ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Robert Randall World Languages · Milpitas

Robert Randall World Languages: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Robert Randall World Languages posts 43% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

1300 Edsel Drive, 95035 (opens in new tab)·Milpitas Unified·Milpitas·Grades TK-8·285 students·59% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 635-2662
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3845
% Exceeded18%21%
% Met+43%43%
Growth-17.1-2.9
Absence14.9%17.9%
Suspension1.7%1.6%
Scope Score
38
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,547 statewide · #10 of 10 in Milpitas Unified

Robert Randall World Languages scores 38 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 38th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “43% proficient” and call it done. Robert Randall World Languages deserves a closer read. The school sits in Milpitas, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 28th to the 38th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Maintained)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 43% of students meet the standard today, above the 32% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 339%30%44%21%32%
Grade 428%25%44%31%40%
Grade 538%19%15%30%37%
Grade 633%14%26%20%26%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 338%33%32%29%63%
Grade 422%4%41%37%60%
Grade 528%8%0%22%24%
Grade 620%11%20%5%22%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

12%
20%
68%
Grade 3 · 32% proficient
23%
17%
60%
Grade 4 · 40% proficient
15%
22%
63%
Grade 5 · 37% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 2.4pp across grades; the floor rises 4.9pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
17.8%
State 21.3%
3.6pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-17.1pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
42.7%
State 42.7%
0.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
14.9%
State 17.9%
3.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.7%
State 1.6%
0.1pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
13.4%
State 18.0%
4.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Robert Randall World Languages in Milpitas, 26.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 54.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Robert Randall World Languages trails its district average for low-income students by 27.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (39.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (22.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 103 students tested.

All students at this school: 38% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 38%, district —, state 43%38%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 29%, district 31%, state 32%29% · −10 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 33%, district 48%, state 32%33% · −5 vs school
MaleMale: this school 41%, district 66%, state 42%41% · +2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 23%, district 24%, state 11%23% · −15 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 36%, district 69%, state 44%36% · −3 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 32%, district 33%, state 22%32% · −6 vs school

5 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 4.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 14.9%, district 15.3%, state 17.9%14.9% · −3.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.7%, district —, state 1.6%1.7% · +0.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (21.7% vs 11.7%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–611.7%
TK/K21.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Robert Randall World Languages
38/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 23:122:1
Teaching staff13 teachers
Avg. experience7.9 years
Fully credentialed92%
First-year teachers8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$76,899 – $153,171
Principal salary$193,997 – $218,147
Superintendent salary$289,625

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $19,428, CA average $14,815$19,428 · spent at this school
Federal share$232 per student

$232 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,174 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support16%
Student services6%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,354 per pupil
2019$12,118 per pupil
2018$12,280 per pupil
2017$11,069 per pupil
2016$10,472 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic80.7%
District 19.5% · CA 56.1%
Other11.2%
District 19.6% · CA 9.0%
Asian4.6%
District 55.3% · CA 10.2%
White2.8%
District 3.9% · CA 19.9%
Black0.7%
District 1.7% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 59.3% (5pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$179K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.25M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+58% · CA 35%
ZIP population78,810
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 29% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Robert Randall World Languages a good elementary school?

Robert Randall World Languages has a Scope Score of 38 out of 100, placing it in the 38th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,547 statewide. 17.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 3.6 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Robert Randall World Languages's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 42.7% of students at Robert Randall World Languages met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 17.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 17.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 224 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Robert Randall World Languages rank in California?

Robert Randall World Languages ranks #3,547 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 38th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Robert Randall World Languages getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Robert Randall World Languages decreases by 17.1 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Robert Randall World Languages?

14.9% of students at Robert Randall World Languages are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Robert Randall World Languages compare to other schools in Milpitas?

Robert Randall World Languages scores 38/100 (38th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 285 students. Use the schools in Milpitas page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Robert Randall World Languages serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Robert Randall World Languages in Milpitas, 26.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 54.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Robert Randall World Languages trails its district average for low-income students by 27.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (39.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (22.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 103 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
17.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 47th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-17.1pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 37th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
42.7%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 50th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
14.9%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 55th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.7%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 49th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
13.4%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 45th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34112%20%15%54%32%−12
Grade 43023%17%23%37%40%−5
Grade 54115%22%15%49%37%−11
Grade 62715%11%33%41%26%−21
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34129%34%5%32%63%+18
Grade 43010%50%27%13%60%+18
Grade 54117%7%20%56%24%−11
Grade 6277%15%19%59%22%−13
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11417%22%41%29%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10326.2%−28−12
Hispanic/Latino11422.8%−15−16
English Learners6312.7%−10+2
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Robert Randall World Languages ←3817.8%42.7%−17.11.7%
John Sinnott Elementary0.7 mi7861.4%78.7%+6.00.7%
Mabel Mattos Elementary1.9 mi7659.0%78.5%+3.60.2%
Curtner Elementary1.9 mi7457.0%77.0%−7.61.6%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193428#395213.2%32.1%10.7%1.0%-5.3pp
2022197#53415.7%20.0%24.2%4.0%-17.9pp
2023194#550814.6%29.3%20.7%3.2%-30.3pp
20243635#372013.8%28.2%18.4%1.9%+0.9pp
20253838#354717.8%42.7%14.9%1.7%-17.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 12 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.3%14.3%+4.0pp
Male11.2%14.7%+3.5pp
Asian1.9%0.0%-1.9pp
White9.8%0.0%-9.8pp
Hispanic/Latino13.2%17.0%+3.8pp
Students with Disabilities15.3%22.2%+6.9pp
English Learners9.6%16.1%+6.5pp
Homeless15.0%25.7%+10.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.2%17.7%+4.5pp
All Students10.7%14.5%+3.8pp
Two or More Races0.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction