Cottonwood Creek Charter: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.
Cottonwood Creek Charter posts 45.9% exceeding the standard — versus 21.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.
Cottonwood Creek Charter scores 66 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 88th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
Most rating sites would stop at “73% proficient” and call it done. Cottonwood Creek Charter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Cottonwood, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 45.9% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.
As a charter, Cottonwood Creek Charter enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 28.4pp across grades; the floor slips 14.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
The community around it
Student demographics
Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.
Subgroup Growth by Grade
Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Funding Breakdown
Neighborhood Context
Whole Child
Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25
For the data nerdsEvery number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 31 | 58% | 19% | 23% | 0% | 77% | +34 |
| Grade 4 | 28 | 50% | 29% | 21% | 0% | 79% | +34 |
| Grade 5 | 27 | 30% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 63% | +15 |
| Grade 6 | 32 | 28% | 31% | 22% | 19% | 59% | +13 |
| Grade 7 | 28 | 25% | 46% | 21% | 7% | 71% | +24 |
| Grade 8 | 28 | 21% | 39% | 25% | 14% | 61% | +15 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 31 | 58% | 29% | 6% | 6% | 87% | +41 |
| Grade 4 | 28 | 54% | 21% | 25% | 0% | 75% | +33 |
| Grade 5 | 27 | 26% | 30% | 33% | 11% | 56% | +20 |
| Grade 6 | 32 | 28% | 34% | 16% | 22% | 63% | +27 |
| Grade 7 | 28 | 39% | 43% | 18% | 0% | 82% | +48 |
| Grade 8 | 28 | 32% | 18% | 36% | 14% | 50% | +18 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 55 | 18% | 18% | 56% | 7% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 150 | 69.3% | +19 | +8 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cottonwood Creek Charter ← | — | 66 | 45.9% | 72.8% | −23.0 | 0.2% |
| California average | — | 43 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.