School district · Stanislaus County

Turlock Unified schools

Turlock Unified’s 9 public elementary schools run from the 1st to the 80th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). They sit in all four bands, from Strong to Needs Support.

Elementary · 9 schools

from 1st to 80th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Walnut Elementary Education Center: 80th percentile, Strong
  • Julien Elementary: 70th percentile, Solid
  • Sandra Tovar Medeiros Elementary: 58th percentile, Solid
  • Osborn Two-Way Immersion Academy: 38th percentile, Developing
  • Wakefield Elementary: 37th percentile, Developing
  • Crowell Elementary: 31st percentile, Developing
  • Dennis G. Earl Elementary: 20th percentile, Needs Support
  • Walter M. Brown Elementary: 14th percentile, Needs Support
  • Cunningham Elementary: 1st percentile, Needs Support
3Needs Support
3Developing
2Solid
1Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 3 schools

from 10th to 50th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Marvin A. Dutcher Middle: 50th percentile, Solid
  • Turlock Junior High: 41st percentile, Developing
  • eCademy Charter at Crane: 10th percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
1Developing
1Solid
0Strong

High · 3 schools

from 9th to 45th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • John H. Pitman High: 45th percentile, Developing
  • Turlock High: 38th percentile, Developing
  • eCademy Charter at Crane: 9th percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
2Developing
0Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 1 of the 14 ranked schools teaches two levels, so it appears in more than one picture.

  • 14 ranked schools
  • 2 schools not ranked statewide

Schools around Turlock Unified

16 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Turlock Unified score highest?

Walnut Elementary Education Center is highest, at the 80th percentile.

That’s higher than 80 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Turlock Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 6 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Turlock Unified had 19 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Turlock Unified score highest?

Marvin A. Dutcher Middle is highest, at the 50th percentile.

That’s higher than 50 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Turlock Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Context

The average middle school in Turlock Unified had 22 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Turlock Unified score highest?

John H. Pitman High is highest, at the 45th percentile.

That’s higher than 45 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Turlock Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Context

The average high school in Turlock Unified had 24 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

2 high schools not ranked statewide

Continuation schools and alternative schools enroll students differently from a regular school, so each is compared only with schools of its kind.

  • Roselawn HighContinuation high school: compared only with other continuation schools
  • Fusion CharterAlternative school: compared only with other alternative schools

The district

Where does Turlock Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Turlock Unified spent $18,903 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 69 cents of every Turlock Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction69%
  • Instruction support10%
  • Student services8%
  • Administration5%
  • Buildings & maintenance7%
  • Other1%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$59.4 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 62 funded actions in 6 goals. That’s 22% of its $269.9 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 155 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

The money is spread out. No action gets more than 12%, and the three largest, MTSS, Educational Services and Health Support, take 35% between them. The plan itself puts 84% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

7 of the plan’s 62 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $1.7 million
  • Math under $0.1 million
  • Catch-up help $9.5 million
  • English learners $1.9 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • MTSS$7.2 million
  • Summer school$2.3 million
  • English Learners$1.9 million
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $38.2 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $37.1 million and estimates it spent $36.8 million, within 1% of the plan.

What changed

The total is $1.4 million (2%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is MTSS, which went from $6.5 million to $7.2 million.

Largest cuts

  • 21st Century Skills−⁠$500,109
  • Curriculum−⁠$325,000
  • Focused Student Supports−⁠$283,081

Largest increases

  • MTSS+⁠$730,517
  • Health Support+⁠$718,258
  • Classroom Technology+⁠$370,000

Ask: What did 21st Century Skills pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $500,109 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2 and 341%42%up 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2 and 328%29%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoals 1, 2 and 421 in 10021 in 100no change
Suspended at least onceGoals 1, 2 and 52.2%2.2%no change

Goal 6 isn’t shown because it tracks named schools.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • MTSS · $7,185,744
  • Educational Services · $7,023,867
  • Health Support · $6,490,249
The full plan6 goals, 76 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($59.4 million).

Where does the money go?

55% to Goal 1, Academic Achievement & Social-Emotional Learning. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4
G5

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Academic Achievement & Social-Emotional Learning$32.5 million55% of action budgets

“Utilize a multi-tiered system of supports to increase academic achievement & social-emotional learning to enhance student success & well- being and promote college & career readiness among all students” p. 18 ↗

28 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $31.4 million (+⁠$1.1 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. MTSS$7.2 millionaction 1.2 · p. 105 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $4.4 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Educational Services$7.0 millionaction 1.15 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.6 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Health Support$6.5 millionaction 1.26 · p. 107 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.2 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. CTE$4.4 millionaction 1.1 · p. 105 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $4.2 million is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Summer school$2.3 millionaction 1.4 · p. 105 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

23 more funded actions in this goal

  • Eligible Student Support · action 1.18 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.3 million
  • SLPAs · action 1.19 · p. 106 ↗$1.0 million
  • College/​Career Counseling · action 1.16 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • Outdoor Education · action 1.14 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • BRIDGE · action 1.9 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • District Farm · action 1.13 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Student Welfare Attendance Specialists · action 1.23 · p. 107 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • District assessments · action 1.8 · p. 105 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Data Analyst · action 1.22 · p. 107 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Guaranteed & Viable Learning Experiences · action 1.3 · p. 105 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • STEM · action 1.5 · p. 105 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • SPED Case Managers · action 1.20 · p. 107 ↗$0.1 million
  • Study Trip Transportation · action 1.11 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Events & Recognitions · action 1.24 · p. 107 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $50,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Music · action 1.7 · p. 105 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Data Entry · action 1.10 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Universal Reading Diagnostic · action 1.21 · p. 107 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • College Program · action 1.6 · p. 105 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Community Resources · action 1.25 · p. 107 ↗under $0.1 million
  • State Seal of Biliteracy · action 1.28 · p. 107 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Student Input · action 1.27 · p. 107 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Concurrent opportunities · action 1.12 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • PSAT · action 1.17 · p. 106 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. MTSS+⁠$0.7 million$6.5 million → $7.2 million · p. 105 ↗
  2. Health Support+⁠$0.7 million$5.8 million → $6.5 million · p. 107 ↗
  3. Summer school−⁠$0.3 million$2.6 million → $2.3 million · p. 105 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Educational Services · $7.0 million → $7.0 million · p. 106 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • CTE · $4.7 million → $4.4 million · p. 105 ↗−⁠$0.2 million
  • Eligible Student Support · $1.3 million → $1.3 million · p. 106 ↗−⁠$19,125
  • SLPAs · $738,995 → $972,044 · p. 106 ↗+⁠$233,049
  • College/​Career Counseling · $465,980 → $493,319 · p. 106 ↗+⁠$27,339
  • Outdoor Education · $385,162 → $385,000 · p. 106 ↗−⁠$162
  • BRIDGE · $256,721 → $263,934 · p. 106 ↗+⁠$7,213
  • District Farm · $230,722 → $238,377 · p. 106 ↗+⁠$7,655
  • Student Welfare Attendance Specialists · $215,583 → $230,194 · p. 107 ↗+⁠$14,611
  • District assessments · $228,650 → $215,000 · p. 105 ↗−⁠$13,650
  • Data Analyst · $126,614 → $132,405 · p. 107 ↗+⁠$5,791
  • Guaranteed & Viable Learning Experiences · $120,000 → $130,000 · p. 105 ↗+⁠$10,000
  • STEM · $121,893 → $123,732 · p. 105 ↗+⁠$1,839
  • SPED Case Managers · $147,508 → $121,020 · p. 107 ↗−⁠$26,488
  • Study Trip Transportation · $100,000 → $100,000 · p. 106 ↗unchanged
  • Events & Recognitions · $110,000 → $80,000 · p. 107 ↗−⁠$30,000
  • Music · $75,000 → $75,000 · p. 105 ↗unchanged
  • Data Entry · $68,000 → $68,000 · p. 106 ↗unchanged
  • Universal Reading Diagnostic · $171,500 → $58,000 · p. 107 ↗−⁠$113,500
  • College Program · $25,000 → $25,000 · p. 105 ↗unchanged
  • Community Resources · $22,450 → $9,450 · p. 107 ↗−⁠$13,000
  • State Seal of Biliteracy · $9,000 → $9,000 · p. 107 ↗unchanged
  • Student Input · $7,000 → $6,000 · p. 107 ↗−⁠$1,000
  • Concurrent opportunities · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 106 ↗unchanged
  • PSAT · $10,000 → $1,500 · p. 106 ↗−⁠$8,500

How the plan measures it · 30 measures · 3 quoted

  • College/Career Indicator p. 19 ↗
    Baseline
    All = 49.1% prepared/Medium Level …
    Target for year 3
    All = 55% prepared/HighLeve l …
  • English Language Arts Indicator p. 19 ↗
    Baseline
    All = 32.3 points below standard. Status Level = Orange (2023 Dashboard); …
    Target for year 3
    All = Increase average to 5 points below standard level/Green (Dashboard); …
  • Mathematics Indicator p. 20 ↗
    Baseline
    All = 73.2 points below standard. Status Level = Orange (2023 Dashboard); …
    Target for year 3
    All = Increase average to 25 points below standard/Green (Dashboard); …

27 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Access & Opportunity$5.3 million9% of action budgets

“Create practices & experiences to increase achievement for all students” p. 43 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.4 million (−⁠$125,638)

Largest funded actions

  1. Home-to-School Transportation$3.6 millionaction 2.1 · p. 107 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. HR Practices$1.2 millionaction 2.2 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. AP Testing$0.2 millionaction 2.4 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Trainings & Materials$0.1 millionaction 2.3 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $100,000 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Focused Student Supports$0.1 millionaction 2.6 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

1 more funded action in this goal

  • Ethnic Studies · action 2.5 · p. 108 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Focused Student Supports−⁠$283,081$392,711 → $109,630 · p. 108 ↗
  2. HR Practices+⁠$0.1 million$1.1 million → $1.2 million · p. 108 ↗
  3. Home-to-School Transportation+⁠$0.1 million$3.6 million → $3.6 million · p. 107 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • AP Testing · $145,000 → $175,000 · p. 108 ↗+⁠$30,000
  • Trainings & Materials · $125,000 → $125,000 · p. 108 ↗unchanged
  • Ethnic Studies · $107,177 → $44,000 · p. 108 ↗−⁠$63,177

How the plan measures it · 11 measures · 2 quoted

  • ELA Indicator p. 46 ↗
    Baseline
    All = 32.3 points below standard. Status Level = Orange (2023 Dashboard); …
    Target for year 3
    All = Increase average to 5 points below standard level/Green (Dashboard); …
  • Mathematics Indicator p. 46 ↗
    Baseline
    All = 73.2 points below standard. Status Level = Orange (2023 Dashboard); …
    Target for year 3
    All = Increase average to 25 points below standard/Green (Dashboard); …

9 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3Curriculum & Instruction$11.2 million19% of action budgets

“Provide guaranteed & viable learning from highly qualified teachers who use adopted materials & effective instructional practices to implement standards” p. 51 ↗

12 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $11.6 million (−⁠$407,937)

Largest funded actions

  1. Curriculum$2.8 millionaction 3.9 · p. 109 ↗
  2. English Learners$1.9 millionaction 3.3 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.5 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Classroom Technology$1.7 millionaction 3.6 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Early Literacy Specialists$1.5 millionaction 3.4 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Technology Staff$1.0 millionaction 3.7 · p. 109 ↗

7 more funded actions in this goal

  • 21st Century Skills · action 3.12 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.6 million
  • Professional Development · action 3.5 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.6 million
  • Professional Learning Communities · action 3.8 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Teacher Induction · action 3.2 · p. 108 ↗$0.4 million
  • Science of Reading · action 3.11 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $50,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Highly Qualified Staff · action 3.1 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • State & Federal Reviews · action 3.10 · p. 109 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. 21st Century Skills−⁠$0.5 million$1.1 million → $0.6 million · p. 109 ↗
  2. Classroom Technology+⁠$0.4 million$1.3 million → $1.7 million · p. 108 ↗
  3. Curriculum−⁠$0.3 million$3.1 million → $2.8 million · p. 109 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • English Learners · $1.7 million → $1.9 million · p. 108 ↗+⁠$0.2 million
  • Early Literacy Specialists · $1.4 million → $1.5 million · p. 108 ↗+⁠$33,065
  • Technology Staff · $1.0 million → $1.0 million · p. 109 ↗+⁠$46,277
  • Professional Development · $859,206 → $645,130 · p. 108 ↗−⁠$214,076
  • Professional Learning Communities · $449,829 → $448,624 · p. 109 ↗−⁠$1,205
  • Teacher Induction · $567,207 → $434,270 · p. 108 ↗−⁠$132,937
  • Science of Reading · $50,000 → $210,000 · p. 109 ↗+⁠$160,000
  • Highly Qualified Staff · $12,400 → $12,400 · p. 108 ↗unchanged
  • State & Federal Reviews · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 109 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 15 measures · 3 quoted

  • ELA Indicator p. 53 ↗
    Baseline
    All = 32.3 points below standard. Status Level = Orange (2023 Dashboard); …
    Target for year 3
    All = Increase average to 5 points below standard level/Green (Dashboard); …
  • Mathematics Indicator p. 53 ↗
    Baseline
    All = 73.2 points below standard. Status Level = Orange (2023 Dashboard); …
    Target for year 3
    All = Increase average to 25 points below standard/Green (Dashboard); …
  • A-G Completion Rate p. 54 ↗
    Baseline
    44.13% of graduates meeting UC/CSU requirements (2022-23 CALPADS)
    Target for year 3
    50% of graduates meeting UC/CSU requirements (CALPADS)

12 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4Parent Engagement$1.6 million3% of action budgets

“Expand opportunities to increase parent & family involvement to support District initiatives” p. 62 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.5 million (+⁠$177,677)

Largest funded actions

  1. Community Liaisons$906,897action 4.3 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Communication$521,365action 4.4 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. PIQE/​PEP$120,000action 4.1 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Family Resource Center$46,000action 4.5 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Parent Information Nights$40,000action 4.2 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

1 more funded action in this goal

  • SARB · action 4.6 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$14,860

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Community Liaisons+⁠$153,047$753,850 → $906,897 · p. 109 ↗
  2. Family Resource Center+⁠$26,000$20,000 → $46,000 · p. 109 ↗
  3. Parent Information Nights−⁠$3,754$43,754 → $40,000 · p. 109 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Communication · $519,569 → $521,365 · p. 109 ↗+⁠$1,796
  • PIQE/​PEP · $120,000 → $120,000 · p. 109 ↗unchanged
  • SARB · $14,272 → $14,860 · p. 109 ↗+⁠$588

How the plan measures it · 9 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 62 ↗.

Goal 5Safety & Security$8.5 million14% of action budgets

“Uphold policies, procedures, & maintain facilities that reflect a safe, secure environment” p. 68 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $7.8 million (+⁠$654,947)

Largest funded actions

  1. Facilities$4.9 millionaction 5.1 · p. 110 ↗
  2. Bell-to-Bell Security$2.8 millionaction 5.4 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. SROs$0.7 millionaction 5.3 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Safety Partnershipsunder $0.1 millionaction 5.5 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Canine Contraband Serviceunder $0.1 millionaction 5.6 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

1 more funded action in this goal

  • Safety Trainings · action 5.2 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Facilities+⁠$0.3 million$4.6 million → $4.9 million · p. 110 ↗
  2. SROs+⁠$180,000$500,000 → $680,000 · p. 110 ↗
  3. Bell-to-Bell Security+⁠$0.2 million$2.6 million → $2.8 million · p. 110 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Safety Partnerships · $37,000 → $40,000 · p. 110 ↗+⁠$3,000
  • Canine Contraband Service · $4,800 → $5,120 · p. 110 ↗+⁠$320
  • Safety Trainings · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 110 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 68 ↗.

Goal 6 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalEquity Multiplier$299,1391% of action budgets

“Utilize a multi-tiered system of supports (MTSS) to increase academic achievement, social-emotional learning, and improve student behavior to enhance student success and well-being while promoting College and Career Readiness for all Roselawn High School students” p. 74 ↗

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $281,716 (+⁠$17,423)

Largest funded actions

  1. MTSS SEL/​Behavior Supports$187,049action 6.1 · p. 110 ↗
  2. Career Ready Students$64,115action 6.3 · p. 110 ↗
  3. CTE Courses$42,807action 6.4 · p. 110 ↗
  4. ELA & Math Achievement$5,168action 6.2 · p. 110 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Career Ready Students+⁠$5,224$58,891 → $64,115 · p. 110 ↗
  2. CTE Courses+⁠$3,783$39,024 → $42,807 · p. 110 ↗
  3. MTSS SEL/​Behavior Supports+⁠$3,248$183,801 → $187,049 · p. 110 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • ELA & Math Achievement · $5,168 · p. 110 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 4 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 74 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 13,744 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 61%2. White: 26%3. Asian: 7%4. Two or more races: 2%5. Not reported: 2%6. Black or African American: 2%7. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. Filipino: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino61%
  2. White26%
  3. Asian7%
  4. Two or more races2%
  5. Not reported2%
  6. Black or African American2%
  7. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. Filipino<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

65%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 8,870 of 13,734 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Turlock Unified extra help in 2026. A student group had the Dashboard’s lowest results (red) on two or more measures three years in a row.

It also qualified the year before.

Which students, on which measures

Students with disabilities
English and math

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 45% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (1,280 of 2,843 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Cunningham Elementary (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (3)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Turlock Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Walnut Elementary Education Center, 80th percentile (Strong). Middle: Marvin A. Dutcher Middle, 50th percentile (Solid). High: John H. Pitman High, 45th percentile (Developing). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Turlock Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Turlock Unified good?

Turlock Unified’s 9 public elementary schools run from the 1st to the 80th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong, 2 Solid, 3 Developing and 3 Needs Support. Turlock Unified’s 3 public middle schools run from the 10th to the 50th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid, 1 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Turlock Unified’s 3 public high schools run from the 9th to the 45th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 2 Developing and 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Turlock Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Turlock Unified had 19 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Turlock Unified had 22 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Turlock Unified had 24 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Turlock Unified spend per student?

Turlock Unified spent $18,903 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 69 cents of every Turlock Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Turlock Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $59.4 million into 62 funded actions in 6 goals, 22% of its $269.9 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $32.5 million, 55% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Turlock Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.