ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Culver Park High · Culver City

Culver Park High: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Culver Park posts low test scores — and suspensions run below the state rate (2.6% vs 3.6%). If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

4601 Elenda Street, 90230 (opens in new tab)·Culver City Unified·Culver City·Grades 10-12·40 students·40% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(310) 390-8886
Continuation school — a small alternative high school designed for students at risk of not graduating. Focuses on credit recovery and flexible scheduling. Test scores and college-readiness rates are not directly comparable to comprehensive high schools.
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2844
% Exceeded3%16%
% Met+6%36%
Grad rate92.3%87.6%
College readiness0.0%35.4%
Absence65.5%30.2%
Suspension2.6%3.6%
Scope Score
28
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #1,713 statewide

Culver Park High scores 28 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 21st percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “6% proficient” and call it done. Culver Park deserves a closer read. The school sits in Culver City, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,160 high schools statewide

Has stayed near the 21st percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELARedMathRed

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 6% meet the standard today, versus 12% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade201920242025
Grade 1124%6%7%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade201920242025
Grade 110%7%6%

The story this school is actually telling

Proficient by 11th grade
6%
State 36%
Graduate
92%
State 88%
Pass an AP exam
0%
State 35%

Of 100 students here: 6 are proficient by 11th grade → 92 graduate → 0 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.

The 6 things our score weighs

Graduation rate
92.3%
State 87.6%
4.7pp above state avg
Exceeded standard
3.3%
State 15.8%
12.5pp below state avg
College readiness
0.0%
State 35.4%
AP exam pass rate below state avg
Met or exceeded
6.5%
State 35.7%
29.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
65.5%
State 30.2%
35.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
2.6%
State 3.6%
1.0pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

All students at this school: 6% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 6%, district —, state 36%6%
MaleMale: this school 9%, district 58%, state 42%9% · +3 vs school

10 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 65.5%, district 16.9%, state 30.2%65.5% · +35.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.6%, district —, state 3.6%2.6% · −1.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 9–1298.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 21:120:1
Teaching staff3 teachers
Avg. experience1.7 years
First-year teachers33%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,905 – $120,580
Principal salary$146,567 – $173,015
Superintendent salary$283,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

Course Breadth
AP courses offered0

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $25,826, CA average $14,815$25,826 · spent at this school
Federal share$132 per student

$132 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,208 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support15%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,510 per pupil
2019$12,217 per pupil
2018$11,949 per pupil
2017$12,209 per pupil
2016$11,853 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic60.0%
District 37.5% · CA 56.1%
White17.5%
District 25.0% · CA 19.9%
Black15.0%
District 10.2% · CA 4.8%
Other5.0%
District 17.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian2.5%
District 10.3% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 40.0% (24pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$107K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.02M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+58% · CA 35%
ZIP population31,009
Median age41 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 40 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California high school (≈1450).

On the state's science test (CAST), 14% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

What is Culver Park High actually for?

Culver Park is Culver City Unified's continuation high school, for grades 10-12. It's built for students who need a different path to a diploma than a comprehensive campus offers — kids who got off track and need to catch up on credits, or who need a more flexible schedule to make it to graduation at all. The site describes it as helping students gain the skills to return to a traditional high school or move on to work or college. With 40 students total (CDE CALPADS enrollment, 2024-25), it's a small, purpose-built setting, not a smaller version of a regular high school.

Is Culver Park the right place for my student?

It depends on what's not working right now. If your student is behind on credits, needs a slower or more flexible pace, or has disengaged from a traditional schedule, a continuation setting like this is designed exactly for that — and the graduation rate here, 92.3% (CDE cohort graduation rate, 2024-25), suggests the model does get students to a diploma. If your student is on track and aiming at a four-year college pathway with AP classes and a full A-G course sequence, a comprehensive campus is the better fit — Culver Park offers 0 AP courses (CDE course enrollment data, 2024-25) and only 16.7% of students complete A-G (CDE A-G completion, 2024-25). Culver Park and a comprehensive campus are built to do different jobs.

What do the attendance and test numbers actually mean here?

They describe a population, not a school-quality score you can line up against a comprehensive campus. Chronic absenteeism is 65.5% (CDE chronic absenteeism, 2024-25) — high compared to a typical high school, but continuation schools by design serve students who arrived already disconnected from regular attendance. Test performance is similarly low: 6.5% met or exceeded standard, 3.3% exceeded (CDE CAASPP, 2024-25). Comparing these directly to a comprehensive high school's numbers compares two different jobs. The more useful comparison is the graduation rate against the mission: is this getting kids to a diploma who weren't going to get there otherwise?

How much should I trust these percentages?

Treat every number here as a snapshot of a very small group, not a stable trend. With only 40 students enrolled (CDE CALPADS enrollment, 2024-25), a handful of students moving in or out can swing the graduation rate, the A-G rate, or the absenteeism figure by several points. One tough semester for a few students can look like a shift in the whole school. Ask the school directly how these numbers have moved year to year and how big the graduating class actually was.

Does Culver Park live up to what it says about itself?

In some places, yes. The school advertises small class sizes for close teacher-student connections, and enrollment of 40 backs that up directly. It also claims 'experienced educators' delivering individualized instruction — but average teacher experience is 1.7 years, and a third of teachers are in their first year (CDE staff assignment data, 2024-25). A small campus can still build close relationships fast, even with several new teachers. But the specific word 'experienced' doesn't match the staffing data, and it's a fair thing to ask about on a visit: how much turnover has there been, and how does the school onboard new teachers mid-year? The site also says its programs prepare students for '4-year colleges, community colleges, trade schools, or the workforce.' The 92.3% graduation rate (CDE cohort graduation rate, 2024-25) and 16.7% A-G completion rate (CDE A-G completion, 2024-25) suggest this campus is doing real work getting students diplomas and toward work or a two-year path — but with zero AP courses offered (CDE course enrollment data, 2024-25), the four-year-college piece of that claim isn't backed by the course data. Worth asking: what does college or trade-school advising actually look like for a student here?

What we found when we looked closer

Culver Park is Culver City Unified's continuation high school — a small, separate campus for students who need a different path to a diploma than the district's comprehensive high school offers. It serves 40 students in grades 10-12 (CDE CALPADS enrollment, 2024-25), and its numbers should be read against that mission, not against a typical high school's report card.

The strongest fact on the page is the graduation rate: 92.3% of this cohort earned a diploma (CDE cohort graduation rate, 2024-25). For a school built to re-engage students who were already off track, that's a real signal the model is doing its core job. Sitting next to it, though, is a set of numbers that look very different from a comprehensive campus: A-G college-eligibility completion at 16.7% (CDE A-G completion, 2024-25), chronic absenteeism at 65.5% (CDE chronic absenteeism, 2024-25), and an average teacher experience of just 1.7 years, with a third of the staff in their first year (CDE staff assignment data, 2024-25). None of these facts contradict the graduation number. They describe the population and the staffing pattern of a continuation school, where students often arrive already disconnected from daily attendance and from a college-prep course sequence. The job here is getting kids to a diploma, not running a college pipeline — and the two figures, read together, say the school is succeeding at the first without claiming to do the second.

The school's own language is worth checking against the record, because it makes some specific claims. It says small class sizes create an intimate, connected learning environment — and an enrollment of 40 backs that up plainly. It also says its 'experienced educators' deliver individualized instruction, but the experience data (1.7 years average, a third of teachers in year one, CDE staff assignment data, 2024-25) doesn't match that word. A small staff on a small campus can still build fast, close relationships with students, even with several new teachers on board. But a family should ask directly what staff turnover has looked like and how new teachers are supported mid-year.

The site also frames its programs as preparation for '4-year colleges, community colleges, trade schools, or the workforce.' The data splits that claim in half. Zero AP courses (CDE course enrollment data, 2024-25) and 16.7% A-G completion (CDE A-G completion, 2024-25) don't point toward a four-year-college pipeline. The 92.3% graduation rate (CDE cohort graduation rate, 2024-25) does point toward a working diploma-and-workforce or two-year pathway. The four-year-college half of the school's own sentence isn't backed by the course data, while the diploma and workforce half is well supported by the graduation number. That's a fair question to bring to a campus visit: what does advising look like for a student who wants to go on to a trade program or community college from here?

A suspension rate of 2.6% is low in absolute terms, alongside the school's claim to prioritize social and emotional well-being. But chronic absenteeism at 65.5% (CDE chronic absenteeism, 2024-25) suggests many students aren't showing up consistently regardless of how the campus feels once they're there — and the data available can't say whether that pattern started before or after they enrolled at Culver Park. That's a genuine unknown, not something to read as a failure of the school's climate or discipline approach.

With only 40 students, every rate on this page can move sharply with a single class. The most useful next step isn't comparing Culver Park's numbers to a comprehensive high school's — it's asking the school how this year's cohort compares to last year's, and what brought individual students to this campus in the first place.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Graduation rate · 25%
92.3%
↑ vs CA 87.6% · 56th pctile
Exceeded standard · 22%
3.3%
↓ vs CA 15.8% · 37th pctile
College readiness · 20%
0.0%
↓ vs CA 35.4% · 29th pctile
Met or exceeded · 18%
6.5%
↓ vs CA 35.7% · 29th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
65.5%
↓ vs CA 30.2% · 21th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.6%
↑ vs CA 3.6% · 55th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 11157%0%33%60%7%−41
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 11160%6%6%88%6%−17
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11215%10%52%33%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

03Peer comparison · nearest high schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Culver Park High ←283.3%6.5%2.6%
Culver City High0.1 mi6332.8%55.7%1.9%
Alexander Hamilton Senior High2 mi5417.8%42.1%1.6%
Cheviot Hills Continuation2.1 mi192.2%4.3%1.5%
California average4415.8%35.7%3.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Graduation Rate
92.3%
AP Exam Prepared
Not offered
This school may not offer AP courses
A-G Completion
16.7%
A-G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193227#14995.9%11.8%56.2%3.4%
20243023#16426.5%6.5%66.5%2.1%
20252821#17133.3%6.5%65.5%2.6%
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Subgroup results are suppressed for small student counts (fewer than 15 tested), following CDE privacy rules.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female86.4%96.4%+10.0pp
Male80.0%100.0%+20.0pp
Hispanic/Latino78.3%100.0%+21.7pp
Students with Disabilities81.8%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged78.8%100.0%+21.2pp
All Students82.5%98.3%+15.8pp
Black/African American91.7%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,160 high schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction