ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
William R. Anton Elementary · Los Angeles

William R. Anton Elementary: The score is middle of the pack. The trajectory isn't.

William R. Anton sits mid-pack on raw proficiency — and it's climbing faster than most schools anywhere near it — and that holds when you follow the same students across grades.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5045
% Exceeded17%21%
% Met+41%43%
Growth+8.3-2.9
Absence21.2%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
50
🚀 Growth Engine · Solid
ranked #1,860 statewide · #199 of 580 in Los Angeles Unified

William R. Anton Elementary scores 50 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 68th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “41% proficient” and call it done. William R. Anton deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: +8.3pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 12th to the 68th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 3000 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 41% of students meet the standard today, above the 28% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 335%17%30%44%29%
Grade 424%21%16%35%46%
Grade 530%30%31%30%47%
Grade 630%40%28%40%35%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 345%21%26%51%41%
Grade 415%15%18%28%43%
Grade 518%16%17%27%39%
Grade 627%30%22%15%37%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

19%
10%
71%
Grade 3 · 29% proficient
26%
20%
54%
Grade 4 · 46% proficient
8%
40%
52%
Grade 5 · 48% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 11.1pp across grades; the floor rises 18.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
17.2%
State 21.3%
4.1pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+8.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
40.9%
State 42.7%
1.8pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
21.2%
State 17.9%
3.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
14.8%
State 18.0%
3.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.

  • Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At William R. Anton Elementary in Los Angeles, 39.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. William R. Anton Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 1.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 39.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 221 students tested.

All students at this school: 39% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 39%, district —, state 43%39%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 40%, district 36%, state 32%40% · +0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 40%, district 36%, state 32%40% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 37%, district 42%, state 44%37% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 42%, district 41%, state 42%42% · +3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 13%, district 9%, state 11%13% · −27 vs school

5 of 11 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 19.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 21.2%, district 24.5%, state 17.9%21.2% · +3.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (28.7% vs 18.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.1%
TK/K28.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 19:1, district 20:119:1
Teaching staff24 teachers
Avg. experience21.6 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $35,335, CA average $14,815$35,335 · spent at this school
Federal share$3,511 per student

$3,511 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic98.5%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
Asian0.7%
District 3.4% · CA 10.2%
Other0.7%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
White0.2%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 97.6% (34pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$73K · CA $85K
Median home value$661K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+13% · CA 35%
ZIP population48,397
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 17% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is William R. Anton Elementary a good elementary school?

William R. Anton Elementary has a Scope Score of 50 out of 100, placing it in the 68th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,860 statewide. 17.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.1 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are William R. Anton Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 40.9% of students at William R. Anton Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 17.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 17.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 337 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does William R. Anton Elementary rank in California?

William R. Anton Elementary ranks #1,860 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 68th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is William R. Anton Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at William R. Anton Elementary increases by 8.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at William R. Anton Elementary?

21.2% of students at William R. Anton Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does William R. Anton Elementary compare to other schools in Los Angeles?

William R. Anton Elementary scores 50/100 (68th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 453 students. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does William R. Anton Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At William R. Anton Elementary in Los Angeles, 39.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. William R. Anton Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 1.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 39.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 221 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
17.2%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 46th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+8.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 71th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
40.9%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 49th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
21.2%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 45th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
14.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 46th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35919%10%24%47%29%−15
Grade 45426%20%13%41%46%+1
Grade 5538%40%15%38%47%−1
Grade 66210%26%37%27%35%−11
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36118%23%21%38%41%−5
Grade 45420%22%24%33%43%+1
Grade 55613%27%20%41%39%+4
Grade 66215%23%23%40%37%+2
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11544%13%65%19%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged22139.8%−1+2
Hispanic/Latino22539.1%−2+0
English Learners296.9%−0−4
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
William R. Anton Elementary ←5017.2%40.9%+8.30.1%
Monterey Highlands Elementary1.6 mi6145.8%69.8%−16.50.1%
El Rio Community2.9 mi6125.7%52.3%−14.50.2%
Multnomah Street Elementary1.7 mi6035.3%63.0%+3.80.4%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192712#48469.3%27.8%15.7%0.0%-16.3pp
20223239#35013.4%20.1%55.3%0.0%+4.1pp
20232821#45056.0%22.8%36.5%0.0%-4.2pp
20245068#181116.6%35.7%27.5%0.1%-19.0pp
20255068#186017.2%40.9%21.2%0.1%+8.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female14.9%20.9%+6.0pp
Male16.5%22.2%+5.7pp
Hispanic/Latino15.4%21.9%+6.5pp
Students with Disabilities19.4%24.2%+4.8pp
English Learners12.7%15.8%+3.1pp
Homeless17.6%25.0%+7.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.7%22.1%+6.4pp
All Students15.8%21.5%+5.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction