ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Zela Davis · Hawthorne

Zela Davis: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Zela Davis posts 36% meeting the standard and 16.8% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

13435 South Yukon Avenue, 90250 (opens in new tab)·Hawthorne·Hawthorne·Grades TK-5·843 students·94% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(310) 679-1771
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3445
% Exceeded17%21%
% Met+36%43%
Growth-10.2-2.9
Absence30.3%17.9%
Suspension1.5%1.6%
Scope Score
34
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,164 statewide · #6 of 7 in Hawthorne

Zela Davis scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 28th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “36% proficient” and call it done. Zela Davis deserves a closer read. The school sits in Hawthorne, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 43rd to the 28th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 36% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 339%36%33%28%44%
Grade 439%24%34%32%38%
Grade 541%37%31%38%29%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 339%40%49%33%40%
Grade 434%18%35%34%31%
Grade 528%24%25%31%35%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

26%
18%
56%
Grade 3 · 44% proficient
15%
24%
61%
Grade 4 · 39% proficient
12%
18%
70%
Grade 5 · 30% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 13.9pp across grades; the floor slips 14.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
16.8%
State 21.3%
4.5pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-10.2pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
36.2%
State 42.7%
6.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
30.3%
State 17.9%
12.4pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.5%
State 1.6%
0.1pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
10.9%
State 18.0%
7.0pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Zela Davis in Hawthorne, 37.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Zela Davis trails its district average for low-income students by 3.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 374 students tested.

All students at this school: 36% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 36%, district —, state 43%36%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 36%, district 37%, state 32%36% · +0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 34%, district 36%, state 32%34% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 34%, district 38%, state 42%34% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 39%, district 38%, state 44%39% · +3 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 39%, district 37%, state 26%39% · +3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 8%, district 10%, state 11%8% · −28 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 9%, district 9%, state 15%9% · −27 vs school

7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 15.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -3.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 30.3%, district 21.9%, state 17.9%30.3% · +12.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.5%, district —, state 1.6%1.5% · −0.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (45.3% vs 25.8%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–625.8%
TK/K45.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 26:126:1
Teaching staff44 teachers
Avg. experience19.3 years
Fully credentialed95%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$62,726 – $132,630
Principal salary$168,381 – $167,122
Superintendent salary$315,195

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $22,394, CA average $14,815$22,394 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,529 per student

$1,529 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,941 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support11%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance11%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,538 per pupil
2019$13,458 per pupil
2018$13,250 per pupil
2017$12,663 per pupil
2016$12,717 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic64.1%
District 71.7% · CA 56.1%
Black28.2%
District 18.7% · CA 4.8%
Other4.5%
District 4.5% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.9%
District 2.5% · CA 10.2%
White1.3%
District 2.6% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 93.6% (30pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$78K · CA $85K
Median home value$875K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+27% · CA 35%
ZIP population93,826
Median age34 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 843 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 19% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Zela Davis a good elementary school?

Zela Davis has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100, placing it in the 28th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,164 statewide. 16.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.5 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Zela Davis's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 36.2% of students at Zela Davis met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 16.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 19.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 16.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 818 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Zela Davis rank in California?

Zela Davis ranks #4,164 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 28th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Zela Davis getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Zela Davis decreases by 10.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Zela Davis?

30.3% of students at Zela Davis are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.5%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Zela Davis compare to other schools in Hawthorne?

Zela Davis scores 34/100 (28th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 843 students. Use the schools in Hawthorne page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Zela Davis serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Zela Davis in Hawthorne, 37.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Zela Davis trails its district average for low-income students by 3.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 374 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
16.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 46th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-10.2pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 37th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
36.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 45th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
30.3%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 30th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.5%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 51th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
10.9%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 41th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 313726%18%23%33%44%+0
Grade 413115%24%15%47%38%−7
Grade 513712%18%24%47%29%−19
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 313923%17%25%35%40%−5
Grade 413512%19%33%36%31%−10
Grade 513914%20%24%42%35%−1
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111395%14%53%27%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged37437.2%−4−1
Hispanic/Latino25934.0%−6−5
Black/African American12540.0%−3+7
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Zela Davis ←3416.8%36.2%−10.21.5%
Madison Elementary3 mi7145.4%65.9%+3.70.3%
Lincoln Elementary2.9 mi6651.1%75.8%−11.70.3%
One Hundred Fifty-Sixth Street Elementary1.8 mi6541.3%66.4%−2.00.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193943#313516.1%36.6%12.3%0.1%-4.9pp
20223035#374511.1%29.9%42.3%1.3%-7.8pp
20233231#392913.7%34.4%35.9%0.7%-12.9pp
20243944#323114.4%32.7%28.7%1.8%+3.8pp
20253428#416416.8%36.2%30.3%1.5%-10.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female11.0%31.4%+20.4pp
Male13.5%30.3%+16.8pp
Asian15.0%10.5%-4.5pp
Black/African American17.8%34.1%+16.3pp
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino9.6%29.5%+19.9pp
Two or More Races13.3%22.2%+8.9pp
Students with Disabilities22.0%41.8%+19.8pp
English Learners9.0%25.3%+16.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.2%31.3%+19.1pp
All Students12.3%30.8%+18.5pp
Foster Youth50.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction