Culver Park High: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.
Culver Park posts low test scores — and suspensions run below the state rate (2.6% vs 3.6%). If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 28 | 3% | 6% | 92.3% | 0.0% | 65.5% | 2.6% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
Culver Park High scores 28 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 21st percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “6% proficient” and call it done. Culver Park deserves a closer read. The school sits in Culver City, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 21st percentile since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 6% meet the standard today, versus 12% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 24% | 6% | 7% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 0% | 7% | 6% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 6 are proficient by 11th grade → 92 graduate → 0 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
10 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$132 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 40 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California high school (≈1450).
On the state's science test (CAST), 14% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
What is Culver Park High actually for?
Culver Park is Culver City Unified's continuation high school, for grades 10-12. It's built for students who need a different path to a diploma than a comprehensive campus offers — kids who got off track and need to catch up on credits, or who need a more flexible schedule to make it to graduation at all. The site describes it as helping students gain the skills to return to a traditional high school or move on to work or college. With 40 students total (CDE CALPADS enrollment, 2024-25), it's a small, purpose-built setting, not a smaller version of a regular high school.
Is Culver Park the right place for my student?
It depends on what's not working right now. If your student is behind on credits, needs a slower or more flexible pace, or has disengaged from a traditional schedule, a continuation setting like this is designed exactly for that — and the graduation rate here, 92.3% (CDE cohort graduation rate, 2024-25), suggests the model does get students to a diploma. If your student is on track and aiming at a four-year college pathway with AP classes and a full A-G course sequence, a comprehensive campus is the better fit — Culver Park offers 0 AP courses (CDE course enrollment data, 2024-25) and only 16.7% of students complete A-G (CDE A-G completion, 2024-25). Culver Park and a comprehensive campus are built to do different jobs.
What do the attendance and test numbers actually mean here?
They describe a population, not a school-quality score you can line up against a comprehensive campus. Chronic absenteeism is 65.5% (CDE chronic absenteeism, 2024-25) — high compared to a typical high school, but continuation schools by design serve students who arrived already disconnected from regular attendance. Test performance is similarly low: 6.5% met or exceeded standard, 3.3% exceeded (CDE CAASPP, 2024-25). Comparing these directly to a comprehensive high school's numbers compares two different jobs. The more useful comparison is the graduation rate against the mission: is this getting kids to a diploma who weren't going to get there otherwise?
How much should I trust these percentages?
Treat every number here as a snapshot of a very small group, not a stable trend. With only 40 students enrolled (CDE CALPADS enrollment, 2024-25), a handful of students moving in or out can swing the graduation rate, the A-G rate, or the absenteeism figure by several points. One tough semester for a few students can look like a shift in the whole school. Ask the school directly how these numbers have moved year to year and how big the graduating class actually was.
Does Culver Park live up to what it says about itself?
In some places, yes. The school advertises small class sizes for close teacher-student connections, and enrollment of 40 backs that up directly. It also claims 'experienced educators' delivering individualized instruction — but average teacher experience is 1.7 years, and a third of teachers are in their first year (CDE staff assignment data, 2024-25). A small campus can still build close relationships fast, even with several new teachers. But the specific word 'experienced' doesn't match the staffing data, and it's a fair thing to ask about on a visit: how much turnover has there been, and how does the school onboard new teachers mid-year? The site also says its programs prepare students for '4-year colleges, community colleges, trade schools, or the workforce.' The 92.3% graduation rate (CDE cohort graduation rate, 2024-25) and 16.7% A-G completion rate (CDE A-G completion, 2024-25) suggest this campus is doing real work getting students diplomas and toward work or a two-year path — but with zero AP courses offered (CDE course enrollment data, 2024-25), the four-year-college piece of that claim isn't backed by the course data. Worth asking: what does college or trade-school advising actually look like for a student here?
What we found when we looked closer
Culver Park is Culver City Unified's continuation high school — a small, separate campus for students who need a different path to a diploma than the district's comprehensive high school offers. It serves 40 students in grades 10-12 (CDE CALPADS enrollment, 2024-25), and its numbers should be read against that mission, not against a typical high school's report card.
The strongest fact on the page is the graduation rate: 92.3% of this cohort earned a diploma (CDE cohort graduation rate, 2024-25). For a school built to re-engage students who were already off track, that's a real signal the model is doing its core job. Sitting next to it, though, is a set of numbers that look very different from a comprehensive campus: A-G college-eligibility completion at 16.7% (CDE A-G completion, 2024-25), chronic absenteeism at 65.5% (CDE chronic absenteeism, 2024-25), and an average teacher experience of just 1.7 years, with a third of the staff in their first year (CDE staff assignment data, 2024-25). None of these facts contradict the graduation number. They describe the population and the staffing pattern of a continuation school, where students often arrive already disconnected from daily attendance and from a college-prep course sequence. The job here is getting kids to a diploma, not running a college pipeline — and the two figures, read together, say the school is succeeding at the first without claiming to do the second.
