ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
William Burnett Elementary · Milpitas

William Burnett Elementary: English learners reach fluency faster than the state rate. But this year's 5th graders test below its 3rd graders.

William Burnett has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.

400 Fanyon, 95035 (opens in new tab)·Milpitas Unified·Milpitas·Grades TK-6·456 students·46% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 635-2650
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5945
% Exceeded37%21%
% Met+59%43%
Growth-11.0-2.9
Absence8.4%17.9%
Suspension0.7%1.6%
Scope Score
59
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #1,094 statewide · #7 of 10 in Milpitas Unified

William Burnett Elementary scores 59 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 81st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “59% proficient” and call it done. William Burnett deserves a closer read. The school sits in Milpitas, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 24.6% of English learners met the ELA standard — versus 10.4% statewide.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 81st-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 59% meet the standard today, versus 64% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 366%77%62%54%65%
Grade 466%68%63%52%51%
Grade 564%69%68%70%61%
Grade 670%60%69%70%75%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 373%76%56%69%71%
Grade 457%66%64%55%52%
Grade 556%57%57%53%53%
Grade 659%60%65%66%66%

The story this school is actually telling

The on-ramp · English learner progress
36.6%

of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

↑ how fast newcomers reach fluency
The trajectory · grade 3→5
11.0pp

proficiency runs 68% in this year's grade 3 against 57% in its grade 5. The state average rises by +4.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

43%
22%
35%
Grade 3 · 65% proficient
30%
21%
49%
Grade 4 · 51% proficient
38%
23%
39%
Grade 5 · 61% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 5.6pp across grades; the floor slips 4.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. The school's 5th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 3rd graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
37.3%
State 21.3%
15.9pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-11.0pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
58.8%
State 42.7%
16.2pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
8.4%
State 17.9%
9.6pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.7%
State 1.6%
0.9pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
36.6%
State 18.0%
18.6pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 3 and grade 5. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At William Burnett Elementary in Milpitas, 47.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 54.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. William Burnett Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 6.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.4% Math proficient); Asian students (82.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.7 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 132 students tested.

All students at this school: 63% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 63%, district —, state 43%63%
FemaleFemale: this school 64%, district 69%, state 44%64% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 62%, district 66%, state 42%62% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 45%, district 48%, state 32%45% · −18 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 82%, district 83%, state 72%82% · +19 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 27%, district 24%, state 11%27% · −35 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 26%, district 31%, state 32%26% · −37 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 66%, district 61%, state 65%66% · +3 vs school

8 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 3.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 8.4%, district 15.3%, state 17.9%8.4% · −9.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.7%, district —, state 1.6%0.7% · −0.9pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (9.6% vs 5.8%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–65.8%
TK/K9.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 23:124:1
Teaching staff19 teachers
Avg. experience16.9 years
Fully credentialed95%
First-year teachers5%
Intern / emergency permit4.5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$76,899 – $153,171
Principal salary$193,997 – $218,147
Superintendent salary$289,625

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,790, CA average $14,815$18,790 · spent at this school
Federal share$455 per student

$455 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,174 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support16%
Student services6%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,354 per pupil
2019$12,118 per pupil
2018$12,280 per pupil
2017$11,069 per pupil
2016$10,472 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian47.6%
District 55.3% · CA 10.2%
Other29.4%
District 19.6% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic20.2%
District 19.5% · CA 56.1%
White2.2%
District 3.9% · CA 19.9%
Black0.7%
District 1.7% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 46.0% (18pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$179K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.25M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+58% · CA 35%
ZIP population78,810
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 50% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is William Burnett Elementary a good elementary school?

William Burnett Elementary has a Scope Score of 59 out of 100, placing it in the 81st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,094 statewide. 37.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 15.9 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are William Burnett Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 58.8% of students at William Burnett Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 37.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.6% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 37.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 379 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does William Burnett Elementary rank in California?

William Burnett Elementary ranks #1,094 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 81st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is William Burnett Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at William Burnett Elementary decreases by 11.0 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at William Burnett Elementary?

8.4% of students at William Burnett Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does William Burnett Elementary compare to other schools in Milpitas?

William Burnett Elementary scores 59/100 (81st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 456 students. Use the schools in Milpitas page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does William Burnett Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At William Burnett Elementary in Milpitas, 47.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 54.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. William Burnett Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 6.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.4% Math proficient); Asian students (82.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.7 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 132 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
37.3%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 65th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-11.0pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 48th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
58.8%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 62th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
8.4%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 66th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.7%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 58th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
36.6%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 76th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37243%22%21%14%65%+22
Grade 45330%21%9%40%51%+6
Grade 56438%23%27%13%61%+13
Grade 67641%34%9%16%75%+28
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37242%29%10%19%71%+25
Grade 45435%17%22%26%52%+10
Grade 56436%17%19%28%53%+18
Grade 67748%18%17%17%66%+31
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/116433%17%42%8%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13247.7%−6+10
Asian12382.1%−2+8
English Learners6124.6%+2+14
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
William Burnett Elementary ←5937.3%58.8%−11.00.7%
John Sinnott Elementary1.4 mi7861.4%78.7%+6.00.7%
Mabel Mattos Elementary2.6 mi7659.0%78.5%+3.60.2%
Curtner Elementary1.7 mi7457.0%77.0%−7.61.6%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195777#127835.5%63.7%5.8%1.2%-9.6pp
20225481#107141.2%69.0%15.9%0.2%-13.9pp
20235983#95638.1%61.6%17.2%0.6%+2.9pp
20245374#149035.1%58.6%12.7%1.0%-0.3pp
20255981#109437.3%58.8%8.4%0.7%-11.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female5.1%4.7%-0.4pp
Male6.3%10.3%+4.0pp
Asian4.9%4.0%-0.9pp
White4.2%7.8%+3.6pp
Hispanic/Latino9.2%17.9%+8.7pp
Two or More Races0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Students with Disabilities17.9%22.2%+4.3pp
English Learners6.8%10.3%+3.5pp
Homeless6.7%19.0%+12.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.7%11.1%+2.4pp
All Students5.7%7.6%+1.9pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction