Clyde W. Needham Elementary: Scores climb 14.0 points from grade 3 to grade 5. But one in four miss a month of school or more.
Clyde W. Needham's strongest signal is real. Attendance is the number to ask about — and both belong on the same page.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 40 | 6% | 24% | +14.0 | 28.3% | 1.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Clyde W. Needham Elementary scores 40 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 44th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.
Most rating sites would stop at “24% proficient” and call it done. Clyde W. Needham deserves a closer read. The school sits in Lodi, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: +14.0pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 16th to the 44th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1400 elementary schools.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 24% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 17% | 8% | 19% | 18% | 11% |
| Grade 4 | 29% | 23% | 6% | 6% | 22% |
| Grade 5 | 24% | 34% | 45% | 22% | 37% |
| Grade 6 | 50% | 32% | 27% | 44% | 28% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 26% | 17% | 25% | 16% | 25% |
| Grade 4 | 21% | 25% | 6% | 9% | 22% |
| Grade 5 | 17% | 16% | 36% | 21% | 26% |
| Grade 6 | 48% | 18% | 16% | 32% | 22% |
The story this school is actually telling
separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
of students miss a month or more of school, versus 17.9% statewide. High absence often tracks community stress — worth asking about on a tour.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.5pp across grades; the floor rises 26.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school tracks and follows up on attendance. High absence often reflects community stress, not classroom quality — a visit will tell you which.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Clyde W. Needham Elementary in Lodi, 22.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Clyde W. Needham Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 10.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (20.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 170 students tested.
8 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 24.6pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +5.3pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (45.1% vs 27.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$1,087 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 13% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Clyde W. Needham Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Clyde W. Needham Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Clyde W. Needham Elementary rank in California?
Is Clyde W. Needham Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Clyde W. Needham Elementary?
How does Clyde W. Needham Elementary compare to other schools in Lodi?
How does Clyde W. Needham Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 52
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 41
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 57 | 2% | 9% | 33% | 56% | 11% | −33 |
| Grade 4 | 50 | 6% | 16% | 24% | 54% | 22% | −23 |
| Grade 5 | 38 | 5% | 32% | 13% | 50% | 37% | −11 |
| Grade 6 | 36 | 0% | 28% | 33% | 39% | 28% | −19 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 57 | 4% | 21% | 12% | 63% | 25% | −21 |
| Grade 4 | 50 | 8% | 14% | 40% | 38% | 22% | −20 |
| Grade 5 | 38 | 11% | 16% | 24% | 50% | 26% | −9 |
| Grade 6 | 36 | 8% | 14% | 33% | 44% | 22% | −13 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 38 | 0% | 13% | 61% | 26% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 170 | 22.9% | −10 | −15 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 145 | 20.7% | −12 | −18 |
| English Learners | 96 | 11.5% | +2 | +1 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clyde W. Needham Elementary ← | — | 40 | 5.8% | 23.7% | +14.0 | 1.1% |
| Rio Valley Charter | 1.1 mi | 56 | 15.3% | 43.0% | +1.6 | 0.2% |
| Vinewood Elementary | 0.9 mi | 55 | 36.3% | 67.2% | −12.4 | 0.9% |
| Vista Oaks Charter | 1.6 mi | 45 | 19.6% | 43.1% | −6.4 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 30 | 16 | #4599 | 6.5% | 22.4% | 15.1% | 1.3% | -0.9pp |
| 2022 | 34 | 44 | #3190 | 6.5% | 20.5% | 42.8% | 0.5% | +12.4pp |
| 2023 | 47 | 68 | #1818 | 7.9% | 23.0% | 36.1% | 0.8% | +18.4pp |
| 2024 | 33 | 25 | #4294 | 2.2% | 15.4% | 27.8% | 0.9% | +4.7pp |
| 2025 | 40 | 44 | #3190 | 5.8% | 23.7% | 28.3% | 1.1% | +14.0pp |
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 15 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 16.5% | 31.0% | +14.5pp |
| Male | 14.2% | 28.1% | +13.9pp |
| Asian | 24.1% | 23.5% | -0.6pp |
| Filipino | 21.4% | 21.4% | +0.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 14.2% | 30.3% | +16.1pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 19.0% | 28.3% | +9.3pp |
| English Learners | 11.7% | 23.4% | +11.7pp |
| Homeless | 12.5% | — | — |
| Military-Connected | 0.0% | 47.1% | +47.1pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 15.2% | 29.0% | +13.8pp |
| All Students | 15.2% | 29.4% | +14.2pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction