Campbell Union runs schools through 5th grade. Its 10 public elementary schools run from the 22nd to the 95th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). Middle and high school are run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.
K5Elementary
612Middle and high
Campbell Union · grades K–5
Another district · grades 6–12
Elementary · 10 schools
from 22nd to 95th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests
Marshall Lane Elementary: 95th percentile, Strong
Forest Hill Elementary: 94th percentile, Strong
Capri Elementary: 82nd percentile, Strong
Village: 81st percentile, Strong
Lynhaven Elementary: 71st percentile, Solid
Campbell School of Innovation: 65th percentile, Solid
Blackford Elementary: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
3Developing
2Solid
4Strong
Middle · 4 schools
from 5th to 93rd · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests
Rolling Hills Middle: 93rd percentile, Strong
Campbell School of Innovation: 81st percentile, Strong
Sherman Oaks Elementary: 60th percentile, Solid
Monroe Middle: 5th percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
2Strong
← lower percentilehigher →
One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 2 of the 12 ranked schools teach two levels, so they appear in more than one picture.
The average elementary school in Campbell Union had 10 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.
Middle schools
Which middle schools in Campbell Union score highest?
Rolling Hills Middle is highest, at the 93rd percentile.
That’s higher than 93 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).
Highest in Campbell Union
Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean
Rolling Hills MiddleLos Gatos · Broad base · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
Monroe MiddleSan Jose · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
5thNeeds SupportScope Score 19
Context
The average middle school in Campbell Union had 11 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.
The district
Where does Campbell Union’s money go, and what does it plan?
Campbell Union spent $22,041 per student in the 2024–25 school year.
That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 63 cents of every Campbell Union dollar went to classroom instruction.
Spending by function
Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.
Share by function, 2024–25
Instruction63%
Instruction support15%
Student services7%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.
What the district plans
$20.0 million
planned in its 2026–27 plan for 58 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 14% of its $143.2 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.
The plan in short
Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 149 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
Where the money goes
Three actions take 36% of the money. The plan itself puts 96% of it toward staff.
Reading Intervention and Improvement Coach Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSAs) $3.4 million
Additional Administrative Support $2.1 million
Hire District Counselors $1.8 million
55 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help
11 of the plan’s 58 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.
Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
Reading $3.5 million
Math $0.3 million
Catch-up help $4.0 million
English learners $0.7 million
An action naming two of these appears under both.
Largest of these
Reading Intervention and Improvement Coach Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSAs)$3.4 million
ELD Teachers$661,792
Math Administrator on Special Assignment (AOSA), Improvement Coach$273,678
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students
It plans $10.9 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $10.4 million and estimates it spent $10.4 million, within 1% of the plan.
$10.4 million spent (estimated)$10.4 million planned
What changed
The total is $32,208 higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Behavior Support: General Education, which went from $331,396 to $1.1 million.
Largest cuts
Behavior Interventionists: Special Education−$239,572
ELD Teachers−$171,304
i-Ready Assessment Program−$146,567
Largest increases
Behavior Support: General Education+$725,216
Additional Administrative Support+$292,914
Reading Intervention and Improvement Coach Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSAs)+$169,095
New in the 2026–27 plan
Math Administrator on Special Assignment (AOSA), Improvement Coach$273,678
District Public Information Office (formerly Communication Specialist) and Marketing Budget$192,937
Mental Health Intern Program (replacing Skills for Student Counseling)$117,119
What its goals measure
Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.
What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure
2024–25
2025–26
Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1
19%
25%
up 6 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1
15%
24%
up 9 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 2
15 in 100
15 in 100
no change
Suspended at least onceGoal 2
1.6%
0.7%
down 0.9 pts
Goal 3 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.
Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.
The plan’s own titles and amounts
Reading Intervention and Improvement Coach Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSAs) · $3,425,317
Additional Administrative Support · $2,074,669
Hire District Counselors · $1,755,298
The full plan3 goals, 28 measures and where the money goes
We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($20.0 million).
Where does the money go?
61% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.
not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
Every goal, in the plan’s order
Goal 1Provide high quality academic first instruction for all students$12.2 million61% of action budgets
32 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $12.2 million (−$49,375) · p. 25 ↗
Largest funded actions
Reading Intervention and Improvement Coach Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSAs)$3.4 millionaction 1.1 · p. 97 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Additional Administrative Support$2.1 millionaction 1.15 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.8 million is state funding counted toward those services
Instructional Associates$1.5 millionaction 1.12 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $911,014 is state funding counted toward those services
Teaching and Learning Department Staff$1.1 millionaction 1.3 · p. 97 ↗
ELD Teachers$0.7 millionaction 1.13 · p. 98 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $373,490 is state funding counted toward those services
27 more funded actions in this goal
Additional Enrichment Teachers · action 1.20 · p. 99 ↗$0.6 million
District Library Media Specialists · action 1.8 · p. 98 ↗$0.4 million
Additional Middle School Teachers · action 1.18 · p. 99 ↗$0.4 million
Math Administrator on Special Assignment (AOSA), Improvement Coach · action 1.6 · p. 97 ↗$0.3 million
Coordinator of Innovation, Teaching and Learning · action 1.2 · p. 97 ↗$0.3 million
MTSS Administrators · action 1.21 · p. 99 ↗$0.2 million
Special Education Support Staff · action 1.5 · p. 97 ↗$0.2 million
Innovation Teachers · action 1.19 · p. 99 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
Provide out of school time intervention programs · action 1.16 · p. 99 ↗$0.2 million
Professional Development · action 1.10 · p. 98 ↗$0.1 million
MTSS Coordinator · action 1.4 · p. 97 ↗$0.1 million
School Site Additional Supplemental Concentration Funding - Monroe Middle School · action 1.7 · p. 97 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
i-Ready Assessment Program · action 1.11 · p. 98 ↗$0.1 million
Rosemary: Contract with EL Education for teacher Professional Development · action 1.24 · p. 100 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Speakers and Resources for Anti-Racism Training/Stipends for teacher leaders · action 1.14 · p. 99 ↗under $0.1 million
Studer Huron Education Consulting · action 1.9 · p. 98 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: Supplies · action 1.25 · p. 100 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: Reading Intervention · action 1.22 · p. 100 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: Field-trips · action 1.28 · p. 101 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: Teacher Stipends · action 1.32 · p. 101 ↗under $0.1 million
Advanced Via Individual Determination (AVID) Implementation · action 1.17 · p. 99 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: Conference · action 1.26 · p. 100 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: Release Days · action 1.27 · p. 100 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: Computer License Programs · action 1.29 · p. 101 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: Contract services · action 1.30 · p. 101 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: Textbooks · action 1.31 · p. 101 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary: MTSS After School Math Intervention · action 1.23 · p. 100 ↗under $0.1 million
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Additional Administrative Support+$0.3 million$1.8 million → $2.1 million · p. 99 ↗
ELD Teachers−$171,304$833,096 → $661,792 · p. 98 ↗
Reading Intervention and Improvement Coach Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSAs)+$0.2 million$3.3 million → $3.4 million · p. 97 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Instructional Associates · $1.5 million → $1.5 million · p. 98 ↗−$37,740
Teaching and Learning Department Staff · $1.1 million → $1.1 million · p. 97 ↗−$29,217
Rosemary: Textbooks · $7,000 · p. 101 ↗new or renamed
Rosemary: MTSS After School Math Intervention · $5,000 → $3,000 · p. 100 ↗−$2,000
A reworded title counts as new.
How the plan measures it · 13 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 25 ↗.
Goal 2Provide high quality social emotional learning for all students$6.4 million32% of action budgets
15 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $6.2 million (+$269,157) · p. 59 ↗
Largest funded actions
Hire District Counselors$1.8 millionaction 2.4 · p. 102 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Behavior Interventionists: Special Education$1.4 millionaction 2.8 · p. 102 ↗
Behavior Support: General Education$1.1 millionaction 2.9 · p. 102 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $493,282 is state funding counted toward those services
Bus Transportation$0.8 millionaction 2.3 · p. 102 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
School Service Staff$0.5 millionaction 2.5 · p. 102 ↗
10 more funded actions in this goal
District: PBIS Safety and Support Positions · action 2.15 · p. 103 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $343,704 is state funding counted toward those services$0.4 million
Rosemary: Behavior Specialist · action 2.11 · p. 102 ↗$0.1 million
Mental Health Intern Program (replacing Skills for Student Counseling) · action 2.1 · p. 101 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Rosemary: MTSS Aide · action 2.13 · p. 103 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Rosemary: Hire School Linked Services Coordinator · action 2.12 · p. 103 ↗$0.1 million
Panorama Contract · action 2.7 · p. 102 ↗under $0.1 million
District Transportation for families experiencing homelessness · action 2.14 · p. 103 ↗under $0.1 million
Professional Development for Staff · action 2.6 · p. 102 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary-Professional Development MTSS Aides Noon Duty Staff · action 2.16 · p. 103 ↗under $0.1 million
Rosemary-PBIS Support · action 2.17 · p. 103 ↗under $0.1 million
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Behavior Support: General Education+$0.7 million$0.3 million → $1.1 million · p. 102 ↗
Behavior Interventionists: Special Education−$0.2 million$1.6 million → $1.4 million · p. 102 ↗
Hire District Counselors+$0.1 million$1.7 million → $1.8 million · p. 102 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Bus Transportation · $857,057 → $815,290 · p. 102 ↗−$41,767
School Service Staff · $488,218 → $519,634 · p. 102 ↗+$31,416
District: PBIS Safety and Support Positions · $373,416 → $380,155 · p. 103 ↗+$6,739
Rosemary: Hire School Linked Services Coordinator · $102,946 → $106,693 · p. 103 ↗+$3,747
Panorama Contract · $27,135 → $28,000 · p. 102 ↗+$865
District Transportation for families experiencing homelessness · $5,000 → $10,000 · p. 103 ↗+$5,000
Professional Development for Staff · $8,000 → $8,000 · p. 102 ↗unchanged
Rosemary-Professional Development MTSS Aides Noon Duty Staff · $2,000 → $5,000 · p. 103 ↗+$3,000
Rosemary-PBIS Support · $3,000 → $3,000 · p. 103 ↗unchanged
A reworded title counts as new.
How the plan measures it · 7 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 59 ↗.
Goal 3Fully engage parents/guardians, and the community in support of student well-being$1.4 million7% of action budgets
11 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.6 million (−$187,574) · p. 73 ↗
Largest funded actions
Community Liaisons$518,793action 3.3 · p. 103 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $379,592 is state funding counted toward those services
All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.
Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends
Student mix
2024–25 · October enrollment count, 6,120 students
1Hispanic or Latino48%
2White20%
3Asian17%
4Two or more races8%
5Black or African American3%
6Filipino2%
7Not reported<1%
8Pacific Islander<1%
9American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.
Free or reduced-price meals
39%
Across California, 63% of students qualify.
2024–25 · 2,409 of 6,108 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.
The district’s state records
Is the state giving the district extra help?
Campbell Union isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.
How English learners moved up on the state’s English test
From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 47% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (94 of 201 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.
Which public schools in Campbell Union rank highest?
Elementary: Marshall Lane Elementary, 95th percentile (Strong). Middle: Rolling Hills Middle, 93rd percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.
Does living in the Campbell Union district decide which school my child attends?
Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)
Are the public schools in Campbell Union good?
Campbell Union’s 10 public elementary schools run from the 22nd to the 95th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 4 Strong, 2 Solid, 3 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Campbell Union’s 4 public middle schools run from the 5th to the 93rd percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Strong, 1 Solid and 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.
How does chronic absence in Campbell Union compare with California?
The average elementary school in Campbell Union had 10 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Campbell Union had 11 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.
How much does Campbell Union spend per student?
Campbell Union spent $22,041 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 63 cents of every Campbell Union dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.
What is in Campbell Union’s 2026–27 spending plan?
The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $20.0 million into 58 funded actions in 3 goals, 14% of its $143.2 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $12.2 million, 61% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.
Where do these results come from?
California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.
Sources and methodology
This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Campbell Union, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26
Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.