Catherine L. Zane Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Catherine L. Zane posts 29% meeting the standard and 8.7% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
Catherine L. Zane Middle scores 27 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 26th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
Most rating sites would stop at “29% proficient” and call it done. Catherine L. Zane deserves a closer read. The school sits in Eureka, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 32.8% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 6.8pp across grades; the floor rises 14.4pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
The community around it
Student demographics
3 more gaps by subject
Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.
Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.
Subgroup Growth by Grade
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 15.8pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +15.2pp.
Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Funding Breakdown
Neighborhood Context
Whole Child
Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25
For the data nerdsEvery number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 120 | 3% | 28% | 19% | 49% | 32% | −15 |
| Grade 7 | 127 | 15% | 25% | 27% | 33% | 40% | −8 |
| Grade 8 | 128 | 10% | 36% | 24% | 30% | 46% | +0 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 122 | 4% | 10% | 19% | 67% | 14% | −21 |
| Grade 7 | 126 | 13% | 11% | 21% | 56% | 24% | −10 |
| Grade 8 | 127 | 7% | 9% | 26% | 58% | 16% | −17 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 125 | 8% | 16% | 59% | 17% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 288 | 34.0% | +2 | −4 |
| White | 135 | 49.6% | +6 | −12 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 123 | 30.9% | +1 | −8 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine L. Zane Middle ← | — | 27 | 8.7% | 28.6% | +8.1 | 16.5% |
| Winship Middle | 1.6 mi | 36 | 11.8% | 32.2% | +14.4 | 10.2% |
| California average | — | 40 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means