Public school · Chino Valley Unified

Michael G. Wickman Elementary — Rating & test scores

Chino Hills · TK–6 · 710 students (2024–25)

How to read this →
92ndpercentileStrong

The dots are California’s 5,728 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2026 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score
69 / 100

Weighted composite · 2026
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 75% and 77% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 316 in English, 331 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).

This rating covers grades 3–5. Michael G. Wickman Elementary teaches TK–6: grade 6 results ↓

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

Are children building strong foundations?

Advanced (exceeded)Proficient (met)Below Proficient

English

grades 3–5Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced
56%
Proficient
19%
Below Proficient
25%

75% proficient or advanced · 316 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaChino Valley Unified
Advanced56%24%36%
Proficient19%22%24%
Developing12%21%18%
Minimal13%33%22%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced
53%
Proficient
24%
Below Proficient
23%

77% proficient or advanced · 331 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaChino Valley Unified
Advanced53%21%31%
Proficient24%21%24%
Developing15%25%23%
Minimal8%33%22%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

English

grade 6Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced
45%
Proficient
33%
Below Proficient
22%

78% proficient or advanced · 107 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaChino Valley Unified
Advanced45%20%32%
Proficient33%28%31%
Developing11%24%19%
Minimal11%28%18%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grade 6Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced
55%
Proficient
17%
Below Proficient
28%

72% proficient or advanced · 107 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaChino Valley Unified
Advanced55%21%36%
Proficient17%16%19%
Developing21%25%22%
Minimal7%38%23%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.

Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?

Things worth knowing

Open a finding for the evidence
In 2025, students in grades 4–6 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls them Exceptional in English and Accelerated in math.grades 4–6 · 2025
+24 ptsEnglish · above expected+18 ptsMath · above expected
Source
CDE growth model, 2025
Students
students with scores in both years in grades 4–6: 315
Comparison
315 students in grades 4–6 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
About half reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2026
56%English · exceeded the standard53%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 316 in English, 331 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Low-income students here (217 tested in English, 227 in math, grades 3–6, spring 2026) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (36% and 30%).grades 3–6 · spring 2026
71%English · met or exceeded68%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 3–6: 217 in English, 227 in math
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 217 students in English and 227 in math.

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 3–5Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school75%
California46%

Tested: 316 here · 1,208,894 in California.

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school75%
Chino Valley Unified60%

Tested: 316 here · 5,805 in Chino Valley Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 24 schools.

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaChino Valley Unified
Advanced56%24%36%
Proficient19%22%24%
Developing12%21%18%
Minimal13%33%22%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school77%
California42%

Tested: 331 here · 1,211,701 in California.

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school77%
Chino Valley Unified55%

Tested: 331 here · 5,903 in Chino Valley Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 24 schools.

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaChino Valley Unified
Advanced53%21%31%
Proficient24%21%24%
Developing15%25%23%
Minimal8%33%22%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

English

grade 6Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school78%
California48%

Tested: 107 here · 415,439 in California.

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school78%
Chino Valley Unified63%

Tested: 107 here · 2,033 in Chino Valley Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 24 schools.

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaChino Valley Unified
Advanced45%20%32%
Proficient33%28%31%
Developing11%24%19%
Minimal11%28%18%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grade 6Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school72%
California37%

Tested: 107 here · 415,904 in California.

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school72%
Chino Valley Unified55%

Tested: 107 here · 2,048 in Chino Valley Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 24 schools.

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaChino Valley Unified
Advanced55%21%36%
Proficient17%16%19%
Developing21%25%22%
Minimal7%38%23%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Progress over time

How have test results changed?

English

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

Latest annual comparison

202581%325 tested
→
202675%316 tested

This school

California, same grades46% → 46%2025 → 2026 · 1,232,086 → 1,208,894 tested

Math

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

Latest annual comparison

202578%335 tested
→
202677%331 tested

This school

California, same grades41% → 42%2025 → 2026 · 1,241,652 → 1,211,701 tested

Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.

Explore the available years, charts & underlying data

Grades 3–5 are well above California. Grade 6 are also well above it.

Chart: 2017–2026. The table includes all available years.

English met or exceeded, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)75%46%
Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)77%42%

Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.

English went from 76% in 2017 to 75% in 2026. Math went from 72% in 2017 to 77% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.

Annual values & tested counts

English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201574%
407 tested		41%
1,396,572 tested
201678%
450 tested		45%
1,395,534 tested
201776%
427 tested		45%
1,384,680 tested
201878%
423 tested		49%
1,346,907 tested
201975%
367 tested		50%
1,332,547 tested
202282%
354 tested		45%
1,260,830 tested
202382%
350 tested		44%
1,247,801 tested
202478%
337 tested		45%
1,235,509 tested
202581%
325 tested		46%
1,232,086 tested
202675%
316 tested		46%
1,208,894 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201575%
409 tested		35%
1,401,446 tested
201678%
456 tested		39%
1,401,413 tested
201772%
430 tested		40%
1,392,040 tested
201872%
427 tested		42%
1,352,321 tested
201973%
373 tested		44%
1,338,625 tested
202276%
356 tested		38%
1,265,943 tested
202377%
359 tested		40%
1,256,519 tested
202480%
347 tested		41%
1,249,262 tested
202578%
335 tested		41%
1,241,652 tested
202677%
331 tested		42%
1,211,701 tested
The state’s growth measure315 students · grades 4–6 · 2025
English+24ptsCDE level: Exceptional (5 of 5)
Math+18ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)

What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 24 points above that prediction, and in math 18 points above it.

The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.

Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.

Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.

School pattern, spring 2026High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.

Life at school

Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

5 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
12in 100 at the average Chino Valley Unified school17in 100 at the average California elementary school

37 of 720 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school5 in 100
at the average Chino Valley Unified school12 in 100
at the average California elementary school17 in 100
0.5%of students were suspended at least once (4 of 741), 2025–26
1.2%at the average Chino Valley Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school

Reviews & community voices

Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace

Parent voices

Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.

Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.

Teacher & staff voices

School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.

Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.

Bring these questions on a visit →

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Proficient or Advanced · grades 3–6 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

Low-income

217 English · 227 math tested

English71% / 36%
Math68% / 30%

Asian

256 English · 269 math tested

English80% / 71%
Math84% / 71%

Hispanic or Latino

82 tested per subject

English66% / 37%
Math51% / 30%

English learners

44 English · 56 math tested · grades 4–6

English32% / 11%
Math46% / 11%

Students with disabilities

47 tested per subject · grades 4–6

English40% / 17%
Math32% / 14%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–6 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Chino Valley Unifiedvs California
Low-income · 217 tested in English, 227 in math
English71%+1754%+3536%
Math68%+2246%+3830%
Asian · 256 tested in English, 269 in math
English80%+278%+971%
Math84%+480%+1371%
Hispanic or Latino · 82 tested
English66%+1452%+2937%
Math51%+1140%+2130%
English learners · 44 tested in English, 56 in math · grades 4–6 only
English32%+824%+2111%
Math46%+1531%+3511%
Students with disabilities · 47 tested · grades 4–6 only
English40%+1822%+2317%
Math32%+1616%+1814%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Chino Valley Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.

Filipino and White students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students, English learners and students with disabilities here did far better than the same groups statewide.

Read the student-group results as sentences

At Michael G. Wickman Elementary in Chino Hills, 71.0% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5 and 6, compared to 54.0% district-wide for those same grades and 36.0% statewide for those same grades. Michael G. Wickman Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 17.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (68.3% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (80.5% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 46.9 percentage points: students with disabilities in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 217 ELA grade test records.

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2025–26 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

1. Asian: 58%2. Hispanic or Latino: 21%3. White: 7%4. Filipino: 6%5. Two or more races: 5%6. Not reported: 2%Unallocated share: 1%. 100% minus available shares; not a student group.Reported shares2025–26
  1. Asian58%
  2. Hispanic or Latino21%
  3. White7%
  4. Filipino6%
  5. Two or more races5%
  6. Not reported2%
  7. Black or African American—
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native—
  9. Pacific Islander—
  10. Unallocated share1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.
Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26Here
Asian58%
Hispanic or Latino21%
White7%
Filipino6%
Two or more races5%
Not reported2%
Black or African American—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

About half students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (45%, 320 of 710). California: 63%.

99% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 99.10%: 32 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 32.2 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

The school path beyond this campus

Explore schools on the map ↗

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district.

  1. ElementaryMichael G. Wickman ElementaryThis campus · grades K-6
  2. MiddleLink not recordedAsk the district about this stage.
  3. High schoolLink not recordedAsk the district about this stage.
All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Middle-school links

  • Robert O. Townsend Junior High

    Historical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

High-school links

  • Chino Hills High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.

Getting in

Ask Chino Valley Unified which school serves your address.

wickman.chino.k12.ca.us

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗
16250 Pinehurst Drive, Chino Hills 91709

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Questions

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

  1. How do you support kids who arrive ahead, and kids who arrive behind?
  2. How do you teach early reading and check each child’s progress?
  3. What does extra support or enrichment look like during the school day?
  4. What are the school-day hours and after-school care options?

Call (909) 393-3774 to ask about a visit.

Other options

Schools to explore

Nearby means close to this campus. It does not establish an attendance boundary or a similar student population.

Nearby elementary schoolsStatewide percentile

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map →

Similar student populations

Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.

Similar elementary schools2026 statewide percentile
How these schools are matched

CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 37.1–53.1% meal eligibility and 355–1,420 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.

Common questions

Is Michael G. Wickman Elementary a good elementary school?
Michael G. Wickman Elementary is in the 92nd percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 69 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Michael G. Wickman Elementary was well above California in English and math: 75% and 77% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Michael G. Wickman Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 75% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 77% the math standard; 56% and 53% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 42% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 316 students were tested in English and 331 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Michael G. Wickman Elementary rank in California?
Michael G. Wickman Elementary is in the 92nd percentile of 5,728 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2026). Michael G. Wickman Elementary ranks #433 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2026 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2024 G3 → 2026 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Michael G. Wickman Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Michael G. Wickman Elementary's grade 3 results in 2024 with its grade 5 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 46th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Michael G. Wickman Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 5.1% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 37 chronically absent of 720 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 0.5%; 4 unduplicated suspended students of 741 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 5.6%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.6%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Michael G. Wickman Elementary compare to other schools in Chino Hills?
Michael G. Wickman Elementary is in the 92nd percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 710 students. Use the schools in Chino Hills page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Michael G. Wickman Elementary?
At Michael G. Wickman Elementary in Chino Hills, 71.0% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5 and 6, compared to 54.0% district-wide for those same grades and 36.0% statewide for those same grades. Michael G. Wickman Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 17.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (68.3% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (80.5% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 46.9 percentage points: students with disabilities in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 217 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does Michael G. Wickman Elementary feed into?
By attendance boundary, Michael G. Wickman Elementary is zoned to Robert O. Townsend Junior High. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology
Download CSVReport a data issueMethodologyData updatesCDE CAASPP research files (opens in new tab)

Michael G. Wickman Elementary is ranked #433 statewide · #4 of 24 in Chino Valley Unified.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2025–26
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard54.2%21.5%42%
Met or exceeded76.6%43.0%23%
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)Below avgaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism5.6%16.9%5%
Suspension rate0.6%1.6%5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)19.5%17.3%5%
Exceeded standard
↑ vs CA 21.5% · index 82 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 43.0% · index 76 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)
↓ vs CA average · ≈46th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 16.9% · index 68 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 1.1pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 59 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 0.4pp higher vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.3% · index 55 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students

From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2025–26 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2026
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38955%22%16%7%78%+34
Grade 412359%12%11%18%72%+27
Grade 510453%25%10%13%78%+30
Grade 610745%34%10%11%79%+32

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5685 reporting schools

State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5706 reporting schools

State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 48.1%; n=5715 reporting schools

State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4052 reporting schools

Math · 2025–26 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2026
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39248%36%12%4%84%+38
Grade 412750%24%15%11%74%+33
Grade 511260%15%16%9%75%+39
Grade 610755%17%22%7%72%+37

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 46.0%; n=5687 reporting schools

State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.4%; n=5704 reporting schools

State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.6%; n=5717 reporting schools

State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.9%; n=4050 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet+
2025 · Grade 3 · ELA11872.9%
2025 · Grade 4 · ELA10381.5%
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA10489.4%
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA13280.3%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math11977.3%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math10680.2%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math11076.4%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math13881.2%
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA8977.5%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA11673.3%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA13283.3%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA11575.7%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math9085.6%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math11875.4%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math13979.1%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math11874.6%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA10781.3%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA12881.3%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA11583.5%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA10885.2%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math11277.7%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math13177.9%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math11675.9%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math10878.7%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA12378.9%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA11782.9%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA11485.1%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA11979.8%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math12580.8%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math11778.6%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math11469.3%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math11972.3%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA11971.4%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA12172.7%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA12780.3%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA18379.2%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math12378.9%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math12371.5%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math12768.5%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math18368.8%
2018 · Grade 3 · ELA11574.8%
2018 · Grade 4 · ELA13076.9%
2018 · Grade 5 · ELA17880.9%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA14977.2%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math11683.6%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math13068.5%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math18167.4%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math14969.8%
2017 · Grade 3 · ELA12380.5%
2017 · Grade 4 · ELA16575.8%
2017 · Grade 5 · ELA13971.2%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA15376.5%
2017 · Grade 3 · Math12583.2%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math16672.9%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math13959.7%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math15366.7%
2016 · Grade 3 · ELA16675%
2016 · Grade 4 · ELA13675%
2016 · Grade 5 · ELA14883%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA11681%
2016 · Grade 3 · Math16788%
2016 · Grade 4 · Math13777%
2016 · Grade 5 · Math15268%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math11869%
2015 · Grade 3 · ELA14069%
2015 · Grade 4 · ELA14776%
2015 · Grade 5 · ELA12076%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA13481%
2015 · Grade 3 · Math14287%
2015 · Grade 4 · Math14775%
2015 · Grade 5 · Math12060%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math13668%

Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide11240%22%28%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21771.0%+17+35
Asian25680.5%+3+10
Hispanic/Latino8265.9%+14+29
Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights

SchoolDistScope · percentile · bandEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Michael G. Wickman Elementary ←—6992nd percentile · Strong · statewide · 202654.2%76.6%−4.2pp+74 pts0.6%
Chaparral Elementary1.3 mi5378th percentile · Strong · statewide · 202632.4%56.5%−17.6pp—1.1%
Glenmeade Elementary1.6 mi3957th percentile · Solid · statewide · 202627.3%51.6%−13.6pp—0.5%
Oak Ridge Elementary1.9 mi5884th percentile · Strong · statewide · 202638.2%62.7%−2.0pp—1.9%
California average—39School average · no percentile21.5%43.0%−2.7pp—1.6%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
201970/10090#495California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2025 · 6.2% → 2026 · 5.1% · −1.1pp
Suspension rate2025 · 0.1% → 2026 · 0.5% · +0.4pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresExcMet+
2026 · ELA42353.2%76.1%
2026 · Math43853.4%75.8%
2025 · ELA45761.9%80.7%
2025 · Math47359.0%78.9%
2024 · ELA45254.6%77.7%
2024 · Math46557.4%78.3%
2023 · ELA45859.2%82.8%
2023 · Math46754.2%77.5%
2022 · ELA47352.9%81.6%
2022 · Math47550.5%75.4%
2019 · ELA55045.3%76.4%
2019 · Math55647.1%71.6%
2018 · ELA57247.5%77.8%
2018 · Math57643.6%71.5%
2017 · ELA58043.3%75.9%
2017 · Math58341.0%70.3%
2016 · ELA56643%78%
2016 · Math57440%76%
2015 · ELA54142%75%
2015 · Math54541%73%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
2019———47.5%73.9%2.3%0.2%-0.7pp
2022———53.8%79.3%16.7%0.2%-2.6pp
2023———56.4%79.6%9.4%0.4%+0.2pp
2024———58.0%79.0%7.8%0.5%-0.3pp
2025———61.0%79.6%6.7%0.2%+7.8pp
20266992#43354.2%76.6%5.6%0.6%-4.2pp

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years
Group2018–192025–26Δ
Female1.9%5.3%+3.4pp
Male2.1%5.0%+2.9pp
Asian0.5%1.4%+0.9pp
Black/African American6.9%——
Filipino1.7%9.3%+7.6pp
Hispanic/Latino2.5%10.1%+7.6pp
Two or More Races0.0%11.8%+11.8pp
White4.9%11.3%+6.4pp
Students with Disabilities6.3%12.0%+5.7pp
English Learners0.0%2.6%+2.6pp
Homeless1.8%6.7%+4.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged1.5%6.7%+5.2pp
All Students2.0%5.1%+3.1pp

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupELAnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+24315Exceptional+18315Accelerated
English Only+24183not categorised+13183not categorised
Asian+19179Accelerated+25179Exceptional
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+21148Exceptional+20148Exceptional
Hispanic or Latino+2171Exceptional+471Average
English Learner+1768Accelerated+3268Exceptional
Students with Disabilities+540Accelerated+940Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+2537not categorised+2537not categorised
English Learners Only+431not categorised+4031not categorised
Filipino+3823Exceptional+2123Exceptional
White+2920Exceptional+1220Accelerated
Two or More Races+1113Accelerated+2213Exceptional

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures

School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints

ELA · 2024 · Grade 3
61%
exceeded standard · 78% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 89 ELA test records with scores
ELA · 2026 · Grade 5
53%
exceeded standard · 78% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 104 ELA test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 90 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

315 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

California growth model, ELA: +24 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 97th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.97th pctile · +24 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

315 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

California growth model, math: +18 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 89th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.89th pctile · +18 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$11,682 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 26,520 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$22 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 710

Central federal expenditures attributed here$898 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 710

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,387 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 61%Instruction support 11%Student services 9%Administration 6%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 3%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$11,682 per pupil
2020$11,008 per pupil
2019$10,931 per pupil
2018$10,448 per pupil
2017$9,751 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 91709
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 91709
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$126,350
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)48.03%
ZCTA population78,006
Median age40.6 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/michael-g-wickman-elementary-0586"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Michael G. Wickman Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=5,728 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction