Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary: The score is middle of the pack. The trajectory isn't.
Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet sits mid-pack on raw proficiency — and it's climbing faster than most schools anywhere near it — and that holds when you follow the same students across grades.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 54 | 20% | 42% | +19.5 | 14.6% | 0.2% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary scores 54 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 74th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “42% proficient” and call it done. Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet deserves a closer read. The school sits in Paso Robles, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: +19.5pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 49th to the 74th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1300 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 42% of students meet the standard today, above the 38% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 44% | 21% | 39% | 31% | 31% |
| Grade 4 | 42% | 34% | 23% | 54% | 45% |
| Grade 5 | 52% | 42% | 40% | 32% | 59% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 41% | 23% | 38% | 34% | 29% |
| Grade 4 | 27% | 23% | 25% | 44% | 45% |
| Grade 5 | 25% | 29% | 26% | 14% | 40% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 17.5pp across grades; the floor rises 28.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary in Paso Robles, 31.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 36.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 4.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 40.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 275 students tested.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 21.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +12.2pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$376 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 45% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary rank in California?
Is Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary?
How does Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary compare to other schools in Paso Robles?
How does Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 101 | 11% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 31% | −13 |
| Grade 4 | 93 | 19% | 26% | 23% | 32% | 45% | +0 |
| Grade 5 | 81 | 28% | 31% | 20% | 21% | 59% | +11 |
| Grade 6 | 98 | 8% | 18% | 34% | 40% | 27% | −20 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 102 | 11% | 19% | 28% | 42% | 29% | −16 |
| Grade 4 | 93 | 25% | 20% | 37% | 18% | 45% | +4 |
| Grade 5 | 83 | 24% | 16% | 28% | 33% | 40% | +4 |
| Grade 6 | 100 | 9% | 9% | 37% | 45% | 18% | −17 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 83 | 13% | 31% | 48% | 7% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 275 | 31.3% | −5 | −7 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 288 | 32.6% | −2 | −6 |
| English Learners | 110 | 7.3% | +2 | −3 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia Brown Dual Immersion Magnet Elementary ← | — | 54 | 19.7% | 41.6% | +19.5 | 0.2% |
| Kermit King Elementary | 1.8 mi | 50 | 23.4% | 48.4% | +10.2 | 0.1% |
| Virginia Peterson Elementary | 1.8 mi | 44 | 13.8% | 37.9% | +10.5 | 1.1% |
| Pat Butler Elementary | 0.8 mi | 35 | 15.3% | 33.5% | +9.5 | 2.2% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 42 | 49 | #2784 | 19.2% | 38.5% | 10.7% | 0.7% | -4.3pp |
| 2022 | 40 | 59 | #2342 | 11.3% | 28.8% | 36.6% | 0.6% | +13.5pp |
| 2023 | 35 | 41 | #3401 | 12.8% | 32.1% | 22.6% | 1.4% | -5.4pp |
| 2024 | 46 | 61 | #2237 | 16.8% | 35.0% | 17.1% | 1.1% | -9.2pp |
| 2025 | 54 | 74 | #1484 | 19.7% | 41.6% | 14.6% | 0.2% | +19.5pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 11.2% | 12.3% | +1.1pp |
| Male | 10.0% | 16.7% | +6.7pp |
| Filipino | 11.8% | 27.3% | +15.5pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 12.8% | 16.5% | +3.7pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 9.3% | 17.1% | +7.8pp |
| English Learners | 11.1% | 18.0% | +6.9pp |
| Homeless | 7.8% | 16.4% | +8.6pp |
| Military-Connected | 5.0% | 18.2% | +13.2pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 14.1% | 16.4% | +2.3pp |
| All Students | 10.7% | 14.4% | +3.7pp |
| Two or More Races | — | 0.0% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction