crescent Elementary is in the 97th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 78 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Crescent Elementary was well above California in English and math: 78% and 80% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Crescent Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 78% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 80% the math standard; 59% and 58% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 42% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 366 students were tested in English and 366 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Crescent Elementary rank in California?
Crescent Elementary is in the 97th percentile of 5,728 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2026). Crescent Elementary ranks #164 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2026 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2024 G3 → 2026 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Crescent Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Crescent Elementary's grade 3 results in 2024 with its grade 5 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 88th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Crescent Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 5.4% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 45 chronically absent of 841 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 0.2%; 2 unduplicated suspended students of 844 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 5.9%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.3%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Crescent Elementary compare to other schools in Anaheim?
Crescent Elementary is in the 97th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 805 students. Use the schools in Anaheim page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Crescent Elementary?
At Crescent Elementary in Anaheim, 67.6% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5 and 6, compared to 44.4% district-wide for those same grades and 36.0% statewide for those same grades. Crescent Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 23.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (69.1% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (91.8% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 23.5 percentage points: Hispanic students in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 139 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does Crescent Elementary feed into?
By attendance boundary, Crescent Elementary is zoned to El Rancho Charter. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↑ vs CA 21.5% · index 86 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 43.0% · index 78 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)
↑ vs CA average · ≈88th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 16.9% · index 68 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 0.7pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 62 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 0.4pp lower vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.3% · index 56 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
ELA
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
118
50%
25%
15%
10%
75%
+32
Grade 4
125
62%
16%
14%
7%
78%
+34
Grade 5
123
63%
18%
11%
7%
81%
+33
Grade 6
145
60%
27%
10%
3%
87%
+41
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5685 reporting schools
State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5706 reporting schools
State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 48.1%; n=5715 reporting schools
State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4052 reporting schools
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
Math
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
118
56%
25%
10%
8%
81%
+35
Grade 4
125
54%
24%
14%
7%
78%
+37
Grade 5
123
63%
17%
11%
9%
80%
+45
Grade 6
145
65%
19%
14%
2%
83%
+49
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 46.0%; n=5687 reporting schools
State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.4%; n=5704 reporting schools
State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.6%; n=5717 reporting schools
State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.9%; n=4050 reporting schools
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met+
2025 · Grade 3 · ELA
108
75.9%
2025 · Grade 4 · ELA
120
90.0%
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA
142
86.6%
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
142
90.8%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math
108
80.6%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math
120
82.5%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math
142
80.3%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
142
78.2%
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA
111
76.6%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA
136
79.4%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA
142
84.5%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
144
86.8%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math
111
82.9%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math
135
84.4%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math
142
79.6%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
145
82.1%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA
112
77.7%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA
132
90.9%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA
145
88.3%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
120
85.0%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math
112
85.7%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math
132
81.1%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math
145
75.9%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
119
76.5%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA
102
71.6%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA
141
85.8%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA
118
79.7%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
127
78.7%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math
102
83.3%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math
141
83.7%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math
118
69.5%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
127
78.0%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA
108
75.9%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA
115
80.9%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA
131
85.5%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
119
84.9%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math
108
80.6%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math
115
85.2%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math
131
77.1%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
120
75.8%
2018 · Grade 3 · ELA
106
78.3%
2018 · Grade 4 · ELA
131
92.4%
2018 · Grade 5 · ELA
119
86.5%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
134
82.1%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math
105
81.9%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math
131
87.8%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math
119
73.1%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
133
72.2%
2017 · Grade 3 · ELA
119
76.5%
2017 · Grade 4 · ELA
122
79.5%
2017 · Grade 5 · ELA
133
80.5%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
128
77.3%
2017 · Grade 3 · Math
119
84.0%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math
122
80.3%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math
133
68.4%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
128
70.3%
2016 · Grade 3 · ELA
113
64%
2016 · Grade 4 · ELA
134
79%
2016 · Grade 5 · ELA
124
80%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
133
83%
2016 · Grade 3 · Math
112
77%
2016 · Grade 4 · Math
134
70%
2016 · Grade 5 · Math
124
66%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
132
80%
2015 · Grade 3 · ELA
114
66%
2015 · Grade 4 · ELA
119
67%
2015 · Grade 5 · ELA
131
78%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
127
87%
2015 · Grade 3 · Math
114
76%
2015 · Grade 4 · Math
119
68%
2015 · Grade 5 · Math
131
60%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
127
74%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
Schoolwide
122
51%
29%
20%
0%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
MET+
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
139
67.6%
+23
+32
Asian
158
91.8%
+7
+21
White
157
76.4%
+5
+17
03Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
04More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Scroll for more columns →
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year
Scope Score
Percentile
Rank
Comparison group
2019
79/100
96
#206
California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.
Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Exc
Met+
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
56.8%
80.9%
3.8%
0.1%
+3.0pp
2022
—
—
—
55.3%
78.9%
13.0%
0.1%
-2.9pp
2023
—
—
—
59.1%
83.3%
10.7%
0.2%
+0.4pp
2024
—
—
—
58.0%
81.2%
7.2%
0.5%
+2.3pp
2025
—
—
—
57.5%
82.7%
6.6%
0.6%
+5.2pp
2026
78
97
#164
58.3%
79.1%
5.9%
0.3%
+2.9pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
3.5%
5.3%
+1.8pp
Male
3.4%
5.5%
+2.1pp
Asian
1.1%
3.5%
+2.4pp
Filipino
0.0%
3.1%
+3.1pp
Hispanic/Latino
6.7%
10.2%
+3.5pp
Two or More Races
0.0%
1.2%
+1.2pp
White
3.5%
5.5%
+2.0pp
Students with Disabilities
5.8%
11.3%
+5.5pp
English Learners
6.1%
7.7%
+1.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
6.3%
9.1%
+2.8pp
All Students
3.5%
5.4%
+1.9pp
Homeless
—
15.4%
—
Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+16
389
Accelerated
+15
389
Accelerated
English Only
+16
332
not categorised
+14
332
not categorised
White
+14
132
Accelerated
+17
132
Accelerated
Asian
+14
118
Accelerated
+17
118
Accelerated
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
+11
97
Accelerated
+15
97
Accelerated
Hispanic or Latino
+16
75
Accelerated
+9
75
Accelerated
Two or More Races
+10
36
Accelerated
+24
36
Exceptional
Students with Disabilities
+22
36
Exceptional
+10
36
Accelerated
English Learner
+5
20
Accelerated
+28
20
Exceptional
Filipino
+6
16
Accelerated
+11
16
Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
0
16
not categorised
+29
16
not categorised
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 3
54%
exceeded standard · 77% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 111 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 5
63%
exceeded standard · 81% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 123 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 111 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
389 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +16 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 90th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.90th pctile · +16 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
389 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +15 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 85th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.85th pctile · +15 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$13,360 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 25,420 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
Central federal expenditures attributed here$1,127 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 805
District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,412 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
ShowHide how the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 59%Instruction support 14%Student services 12%Administration 5%Buildings & maintenance 9%
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 92807
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 92807
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$138,741
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
49.17%
ZCTA population
37,296
Median age
42.3 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=5,728 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.