School district · San Bernardino County

Mountain View Elementary schools

Mountain View Elementary runs schools through 8th grade. Mountain View Elementary’s 4 public elementary schools run from the 31st to the 97th percentile among the 5,728 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 4 schools

from 31st to 97th · among 5,728 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Park View Elementary: 97th percentile, Strong
  • Ranch View Elementary: 55th percentile, Solid
  • Mountain View Elementary: 46th percentile, Developing
  • Creek View Elementary: 31st percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
2Developing
1Solid
1Strong

Middle · 1 school

at 74th · among 2,532 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Grace Yokley Junior High: 74th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

After 8th grade · a separate district

High school: another district

Confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary schools

Mountain View Elementary’s 4 public elementary schools run from the 31st to the 97th percentile among the 5,728 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary schools in Mountain View Elementary

Statewide percentile
Context

The average Mountain View Elementary elementary school had 10 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school had 17 in 100.

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Middle schools

Mountain View Elementary has one public middle school we score, Grace Yokley Junior High, at the 74th percentile among the 2,532 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Middle schools in Mountain View Elementary

Statewide percentile
Schools around Mountain View Elementary

5 listed public schools with mapped locations

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

School locations, not attendance boundaries. Confirm eligibility with the district.

How the district works

The district as a whole, from its state records.

Spending, FY 2024–25

District finance · FY 2024–25

Where the district's dollars go.

Mountain View Elementary spent $15,428 per student in FY 2024–25 — $5,063 less than the median California district ($20,491), about 25% lower. About 66 cents of every dollar goes to classroom instruction.

Current expense per student

Current expense of education per unit of average daily attendance, from the district's annual SACS filing to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus. Spending is context, not a measure of school quality.

Share by function

  • Instruction66%
  • Instruction support9%
  • Student services10%
  • Administration7%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%

Shares of the same current-expense total, by SACS function. Names are simplified from the filing's own categories.

Students, staff and money

The system behind the schools

The people behind the classrooms — district-grain context that never enters a school's score.

People
District enrollment2,625 · students
Who attends
Hispanic 61.4% · White 8.3% · Black 8.4% · Asian 14.3% · Other 7.7%
Free/reduced lunch58% · economic need indicator

CDE enrollment (district averages)

What the district plans (2026–27 plan)

For 2026–27, the district’s LCAP budgets $9.3 million across 26 funded actions in 3 goals—with 68% ($6.3 million) concentrated in Goal 3. It budgets $7.4 million in services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth ($4.9 million projected in extra state funding), after reporting $6.8 million in estimated actual spending on those services in 2025–26 against $6.2 million planned ($649,357 more than planned, our arithmetic).

Every spring, the district adopts a three-year plan (the LCAP) setting its goals, the programs it budgets for 2026–27, and the targets it measures itself against. These are planned amounts, not what the district later spent.

Action budgets (2026–27 plan)
$9.3 million
26 funded actions across 3 goals · 15% of $60.5 million general fund
High-need student services (2026–27 plan)
$7.4 million planned
For English learners, low-income students and foster youth · $4.9 million projected in extra state funding
Last year’s follow-through (2025–26 plan)
$6.8 million estimated actual
vs. $6.2 million planned by the district ($649,357 more than planned, our arithmetic)
The plan’s $9.3 million of action budgets, split across its 3 goals (our sum of the actions filed under each).
Goal 1Ensure all students, including English learners and all other identified student groups, demonstrate academic…Largest actions: Paraeducator Support for Students with Disabilities ($803,937) · English Learner Support ($330,782)Sample trajectory: CAASPP ELA - District Distance from Standard (DFS) (Baseline: 0.8 → Latest: +3.3 → Year 3 target: +9)$1.8 million20% of action budgets

Ensure all students, including English learners and all other identified student groups, demonstrate academic growth and proficiency to leave each grade meeting or exceeding standards by aligning student learning to state-adopted standards to promote exemplary teaching and learning. p. 16 ↗

13 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.0 million (−⁠$165,755)

Largest funded actions

  1. Paraeducator Support for Students with Disabilities$803,937action 1.11 · 44% of goal · p. 84 ↗
  2. English Learner Support$330,782action 1.6 · 18% of goal · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Professional Learning Communities$163,602action 1.10 · 9% of goal · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. ELA Paraeducator Support$162,290action 1.1 · 9% of goal · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Math Intervention After School (Grades 2-6)$91,798action 1.3 · 5% of goal · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  6. English Language Arts and Mathematics Professional Staff Development$85,260action 1.7 · 5% of goal · p. 83 ↗

And 7 more funded actions in the plan (p. 16 ↗).

How the plan measures it · 12 measures

  • CAASPP ELA - District Distance from Standard (DFS)p. 17 ↗
    Baseline
    0.8
    2023 · ALL
    Latest (Year 2)
    +3.3
    2025 · ALL
    Year 3 target
    +9
    ALL
  • CAASPP Math - District Distance from Standard (DFS)p. 19 ↗
    Baseline
    35.2
    2023 · ALL
    Latest (Year 2)
    24.1
    2025 · ALL
    Year 3 target
    20
    ALL
  • English Learner Proficiency Indicator (ELPI) (students who make progress toward English proficiency based on the English Language Proficiency Assessment for California (ELPAC)p. 20 ↗
    Baseline
    58.3%
    2023
    Latest (Year 2)
    45.7%
    2025
    Year 3 target
    65%

9 other measures in the plan

  • p. 17 ↗Implementation of State Standards
  • p. 18 ↗CAASPP ELA - School and Student Group Distance from Standard (DFS)
  • p. 19 ↗CAASPP Math - School and Student Group Distance from Standard (DFS)
  • p. 20 ↗English Learner Reclassification Rate
  • p. 20 ↗i-Ready Winter Diagnostic Growth Rate Results for Reading
  • p. 20 ↗i-Ready Winter Diagnostic Growth Rate Results for Mathematics
  • p. 21 ↗i-Ready Diagnostic Annual Growth Rate Results for Reading (Discovery Center Intervention Students)
  • p. 21 ↗CAST (California Science Test) - District 5th and 8th grade students
  • p. 22 ↗Student Performance on CAASPP ELA and Math- Junior High
Goal 2Ensure all students receive a comprehensive, well-rounded, and rigorous educational experience by engaging…Largest actions: Visual and Performing Arts Program ($805,693) · High School Level Courses at the Junior High Level ($135,998)Sample trajectory: Middle School Dropout Rate (Baseline: 0% → Latest: 0% → Year 3 target: 0%)$1.1 million12% of action budgets

Ensure all students receive a comprehensive, well-rounded, and rigorous educational experience by engaging students in the educational process. p. 34 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $801,619 (+⁠$302,542)

Largest funded actions

  1. Visual and Performing Arts Program$805,693action 2.6 · 73% of goal · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $185,605 is LCFF funding counted toward the requirement
  2. High School Level Courses at the Junior High Level$135,998action 2.2 · 12% of goal · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. After School Junior High Sports Program$73,177action 2.3 · 7% of goal · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. AVID Program at the Junior High Level$41,288action 2.1 · 4% of goal · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. After School Coding Club at the Elementary Level$35,152action 2.5 · 3% of goal · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  6. Jump Start Summer School$12,853action 2.4 · 1% of goal · p. 84 ↗

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

  • School Absence Ratep. 34 ↗
  • Chronic Absenteeism Rate - Districtp. 35 ↗
  • Middle School Dropout Ratep. 36 ↗
    Baseline
    0%
    2022–23
    Latest (Year 2)
    0%
    2024–25
    Year 3 target
    0%

4 other measures in the plan

  • p. 35 ↗Chronic Absenteeism Rate - School and Student Group
  • p. 36 ↗Students have access and are enrolled in a broad course of study including courses described for grades 1 to 6 and/or the adopted course of study for grades 7 and 8
  • p. 37 ↗Visual and Performing Arts Program
  • p. 37 ↗Chronic Absenteeism Rate - Junior High (7th and 8th Grade)

Goal 3

Create conditions and a climate for a safe and exceptional learning environment. p. 43 ↗

$6.3 million

68% of action budgets

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $4.8 million (+⁠$1.6 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Lower Class Sizes for Primary Grades and Junior High Math$2.9 million47% of goal · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Paraeducator Support$1.5 million24% of goal · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Counseling Support (Coordinator and Counselors)$748,81212% of goal · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $387,717 is LCFF funding counted toward the requirement
  4. Technology (Devices and Support)$596,4879% of goal · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

How the plan measures it · 10 measures

  • Rate of Teacher Misassignmentp. 44 ↗
    Baseline
    96.9%
    2023
    Latest (Year 2)
    96.9%
    2025
    Year 3 target
    100%
  • Every student has sufficient access to standards-aligned instructional materialsp. 44 ↗
    Baseline
    100%
    Latest (Year 2)
    100%
    Year 3 target
    100%
  • School facilities in good repairp. 44 ↗
    Baseline
    100%
    2023
    Latest (Year 2)
    100%
    2025
    Year 3 target
    100%
Full table for all 10 measures (with subgroup cells) · 3 other actions

The goal’s other funded actions

  1. Library Services$365,393action 3.5 · 6% of goal · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. New Teacher Induction Support$85,263action 3.7 · 1% of goal · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Provide Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS)$25,512action 3.1 · under 1% of goal · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

3 previewed measures, as the plan wrote them

  • Metric 3.1Rate of Teacher Misassignment p. 44 ↗
    Baseline
    Appropriately Assigned Teachers (CA School Dashboard 2023) - 96.9%
    Year 1 outcome
    Appropriately Assigned Teachers (CA School Dashboard 2024) - 96.9%
    Year 2 outcome
    Appropriately Assigned Teachers (CA School Dashboard 2025) - 96.9%
    Target for year 3
    Appropriately Assigned Teachers - 100%
  • Metric 3.2Every student has sufficient access to standards-aligned instructional materials p. 44 ↗
    Baseline
    Students with access to standards-aligned instructional materials (CA School Dashboard 2023) - 100%
    Year 1 outcome
    Students with access to standards-aligned instructional materials (CA School Dashboard 2024) - 100%
    Year 2 outcome
    Students with access to standards-aligned instructional materials (CA School Dashboard 2025) - 100%
    Target for year 3
    Students with access to standards-aligned instructional materials - 100%
  • Metric 3.3School facilities in good repair p. 44 ↗
    Baseline
    Percent of schools in good repair (CA School Dashboard 2023) - 100%
    Year 1 outcome
    Percent of schools in good repair (CA School Dashboard 2024) - 100%
    Year 2 outcome
    Percent of schools in good repair (CA School Dashboard 2025) - 100%
    Target for year 3
    Percent of schools in good repair - 100%

The goal’s other 7 measures

The plan’s pages list each measure’s baseline and target; the first 3 are printed here.

“Marked as contributing to high-need services” is the district’s own label for an action it counts toward its required services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. The amount beside each title is the action’s total funds; the plan counts only the part it funds from the LCFF toward that requirement, and where that part is smaller we print it. Baselines, outcomes and targets are printed as the district wrote them in its plan’s results table. The outcomes are the district’s own reporting.

What changed since last year’s plan

Action budgets went from $7.6 million in the 2025–26 plan to $9.3 million in the 2026–27 plan (+⁠$1.7 million, our arithmetic). 22 of the 26 actions whose titles we could confirm also appear in last year’s plan.

Largest dollar changes, same title in both plans

  1. Paraeducator Support+⁠$749,212$798,214 → $1.5 million · p. 85 ↗
  2. Visual and Performing Arts Program+⁠$269,813$535,880 → $805,693 · p. 85 ↗
  3. Lower Class Sizes for Primary Grades and Junior High Math+⁠$263,588$2.7 million → $2.9 million · p. 85 ↗

New titles

  1. Paraeducator Support for Students with Disabilities$803,937p. 84 ↗
  2. Counseling Support (Coordinator and Counselors)$748,812p. 85 ↗
  3. ELA Paraeducator Support$162,290p. 83 ↗

and 1 more

Titles from last year’s plan that aren’t in this one

  1. Paraeducator support for students with disabilties$723,694p. 81 ↗
  2. ELA Intervention During the School Day (Discovery Center for Grades 1-4)$449,042p. 80 ↗
  3. Counseling Support (Coordinator)$364,510p. 83 ↗

and 1 more

An action with a reworded title shows as one dropped and one added; we don’t match them.

Source: the district’s LCAP (125 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard. We read the amounts from the PDF; page links open the plan.

Extra help from the state

The state is giving Mountain View Elementary extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

English learner progress

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 54% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (186 of 347 students). California: 47%. This measures progress, not fluency.

2 schools getting state support, 2025–26Creek View Elementary (Extra targeted support (ATSI)) · Mountain View Elementary (Extra targeted support (ATSI))

Charter schools aren’t listed; each charter’s own page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: Plans (California School Dashboard) ↗ · District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

More places to look

Cities in the district

Districts nearby

A district outline or ZIP code doesn’t decide which school a child attends. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district. See these schools on the map ›

Common questions

Are the public schools in Mountain View Elementary good?
Mountain View Elementary’s 4 public elementary schools run from the 31st to the 97th percentile among the 5,728 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong, 1 Solid and 2 Developing. Mountain View Elementary has one public middle school we score, Grace Yokley Junior High, at the 74th percentile among the 2,532 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score; it isn’t a grade. How we score schools.
Which public schools in Mountain View Elementary rank highest?
Elementary: Park View Elementary, 97th percentile statewide (Strong). Middle: Grace Yokley Junior High, 74th percentile statewide (Solid). Each level is ranked separately, and a few percentiles apart is a tie. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.
How does chronic absence in Mountain View Elementary compare with California?
The average Mountain View Elementary elementary school had 10 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school had 17 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.
How much does Mountain View Elementary spend per student?
Mountain View Elementary spent $15,428 per student in FY 2024–25 — $5,063 less than the median California district ($20,491), about 25% lower. About 66 cents of every dollar goes to classroom instruction. Current expense of education per unit of average daily attendance from the district’s annual SACS filing to the California Department of Education. Where the district’s dollars go.
What is in Mountain View Elementary’s 2026–27 LCAP plan?
The plan ties $9.3 million of the district’s $60.5 million general fund budget to its 26 funded actions, filed under 3 goals. It projects $4.9 million in extra state money for English learners, low-income students and foster youth, and plans $7.4 million in extra services for them. Last year (2025–26 plan): $6.2 million planned for those services and $6.8 million estimated actual by the district ($649,357 more than planned, our arithmetic). Largest goals by planned budget: Goal 3 (Create conditions and a climate for a safe and exceptional learning environment.): $6.3 million (68% of action budgets) — largest actions: Lower Class Sizes for Primary Grades and Junior High Math ($2.9 million) · Paraeducator Support ($1.5 million); Goal 1 (Ensure all students, including English learners and all other identified student groups, demonstrate academic…): $1.8 million (20% of action budgets) — largest actions: Paraeducator Support for Students with Disabilities ($803,937) · English Learner Support ($330,782). Every figure is read from the district’s adopted LCAP PDF with page citations. What the district plans (2026–27 plan).
Does living in Mountain View Elementary decide which school my child attends?
Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
Where do these results come from?
California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, both published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations, not official state ratings. Private schools don’t take the state tests, so we don’t score them. Methodology and limitations.

Sources & methodology

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025-26

Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations, not official state ratings. Use them alongside school visits and questions about your child’s needs.

Download these schools (CSV) · free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution