School district · Sonoma County

Bellevue Union schools

Bellevue Union runs schools through 6th grade. Its 4 public elementary schools run from the 12th to the 43rd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). Middle and high school are run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 4 schools

from 12th to 43rd · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Meadow View Elementary: 43rd percentile, Developing
  • Taylor Mountain Elementary: 21st percentile, Needs Support
  • Kawana Springs Elementary: 19th percentile, Needs Support
  • Bellevue Elementary: 12th percentile, Needs Support
3Needs Support
1Developing
0Solid
0Strong

One dot per school.

Schools around Bellevue Union

4 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Bellevue Union score highest?

Meadow View Elementary is highest, at the 43rd percentile.

That’s higher than 43 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Bellevue Union

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 1 elementary school
Context

The average elementary school in Bellevue Union had 19 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

The district

Where does Bellevue Union’s money go, and what does it plan?

Bellevue Union spent $23,949 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 64 cents of every Bellevue Union dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction64%
  • Instruction support8%
  • Student services16%
  • Administration6%
  • Buildings & maintenance6%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$9.5 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 24 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s 24% of its $39.7 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 106 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 48% of the money. The plan itself puts 86% of it toward staff.

  • Additional Teaching Staff (Grades 1-6) $1.8 million
  • Additional Support for Special Day Class (SDC) Program $1.5 million
  • Additional Teaching Staff (Transitional Kindergarten and Kindergarten) $1.3 million
  • 21 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

1 of the plan’s 24 funded actions names reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in its title.

Actions whose titles name English learners
  • English learners $97,654

Largest of these

  • Technology Platforms to Support English Learners$97,654
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $7.1 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $6.9 million and estimates it spent $7.6 million, $0.7 million (10%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $2.2 million (30%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Additional Support for Special Day Class (SDC) Program, which went from $383,300 to $1.5 million.

Largest cuts

  • Student Services Program−⁠$124,447
  • Additional Supports for Unduplicated Students−⁠$33,309
  • Additional Support for Struggling Learners−⁠$32,823

Largest increases

  • Additional Support for Special Day Class (SDC) Program+⁠$1.1 million
  • Additional Teaching Staff (Transitional Kindergarten and Kindergarten)+⁠$539,881
  • Professional Development+⁠$127,175

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Additional Support for Kindergarten Classrooms$445,967
  • Hybrid/​Alternative Learning Support$30,250

Ask: What did Student Services Program pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $124,447 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Increase Student Success and Support Student Learning27%25%down 2 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Increase Student Success and Support Student Learning19%21%up 2 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 220 in 10019 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 31.2%1.1%down 0.1 pts

Goal 4 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Additional Teaching Staff (Grades 1-6) · $1,806,297
  • Additional Support for Special Day Class (SDC) Program · $1,455,482
  • Additional Teaching Staff (Transitional Kindergarten and Kindergarten) · $1,305,962
The full plan4 goals, 38 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($9.5 million).

Where does the money go?

62% to Goal 1, Increase Student Success and Support Student Learning. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Increase Student Success and Support Student Learning$5.9 million62% of action budgets

“Ensure quality learning for each and every student to reach their potential 1.1 Improve Student Learning Outcomes through High-Quality Instruction 1.2 Improve Academic Support through the Use of Research-Based Curriculum and Instruction 1.3 Improve Educator Proficiency (Efficacy) through Robust Professional Development and Collaboration 1.4 Improve Data Systems 1.5 Recruit, Support and Retain Highly Qualified Staff” p. 17 ↗

11 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $4.1 million (+⁠$1.7 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Additional Teaching Staff (Grades 1-6)$1.8 millionaction 1.6 · p. 64 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Additional Support for Special Day Class (SDC) Program$1.5 millionaction 1.2 · p. 64 ↗
  3. Additional Teaching Staff (Transitional Kindergarten and Kindergarten)$1.3 millionaction 1.4 · p. 64 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Professional Development$0.3 millionaction 1.9 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Instructional Planning$0.3 millionaction 1.11 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

6 more funded actions in this goal

  • Student Data Synthesis and Analysis · action 1.13 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Additional Supports for Unduplicated Students · action 1.3 · p. 64 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Student Data and Support · action 1.12 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Technology Platforms to Support English Learners · action 1.10 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Hybrid/​Alternative Learning Support · action 1.8 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Additional Support for Struggling Learners · action 1.5 · p. 64 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Additional Support for Special Day Class (SDC) Program+⁠$1.1 million$0.4 million → $1.5 million · p. 64 ↗
  2. Additional Teaching Staff (Transitional Kindergarten and Kindergarten)+⁠$0.5 million$0.8 million → $1.3 million · p. 64 ↗
  3. Professional Development+⁠$127,175$213,889 → $341,064 · p. 65 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Additional Teaching Staff (Grades 1-6) · $1.8 million → $1.8 million · p. 64 ↗+⁠$13,497
  • Instructional Planning · $325,000 → $339,259 · p. 65 ↗+⁠$14,259
  • Student Data Synthesis and Analysis · $193,936 → $206,835 · p. 65 ↗+⁠$12,899
  • Additional Supports for Unduplicated Students · $205,300 → $171,991 · p. 64 ↗−⁠$33,309
  • Student Data and Support · $108,619 → $100,869 · p. 65 ↗−⁠$7,750
  • Technology Platforms to Support English Learners · $88,146 → $97,654 · p. 65 ↗+⁠$9,508
  • Hybrid/​Alternative Learning Support · $30,250 · p. 65 ↗new or renamed
  • Additional Support for Struggling Learners · $45,000 → $12,177 · p. 64 ↗−⁠$32,823

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 17 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 17 ↗.

Goal 2Increase Connectedness, Involvement and Positive School Environments: Ensure a positive and respectful school…$1.4 million15% of action budgets

“Increase Connectedness, Involvement and Positive School Environments: Ensure a positive and respectful school climate for students, staff and families which includes positive school cultures 2.1 Improve Student Engagement through Experiential Learning 2.2 Build on Existing Classroom Management Strategies to Further Maximize Instructional Time for Learning 2.3 Build on Existing Strategies to Create Safe and Welcoming Environments that Foster a Sense of Belonging 2.4 Expand/​Build on Existing Structures that Support Family Engagement and Belonging (Sense of Community)” p. 33 ↗

8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.5 million (−⁠$71,483)

Largest funded actions

  1. Social Emotional Learning and Support$543,887action 2.6 · p. 66 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Home to School Support$337,944action 2.9 · p. 66 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Experiential Learning Experiences$160,000action 2.1 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Student Mental Health and Behavioral Support$112,674action 2.3 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Student Services Program Support$79,609action 2.7 · p. 66 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

3 more funded actions in this goal

  • Chronic Absenteeism Prevention · action 2.5 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$73,390
  • Services for Family Engagement · action 2.8 · p. 66 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$46,717
  • Student Services Program · action 2.4 · p. 65 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$33,108

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Student Services Program−⁠$124,447$157,555 → $33,108 · p. 65 ↗
  2. Social Emotional Learning and Support+⁠$33,320$510,567 → $543,887 · p. 66 ↗
  3. Services for Family Engagement+⁠$18,000$28,717 → $46,717 · p. 66 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Home to School Support · $324,370 → $337,944 · p. 66 ↗+⁠$13,574
  • Experiential Learning Experiences · $160,000 → $160,000 · p. 65 ↗unchanged
  • Student Mental Health and Behavioral Support · $111,328 → $112,674 · p. 65 ↗+⁠$1,346
  • Student Services Program Support · $90,845 → $79,609 · p. 66 ↗−⁠$11,236
  • Chronic Absenteeism Prevention · $75,430 → $73,390 · p. 65 ↗−⁠$2,040

How the plan measures it · 11 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 33 ↗.

Goal 3Optimize facilities and learning environments for all students: Ensure safe, secure, accessible, and…$1.8 million19% of action budgets

“Optimize facilities and learning environments for all students: Ensure safe, secure, accessible, and efficient classrooms, facilities, and grounds 3.1 Enhance Learning Environments to Further Maximize Instructional Time for Learning 3.2 Utilize Best Practices for Staff Development in the Area of School Safety 3.3 Provide Safe and Active Engagement for Students Outside of Instructional Time” p. 43 ↗

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.7 million (+⁠$102,741)

Largest funded actions

  1. Transportation for Students$932,702action 3.4 · p. 66 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Safe and Engaging Learning Environments$666,706action 3.2 · p. 66 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Student Health and Wellness$143,999action 3.1 · p. 66 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Provide Extracurricular Activities to Students$91,336action 3.3 · p. 66 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Safe and Engaging Learning Environments+⁠$57,466$609,240 → $666,706 · p. 66 ↗
  2. Transportation for Students+⁠$32,702$900,000 → $932,702 · p. 66 ↗
  3. Provide Extracurricular Activities to Students+⁠$22,173$69,163 → $91,336 · p. 66 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Student Health and Wellness · $153,599 → $143,999 · p. 66 ↗−⁠$9,600

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 43 ↗.

Goal 4 · Focus GoalIncrease Student Success in Kindergarten$445,9675% of action budgets

“Ensure early learners receive high quality instructional support by reducing student to adult ratios to provide intervention and acceleration for identified students. Students will demonstrate growth in both ESGI letter sounds and addition as a result of the decreased ratios allowing for more concentrated and focused instruction and intervention both in one-on-one settings and in small groups” p. 49 ↗

1 funded action · 2025–26 plan: $0 (+⁠$445,967)

Largest funded actions

  1. Additional Support for Kindergarten Classrooms$445,967action 4.1 · p. 66 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Additional Support for Kindergarten Classrooms · $445,967 · p. 66 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 3 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 49 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 1,655 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 84%2. White: 7%3. Asian: 5%4. Black or African American: 2%5. Two or more races: 1%6. Pacific Islander: <1%7. Filipino: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino84%
  2. White7%
  3. Asian5%
  4. Black or African American2%
  5. Two or more races1%
  6. Pacific Islander<1%
  7. Filipino<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported0%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

75%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 1,237 of 1,646 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Bellevue Union extra help in 2026. A student group had the Dashboard’s lowest results (red) on two or more measures three years in a row.

Which students, on which measures

English learners
English and English learner progress

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 44% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (265 of 605 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Bellevue Union rank highest?

Elementary: Meadow View Elementary, 43rd percentile (Developing). Each percentile is among the California elementary schools we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Bellevue Union district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Bellevue Union good?

Bellevue Union’s 4 public elementary schools run from the 12th to the 43rd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing and 3 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Bellevue Union compare with California?

The average elementary school in Bellevue Union had 19 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Bellevue Union spend per student?

Bellevue Union spent $23,949 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 64 cents of every Bellevue Union dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Bellevue Union’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $9.5 million into 24 funded actions in 4 goals, 24% of its $39.7 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $5.9 million, 62% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Bellevue Union, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.