Daniel Webster Middle: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.
Daniel Webster posts 32.2% meeting the standard — versus 39.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 47 | 11% | 32% | -1.3 | 20.7% | 0.7% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Daniel Webster Middle scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 66th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Daniel Webster deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: +1.3pp separates this year's grade 6 from its grade 8. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G6 → 2025 G8 points the same way.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 18th to the 66th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 900 middle schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 32% of students meet the standard today, above the 26% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 31% | 23% | 17% | 25% | 39% |
| Grade 7 | 36% | 27% | 26% | 29% | 39% |
| Grade 8 | 28% | 34% | 23% | 35% | 42% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 25% | 14% | 15% | 14% | 29% |
| Grade 7 | 23% | 11% | 13% | 20% | 21% |
| Grade 8 | 15% | 16% | 8% | 15% | 23% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 3.1pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Daniel Webster Middle in Los Angeles, 37.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Daniel Webster Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 3.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (38.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 370 students tested.
6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 4.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$2,586 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 438 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).
On the state's science test (CAST), 27% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Daniel Webster Middle a good middle school?
What are Daniel Webster Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does Daniel Webster Middle rank in California?
Is Daniel Webster Middle getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Daniel Webster Middle?
How does Daniel Webster Middle compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
How does Daniel Webster Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 58
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 120 | 13% | 26% | 23% | 38% | 39% | −7 |
| Grade 7 | 144 | 9% | 30% | 29% | 32% | 39% | −9 |
| Grade 8 | 161 | 13% | 29% | 31% | 27% | 42% | −4 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 125 | 15% | 14% | 26% | 45% | 29% | −6 |
| Grade 7 | 147 | 5% | 16% | 31% | 48% | 21% | −13 |
| Grade 8 | 164 | 10% | 13% | 23% | 54% | 23% | −9 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 164 | 9% | 18% | 61% | 12% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 370 | 37.1% | −4 | −1 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 298 | 38.6% | −2 | −0 |
| Black/African American | 74 | 38.5% | +3 | +6 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Webster Middle ← | — | 47 | 11.1% | 32.2% | −1.3 | 0.7% |
| ICEF Vista Middle Academy | 2.6 mi | 65 | 25.8% | 60.9% | +12.9 | 0.7% |
| Mark Twain Middle | 2.2 mi | 56 | 29.7% | 52.5% | −16.4 | 0.6% |
| John Adams Middle | 2.3 mi | 53 | 28.2% | 56.0% | −2.8 | 3.0% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 27 | 18 | #1641 | 6.5% | 26.4% | 21.9% | 0.0% | -6.5pp |
| 2022 | 29 | 29 | #1527 | 4.5% | 20.8% | 40.4% | 0.0% | +6.6pp |
| 2023 | 29 | 18 | #1779 | 3.6% | 16.9% | 34.7% | 0.4% | -0.2pp |
| 2024 | 33 | 39 | #1359 | 8.3% | 23.1% | 23.8% | 1.3% | +6.1pp |
| 2025 | 47 | 66 | #764 | 11.1% | 32.2% | 20.7% | 0.7% | -1.3pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 19.5% | 20.8% | +1.3pp |
| Male | 24.3% | 20.8% | -3.5pp |
| Black/African American | 32.6% | 40.0% | +7.4pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 17.4% | 14.2% | -3.2pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 20.6% | 27.0% | +6.4pp |
| English Learners | 19.6% | 16.7% | -2.9pp |
| Homeless | 56.3% | 20.0% | -36.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 22.3% | 22.1% | -0.2pp |
| All Students | 22.0% | 20.8% | -1.2pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction