Charter school · Delano Union Elementary

Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy — Rating & test scores

1430 Cecil Avenue, Delano · 585 students · Grades 6–8

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four middle schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap, inside the campus outline from the California School Campus Database (2025). Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

Scope Score 75

SolidScope Score · 50th percentile. Higher than 50 in 100 of the 2,529 California public middle schools we score.

75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built

Near California in English, well below in math: 48% and 26% scored Proficient or Advanced in grades 6–8, spring 2026, against 49% and 37%.

Source for this line
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 598 in English, 605 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s grade 6, 7 and 8 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).

Overview

Is this school a good middle school?

Solid. Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy is higher than most California middle schools on English test results, progress in both subjects and attendance. Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy is lower than most on math test results.

Test results, spring 2026

English, Proficient or Advanced5448%
Math, Proficient or Advanced3926%
English, Advanced5014%
Math, Advanced4212%

Progress in a year, 2025

English85+12 pts
Math64+4 pts

Showing up, 2025–26

Attendance7710 in 100
Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy’s place among California middle schools, out of 100Delano Union Elementary’s other middle schoolsBar colour, from the lowest quarter of schools to the highest

One more thing to know

In grades 6–8, spring 2026, 14% of students tested in English (reading and writing) and 12% in math scored Advanced, against 19% and 21% across California. Advanced is the top of the state’s four levels.

Each bar is Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy’s place among 2,529 California public middle schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.

How to read these bars, and their sources

A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 6–8. Progress is the state’s measure of how the same students’ scores changed against the score it expected, 2025. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.

Source for the sentence
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026. All students tested in grades 6–8: 598 in English, 605 in math. California: CDE’s grade 6, 7 and 8 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).

In its own words

What does this school say about itself?

We haven’t read Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy’s website yet. Until we do, the school’s own site is the best place to hear it in its own words.

Open duesd.org (opens in a new tab)

Progress

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

In English, yes. In math, about the same. In 2025, students here in grades 6–8 scored 12 points higher in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Accelerated. In math, they scored 4 points higher, which the state calls Average.

English

+12

points higher than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Accelerated, the fourth of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Low-income511+12 points
Hispanic or Latino498+12 points
English learners308+13 points
Long-term English learners99+10 points
Filipino43+18 points

Math

+4

points higher than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Average, the third of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Low-income511+3 points
Hispanic or Latino498+4 points
English learners308+1 points
Long-term English learners99+13 points
Filipino43+6 points

Grades 6–8, 2025, 551 students with scores in both years. It describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education, growth model.

How the state’s growth measure works

The state calls this comparison an expected score. It sets one for each student from that student’s own score the year before.

California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 12 points above that expected score, and in math 4 points above it. Unlike the growth in our Scope Score, it follows the same students from one year to the next.

The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.

Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.

Our Scope Score measures growth another way. It compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier (partly different children), then places that change among California schools at the same level. The state’s measure counts only students who took California’s test the year before, so the two can point different ways.

SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 59th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across English and math, not matched students in California's separate growth model.

Nearby

How does it compare with schools nearby?

2 of the 2 middle schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy. Each school is compared with every California middle school.

Scope Score

3 middle schools within 1.3 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.

  1. La VinaNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 8074th
  2. Almond TreeNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 7658th
  3. Cecil Avenue Math and Science AcademyScope Score 7550th
Delano Union Elementary

Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map

Scores and family income

Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students scored Proficient or Advanced in English.

50%0%25%50%75%100%

English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.

Schools like it

How does this school compare with schools like it?

Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy’s Scope Score is 75. 634 California middle schools, counting Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 71. Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy’s result is higher than 490 of them.

The five schools with the highest results of the 634

  1. Students from low-income families: 88%

    Scope Score 95Strong · 98th percentile

  2. Students from low-income families: 92%

    Scope Score 89Strong · 93rd percentile

  3. Students from low-income families: 93%

    Scope Score 88Strong · 92nd percentile

  4. Students from low-income families: 96%

    Scope Score 87Strong · 91st percentile

  5. Students from low-income families: 89%

    Scope Score 87Strong · 91st percentile

634 California public middle schools where 84% to 96% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.

How the group is chosen

The group is every California public middle school we score where 84% to 96% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy’s share. The count includes Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.

Over time

Have results changed?

Results in both subjects were similar to 2025. English went from 46% to 48% and math from 27% to 26%.

Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026

Grades 6–8. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.

English

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017201820192022202320242025202640%35%55%Delano Union ElementaryDistrict49%CaliforniaCalifornia48%Cecil Avenue Math and Science AcademyThis school

Math

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017201820192022202320242025202625%20%37%CaliforniaCalifornia37%Delano Union ElementaryDistrict26%Cecil Avenue Math and Science AcademyThis school

The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Delano Union Elementary’s line combines its 4 middle schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other schools. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Each year’s results

The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Delano Union Elementary’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.

English, grades 6–8: share at the top two levels
SpringCecil Avenue Math and Science AcademyDelano Union ElementaryCaliforniaTested here
201735%40%48%694
201834%38%49%651
201938%43%50%604
202234%46%47%575
202338%48%46%599
202440%53%46%602
202546%57%49%591
202648%55%49%598
Math, grades 6–8: share at the top two levels
SpringCecil Avenue Math and Science AcademyDelano Union ElementaryCaliforniaTested here
201720%25%37%704
201819%24%37%659
201923%28%38%606
202214%23%31%583
202319%28%32%608
202422%32%33%610
202527%35%36%601
202626%37%37%605

Tests

How did students here do on state tests?

Near California in English; well below it in math.

English

48%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

26263414
Delano Union Elementary55%California49%

Math

26%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

44301412
Delano Union Elementary37%California37%
MinimalDeveloping levelProficientAdvanced

In grades 6–8, spring 2026, 48% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 26% in math, against 49% and 37% across California.

The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 6–8 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

How does math compare with English?

In grades 6–8, spring 2026, math trails English by 22 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 12 points across California. The grades 6–8 cards above give each subject’s share.

Results for each grade, spring 2026

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English

English, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced41%51%51%
Advanced14%13%14%
Proficient27%38%37%
Developing level24%27%27%
Minimal35%22%22%
Tested191198209
California48%51%49%
Difference−70+2

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math

Math, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced25%24%29%
Advanced12%9%15%
Proficient13%15%14%
Developing level27%34%27%
Minimal48%42%44%
Tested195200210
California37%38%36%
Difference−12−14−7

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

All four test levels, with the number of students tested
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026. The state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal.
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grades 6–8 · This school14%34%26%26%598
English, grades 6–8 · California19%30%23%28%1,254,039
English, grades 6–8 · Delano Union Elementary21%34%24%21%2,084
Math, grades 6–8 · This school12%14%30%44%605
Math, grades 6–8 · California21%16%23%40%1,254,800
Math, grades 6–8 · Delano Union Elementary19%18%28%35%2,089

Spring 2026, grades 6–8 combined: 598 tested in English, 605 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Who goes here

Who goes here?

Hispanic or Latino students are the largest group here, at 90% of students. 60 of 629 students missed 10% or more of school days.

Missing school, 2025–26

10in 100

students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (60 of 629 students).

At the average middle school in the Delano Union Elementary district: 7 in 100. At the average California middle school: 18 in 100.

Suspensions: 2.5% of students were suspended at least once (16 of 642). Average California middle school 3.7%.

Students, 2024–25

585

students in grades 6–8.

Hispanic or Latino 90%Filipino 7%

Family income

90%

of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 529 of 585. California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

32

teachers, with 10 years of experience on average.

12% were in their first year.

59% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.

English learners

52%

of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026 (72 of 139 students).

Delano Union Elementary: 50%. California: 47%.

It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Sources: California Department of Education and the California School Dashboard. Each tile names its year.

Missing school, by grade
Grade 6
8 in 100 students in grade 6 were chronically absent (17 of 204).
Grades 7–8
10 in 100 students in grades 7–8 were chronically absent (43 of 425).
Full student mix, 2025–26
StudentsHere
Hispanic or Latino90%
Filipino7%
White—
Asian—
Black or African American—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Where these figures come from

Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. English learner progress: California School Dashboard, 2026 . Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.

Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 17.5 of 29.8 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.

Student groups

How do kids like mine do here?