The school's own language is worth checking against the record, because it makes some specific claims. It says small class sizes create an intimate, connected learning environment — and an enrollment of 40 backs that up plainly. It also says its 'experienced educators' deliver individualized instruction, but the experience data (1.7 years average, a third of teachers in year one, CDE staff assignment data, 2024-25) doesn't match that word. A small staff on a small campus can still build fast, close relationships with students, even with several new teachers on board. But a family should ask directly what staff turnover has looked like and how new teachers are supported mid-year.
The site also frames its programs as preparation for '4-year colleges, community colleges, trade schools, or the workforce.' The data splits that claim in half. Zero AP courses (CDE course enrollment data, 2024-25) and 16.7% A-G completion (CDE A-G completion, 2024-25) don't point toward a four-year-college pipeline. The 92.3% graduation rate (CDE cohort graduation rate, 2024-25) does point toward a working diploma-and-workforce or two-year pathway. The four-year-college half of the school's own sentence isn't backed by the course data, while the diploma and workforce half is well supported by the graduation number. That's a fair question to bring to a campus visit: what does advising look like for a student who wants to go on to a trade program or community college from here?
A suspension rate of 2.6% is low in absolute terms, alongside the school's claim to prioritize social and emotional well-being. But chronic absenteeism at 65.5% (CDE chronic absenteeism, 2024-25) suggests many students aren't showing up consistently regardless of how the campus feels once they're there — and the data available can't say whether that pattern started before or after they enrolled at Culver Park. That's a genuine unknown, not something to read as a failure of the school's climate or discipline approach.
With only 40 students, every rate on this page can move sharply with a single class. The most useful next step isn't comparing Culver Park's numbers to a comprehensive high school's — it's asking the school how this year's cohort compares to last year's, and what brought individual students to this campus in the first place.
Written by SchoolScope from Culver Park High’s own website and California Department of Education data, checked 2026-08-10· How we do this · Who we are
Sources (9)
- cphs.ccusd.org — home
- 4.files.edl.io/dda8/08/08/26/062343-ada65e06-f985-4089-930d-db6e7719bb37.pdf — about
- cphs.ccusd.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?pREC_ID=1024526&type=d&uREC_ID=358446 — about
- 4.files.edl.io/10b5/08/08/26/061326-4aaf3dc0-0a31-4869-acbe-199495515d3a.pdf — safety
- cphs.ccusd.org/apps/departments/index.jsp?show=SEC — academics
- cphs.ccusd.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?pREC_ID=1125580&type=d&uREC_ID=358614 — academics
- cphs.ccusd.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?pREC_ID=776704&type=d&uREC_ID=358446 — principal
- cphs.ccusd.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?pREC_ID=776789&type=d&uREC_ID=358665 — academics
- cphs.ccusd.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?pREC_ID=776792&type=d&uREC_ID=358665 — academics
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 45
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 15 | 7% | 0% | 33% | 60% | 7% | −41 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 16 | 0% | 6% | 6% | 88% | 6% | −17 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 21 | 5% | 10% | 52% | 33% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culver Park High ← | — | 28 | 3.3% | 6.5% | — | 2.6% |
| Culver City High | 0.1 mi | 63 | 32.8% | 55.7% | — | 1.9% |
| Alexander Hamilton Senior High | 2 mi | 54 | 17.8% | 42.1% | — | 1.6% |
| Cheviot Hills Continuation | 2.1 mi | 19 | 2.2% | 4.3% | — | 1.5% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 32 | 27 | #1499 | 5.9% | 11.8% | 56.2% | 3.4% | — |
| 2024 | 30 | 23 | #1642 | 6.5% | 6.5% | 66.5% | 2.1% | — |
| 2025 | 28 | 21 | #1713 | 3.3% | 6.5% | 65.5% | 2.6% | — |
- — Subgroup results are suppressed for small student counts (fewer than 15 tested), following CDE privacy rules.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 86.4% | 96.4% | +10.0pp |
| Male | 80.0% | 100.0% | +20.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 78.3% | 100.0% | +21.7pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 81.8% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 78.8% | 100.0% | +21.2pp |
| All Students | 82.5% | 98.3% | +15.8pp |
| Black/African American | — | 91.7% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction