ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
School Profile · Chino Hills

Michael G. Wickman Elementary: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Michael G. Wickman posts 61.0% exceeding the standard — versus 21.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

16250 Pinehurst Drive, 91709 (opens in new tab)·Chino Valley Unified·Chino Hills·Grades TK-6·710 students·45% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(909) 393-3774·Website
Scope Score
80
⭐ High Ceiling · Strong
ranked #144 statewide · #2 of 24 in Chino Valley Unified

Michael G. Wickman Elementary scores 80 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 97th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

CDE CAASPP 2025

Most rating sites would stop at “80% proficient” and call it done. Michael G. Wickman deserves a closer read. The school sits in Chino Hills, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Michael G. Wickman's low-income kids hit 75.7% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

57%
16%
27%
Grade 3 · 73% proficient
65%
17%
18%
Grade 4 · 82% proficient
69%
20%
11%
Grade 5 · 89% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 12.5pp across grades; the floor rises 16.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

75.7%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Michael G. Wickman's most underrated number

75.7% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Michael G. Wickman low-income: 75.7%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
61.0%
State 21.3%
39.6pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+7.8pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
79.6%
State 42.7%
37.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
6.7%
State 17.9%
11.2pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.2%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
23.6%
State 18.0%
5.6pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Michael G. Wickman Elementary
80/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Planning ahead? 2 licensed preschools near this school →

The community around it

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic21.3%
District 54.1% · CA 56.1%
White7.8%
District 10.2% · CA 19.9%
Asian58.9%
District 22.5% · CA 10.2%
Black0.7%
District 3.9% · CA 4.8%
Other11.4%
District 9.3% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 45.1% (19pp below CA avg)
Resources & Access
Enrollment
710
230 above CA avg (~480)
Transitional Kindergarten
20 TK students
3% of a 703-student campus · CDE Census Day 2025-26
Student-Teacher Ratio
25:1
4 more students per teacher than CA avg · District avg: 24.1:1
Per-Pupil Spending
$16,001
District avg: $11,682 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
23.6% Level 4
Share of English Learners reaching full proficiency
Teacher Salary Range
$60,908 – $127,536
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Michael G. Wickman Elementary in Chino Hills, 75.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 53.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Michael G. Wickman Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 21.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (74.2% Math proficient); Asian students (82.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 39.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 214 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Hispanic+9.3pp
16.0% vs 6.7% overall · n=162
ELA · English Learner−39.3pp
41.7% vs 81.0% overall · n=33
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · Disabilities−48.6pp
13.6% vs 62.3% overall · n=22
Math · Disabilities−28.8pp
50.0% vs 78.8% overall · n=22
Math Exceeded · Disabilities−27.1pp
31.8% vs 58.9% overall · n=22

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income225 tested
ELA 75.7%·Math 74.2%· +21.8pp vs district
Asian276 tested
ELA 82.1%·Math 87.3%· +1.5pp vs district
Hispanic103 tested
ELA 75.5%·Math 61.2%· +23.9pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 15.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.2pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 64%Support 34%Other 2%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$126K
$41K above CA median
Median Home Value
$876K
$217K above CA median
Bachelor's+
48%
13pp above CA avg
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
12.6 years avg experience
33 teachers · 3% second-year
Teacher Credentials
99% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

Frequently asked questions

Is Michael G. Wickman Elementary a good elementary school?
Michael G. Wickman Elementary has a Scope Score of 80 out of 100, placing it in the 97th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #144 statewide. 61.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 39.6 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Michael G. Wickman Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 79.6% of students at Michael G. Wickman Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 61.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 18.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 61.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 660 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Michael G. Wickman Elementary rank in California?
Michael G. Wickman Elementary ranks #144 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 97th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Michael G. Wickman Elementary getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Michael G. Wickman Elementary increases by 7.8 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Michael G. Wickman Elementary?
6.7% of students at Michael G. Wickman Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Michael G. Wickman Elementary compare to other schools in Chino Hills?
Michael G. Wickman Elementary scores 80/100 (97th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 710 students. Use the schools in Chino Hills page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Michael G. Wickman Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Michael G. Wickman Elementary in Chino Hills, 75.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 53.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Michael G. Wickman Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 21.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (74.2% Math proficient); Asian students (82.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 39.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 214 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

All schools in Chino Hills →

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
61.0%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 88th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+7.8pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 62th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
79.6%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 78th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
6.7%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 68th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.2%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
23.6%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 59th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 311857%16%14%13%73%+30
Grade 410365%17%10%9%82%+37
Grade 510469%20%3%8%89%+42
Grade 613258%22%11%9%80%+34
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 311958%19%12%11%77%+32
Grade 410658%22%12%8%80%+39
Grade 511058%18%15%8%76%+41
Grade 613861%20%12%7%81%+46
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1111042%24%25%9%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21475.7%+22+37
Asian26382.1%+2+8
Hispanic/Latino10275.5%+24+37
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Michael G. Wickman Elementary ←—8061.0%79.6%+7.80.2%
Oak Ridge Elementary1.9 mi5839.9%66.2%+6.70.6%
Chaparral Elementary1.3 mi5230.3%58.5%+1.41.8%
Gerald F. Litel Elementary2.4 mi4835.5%63.0%−10.40.7%
California average—4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Scope Score history
70%80%'19'22'23'24'25
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · no testing 2020–21 (COVID) · rank #502 → #307 → #298 → #176 → #144
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

← Browse all schools