Five student groups at Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy have test results. Each bar compares one group with the same group across California.

This schoolThe same group, California
  • Filipino35 tested60%California 74%
  • Hispanic or Latino541 tested47%California 39%
  • Low-income552 tested47%California 39%
  • Students with disabilities52 tested13%California 14%
  • English learners144 tested12%California 7%

Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grades 6–8 English, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Every group’s results, with the district

Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.

Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Delano Union Elementaryvs California
Low-income · 552 tested in English, 556 in math
English47%−653%+839%
Math25%−934%−126%
Hispanic or Latino · 541 tested in English, 546 in math
English47%−754%+839%
Math24%−1034%−125%
Filipino · 35 tested · grades 7 and 8 only
English60%−1272%−1474%
Math46%−854%−1460%
English learners · 144 tested in English, 150 in math
English12%012%+57%
Math3%−36%−47%
Students with disabilities · 52 tested
English13%−215%−114%
Math8%−19%−210%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Delano Union Elementary, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.

No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Family and staff answers

What would families and staff tell you?

Families can answer a short set of questions about Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy. These are not star ratings or reviews.

  1. Family answers show once 20 families have answered.Until then this page shows how many have answered.
  2. The questions are about the school, never a person.No question asks about a named teacher or staff member.
  3. Answers are never part of the Scope Score.They sit beside the state’s records and do not change a school’s score.

Families

No family answers yet

0 of 20 needed before answers show

  • Does the school tell you how your child is doing, in a way you understand, before report cards arrive?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
  • When you contact the school with a question, do you hear back within two school days?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely · Haven’t contacted them
  • Can you get school information in the language you read best?Yes · Mostly · No
  • And 4 more questions.

Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work

Staff

Staff can’t answer for this school yet

We don’t check staff emails for Delano Union Elementary yet. Tell us your district’s email domain and we’ll work on adding it.

Ask us to add your district

Money

How much is spent on each student here?

$20,214 for each student in 2024–25. California’s middle schools spent $19,269 for each student.

$20,214

for each student at this school, 2024–25
Spent at the school
$17,941
The school’s share of district office costs
$2,273
Of the total, from federal funds
$2,563
  • Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy$20,214
  • Delano Union Elementary middle schools$16,855
  • California middle schools$19,269

The district and California figures combine their middle schools, weighted by enrollment (our calculation, 1,241 California schools). Spending does not show how well money is used. Source: California Department of Education, per-school spending report, 2024–25. Funding records ↓

The neighborhood

What is the area around this school like?

These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 93215. They are not figures for the families at Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy.

Typical household income in a year

$66,204

Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 93215.

Typical home value
$302,700
People who live in this ZIP code
54,556
Typical age
33.8 years
Adults 25 and older with a four-year college degree
7%

What you can do

Who can act on this school’s results?

Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy’s own board decides its plan.

State support

The state hasn’t placed Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source 

Questions to ask

What should I ask, and when?

Bring these 9 questions to Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.

On a tour

  1. What is the school doing about chronic absence?10 in 100 chronically absent, 2025–26 (60 of 629 students); 5 in 100 in 2024–25
  2. What extra help do English learners get, and how do you know it’s working?3% of English learners scored Proficient or Advanced in math, grades 6–8, spring 2026 (150 students tested); the same group across California: 7%
  3. What extra help do students who are behind get, and how do you know it’s working?52% in English and 74% in math scored at the Developing or Minimal level, grades 6–8, spring 2026 (598 tested in English, 605 in math); California: 51% and 63%
  4. Which math courses can students take, and how are placements decided?
  5. Which electives and high-school transition supports are available?

Before you apply

  1. Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
  2. What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?

At the office

  1. What time does the day start and end, and is any day shorter?
  2. What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

Getting in

What comes after this school, and how do I get in?

Ask Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. No assigned next school.

Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy is a charter, so a student’s later schools follow the family’s home address, not this campus, unless the family applies elsewhere. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level.

  1. Elementary
    Del Vista Math and Science Academy
    Scope Score 77Solid · 59th percentile · 2026Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
  2. Middle · this school
    Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy
    Grades 6–8Scope Score 75Solid · 50th percentile
  3. High
    Link not recorded
    Ask the district about this stage.

