ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Campbell School of Innovation · Campbell

Campbell School of Innovation: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Campbell School of Innovation posts 50% meeting the standard, and 26.5% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

295 West Cherry Lane, 95008 (opens in new tab)·Campbell Union·Campbell·Grades TK-8·815 students·32% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 364-4222·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5245
% Exceeded26%21%
% Met+50%43%
Growth+3.5-2.9
Absence10.8%17.9%
Suspension2.7%1.6%
Scope Score
52
📈 On the Rise · Solid
ranked #1,741 statewide · #4 of 10 in Campbell Union

Campbell School of Innovation scores 52 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 70th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “50% proficient” and call it done. Campbell School of Innovation deserves a closer read. The school sits in Campbell, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

As a charter, Campbell School of Innovation enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 82nd to the 70th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 50% meet the standard today, versus 62% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 359%68%50%51%45%
Grade 476%43%59%57%60%
Grade 567%56%57%56%
Grade 644%62%36%56%
Grade 753%52%58%47%
Grade 843%52%56%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 362%64%46%56%48%
Grade 452%46%57%49%49%
Grade 546%35%47%44%
Grade 634%40%25%52%
Grade 727%39%44%38%
Grade 820%27%42%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

24%
22%
54%
Grade 3 · 46% proficient
38%
23%
39%
Grade 4 · 61% proficient
26%
30%
44%
Grade 5 · 56% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 1.9pp across grades; the floor rises 10.7pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
26.5%
State 21.3%
5.2pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+3.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
50.3%
State 42.7%
7.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
10.8%
State 17.9%
7.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.7%
State 1.6%
1.1pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Campbell School of Innovation in Campbell, 22.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 28.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Campbell School of Innovation trails its district average for low-income students by 6.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (17.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (23.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 48.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 160 students tested.

All students at this school: 49% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 49%, district —, state 43%49%
FemaleFemale: this school 47%, district 48%, state 44%47% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 52%, district 49%, state 42%52% · +2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 20%, district 25%, state 32%20% · −29 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 20%, district 25%, state 32%20% · −30 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 65%, district 68%, state 56%65% · +16 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 4%, district 9%, state 11%4% · −45 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 81%, district 82%, state 72%81% · +31 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 83%, district 70%, state 56%83% · +34 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 9.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.0pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 10.8%, district 11.6%, state 17.9%10.8% · −7.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.7%, district —, state 1.6%2.7% · +1.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (20.0% vs 7.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–67.9%
Grades 7–810.1%
TK/K20.0%

Where the path goes

The path below is estimated from nearby schools in the same district — scores shown for each next step.

Estimated K-12 Path
Elementary
Campbell School of Innova…
52
This school

Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 27:1, district 22:127:1
Teaching staff31 teachers
Avg. experience7.5 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$80,830 – $139,687
Principal salary$192,937 – $0
Superintendent salary$384,595

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $19,318, CA average $14,815$19,318 · spent at this school
Federal share$332 per student

$332 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,041 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support15%
Student services7%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,152 per pupil
2019$13,815 per pupil
2018$13,527 per pupil
2017$13,244 per pupil
2016$12,436 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic40.1%
District 48.2% · CA 56.1%
White28.3%
District 20.4% · CA 19.9%
Other14.7%
District 11.1% · CA 9.0%
Asian13.1%
District 16.9% · CA 10.2%
Black3.7%
District 3.4% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 32.3% (32pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$141K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.63M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+59% · CA 35%
ZIP population48,333
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 815 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 53% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Campbell School of Innovation a good elementary school?

Campbell School of Innovation has a Scope Score of 52 out of 100, placing it in the 70th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,741 statewide. 26.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.2 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Campbell School of Innovation's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 50.3% of students at Campbell School of Innovation met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 26.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 26.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 525 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Campbell School of Innovation rank in California?

Campbell School of Innovation ranks #1,741 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 70th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Campbell School of Innovation getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Campbell School of Innovation increases by 3.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Campbell School of Innovation?

10.8% of students at Campbell School of Innovation are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 2.7%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Campbell School of Innovation compare to other schools in Campbell?

Campbell School of Innovation scores 52/100 (70th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 815 students. Use the schools in Campbell page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Campbell School of Innovation serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Campbell School of Innovation in Campbell, 22.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 28.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Campbell School of Innovation trails its district average for low-income students by 6.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (17.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (23.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 48.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 160 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
26.5%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 55th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+3.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 55th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
50.3%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 56th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
10.8%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 62th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.7%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 41th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39324%22%22%33%45%+2
Grade 48038%23%14%26%60%+15
Grade 58626%30%16%28%56%+8
Grade 68223%33%21%23%56%+10
Grade 76819%28%28%25%47%−1
Grade 87224%32%22%22%56%+9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39624%24%17%35%48%+2
Grade 48223%26%23%28%49%+7
Grade 58825%19%31%25%44%+9
Grade 68333%19%17%31%52%+17
Grade 76920%17%20%42%38%+4
Grade 87226%15%19%39%42%+9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1116026%27%32%16%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16022.5%−6−16
Hispanic/Latino17623.3%−5−16
White15269.7%−1+8
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Campbell School of Innovation ←5226.5%50.3%+3.52.7%
Oster Elementary2.8 mi8057.9%78.3%+2.11.2%
Forest Hill Elementary1.5 mi7860.0%81.0%+8.01.1%
Bagby Elementary1.9 mi7549.8%73.5%+11.90.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196282#97435.4%62.0%4.4%1.5%
20225178#129033.6%55.8%16.5%1.7%-9.2pp
20235175#145428.8%50.6%16.8%4.5%-2.1pp
20244865#199929.0%52.8%12.9%1.6%-1.2pp
20255270#174126.5%50.3%10.8%2.7%+3.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 16 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female5.9%10.6%+4.7pp
Male1.8%10.1%+8.3pp
Asian6.0%3.7%-2.3pp
Black/African American0.0%16.7%+16.7pp
Hispanic/Latino6.0%15.6%+9.6pp
Two or More Races3.9%11.6%+7.7pp
Students with Disabilities0.0%19.5%+19.5pp
English Learners8.2%14.1%+5.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.3%16.4%+5.1pp
All Students3.8%10.4%+6.6pp
White14.3%
Homeless12.5%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction