School district · San Bernardino County

Chino Valley Unified schools

Chino Valley Unified’s 24 public elementary schools run from the 16th to the 99th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). They sit in all four bands, from Strong to Needs Support.

Elementary · 24 schools

from 16th to 99th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Country Springs Elementary: 99th percentile, Strong
  • Hidden Trails Elementary: 95th percentile, Strong
  • Rolling Ridge Elementary: 94th percentile, Strong
  • Michael G. Wickman Elementary: 92nd percentile, Strong
  • Eagle Canyon Elementary: 89th percentile, Strong
  • Edwin Rhodes Elementary: 86th percentile, Strong
  • Oak Ridge Elementary: 83rd percentile, Strong
  • Gerald F. Litel Elementary: 83rd percentile, Strong
  • Liberty Elementary: 81st percentile, Strong
  • Cal Aero Preserve Academy: 81st percentile, Strong
  • Chaparral Elementary: 78th percentile, Strong
  • Butterfield Ranch Elementary: 77th percentile, Strong
  • Lyle S. Briggs Fundamental: 68th percentile, Solid
  • Allegiance STEAM Academy - Thrive: 66th percentile, Solid
  • Legacy Academy: 64th percentile, Solid
  • Alicia Cortez Elementary: 57th percentile, Solid
  • Glenmeade Elementary: 57th percentile, Solid
  • E. J. Marshall Elementary: 52nd percentile, Solid
  • Howard Cattle Elementary: 49th percentile, Developing
  • Newman Elementary: 39th percentile, Developing
  • Levi H. Dickey Elementary: 36th percentile, Developing
  • Walnut Avenue Elementary: 34th percentile, Developing
  • Dickson Elementary: 28th percentile, Developing
  • Anna A. Borba Fundamental Elementary: 16th percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
5Developing
6Solid
12Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 9 schools

from 27th to 96th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Canyon Hills Junior High: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Cal Aero Preserve Academy: 93rd percentile, Strong
  • Robert O. Townsend Junior High: 89th percentile, Strong
  • Lyle S. Briggs Fundamental: 66th percentile, Solid
  • Legacy Academy: 63rd percentile, Solid
  • Allegiance STEAM Academy - Thrive: 61st percentile, Solid
  • Woodcrest Junior High: 55th percentile, Solid
  • Magnolia Junior High: 53rd percentile, Solid
  • Ramona Junior High: 27th percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
5Solid
3Strong

High · 4 schools

from 38th to 91st · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Ruben S. Ayala High: 91st percentile, Strong
  • Chino Hills High: 79th percentile, Strong
  • Don Antonio Lugo High: 48th percentile, Developing
  • Chino High: 38th percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
2Developing
0Solid
2Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 4 of the 33 ranked schools teach two levels, so they appear in more than one picture.

  • 33 ranked schools
  • 2 schools not ranked statewide

Schools around Chino Valley Unified

35 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Chino Valley Unified score highest?

Country Springs Elementary is highest, at the 99th percentile.

That’s higher than 99 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Chino Valley Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 21 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Chino Valley Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Chino Valley Unified score highest?

Canyon Hills Junior High is highest, at the 96th percentile.

That’s higher than 96 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Chino Valley Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 6 middle schools
Context

The average middle school in Chino Valley Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Chino Valley Unified score highest?

Ruben S. Ayala High is highest, at the 91st percentile.

That’s higher than 91 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Chino Valley Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 1 high school
Context

The average high school in Chino Valley Unified had 21 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

2 high schools not ranked statewide

Continuation schools and court and community schools enroll students differently from a regular school, so each is compared only with its own kind or not ranked.

The district

Where does Chino Valley Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Chino Valley Unified spent $17,387 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Chino Valley Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction61%
  • Instruction support11%
  • Student services9%
  • Administration6%
  • Buildings & maintenance10%
  • Other3%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$92.4 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 59 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s 18% of its $507.2 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 162 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 45% of the money. The plan itself puts 78% of it toward staff.

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support $26.3 million
  • Transportation $9.8 million
  • Facilities $6.0 million
  • 56 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

7 of the plan’s 59 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Math under $0.1 million
  • Catch-up help $4.8 million
  • English learners $1.0 million

Largest of these

  • Increased Academic Support within Smaller Settings at Buena Vista and Boys Republic$3.8 million
  • Bilingual Translation Services$789,058
  • High School Intervention Counselors$669,767
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $73.7 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $41.4 million and estimates it spent $49.2 million, $7.8 million (19%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $32.0 million (53%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Multi-Tiered Systems of Support, which went from $4.6 million to $26.3 million.

Largest increases

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support+⁠$21.7 million
  • Transportation+⁠$8.1 million
  • Promotion of Multilingual Programs+⁠$650,171

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support-Behavior (MTSS-B) Intervention Counselors$5.5 million
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 362%63%up 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 350%51%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 216 in 10015 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 22.4%2.1%down 0.3 pts

Goal 4 tracks named schools and Goal 1 tracks other measures, so they aren’t shown here.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support · $26,297,192
  • Transportation · $9,763,703
  • Facilities · $5,965,000
The full plan4 goals, 47 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($92.4 million).

Where does the money go?

37% to Goal 3. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1All students are provided a high-quality teaching and learning environment$22.2 million24% of action budgets

15 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $21.5 million (+⁠$673,587) · p. 21 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Facilities$6.0 millionaction 1.14 · p. 112 ↗
  2. Student Technology$3.4 millionaction 1.12 · p. 112 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Instructional Support$3.0 millionaction 1.6 · p. 111 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. VAPA$1.9 millionaction 1.9 · p. 111 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Library and Media Support$1.8 millionaction 1.3 · p. 111 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

10 more funded actions in this goal

  • Common Core Materials · action 1.4 · p. 111 ↗$1.5 million
  • Preschool Inclusion Program · action 1.11 · p. 111 ↗$1.2 million
  • Professional Development · action 1.7 · p. 111 ↗$1.1 million
  • Career Pathways and Options · action 1.10 · p. 111 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $767,337 is state funding counted toward those services$0.9 million
  • Teacher Technology · action 1.15 · p. 112 ↗$0.6 million
  • New Teacher Induction · action 1.2 · p. 111 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • GATE · action 1.8 · p. 111 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Common Core Supplemental Supports · action 1.5 · p. 111 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Instructional Technology · action 1.13 · p. 112 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Recruitment Fairs · action 1.1 · p. 111 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Professional Development+⁠$0.6 million$0.6 million → $1.1 million · p. 111 ↗
  2. Preschool Inclusion Program−⁠$0.2 million$1.4 million → $1.2 million · p. 111 ↗
  3. Career Pathways and Options+⁠$130,466$786,871 → $917,337 · p. 111 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Facilities · $6.0 million → $6.0 million · p. 112 ↗unchanged
  • Student Technology · $3.4 million → $3.4 million · p. 112 ↗unchanged
  • Instructional Support · $3.0 million → $3.0 million · p. 111 ↗+⁠$25,346
  • VAPA · $1.8 million → $1.9 million · p. 111 ↗+⁠$44,497
  • Library and Media Support · $1.8 million → $1.8 million · p. 111 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Common Core Materials · $1.4 million → $1.5 million · p. 111 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Teacher Technology · $600,000 → $600,000 · p. 112 ↗unchanged
  • New Teacher Induction · $500,000 → $500,000 · p. 111 ↗unchanged
  • GATE · $200,000 → $200,000 · p. 111 ↗unchanged
  • Common Core Supplemental Supports · $35,000 → $35,000 · p. 111 ↗unchanged
  • Instructional Technology · $20,000 → $20,000 · p. 112 ↗unchanged
  • Recruitment Fairs · $15,000 → $15,000 · p. 111 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 9 measures · 3 quoted

  • % of Fully Credentialed Teachers (State p. 22 ↗
    Baseline
    2021-2022 District: 91.7% clear or …
    Target for year 3
    2024-2025 District: 92.0% clear or …
  • % of teachers and students with access to technology that is four years or newer p. 25 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 District: 100% of teachers and students have access to upgraded technology and access to …
    Target for year 3
    2026-2027 District: 100% of teachers and students have access to upgraded technology and access to …
  • % of School Facilities in “Good” Repair (State p. 25 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 District: 100% of facilities have a good or higher rating with minimal deficiencies
    Target for year 3
    2026-2027 District: 100% of facilities have a good or higher rating with minimal deficiencies

6 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Students, parents, families, and staff are connected and engaged to their school to ensure student success$31.7 million34% of action budgets

24 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $22.8 million (+⁠$8.8 million) · p. 33 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Transportation$9.8 millionaction 2.18 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Multi-Tiered Systems of Support-Behavior (MTSS-B) Intervention Counselors$5.5 millionaction 2.10 · p. 113 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $5.0 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. School Based Health Services$5.3 millionaction 2.15 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $4.7 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Intensive Student Support$2.3 millionaction 2.24 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $631,879 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Mental Health Services (Licensed Therapists)$1.8 millionaction 2.13 · p. 114 ↗

19 more funded actions in this goal

  • Chronic Absenteeism Supports · action 2.22 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.0 million
  • Supplemental Education for K-12 · action 2.11 · p. 113 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.8 million
  • Bilingual Translation Services · action 2.3 · p. 112 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.8 million
  • HOPE Resource Center · action 2.17 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $500,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.8 million
  • Community Day School · action 2.19 · p. 114 ↗$0.7 million
  • High School Intervention Counselors · action 2.9 · p. 113 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.7 million
  • CVUSD Health Center · action 2.16 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Student Support Services Staff/​School Sites · action 2.25 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Family Engagement · action 2.1 · p. 112 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Case Management for Families with Need · action 2.12 · p. 113 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $82,638 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • Foster Youth Counselor and Clerk · action 2.20 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Contracted Mental Health Services · action 2.21 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support-Behavior (MTSS-B) Materials · action 2.5 · p. 113 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Saturday School · action 2.14 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Safe Schools · action 2.7 · p. 113 ↗under $0.1 million
  • School Governance · action 2.2 · p. 112 ↗under $0.1 million
  • School Quality Survey · action 2.8 · p. 113 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Suicide Prevention Training · action 2.6 · p. 113 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Parent/​Guardian Information Forum · action 2.4 · p. 113 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Transportation+⁠$8.1 million$1.7 million → $9.8 million · p. 114 ↗
  2. Intensive Student Support+⁠$0.3 million$2.0 million → $2.3 million · p. 114 ↗
  3. HOPE Resource Center+⁠$161,132$600,000 → $761,132 · p. 114 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support-Behavior (MTSS-B) Intervention Counselors · $5.5 million · p. 113 ↗new or renamed
  • School Based Health Services · $5.2 million → $5.3 million · p. 114 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Mental Health Services (Licensed Therapists) · $1.7 million → $1.8 million · p. 114 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Chronic Absenteeism Supports · $974,544 → $996,704 · p. 114 ↗+⁠$22,160
  • Supplemental Education for K-12 · $866,748 → $819,522 · p. 113 ↗−⁠$47,226
  • Bilingual Translation Services · $752,258 → $789,058 · p. 112 ↗+⁠$36,800
  • Community Day School · $711,982 → $741,083 · p. 114 ↗+⁠$29,101
  • High School Intervention Counselors · $670,373 → $669,767 · p. 113 ↗−⁠$606
  • CVUSD Health Center · $417,373 → $440,606 · p. 114 ↗+⁠$23,233
  • Student Support Services Staff/​School Sites · $396,923 → $420,307 · p. 114 ↗+⁠$23,384
  • Family Engagement · $303,612 → $313,377 · p. 112 ↗+⁠$9,765
  • Case Management for Families with Need · $250,022 → $254,995 · p. 113 ↗+⁠$4,973
  • Foster Youth Counselor and Clerk · $240,416 → $254,892 · p. 114 ↗+⁠$14,476
  • Contracted Mental Health Services · $182,097 → $182,097 · p. 114 ↗unchanged
  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support-Behavior (MTSS-B) Materials · $161,000 → $161,000 · p. 113 ↗unchanged
  • Saturday School · $90,880 → $90,816 · p. 114 ↗−⁠$64
  • Safe Schools · $44,000 → $44,000 · p. 113 ↗unchanged
  • School Governance · $12,000 → $30,000 · p. 112 ↗+⁠$18,000
  • School Quality Survey · $30,000 → $30,000 · p. 113 ↗unchanged
  • Suicide Prevention Training · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 113 ↗unchanged
  • Parent/​Guardian Information Forum · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 113 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 11 measures · 3 quoted

  • % of Graduation Rate (State California School Dashboard - Graduation Rate p. 35 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 District: 94.7% graduation rate …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026 District: 95% graduation rate …
  • % of Attendance Rate (State p. 35 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 District: 92.75% attendance rate
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026 District: 93.00% attendance rate
  • % of Chronic Absenteeism Rate (State p. 35 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 District: 19.5% chronic absenteeism rate …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026 District: 16.5% chronic absenteeism rate …

8 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3All students are prepared for college and career beyond graduation$34.5 million37% of action budgets

14 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $12.1 million (+⁠$22.4 million) · p. 49 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Multi-Tiered Systems of Support$26.3 millionaction 3.2 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Regional Occupational Program$3.2 millionaction 3.19 · p. 116 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Promotion of Multilingual Programs$2.6 millionaction 3.16 · p. 116 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Access & Equity$0.6 millionaction 3.12 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $223,103 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. AVID$0.4 millionaction 3.8 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

9 more funded actions in this goal

  • Career Centers · action 3.10 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Professional Development to Support English Learners and Long Term English Learners (LTELs) · action 3.11 · p. 115 ↗$0.2 million
  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: Academic (MTSS-A) Support · action 3.1 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Alternative Education Support · action 3.3 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Advanced Placement Exam Access · action 3.14 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Increased Access to Advanced Placement (AP) Programs · action 3.15 · p. 116 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $132,000 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • After School Tutoring · action 3.5 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • College Awareness · action 3.6 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Multilingual Program Support · action 3.17 · p. 116 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Multi-Tiered Systems of Support+⁠$21.7 million$4.6 million → $26.3 million · p. 115 ↗
  2. Promotion of Multilingual Programs+⁠$0.7 million$1.9 million → $2.6 million · p. 116 ↗
  3. Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: Academic (MTSS-A) Support+⁠$68,000$165,000 → $233,000 · p. 114 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Regional Occupational Program · $3.2 million → $3.2 million · p. 116 ↗unchanged
  • Access & Equity · $609,478 → $639,887 · p. 115 ↗+⁠$30,409
  • AVID · $411,000 → $411,000 · p. 115 ↗unchanged
  • Career Centers · $286,594 → $283,719 · p. 115 ↗−⁠$2,875
  • Professional Development to Support English Learners and Long Term English Learners (LTELs) · $235,000 → $235,000 · p. 115 ↗unchanged
  • Alternative Education Support · $165,026 → $174,330 · p. 115 ↗+⁠$9,304
  • Advanced Placement Exam Access · $135,000 → $168,000 · p. 115 ↗+⁠$33,000
  • Increased Access to Advanced Placement (AP) Programs · $166,000 → $166,000 · p. 116 ↗unchanged
  • After School Tutoring · $100,000 → $100,000 · p. 115 ↗unchanged
  • College Awareness · $29,000 → $29,000 · p. 115 ↗unchanged
  • Multilingual Program Support · $11,000 → $11,000 · p. 116 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 21 measures · 2 quoted

  • California Science Test (CAST): Grades 5, 8, and High School % Met or Exceeded (M or E) (State p. 53 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 District: 37.18% …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026 District: 39.0% …
  • % of English learners reclassified as Fluent English Proficient since last census (State p. 55 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 District: 20.7% of English learners reclassified as Fluent English Proficient since last …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026 District: 24.0% of English learners reclassified as Fluent English Proficient since last …

19 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalDuring the 2024-2027 LCAP cycle, Chino Valley School District is committed to increasing the college and…$4.0 million4% of action budgets

“During the 2024-2027 LCAP cycle, Chino Valley School District is committed to increasing the college and career readiness of students at Buena Vista (BV), Chino Valley Learning Academy (CVLA), and Boys Republic High School (BR). This commitment is reflected in a targeted emphasis on improving Graduation Rates, Suspension Rates, Mathematics proficiency, school connectedness, and performance on the College and Career Indicator. The goal is designed to benefit every student, with a targeted focus on providing Foster Youth, Hispanic students, and those facing Socioeconomic challenges with additional support tailored to their needs” p. 67 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.9 million (+⁠$78,540)

Largest funded actions

  1. Increased Academic Support within Smaller Settings at Buena Vista and Boys Republic$3.8 millionaction 4.4 · p. 117 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.5 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Buena Vista Infant Toddler Center$0.1 millionaction 4.7 · p. 117 ↗
  3. Student Connectedness$0.1 millionaction 4.6 · p. 117 ↗
  4. BVROP Transportationunder $0.1 millionaction 4.1 · p. 116 ↗
  5. Career and Community College Awarenessunder $0.1 millionaction 4.5 · p. 117 ↗

1 more funded action in this goal

  • Math PLC · action 4.2 · p. 116 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Increased Academic Support within Smaller Settings at Buena Vista and Boys Republic+⁠$0.1 million$3.8 million → $3.8 million · p. 117 ↗
  2. Student Connectedness−⁠$3,044$55,274 → $52,230 · p. 117 ↗
  3. Buena Vista Infant Toddler Center−⁠$1,468$107,051 → $105,583 · p. 117 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • BVROP Transportation · $20,000 → $20,000 · p. 116 ↗unchanged
  • Career and Community College Awareness · $4,000 → $4,000 · p. 117 ↗unchanged
  • Math PLC · $3,000 → $3,000 · p. 116 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 6 measures · 2 quoted

  • % of Students Accessing Transportation to BVROP p. 68 ↗
    Baseline
    2024-2025 100% access to BVROP for students who need transportation
    Target for year 3
    2026-2027 100% access to BVROP for students who need transportation
  • % Prepared on the College and Career Indicator p. 69 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 District: 49.7% (medium) …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026 District: 50.0% prepared (medium) …

4 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 26,529 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 54%2. Asian: 22%3. White: 10%4. Filipino: 5%5. Black or African American: 4%6. Two or more races: 3%7. Not reported: 1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino54%
  2. Asian22%
  3. White10%
  4. Filipino5%
  5. Black or African American4%
  6. Two or more races3%
  7. Not reported1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

62%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 16,318 of 26,498 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Chino Valley Unified isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 52% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (1,192 of 2,276 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (6)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Chino Valley Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Country Springs Elementary, 99th percentile (Strong). Middle: Canyon Hills Junior High, 96th percentile (Strong). High: Ruben S. Ayala High, 91st percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Chino Valley Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Chino Valley Unified good?

Chino Valley Unified’s 24 public elementary schools run from the 16th to the 99th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 12 Strong, 6 Solid, 5 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Chino Valley Unified’s 9 public middle schools run from the 27th to the 96th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 3 Strong, 5 Solid and 1 Developing. Chino Valley Unified’s 4 public high schools run from the 38th to the 91st percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 2 Strong and 2 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Chino Valley Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Chino Valley Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Chino Valley Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Chino Valley Unified had 21 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Chino Valley Unified spend per student?

Chino Valley Unified spent $17,387 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Chino Valley Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Chino Valley Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $92.4 million into 59 funded actions in 4 goals, 18% of its $507.2 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $34.5 million, 37% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Chino Valley Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

View CDE data ↗ (opens in a new tab)How Scope Scores work →

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.