English
−6
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Independent charter school · Cottonwood Union Elementary
3425 Brush Street, Cottonwood · 294 students · Grades TK–8
Choose up to four elementary schools.
Type at least two characters to search.
Cottonwood Creek Charter’s 2025–26 test results, released October 15, 2026, are on this page.
Campus map · © OpenStreetMap
Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.
A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.
Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.
Scope Score 84
75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built
Well above California in English (reading and writing) and math, grades 3–5, spring 2026: 71% and 67% scored Proficient or Advanced, against 46% and 42%.
For grades 6–8, the standing among California middle schools is in Tests ↓
Overview
Strong. Cottonwood Creek Charter is higher than most California elementary schools on test results, progress in math and attendance. Cottonwood Creek Charter is lower than most on progress in English.
Test results, spring 2026
Progress in a year, 2025
Showing up, 2025–26
In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 45% of students tested in English and 47% in math scored Advanced, against 24% and 21% across California. Advanced is the top of the state’s four levels.
Each bar is Cottonwood Creek Charter’s place among 5,726 California public elementary schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.
A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 3–5. Progress is the state’s measure of how the same students’ scores changed against the score it expected, 2025. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.
In its own words
We haven’t read Cottonwood Creek Charter’s website yet. Until we do, the school’s own site is the best place to hear it in its own words.
Progress
In English, lower. In math, about the same. In 2025, students here in grades 4–8 scored 6 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Moderate. In math, they scored 3 points higher, which the state calls Average.
English
−6
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Math
+3
points higher than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Average, the third of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Grades 4–8, 2025, 139 students with scores in both years. Faded rows have fewer than 40 students. It describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education, growth model.
The state calls this comparison an expected score. It sets one for each student from that student’s own score the year before.
California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 6 points below that expected score, and in math 3 points above it.
The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.
Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.
Nearby
0 of the 3 elementary schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Cottonwood Creek Charter. Each school is compared with every California elementary school.
Scope Score
4 elementary schools within 4.8 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.
A neighborhood school in another district takes students who live in its area. Ask that district about a transfer. A charter school takes applications from any family and holds a lottery when it has more applicants than seats.
Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 3–5. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map
Scores and family income
Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students scored Proficient or Advanced in English.
English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 3–5. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.
Schools like it
Cottonwood Creek Charter’s Scope Score is 84. 518 California elementary schools, counting Cottonwood Creek Charter, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 84. Cottonwood Creek Charter’s result is higher than 280 of them.
The five schools with the highest results of the 518
Students from low-income families: 24%
Placentia
Scope Score 99Strong · 99th percentile
Students from low-income families: 23%
Santa Ana
Scope Score 99Strong · 99th percentile
Students from low-income families: 27%
Los Angeles
Scope Score 98Strong · 99th percentile
Students from low-income families: 28%
Fullerton
Scope Score 97Strong · 99th percentile
Students from low-income families: 22%
Beverly Hills
Scope Score 97Strong · 99th percentile
518 California public elementary schools where 21% to 33% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.
The group is every California public elementary school we score where 21% to 33% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Cottonwood Creek Charter’s share. The count includes Cottonwood Creek Charter. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.
Over time
English results were similar to 2025; math results were lower. English went from 73% to 71% and math from 73% to 67%.
Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026
Grades 3–5. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.
English
Math
The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now.
| Spring | Cottonwood Creek Charter | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 55% | 45% | 74 |
| 2018 | 60% | 49% | 75 |
| 2019 | 72% | 50% | 79 |
| 2022 | 77% | 45% | 84 |
| 2023 | 78% | 44% | 83 |
| 2024 | 75% | 45% | 83 |
| 2025 | 73% | 46% | 86 |
| 2026 | 71% | 46% | 85 |
| Spring | Cottonwood Creek Charter | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 59% | 40% | 74 |
| 2018 | 67% | 42% | 75 |
| 2019 | 78% | 44% | 79 |
| 2022 | 70% | 38% | 84 |
| 2023 | 82% | 40% | 83 |
| 2024 | 73% | 41% | 83 |
| 2025 | 73% | 41% | 86 |
| 2026 | 67% | 42% | 85 |
Tests
Well above California in both subjects.
English
71%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
11182645Math
67%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
8252047In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 71% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 67% in math, against 46% and 42% across California.
The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 3–5 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
Near California in English; well above it in math. In grades 6–8, spring 2026, 52% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 65% in math, against 49% and 37% across California. The middle grades are placed separately: 80th percentile (Strong) among California’s middle schools.
English
52%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
11373121Math
65%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
11242837What each level means: California's level descriptions.
English
| Measure | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 73% | 73% | 65% |
| Advanced | 62% | 55% | 15% |
| Proficient | 11% | 18% | 50% |
| Developing level | 12% | 18% | 27% |
| Minimal | 15% | 9% | 8% |
| Tested | 26 | 33 | 26 |
| California | 44% | 46% | 49% |
| Difference | +29 | +27 | +16 |
| Measure | Grade 6 | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 37% | 66% | 54% |
| Advanced | 11% | 17% | 35% |
| Proficient | 26% | 49% | 19% |
| Developing level | 44% | 24% | 42% |
| Minimal | 19% | 10% | 4% |
| Tested | 27 | 29 | 26 |
| California | 48% | 51% | 49% |
| Difference | −11 | +15 | +5 |
California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Math
| Measure | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 77% | 70% | 54% |
| Advanced | 58% | 52% | 31% |
| Proficient | 19% | 18% | 23% |
| Developing level | 19% | 21% | 34% |
| Minimal | 4% | 9% | 12% |
| Tested | 26 | 33 | 26 |
| California | 47% | 42% | 37% |
| Difference | +30 | +28 | +17 |
| Measure | Grade 6 | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 56% | 69% | 69% |
| Advanced | 19% | 38% | 54% |
| Proficient | 37% | 31% | 15% |
| Developing level | 29% | 21% | 23% |
| Minimal | 15% | 10% | 8% |
| Tested | 27 | 29 | 26 |
| California | 37% | 38% | 36% |
| Difference | +19 | +31 | +33 |
California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.
| Students | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English, grades 3–5 · This school | 45% | 26% | 18% | 11% | 85 |
| English, grades 3–5 · California | 24% | 22% | 21% | 33% | 1,208,894 |
| English, grades 3–5 · Cottonwood Union Elementary | 20% | 24% | 25% | 31% | 370 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · This school | 47% | 20% | 25% | 8% | 85 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · California | 21% | 21% | 25% | 33% | 1,211,701 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · Cottonwood Union Elementary | 17% | 21% | 28% | 34% | 370 |
| English, grades 6–8 · This school | 21% | 31% | 37% | 11% | 82 |
| English, grades 6–8 · California | 19% | 30% | 23% | 28% | 1,254,039 |
| English, grades 6–8 · Cottonwood Union Elementary | 17% | 34% | 29% | 20% | 384 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · This school | 37% | 28% | 24% | 11% | 82 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · California | 21% | 16% | 23% | 40% | 1,254,800 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · Cottonwood Union Elementary | 24% | 24% | 28% | 24% | 384 |
Spring 2026, grades 3–5 combined: 85 tested in English, 85 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Who goes here
White students are the largest group here, at 87% of students. 11 of 308 students missed 10% or more of school days.
Missing school, 2025–26
4in 100
students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (11 of 308 students).
At the average California elementary school: 17 in 100.
No district average: Cottonwood Creek Charter is the only regular elementary school we rank in the Cottonwood Union Elementary district with an attendance record.
Students, 2024–25
294
students in grades TK–8.
Family income
27%
of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 78 of 294. California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
15
teachers, with 14 years of experience on average.
7% were in their first year.
78% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.
Suspensions, 2025–26
0
students were suspended at least once. Average California elementary school 1.6%.
Sources: California Department of Education. Each tile names its year.
Our records hold no figure for Grades TK–3.
| Students | Here |
|---|---|
| White | 87% |
| Two or more races | 6% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 5% |
| Asian | — |
| Black or African American | — |
| Filipino | — |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | — |
| Pacific Islander | — |
| Not reported | — |
Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.
Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 8.7 of 11.1 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.
Student groups
White students here scored well above the same group across Cottonwood Union Elementary.
64% of White students scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 69% in math (grades 3–8, spring 2026), against 44% and 37% for the same group across Cottonwood Union Elementary.
Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grades 3–8, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.
| Group and subject | Here | vs Cottonwood Union Elementary | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|
| White · 143 tested | |||
| English | 64% | +2044% | +361% |
| Math | 69% | +3237% | +1653% |
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Cottonwood Union Elementary, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.
Low-income students, 48 tested: no rate for grades 3 and 6–8 in our records, and fewer than 30 tested in the grades with one. No published rate here for Hispanic or Latino, Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Family and staff answers
Families can answer a short set of questions about Cottonwood Creek Charter. These are not star ratings or reviews.
Families
0 of 20 needed before answers show
Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work
The school day
Cottonwood Creek Charter has transitional kindergarten (TK). Our records do not hold school hours or before- and after-school care yet. Ask the office.
Transitional kindergarten (TK), 2025–26
15
TK students in 2025–26.
TK is California’s free public program for four-year-olds.
TK count: California Department of Education, Census Day enrollment, 2025–26. Find TK schools near you
The neighborhood
These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 96022. They are not figures for the families at Cottonwood Creek Charter.
Typical household income in a year
$89,338
Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 96022.
What you can do
Cottonwood Creek Charter’s own board decides its plan.
Where is its yearly plan?
Cottonwood Union Elementary authorized this charter; its current term ends June 30, 2028.
Authorizer from the California Department of Education’s charter term file; term from its Charter School Database, checked October 22, 2026. Source
State support
The state hasn’t placed Cottonwood Creek Charter in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source
California law requires schools to screen kindergartners through second graders for reading difficulties every year, with some exceptions. You get notice at least 15 days before, results within 45 days, and can opt out in writing.
Kindergartners can’t be screened before the 91st school day; transitional kindergarten isn’t covered.
If screening shows your child may be at risk for reading difficulties, the school must provide supports. That result isn’t a diagnosis, and screening can’t be used to delay a special-education evaluation.
Ask how many K–2 students screening found at risk last year, and how many got extra reading help.
California Education Code § 53008. Source
Questions to ask
Bring these 5 questions to Cottonwood Creek Charter. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.
Getting in
Ask Cottonwood Creek Charter how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.
Where it is
A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map
Ask Cottonwood Creek Charter how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. See the details ↓
Cottonwood Creek Charter has a Scope Score of 84. It scored higher than 84 in 100 of California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools (Strong, 84th percentile, spring 2026).
In 2025–26, 4 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 17 in 100 at the average California elementary school. 0 of 316 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school. See the details ↓
In English, lower. In math, about the same. In 2025, students here in grades 4–8 scored 6 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Moderate. In math, they scored 3 points higher, which the state calls Average.
In spring 2026, 64% of White students in grades 3–8 at Cottonwood Creek Charter scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 61% for the same group across California. See the details ↓
In its 2026–27 plan, $339,599 is planned for 9 funded actions in 1 goal. That’s 8% of its $4.2 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.
The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓
Its own plan
$339,599 is planned for 9 funded actions in 1 goal. That’s 8% of its $4.2 million general fund budget.
$339,599
planned in the school’s own plan for 2026–27The three largest actions in the plan
These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan. Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 53 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.
Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 53 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
Three actions take 69% of the money. The plan itself puts 63% of it toward staff.
4 of the plan’s 9 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.
An action naming two of these appears under both.
Largest of these
It plans $214,000 in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $214,000 and estimates it spent $252,357, $38,357 (18%) more than planned (our arithmetic).
The total is the same as in the 2025–26 plan.
Read these state results for this school as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.
The test rows are schoolwide results for every grade the school tests; the source doesn’t list which grades. The headline at the top of this page covers grades 3–5 only: 71% in English and 67% in math, spring 2026.
| Measure | 2024–25 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 | 68% | 62% | down 6 pts |
| Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 | 69% | 66% | down 3 pts |
Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the school tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.
We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($339,599).
100% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.
Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title
“Working together with the Cottonwood Community, Cottonwood Creek Charter School staff and parents will help students reach their highest potential. Our vision is for the students of Cottonwood Creek to become well rounded participants in their community today as well as in the future. We will use a blended learning model that combines both site based classes and Personalized Learning to develop an individualized program of study for every student, melding "hands-on" educational opportunities through technological resources, educational field trips, local experts and a dedicated, committed staff of talented teachers and parents” p. 9 ↗
9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $339,599 (unchanged)
Largest funded actions
4 more funded actions in this goal
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
How the plan measures it · 8 measures · 1 quoted
7 more measures in the plan’s table.
All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.
The full record
This page is built from 12 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.
Data updated
October 15, 2026
Results
Students
Money and staff
Place, downloads and method
| Factor | School | Index | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advancedaverage of English and math | 45% | 73 | 42% |
| Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math | 69% | 70 | 23% |
| Chronically absent | 4 in 100 | 68 | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0 of 316 | 62 | 5% |
| Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) | -15.4pp | — | not scored |
Index is where the school's value sits among the California elementary schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. The weights above add to 75%: the remaining 25%, for measures with no value here, is shared out among the measures above.
| School year | Scope Score | Percentile | Rank | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 84 | 84 | #869 | California elementary schools · 5,726 schools · current formula |
2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.
| School year | Chronic absence | Suspension | Grade gap (points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018–19 | not on file | not on file | −24 |
| 2021–22 | not on file | not on file | −27 |
| 2022–23 | not on file | not on file | +9 |
| 2023–24 | 7 in 100 | 0 of 284 | −18 |
| 2024–25 | 6 in 100 | 0 of 307 | −23 |
| 2025–26 | 4 in 100 | 0 of 316 | −15 |
Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.
English and math by test year · all tested grades
| Year · subject | Students with scores | Top level | Top two levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · English | 167 | 33% | 62% |
| 2026 · Math | 167 | 42% | 66% |
| 2025 · English | 174 | 36% | 68% |
| 2025 · Math | 174 | 40% | 69% |
| 2024 · English | 167 | 35% | 75% |
| 2024 · Math | 167 | 42% | 74% |
| 2023 · English | 167 | 38% | 71% |
| 2023 · Math | 167 | 44% | 75% |
| 2022 · English | 156 | 42% | 72% |
| 2022 · Math | 156 | 47% | 71% |
| 2019 · English | 153 | 31% | 70% |
| 2019 · Math | 153 | 35% | 65% |
| 2018 · English | 140 | 30% | 59% |
| 2018 · Math | 140 | 31% | 58% |
| 2017 · English | 140 | 21% | 57% |
| 2017 · Math | 140 | 26% | 59% |
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
| Year · grade · subject | Students with scores | Met or exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 · Grade 3 · English | 31 | 77% |
| 2025 · Grade 4 · English | 28 | 79% |
| 2025 · Grade 5 · English | 27 | 63% |
| 2025 · Grade 6 · English | 32 | 59% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · English | 28 | 71% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · English | 28 | 61% |
| 2025 · Grade 3 · Math | 31 | 87% |
| 2025 · Grade 4 · Math | 28 | 75% |
| 2025 · Grade 5 · Math | 27 | 56% |
| 2025 · Grade 6 · Math | 32 | 62% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · Math | 28 | 82% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · Math | 28 | 50% |
| 2024 · Grade 3 · English | 28 | 75% |
| 2024 · Grade 4 · English | 26 | 85% |
| 2024 · Grade 5 · English | 29 | 66% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · English | 29 | 72% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · English | 29 | 69% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · English | 26 | 85% |
| 2024 · Grade 3 · Math | 28 | 82% |
| 2024 · Grade 4 · Math | 26 | 85% |
| 2024 · Grade 5 · Math | 29 | 55% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · Math | 29 | 72% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · Math | 29 | 72% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · Math | 26 | 77% |
| 2023 · Grade 3 · English | 27 | 74% |
| 2023 · Grade 4 · English | 29 | 72% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · English | 27 | 89% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · English | 31 | 55% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · English | 26 | 58% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · English | 27 | 81% |
| 2023 · Grade 3 · Math | 27 | 81% |
| 2023 · Grade 4 · Math | 29 | 79% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · Math | 27 | 85% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · Math | 31 | 61% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · Math | 26 | 81% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · Math | 27 | 67% |
| 2022 · Grade 3 · English | 29 | 83% |
| 2022 · Grade 4 · English | 27 | 89% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · English | 28 | 61% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · English | 24 | 54% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · English | 22 | 77% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · English | 26 | 65% |
| 2022 · Grade 3 · Math | 29 | 79% |
| 2022 · Grade 4 · Math | 27 | 85% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · Math | 28 | 46% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · Math | 24 | 67% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · Math | 22 | 77% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · Math | 26 | 69% |
| 2019 · Grade 3 · English | 27 | 81% |
| 2019 · Grade 4 · English | 25 | 76% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · English | 27 | 59% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · English | 24 | 50% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · English | 26 | 85% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · English | 24 | 67% |
| 2019 · Grade 3 · Math | 27 | 89% |
| 2019 · Grade 4 · Math | 25 | 84% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · Math | 27 | 63% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · Math | 24 | 38% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · Math | 26 | 58% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · Math | 24 | 54% |
| 2018 · Grade 3 · English | 25 | 56% |
| 2018 · Grade 4 · English | 26 | 81% |
| 2018 · Grade 5 · English | 24 | 42% |
| 2018 · Grade 6 · English | 25 | 52% |
| 2018 · Grade 7 · English | 22 | 73% |
| 2018 · Grade 8 · English | 18 | 50% |
| 2018 · Grade 3 · Math | 25 | 64% |
| 2018 · Grade 4 · Math | 26 | 92% |
| 2018 · Grade 5 · Math | 24 | 42% |
| 2018 · Grade 6 · Math | 25 | 44% |
| 2018 · Grade 7 · Math | 22 | 64% |
| 2018 · Grade 8 · Math | 18 | 33% |
| 2017 · Grade 3 · English | 28 | 68% |
| 2017 · Grade 4 · English | 21 | 43% |
| 2017 · Grade 5 · English | 25 | 52% |
| 2017 · Grade 6 · English | 22 | 73% |
| 2017 · Grade 7 · English | 18 | 33% |
| 2017 · Grade 8 · English | 26 | 65% |
| 2017 · Grade 3 · Math | 28 | 79% |
| 2017 · Grade 4 · Math | 21 | 52% |
| 2017 · Grade 5 · Math | 25 | 44% |
| 2017 · Grade 6 · Math | 22 | 59% |
| 2017 · Grade 7 · Math | 18 | 39% |
| 2017 · Grade 8 · Math | 26 | 69% |
Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 52 | 19% | 35% | 44% | 2% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Group · English | Tested | Proficient or Advanced | vs district | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 143 | 64% | +20 | +3 |
| Group | English | n | CDE category | Math | n | CDE category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All students | −6 | 139 | Moderate | +3 | 139 | Average |
| English-only students | −6 | 138 | not categorized | +4 | 138 | not categorized |
| White | −7 | 124 | Moderate | +2 | 124 | Average |
| Low-income | +3 | 38 | Average | +6 | 38 | Accelerated |
| Students with disabilities | −7 | 14 | Moderate | +4 | 14 | Average |
CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
State model · English−6 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 4–8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 4–8
139 students
CDE growth category: Moderate
State model · math+3 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 4–8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 4–8
139 students
CDE growth category: Average
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median English estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.
CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.
| Year-over-year school rates |
|---|
| Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 6 in 100 → 2025–26 · 4 in 100 · −2 in 100 |
| Suspension rate2024–25 · 0 of 307 → 2025–26 · 0 of 316 · 0.0 percentage points |
| Group | 2018–19 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | — | 4 in 100 | — |
| Male | — | 3 in 100 | — |
| Hispanic or Latino | — | 5 of 16 | — |
| Two or more races | — | 0 of 19 | — |
| White | — | 2 in 100 | — |
| Students with disabilities | — | 1 of 33 | — |
| Low-income | — | 4 of 97 | — |
| All students | — | 4 in 100 | — |
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 947 pupils
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
| Group | Dollars | Share, to two decimals | Printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $8,191,892 | 59.98% | 60% |
| Instruction support | $1,266,196 | 9.27% | 9% |
| Student services | $1,367,774 | 10.02% | 10% |
| Administration | $1,076,298 | 7.88% | 8% |
| Buildings & maintenance | $1,213,211 | 8.88% | 9% |
| Other | $541,557 | 3.97% | 4% |
| Total | $13,656,928 | 100.00% | 100% |
These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $13,656,928 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
| Measure | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $89,338 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+) | 22% |
| ZIP-area population | 17,092 |
| Median age | 41.8 years |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 96022 →
Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 5,726 elementary schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026
Optional and anonymous. Up to 280 characters.
What brought you here? Optional
Thanks — that helps.