These links come from past records and from distance. Confirm your child’s school with the district. Explore schools on the map

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Elementary links

  • Del Vista Math and Science Academy

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder · Charter school. Check how it admits students.

    Scope Score 77 · Solid · 59th percentile · elementary · 2026

  • Princeton Street Elementary

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    Scope Score 73 · Developing · 37th percentile · elementary · 2026

  • Terrace Elementary

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    Scope Score 75 · Solid · 50th percentile · elementary · 2026

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking.

Where it is

Where is this school?

Address
1430 Cecil Avenue, Delano 93215Get directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
Administrator
Lionel ReynaAs the state’s school directory lists it, last updated February 9, 2023.

A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map

Short answers to 7 common questions

How do I get in?

Ask Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. See the details ↓

Is Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy a good middle school?

Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy has a Scope Score of 75. It scored higher than 50 in 100 of California’s 2,529 scored public middle schools (Solid, 50th percentile, spring 2026). See the details ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 10 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 7 in 100 at the average middle school in the Delano Union Elementary district. 2.5% of students (16 of 642) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school. See the details ↓

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

In English, yes. In math, about the same. In 2025, students here in grades 6–8 scored 12 points higher in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Accelerated. In math, they scored 4 points higher, which the state calls Average.

  • Included in this measure: 551 students

See the details ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 47% of low-income students in grades 6–8 at Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy in Delano scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 39% for the same group across California. See the details ↓

What does its own plan pay for?

In its 2026–27 plan, $4.0 million is planned for 30 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 37% of its $10.9 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓

Its own plan

What does this school’s own plan commit to?

$4.0 million is planned for 30 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 37% of its $10.9 million general fund budget.

$4.0million

planned in the school’s own plan for 2026–27

The three largest actions in the plan

  • Intervention Teacher/​HIT Tutors$608,003
  • Technology equipment/ Infrastructure$457,131
  • Behavior Intervention Instructor$311,462

These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan. Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 125 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

The whole plan: every goal, what it measures and what it pays for

The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.

The 2026–27 plan in short

Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 125 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 34% of the money. The plan itself puts 77% of it toward staff.

  • Intervention Teacher/HIT Tutors $608,003
  • Technology equipment/ Infrastructure $457,131
  • Behavior Intervention Instructor $311,462
  • 27 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

4 of the plan’s 30 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

  • Catch-up help $707,609
  • English learners $20,000

Largest of these

  • Intervention Teacher/​HIT Tutors$608,003
  • MTSS$99,606
  • English Learner Support$10,000
For high-need students

It plans $3.6 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $3.9 million and estimates it spent $2.4 million, $1.5 million (38%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $1.5 million under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What changed

The total is $27,052 (1%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Technology equipment/ Infrastructure, which went from $1.2 million to $457,131.

Largest cuts

  • Technology equipment/ Infrastructure−⁠$775,508
  • Visual/​Performing Arts−⁠$43,891
  • Behavior Intervention Instructor−⁠$25,286

Largest increases

  • STEAM Instruction+⁠$152,791
  • Intervention Teacher/​HIT Tutors+⁠$136,637
  • Campus Security+⁠$107,485

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Academic Incentives and Academic Field Trips$100,000
  • MTSS$99,606
  • Professional Development and Instruction$96,263

Ask: What did Technology equipment/ Infrastructure pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $775,508 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for this school as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

The test rows are schoolwide results for every grade the school tests; the source doesn’t list which grades. The headline at the top of this page covers grades 6–8 only: 48% in English and 26% in math, spring 2026.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
Chronically absentGoal 25 in 10010 in 1005 more in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 21.4%2.5%up 1.1 pts

Goals 1 and 3 aren’t shown because they track other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the school tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Intervention Teacher/​HIT Tutors · $608,003
  • Technology equipment/ Infrastructure · $457,131
  • Behavior Intervention Instructor · $311,462
The full plan3 goals, 21 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($4.0 million).

Where does the money go?

38% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Cecil Avenue Math & Science Academy endeavors to deliver an unparalleled educational experience within a…$1.5 million38% of action budgets

“Cecil Avenue Math & Science Academy endeavors to deliver an unparalleled educational experience within a nurturing atmosphere, igniting an innate curiosity and fervor for learning. Our commitment is to cultivate an environment that fosters academic excellence, preparing students for the rigors of higher education and professional endeavors. Through enhancing the caliber of instruction and support services, we aim to elevate academic attainment levels, thereby equipping our students with the requisite skills and knowledge for success in college, careers, and beyond” p. 13 ↗

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.2 million (+⁠$323,971)

Largest funded actions

  1. Intervention Teacher/​HIT Tutors$608,003action 1.5 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $280,808 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. 6th Grade Teacher$261,924action 1.7 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Academic Counselor$180,550action 1.2 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Physical Education Teacher$176,370action 1.8 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Learning Coordinator$162,001action 1.4 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $95,942 is state funding counted toward those services

4 more funded actions in this goal

  • Professional Development and Instruction · action 1.1 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$96,263
  • Site Resource Teacher · action 1.3 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$36,931
  • English Learner Support · action 1.9 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$10,000
  • Long Term English Learners · action 1.10 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$10,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Intervention Teacher/​HIT Tutors+⁠$136,637$471,366 → $608,003 · p. 83 ↗
  2. Physical Education Teacher+⁠$65,464$110,906 → $176,370 · p. 83 ↗
  3. Learning Coordinator+⁠$29,883$132,118 → $162,001 · p. 83 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • 6th Grade Teacher · $239,526 → $261,924 · p. 83 ↗+⁠$22,398
  • Academic Counselor · $171,494 → $180,550 · p. 83 ↗+⁠$9,056
  • Professional Development and Instruction · $96,263 · p. 83 ↗new or renamed
  • Site Resource Teacher · $35,473 → $36,931 · p. 83 ↗+⁠$1,458
  • English Learner Support · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 83 ↗unchanged
  • Long Term English Learners · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 84 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 8 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 13 ↗.

Goal 2All students shall benefit from an environment conducive to safety, security, engagement, and stimulation…$1.2 million30% of action budgets

“All students shall benefit from an environment conducive to safety, security, engagement, and stimulation, tailored to accommodate the diverse needs of our student body, with particular emphasis on English Learners, Long Term English Learners, Foster Youth, and other cohorts identified as low-performing. The anticipated outcome for this objective is a discernible rise in student attendance, a decline in suspension occurrences, and heightened levels of student cohesion” p. 29 ↗

11 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $883,357 (+⁠$303,339)

Largest funded actions

  1. Behavior Intervention Instructor$311,462action 2.7 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Campus Security$285,459action 2.4 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Vice Principal$172,246action 2.3 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Health Services$120,292action 2.1 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Academic Incentives and Academic Field Trips$100,000action 2.10 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

6 more funded actions in this goal

  • MTSS · action 2.8 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$99,606
  • Positive School Climate · action 2.5 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$50,000
  • School Safety · action 2.9 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$37,631
  • Mental Health and Social Emotional Learning · action 2.12 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$5,000
  • Parent Involvement · action 2.6 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3,000
  • Additional Student Supports · action 2.11 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Campus Security+⁠$107,485$177,974 → $285,459 · p. 84 ↗
  2. Positive School Climate+⁠$30,000$20,000 → $50,000 · p. 84 ↗
  3. Health Services+⁠$26,539$93,753 → $120,292 · p. 84 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Behavior Intervention Instructor · $336,748 → $311,462 · p. 84 ↗−⁠$25,286
  • Vice Principal · $160,382 → $172,246 · p. 84 ↗+⁠$11,864
  • Academic Incentives and Academic Field Trips · $100,000 · p. 84 ↗new or renamed
  • MTSS · $99,606 · p. 84 ↗new or renamed
  • School Safety · $15,000 → $37,631 · p. 84 ↗+⁠$22,631
  • Mental Health and Social Emotional Learning · $10,000 → $5,000 · p. 84 ↗−⁠$5,000
  • Parent Involvement · $3,000 → $3,000 · p. 84 ↗unchanged
  • Additional Student Supports · $2,000 → $2,000 · p. 84 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 29 ↗.

Goal 3Cecil Avenue Math & Science Academy will continue in establishing a 21st Century learning community…$1.3 million32% of action budgets

“Cecil Avenue Math & Science Academy will continue in establishing a 21st Century learning community, fostering a dynamic synergy between students and parents. This endeavor will cultivate a culture ripe with avenues for progression, facilitating expanded access to a diverse array of academic disciplines, spanning Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM), while concurrently championing heightened levels of parental involvement” p. 40 ↗

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.9 million (−⁠$600,258)

Largest funded actions

  1. Technology equipment/ Infrastructure$457,131action 3.6 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. STEAM Instruction$227,791action 3.7 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Resource Clerk/​Librarian$195,931action 3.3 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. AVID Instruction/​Elective Course$173,919action 3.4 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Visual/​Performing Arts$157,109action 3.1 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • Science Education - SCICON · action 3.8 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$40,000
  • Biology · action 3.10 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$20,000
  • Technology (Software) · action 3.5 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$15,000
  • Family Engagement · action 3.2 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$5,000
  • Gifted and Talented Education · action 3.9 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Technology equipment/ Infrastructure−⁠$0.8 million$1.2 million → $0.5 million · p. 85 ↗
  2. STEAM Instruction+⁠$152,791$75,000 → $227,791 · p. 85 ↗
  3. AVID Instruction/​Elective Course+⁠$43,919$130,000 → $173,919 · p. 85 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Resource Clerk/​Librarian · $183,000 → $195,931 · p. 85 ↗+⁠$12,931
  • Visual/​Performing Arts · $201,000 → $157,109 · p. 85 ↗−⁠$43,891
  • Science Education - SCICON · $30,000 → $40,000 · p. 85 ↗+⁠$10,000
  • Biology · $20,000 → $20,000 · p. 85 ↗unchanged
  • Technology (Software) · $7,500 → $15,000 · p. 85 ↗+⁠$7,500
  • Family Engagement · $6,000 → $5,000 · p. 85 ↗−⁠$1,000
  • Gifted and Talented Education · $8,000 → $1,000 · p. 85 ↗−⁠$7,000

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 40 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

The full record

Source records

This page is built from 12 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.

Data updated

October 15, 2026

Record sets on this page
12
Sources
California Department of EducationU.S. Census Bureau
State test years
2017–2026

Results

Students

Money and staff

Place, downloads and method

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2025–26 · ranked #1,264 of 2,529 California middle schools we score · #4 of 4 in Delano Union Elementary
Score factors, 2025–26
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Advancedaverage of English and math13%4542%
Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math37%4723%
8th graders in 2026 against 6th graders in 2024 (partly different children)+50 scale-score pts5320%
Chronically absent10 in 100615%
Suspension rate2.5% (16 of 642)555%
English learners: top level16%435%

Index is where the school's value sits among the California middle schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. Growth is the change between the school's earlier and later grade-level groups, in scale-score points; it does not follow the same students.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2025–26 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2025–267550#1264California middle schools · 2,529 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspensionGrade gap (points)
2018–194 in 1008.0% (51 of 639)+2
2021–22not on filenot on file+8
2022–23not on filenot on file+11
2023–2412 in 1005.5% (36 of 652)−2
2024–255 in 1001.4% (9 of 642)−1
2025–2610 in 1002.5% (16 of 642)+7

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

Grade gap: the same year’s grade 6 and grade 8 results, side by side. They are different children, so the gap describes one year, not any child’s progress. The Scope Score’s growth measure is a different comparison, shown in Score factors above (how it’s built).
No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English59814%48%
2026 · Math60512%26%
2025 · English59113%46%
2025 · Math6018%27%
2024 · English60212%40%
2024 · Math6108%22%
2023 · English5998%38%
2023 · Math6088%19%
2022 · English57510%34%
2022 · Math5833%14%
2019 · English60410%38%
2019 · Math6068%23%
2018 · English6518%34%
2018 · Math6597%19%
2017 · English6947%35%
2017 · Math7047%20%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · English19547%
2025 · Grade 7 · English20151%
2025 · Grade 8 · English19540%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math19626%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math20426%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math20130%
2024 · Grade 6 · English17046%
2024 · Grade 7 · English19937%
2024 · Grade 8 · English23338%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math17320%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math20222%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math23523%
2023 · Grade 6 · English15731%
2023 · Grade 7 · English22740%
2023 · Grade 8 · English21540%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math15914%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math23017%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math21926%
2022 · Grade 6 · English17129%
2022 · Grade 7 · English20437%
2022 · Grade 8 · English20035%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math1749%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math20616%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math20318%
2019 · Grade 6 · English16037%
2019 · Grade 7 · English20936%
2019 · Grade 8 · English23540%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math16124%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math21020%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math23525%
2018 · Grade 6 · English20835%
2018 · Grade 7 · English23734%
2018 · Grade 8 · English20632%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math20917%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math24119%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math20920%
2017 · Grade 6 · English24833%
2017 · Grade 7 · English19638%
2017 · Grade 8 · English25035%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math24919%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math20118%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math25424%

Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide2099%15%57%20%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California
Group · EnglishTestedProficient or Advancedvs districtvs California
Low-income55247%−6+8
Hispanic or Latino54147%−7+8
English learners14412%0+5
Student groups: the state’s growth measureCalifornia School Dashboard 2025 · points above or below what the state expected · shown, not part of the score
GroupEnglishnCDE categoryMathnCDE category
All students+12551Accelerated+4551Average
Low-income+12511Accelerated+3511Average
Hispanic or Latino+12498Accelerated+4498Average
English learners+13308Accelerated+1308Average
English-only students+11200not categorized+7200not categorized
Recently reclassified as fluent in English+18186not categorized−2186not categorized
English learners only+2122not categorized+6122not categorized
Long-term English learners (grades 6–8 only)+1099Accelerated+1399Accelerated
Filipino+1843Accelerated+643Accelerated
Students with disabilities+2237Exceptional+3937Exceptional
Homeless+814Accelerated+1914Accelerated

CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-term English learner counts cover grades 6–8 only (CDE’s rule), so that row is not comparable to the All students row. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth recordsthe state’s student-by-student measure, and grade 8 against the same school’s grade 6 two years earlier, partly different children · two different measures

Grade 8 in 2026 against grade 6 in 2024 · English

English · 2024 · Grade 6
14%
exceeded standard · 46% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 170 English test records with scores
English · 2026 · Grade 8
14%
Advanced · 51% Proficient or Advanced
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 209 English test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 172 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe English results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across English and math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · points vs expected

State model · English+12 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 6–8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 6–8

551 students

CDE growth category: Accelerated

California growth model, English: +12 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Accelerated, against SchoolScope's −2-point median for California middle school records.

State model · math+4 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 6–8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 6–8

551 students

CDE growth category: Average

California growth model, math: +4 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Average, against SchoolScope's −3-point median for California middle school records.

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median English estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 5 in 100 → 2025–26 · 10 in 100 · +5 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 1.4% (9 of 642) → 2025–26 · 2.5% (16 of 642) · +1.1 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female4 in 1007 in 100+3 in 100
Male4 in 10012 in 100+8 in 100
Filipino0 of 390 of 46—
Hispanic or Latino5 in 10010 in 100+5 in 100
Students with disabilities3 of 5310 of 59—
English learners3 in 10011 in 100+8 in 100
Military families2 of 4510 of 69—
Low-income4 in 10010 in 100+6 in 100
All students4 in 10010 in 100+6 in 100
Homeless—1 of 17—

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$16,076 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 6,392 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$1,053 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 585

Central federal expenditures attributed here$1,510 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 585

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,322 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 59%Instruction support 10%Student services 11%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 11%Other 2%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$66,044,00158.59%59%
Instruction support$11,268,68810.00%10%
Student services$12,573,08911.15%11%
Administration$8,156,5987.24%7%
Buildings & maintenance$12,312,70210.92%11%
Other$2,366,5322.10%2%
Total$112,721,611100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $112,721,611 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$16,076 per pupil
2020$15,222 per pupil
2019$14,966 per pupil
2018$13,610 per pupil
2017$12,457 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders10.6%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 93215 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 93215 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$66,204
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)7%
ZIP-area population54,556
Median age33.8 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 93215 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/cecil-avenue-math-and-science-academy-9351"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 2,529 middle schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026

How we analyzeRequest a correction