School district · Sonoma County

Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified schools

In Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified, 2 of 3 public high schools sit at or above the 50th percentile among California high schools we score; 0 of 3 public middle schools do (spring 2026 tests; high schools, spring 2025).

Elementary · 7 schools

from 4th to 58th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Monte Vista Elementary: 58th percentile, Solid
  • Marguerite Hahn Elementary: 43rd percentile, Developing
  • University Elementary at La Fiesta: 41st percentile, Developing
  • Evergreen Elementary: 27th percentile, Developing
  • Richard Crane Elementary: 17th percentile, Needs Support
  • John Reed Primary: 7th percentile, Needs Support
  • Thomas Page Academy: 4th percentile, Needs Support
3Needs Support
3Developing
1Solid
0Strong

Middle · 3 schools

from 8th to 33rd · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Lawrence E. Jones Middle: 33rd percentile, Developing
  • Technology Middle: 20th percentile, Needs Support
  • Thomas Page Academy: 8th percentile, Needs Support
2Needs Support
1Developing
0Solid
0Strong

High · 3 schools

from 22nd to 96th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Technology High: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Credo High: 85th percentile, Strong
  • Rancho Cotate High: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
2Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 1 of the 12 ranked schools teaches two levels, so it appears in more than one picture.

  • 12 ranked schools
  • 1 school not ranked statewide

Schools around Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified

13 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified score highest?

Monte Vista Elementary is highest, at the 58th percentile.

That’s higher than 58 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 4 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified had 18 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified score highest?

Lawrence E. Jones Middle is highest, at the 33rd percentile.

That’s higher than 33 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Context

The average middle school in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified had 20 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified score highest?

Technology High is highest, at the 96th percentile.

That’s higher than 96 in 100 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

  • Technology HighRohnert Park · Broad base · Check how it admits students.
    96thStrongScope Score 84
  • Credo HighRohnert Park · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
    85thStrongScope Score 71
  • Rancho Cotate HighRohnert Park
    22ndNeeds SupportScope Score 47
Context

The average high school in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified had 16 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

1 high school not ranked statewide
  • El Camino HighContinuation high school: compared only with other continuation schools

The district

Where does Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified spent $18,291 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction61%
  • Instruction support11%
  • Student services13%
  • Administration6%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%
  • Other1%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$13.4 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 53 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 12% of its $113.2 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 222 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

The money is spread out. No action gets more than 9%, and the three largest, K-3 Class Size Reduction, Mental & Behavioral Health Services and Nursing Support, take 23% between them. The plan itself puts 70% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

11 of the plan’s 53 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $0.3 million
  • Math $0.2 million
  • Catch-up help $1.7 million
  • English learners $0.1 million

Largest of these

  • Summer School Intervention$750,000
  • Language Intervention Sections$612,475
  • MTSS$226,843
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $8.1 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $8.1 million and estimates it spent $8.1 million, within 1% of the plan.

What changed

The total is $54,000 higher than in the 2025–26 plan.

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • El Camino Counselor$104,000
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2 and 441%42%up 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2 and 428%27%down 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoals 1, 2 and 421 in 10020 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoals 2, 3 and 43.8%3.8%no change

Goal 5 isn’t shown because it tracks named schools.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • K-3 Class Size Reduction · $1,253,991
  • Mental & Behavioral Health Services · $942,248
  • Nursing Support · $929,671
The full plan5 goals, 101 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($13.4 million).

Where does the money go?

43% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1CRPUSD will enhance instructional outcomes for students and close achievement gaps across specific student…$5.7 million43% of action budgets

“CRPUSD will enhance instructional outcomes for students and close achievement gaps across specific student demographic groups so that ALL students receive a high-quality, well-rounded, just, and accommodating education that addresses their individual needs” p. 33 ↗

22 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.7 million (unchanged)

Largest funded actions

  1. K-3 Class Size Reduction$1.3 millionaction 1.18 · p. 172 ↗
  2. Professional Development$0.8 millionaction 1.4 · p. 171 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Summer School Intervention$0.8 millionaction 1.22 · p. 173 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $100,000 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. El Camino High School$0.6 millionaction 1.23 · p. 173 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Phoenix Staffing$0.4 millionaction 1.17 · p. 172 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

16 more funded actions in this goal

  • AVID · action 1.12 · p. 172 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Teacher Induction Training · action 1.9 · p. 171 ↗$0.3 million
  • College and Career Readiness · action 1.11 · p. 172 ↗$0.2 million
  • ELA Supports · action 1.7 · p. 171 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Afterschool Intervention at Middle Schools · action 1.16 · p. 172 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Elementary Math Curriculum · action 1.25 · p. 173 ↗$0.1 million
  • Online Core Curriculum · action 1.10 · p. 171 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Data Analysis · action 1.5 · p. 171 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Attendance · action 1.19 · p. 173 ↗$0.1 million
  • Math Supports · action 1.8 · p. 171 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • New Teacher Support · action 1.21 · p. 173 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Common Formative Assessment · action 1.2 · p. 171 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Outdoor Education · action 1.14 · p. 172 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Summer School Credit Recovery · action 1.15 · p. 172 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Social Studies Supplemental Curriculum · action 1.24 · p. 173 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Local Assessment · action 1.6 · p. 171 ↗under $0.1 million

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • K-3 Class Size Reduction · $1.3 million → $1.3 million · p. 172 ↗unchanged
  • Professional Development · $773,421 → $773,421 · p. 171 ↗unchanged
  • Summer School Intervention · $750,000 → $750,000 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • El Camino High School · $606,000 → $606,000 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • Phoenix Staffing · $370,000 → $370,000 · p. 172 ↗unchanged
  • AVID · $366,000 → $366,000 · p. 172 ↗unchanged
  • Teacher Induction Training · $345,000 → $345,000 · p. 171 ↗unchanged
  • College and Career Readiness · $181,086 → $181,086 · p. 172 ↗unchanged
  • ELA Supports · $175,000 → $175,000 · p. 171 ↗unchanged
  • Afterschool Intervention at Middle Schools · $130,000 → $130,000 · p. 172 ↗unchanged
  • Elementary Math Curriculum · $130,000 → $130,000 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • Online Core Curriculum · $126,442 → $126,442 · p. 171 ↗unchanged
  • Data Analysis · $122,664 → $122,664 · p. 171 ↗unchanged
  • Title not confirmed · $115,000 · p. 172 ↗not compared
  • Attendance · $53,000 → $53,000 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • Math Supports · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 171 ↗unchanged
  • New Teacher Support · $45,000 → $45,000 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • Common Formative Assessment · $40,092 → $40,092 · p. 171 ↗unchanged
  • Outdoor Education · $38,000 → $38,000 · p. 172 ↗unchanged
  • Summer School Credit Recovery · $27,500 → $27,500 · p. 172 ↗unchanged
  • Social Studies Supplemental Curriculum · $25,000 → $25,000 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • Local Assessment · $17,716 → $17,716 · p. 171 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 32 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 33 ↗.

Goal 2CRPUSD will create a safe and welcoming learning atmosphere that provides a conducive environment that…$4.5 million34% of action budgets

“CRPUSD will create a safe and welcoming learning atmosphere that provides a conducive environment that supports social emotional learning for all student scholars and staff” p. 72 ↗

14 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $4.5 million (unchanged)

Largest funded actions

  1. Mental & Behavioral Health Services$942,248action 2.8 · p. 174 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Nursing Support$929,671action 2.9 · p. 174 ↗
  3. TPA Bussing$793,451action 2.11 · p. 174 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Student Support Advisors$558,787action 2.14 · p. 175 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Elementary Assistant Principals$365,381action 2.6 · p. 174 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

9 more funded actions in this goal

  • MTSS · action 2.1 · p. 173 ↗$226,843
  • Team Success & CPI / Suspension & Expulsion Diversion · action 2.10 · p. 174 ↗$200,000
  • Student Services Specialist II · action 2.15 · p. 175 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$198,514
  • PBIS · action 2.2 · p. 173 ↗$118,643
  • Professional Development · action 2.5 · p. 174 ↗$70,000
  • Homeless/​Foster Support · action 2.12 · p. 175 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$50,000
  • SEL Curriculum · action 2.4 · p. 173 ↗$41,648
  • Restorative Practices Administrator Academy · action 2.3 · p. 173 ↗$28,958
  • Co-Teaching · action 2.13 · p. 175 ↗$10,000

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Mental & Behavioral Health Services · $942,248 → $942,248 · p. 174 ↗unchanged
  • Nursing Support · $929,671 → $929,671 · p. 174 ↗unchanged
  • TPA Bussing · $793,451 → $793,451 · p. 174 ↗unchanged
  • Student Support Advisors · $558,787 → $558,787 · p. 175 ↗unchanged
  • Elementary Assistant Principals · $365,381 → $365,381 · p. 174 ↗unchanged
  • MTSS · $226,843 → $226,843 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • Team Success & CPI / Suspension & Expulsion Diversion · $200,000 → $200,000 · p. 174 ↗unchanged
  • Student Services Specialist II · $198,514 → $198,514 · p. 175 ↗unchanged
  • PBIS · $118,643 → $118,643 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • Professional Development · $70,000 → $70,000 · p. 174 ↗unchanged
  • Homeless/​Foster Support · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 175 ↗unchanged
  • SEL Curriculum · $41,648 → $41,648 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • Restorative Practices Administrator Academy · $28,958 → $28,958 · p. 173 ↗unchanged
  • Co-Teaching · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 175 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 26 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 72 ↗.

Goal 3CRPUSD will engage parents, families and community partners through education, communication, and…$681,8565% of action budgets

“CRPUSD will engage parents, families and community partners through education, communication, and collaboration to promote student success” p. 101 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $731,856 (−⁠$50,000)

Largest funded actions

  1. Translation Services$304,514action 3.5 · p. 176 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Community Liaisons$287,342action 3.4 · p. 175 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Educational Partner Education$50,000action 3.2 · p. 175 ↗
  4. Parent Communication$30,000action 3.1 · p. 175 ↗
  5. Community Resources$5,000action 3.6 · p. 176 ↗

1 more funded action in this goal

  • Family and Community Engagement · action 3.8 · p. 176 ↗$5,000

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Translation Services · $304,514 → $304,514 · p. 176 ↗unchanged
  • Community Liaisons · $287,342 → $287,342 · p. 175 ↗unchanged
  • Educational Partner Education · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 175 ↗unchanged
  • Parent Communication · $30,000 → $30,000 · p. 175 ↗unchanged
  • Community Resources · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 176 ↗unchanged
  • Family and Community Engagement · $5,000 · p. 176 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 11 measures · 3 quoted

  • Percentage of Schools that have ELAC meetings that meet the frequency and composition requirement p. 102 ↗
    Baseline
    90% of schools had a functioning ELAC.
    Target for year 3
    100% of schools have a functioning ELAC, meeting all state requirements.
  • DELAC Participation p. 102 ↗
    Baseline
    90% schools have an elected parent rep in DELAC.
    Target for year 3
    100% schools have an elected parent rep in DELAC.
  • ELAC Compliance p. 103 ↗
    Baseline
    90% schools have a functioning ELAC
    Target for year 3
    100% schools have a functioning ELAC

8 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4 · Focus GoalCRPUSD will improve academic outcomes for Multilingual Language Learners$2.3 million17% of action budgets

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.3 million (unchanged) · p. 111 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Multilingual Language Learner Support Staffing$877,951action 4.5 · p. 176 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Language Intervention Sections$612,475action 4.6 · p. 176 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Middle School Multilingual Curriculum$275,000action 4.9 · p. 177 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $13,300 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Middle School Investigative Learning$162,201action 4.8 · p. 177 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Unduplicated Student ELA Support$118,000action 4.10 · p. 177 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • ELD Professional Development · action 4.1 · p. 176 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$100,000
  • Multilingual Language Learner Roadmap · action 4.3 · p. 176 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$70,000
  • ELPAC Testing Support · action 4.4 · p. 176 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$44,322
  • ELD Instructional Supports · action 4.2 · p. 176 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$30,000
  • Seal of Biliteracy · action 4.7 · p. 177 ↗$2,000

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Multilingual Language Learner Support Staffing · $877,951 → $877,951 · p. 176 ↗unchanged
  • Language Intervention Sections · $612,475 → $612,475 · p. 176 ↗unchanged
  • Middle School Multilingual Curriculum · $275,000 → $275,000 · p. 177 ↗unchanged
  • Middle School Investigative Learning · $162,201 → $162,201 · p. 177 ↗unchanged
  • Unduplicated Student ELA Support · $118,000 → $118,000 · p. 177 ↗unchanged
  • ELD Professional Development · $100,000 → $100,000 · p. 176 ↗unchanged
  • Multilingual Language Learner Roadmap · $70,000 → $70,000 · p. 176 ↗unchanged
  • ELPAC Testing Support · $44,322 → $44,322 · p. 176 ↗unchanged
  • ELD Instructional Supports · $30,000 → $30,000 · p. 176 ↗unchanged
  • Seal of Biliteracy · $2,000 → $2,000 · p. 177 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 27 measures · 1 quoted

  • Seal of Biliteracy p. 112 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 7 students district wide
    Target for year 3
    30 students district wide

26 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 5 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalEl Camino High School will increase student engagement and overall well-being by providing access to a…$104,0001% of action budgets

“El Camino High School will increase student engagement and overall well-being by providing access to a dedicated counselor who delivers individualized academic guidance, credit recovery support, and social-emotional services. This support will foster strong, supportive adult relationships that promote student engagement, persistence, and academic success” p. 129 ↗

1 funded action · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. El Camino Counselor$104,000action 5.1 · p. 177 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • El Camino Counselor · $104,000 · p. 177 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 5 measures · 1 quoted

  • El Camino Attendance rate p. 129 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024: 63.58%
    Target for year 3
    All Students: 80%

4 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 6,798 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 45%2. White: 37%3. Two or more races: 7%4. Asian: 4%5. Black or African American: 3%6. Not reported: 2%7. Filipino: <1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino45%
  2. White37%
  3. Two or more races7%
  4. Asian4%
  5. Black or African American3%
  6. Not reported2%
  7. Filipino<1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

47%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 3,174 of 6,737 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified extra help in 2026. A student group had the Dashboard’s lowest results (red) on two or more measures three years in a row.

It also qualified the year before.

Which students, on which measures

English learners
English and math
Long-term English learners
English and math

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 47% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (407 of 859 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Technology Middle (Extra targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (3)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Monte Vista Elementary, 58th percentile (Solid). Middle: Lawrence E. Jones Middle, 33rd percentile (Developing). High: Technology High, 96th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified good?

Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified’s 7 public elementary schools run from the 4th to the 58th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid, 3 Developing and 3 Needs Support. Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified’s 3 public middle schools run from the 8th to the 33rd percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing and 2 Needs Support. Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified’s 3 public high schools run from the 22nd to the 96th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 2 Strong and 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified had 18 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified had 20 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified had 16 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified spend per student?

Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified spent $18,291 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $13.4 million into 53 funded actions in 5 goals, 12% of its $113.2 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $5.7 million, 43% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.