Young Oak Kim Academy: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Young Oak Kim Academy posts 31% meeting the standard and 10.1% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 42 | 10% | 31% | +8.9 | 11.8% | 0.1% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Young Oak Kim Academy scores 42 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 51st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.
Most rating sites would stop at “31% proficient” and call it done. Young Oak Kim Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 0.1% suspension rate — versus 3.7% statewide.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 35th to the 51st percentile since 2019 — past roughly 200 middle schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 31% of students meet the standard today, above the 22% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 26% | 34% | 25% | 33% | 29% |
| Grade 7 | 25% | 34% | 37% | 41% | 43% |
| Grade 8 | 26% | 36% | 32% | 39% | 43% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 12% | 19% | 13% | 16% | 19% |
| Grade 7 | 21% | 16% | 17% | 22% | 28% |
| Grade 8 | 23% | 11% | 6% | 13% | 24% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.6pp across grades; the floor rises 13.3pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Young Oak Kim Academy in Los Angeles, 38.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Young Oak Kim Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 2.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (23.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 697 students tested.
6 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 12.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Grades 4–6 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 7–8 students (15.5% vs 10.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$2,193 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 23% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Young Oak Kim Academy a good middle school?
What are Young Oak Kim Academy's CAASPP test scores?
How does Young Oak Kim Academy rank in California?
Is Young Oak Kim Academy getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Young Oak Kim Academy?
How does Young Oak Kim Academy compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
How does Young Oak Kim Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 53
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 221 | 6% | 23% | 28% | 43% | 29% | −17 |
| Grade 7 | 259 | 12% | 31% | 21% | 36% | 43% | −4 |
| Grade 8 | 232 | 10% | 33% | 27% | 30% | 43% | −3 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 220 | 9% | 10% | 23% | 58% | 19% | −16 |
| Grade 7 | 259 | 13% | 15% | 23% | 49% | 28% | −6 |
| Grade 8 | 232 | 11% | 13% | 23% | 53% | 24% | −9 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 232 | 6% | 17% | 65% | 12% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 697 | 38.6% | −2 | +0 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 666 | 39.2% | −2 | +0 |
| English Learners | 118 | 0.8% | −6 | −10 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young Oak Kim Academy ← | — | 42 | 10.1% | 31.0% | +8.9 | 0.1% |
| Magnolia Science Academy 6 | 1.5 mi | 58 | 22.9% | 48.2% | +13.4 | 3.7% |
| Thomas Starr King Middle School Film and Media Mag | 2.3 mi | 51 | 27.1% | 50.0% | +2.3 | 0.6% |
| Rise Kohyang Middle | 0.4 mi | 49 | 18.5% | 40.9% | +3.2 | 0.5% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 33 | 35 | #1302 | 4.8% | 22.2% | 14.1% | 0.2% | +5.4pp |
| 2022 | 30 | 31 | #1483 | 5.7% | 25.0% | 25.6% | 0.1% | -3.4pp |
| 2023 | 31 | 24 | #1659 | 4.7% | 21.7% | 18.3% | 0.0% | +0.1pp |
| 2024 | 32 | 36 | #1421 | 6.9% | 27.3% | 11.6% | 0.1% | +1.6pp |
| 2025 | 42 | 51 | #1088 | 10.1% | 31.0% | 11.8% | 0.1% | +8.9pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 14.5% | 11.5% | -3.0pp |
| Male | 13.7% | 12.0% | -1.7pp |
| Asian | 14.3% | — | — |
| Black/African American | 17.4% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 14.1% | 11.1% | -3.0pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 18.2% | 14.5% | -3.7pp |
| English Learners | 12.9% | 15.1% | +2.2pp |
| Homeless | 25.8% | 19.2% | -6.6pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 13.8% | 11.4% | -2.4pp |
| All Students | 14.1% | 11.7% | -2.4pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction