Elementary Schools in San Leandro, California: 12 schools. Average score 7.0 points below the state. Here is what that number does — and doesn't — tell you.
San Leandro, California has 12 ranked elementary schools with an average Scope Score of 37.8/100 — 7.0 points below the state average of 44.8. The highest-scoring school is Madison Elementary at 53/100, where 28.1% of students exceed the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment. San Leandro schools average 14.7% exceeded standard (state: 21.3%) — this exceeded-vs-met distinction reveals whether schools push students beyond proficiency or pace toward it. Chronic absenteeism averages 22.0% (above the state average of 17.9%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
| Level | Schools | Avg Score | Exceeded | vs State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elementary | 12 | Developing 37.8/100 | 14.7% | -7.0 |
| High | 2 | Developing 31.0/100 | 6.6% | -12.8 |
| Middle | 3 | Developing 38.2/100 | 12.2% | -4.4 |
How San Leandro schools compare
San Leandro has 12 ranked elementary schools with an average Scope Score of 37.8/100 — 7.0 points below the state average of 44.8 (CDE CAASPP 2025).
The top-ranked school is Madison Elementary with a Scope Score of 53 and 28.1% of students exceeding standard.
Chronic absenteeism in San Leandro averages 22.0% — above the state average of 17.9%.
How we score · Weighted composite of test performance, growth, and school climate · Full weights on the methodology page
School archetypes in San Leandro
Archetypes are data-driven labels based on Scope Score dimensions. Learn more
Every school in San Leandro
ranked by Scope Score · 2024–25 CAASPP
| # | School | Exceeded | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madison Elementary San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 28.1% | Solid 53/100 |
| 2 | Roosevelt Elementary San Leandro Unified Culture First | 31.4% | Developing 50/100 |
| 3 | San Leandro High San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 10.2% | Developing 45/100 |
| 4 | John Muir Middle San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 12.8% | Developing 42/100 |
| 5 | Washington Elementary San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 18.4% | Developing 41/100 |
| 6 | Monroe Elementary San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 14.8% | Developing 39/100 |
| 7 | Dayton Elementary San Lorenzo Unified Building Momentum | 21.1% | Developing 39/100 |
| 8 | Washington Manor Middle San Lorenzo Unified Building Momentum | 12.3% | Developing 38/100 |
| 9 | Jefferson Elementary San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 9.5% | Developing 37/100 |
| 10 | Halkin Elementary San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 11.2% | Developing 36/100 |
| 11 | McKinley Elementary San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 12.1% | Developing 36/100 |
| 12 | San Leandro Virtual Academy San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 4.5% | Developing 35/100 |
| 13 | Corvallis Elementary San Lorenzo Unified Building Momentum | 13.0% | Developing 34/100 |
| 14 | Bancroft Middle San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 11.3% | Developing 34/100 |
| 15 | Garfield Elementary San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 7.1% | Developing 32/100 |
| 16 | Hillside Elementary San Lorenzo Unified Building Momentum | 5.2% | Needs Support 22/100 |
| 17 | Lincoln High (Continuation) San Leandro Unified Building Momentum | 2.9% | Needs Support 17/100 |
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2024-25 · Methodology
Scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data, not official CDE ratings. They represent one way of interpreting test results and should not be the sole basis for school decisions.
Private Schools in San Leandro
Private schools don't participate in California's standardized testing (CAASPP) and cannot be scored or ranked. Showing enrollment, student-teacher ratio, and affiliation where available.
Numbers tell you whether students are clearing the bar. A school visit tells you whether they're happy doing it. These metrics are intentionally missing from the Scope Score: class sizes and student-teacher interaction quality; arts, music, athletics, and enrichment programs; teacher experience and turnover; campus safety and social-emotional support; parent and community engagement; quality of special education and gifted programs; how school zones and enrollment boundaries affect access. Full methodology